Lessons for Effective Fiscal Decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa
Author:
Mr. Niko A Hobdari
Search for other papers by Mr. Niko A Hobdari in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Vina Nguyen https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396, International Monetary Fund

Search for other papers by Vina Nguyen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Salvatore Dell'Erba
Search for other papers by Mr. Salvatore Dell'Erba in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Mr. Edgardo Ruggiero
Search for other papers by Mr. Edgardo Ruggiero in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Fiscal decentralization is becoming a pressing issue in a number of countries in sub-Saharan Africa, reflecting demands for a greater local voice in spending decisions and efforts to strengthen social cohesion. Against this backdrop, this paper seeks to distill the lessons for an effective fiscal decentralization reform, focusing on the macroeconomic aspects. The main findings for sub-Saharan African countries that have decentralized, based on an empirical analysis and four case studies (Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda), are as follows: • Determinants and effectiveness: Empirical results suggest that (1) the major driving forces behind fiscal decentralization in sub-Saharan Africa include efforts to defuse ethnic conflicts, the initial level of income, and the urban-ization rate, whereas strength of democracy is not an important determi-nant for decentralization; and (2) decentralization in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with higher growth in the presence of stronger institutions. • Spending assignments: The allocation of spending across levels of gov-ernment in the four case studies is broadly consistent with best practice. However, in Uganda, unlike in the other three case studies, subnational governments have little flexibility to make spending decisions as a result of a deconcentrated rather than a devolved system of government. • Own revenue: The assignment of taxing powers is broadly in line with best practice in the four case studies, with the bulk of subnational revenue coming from property taxes and from fees for local services. However, own revenues are a very small fraction of subnational spending, reflecting weak cadaster systems and a high level of informality in the economy.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Departmental Papers