Abstract
The IMF Research Bulletin, a quarterly publication, selectively summarizes research and analytical work done by various departments at the IMF, and also provides a listing of research documents and other research-related activities, including conferences and seminars. The Bulletin is intended to serve as a summary guide to research done at the IMF on various topics, and to provide a better perspective on the analytical underpinnings of the IMF’s operational work.
Marco Terrones
Housing prices in industrial countries have increased unusually rapidly in recent years. In some cases—notably Australia, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom—housing prices adjusted for inflation have risen by 60 percent or more since 1997, increases that are difficult to explain in terms of economic fundamentals alone. In addition, a number of housing indicators—including the housing affordability ratio, and the ratios of housing prices to rent and mortgage debt—have reached record high levels in several countries. This has led many observers to suggest that a housing price correction is imminent, with potentially adverse effects on the economy. What is the relationship between housing prices and the economy on the whole? What are the implications of a bust in the price of housing? To address these questions, this article surveys recent IMF research on housing prices and their interlinkages with the economy in industrial countries.
By affecting households’ net wealth and capacity to borrow and spend, large housing price movements can influence aggregate demand and output.
Edison (2002) and Bayoumi and Edison (2003) report that household consumption in industrial countries is directly related to housing wealth. For every dollar increase in housing wealth in those countries, consumption increases by 5 cents. In addition, changes in housing wealth have a higher effect on consumption in countries with a market-based financial system than those with a bank-based financial system, and the wealth effects on consumption have increased over time. Ludwig and Sløk (2002) found broadly similar results. The housing price effects on consumption are also a function of the age of the population and home ownership rates. Campbell and Cocco (2004), using micro data for the United Kingdom, find that as the population becomes older and home ownership more concentrated in the older age group, changes in housing prices have a stronger effect on consumption. Movements in housing prices also affect residential investment by altering the ratio between house prices and costs (Tobin’s q). The strength of this relation, however, has been difficult to assess (Girouard and Blöndal, 2001). Faulkner-MacDonagh and Mühleisen (2004) argue that recent strong consumer spending in the United States in part reflects increases in (housing) wealth and mortgage refinancing.
Similarly, housing prices can be affected by changes in macroeconomic conditions (i.e., disposable income) and financial conditions (i.e., credit and interest rates). There is evidence that the growth rate of housing prices in industrial countries is positively affected by real income growth and credit availability and negatively affected by interest rates (Milesi-Ferretti and Kodres, 2004; and Terrones, 2004). In addition, housing prices show a long-run reversion to fundamentals, as prices tend to fall when they are out of line with income levels. Housing prices also depend on the structure of mortgage markets and other structural factors—evidence suggests that countries with predominantly adjustable-rate mortgage contracts have had greater housing price growth and volatility than countries with predominantly fixed-rate mortgages (Kodres, 2004). Innovations in mortgage markets can also affect house prices—Schnure (2005) reports evidence suggesting that the process of securitization of the U.S. mortgage market may have contributed to dampening of the country’s house price fluctuations.
Reflecting these interlinkages, housing prices in industrial countries are procyclical—rising in a boom and falling in a recession—and, more surprisingly, synchronized across countries, as these prices tend to move in tandem. Analyses suggest that the synchronization of housing prices reflects the key role played by global factors, primarily through interest rates and global economic activity (Terrones and Otrok, 2004; and Otrok and Terrones, forthcoming). Indeed, global developments explain a large share of housing price movements. Across individual countries, the effects of global factors on these prices vary significantly and are especially important in the United Kingdom and the United States. Not surprisingly, in the countries where housing prices are less synchronized, country-specific forces affecting housing market developments play a significant role. This seems particularly true in Australia, Italy, New Zealand, and Switzerland. An important implication of these findings is that, just as the current upswing in housing prices has largely been a global phenomenon, any downturn is also likely to be highly synchronized across countries, with corresponding implications for the world economy.
“Just as the current upswing in housing prices has largely been a global phenomenon, any downturn is also likely to be highly synchronized across countries, with corresponding implications for the world economy.”
But what are economic implications of a bust in housing prices? Helbling and Terrones (2003a and b) and Helbling (2004) have studied booms and busts in residential housing in industrial countries. To qualify as a bust, a house price contraction had to exceed 14 percent; and using this measure, there were 20 housing price busts between the first quarter of 1971 and the third quarter of 2002. Analysis of these events suggests that price busts were associated with substantial negative output gaps, as output growth decreased noticeably. As a result, the output level three years after the beginning of a bust in housing prices was about 8 percent below the level that would have prevailed during the three years up to the bust. Hunt (2005), using simulation analysis for the United Kingdom, finds smaller output losses. The beginning of the output slowdown after a housing price bust coincided roughly with the beginning of the bust itself, which is consistent with the finding that all but one of the housing price busts were associated with recessions. The slowdown and fall in output growth mainly reflected the sharp effects of a bust in housing prices on consumption and residential investment. Interestingly, in most cases, short-term interest rates rose prior to the bust and remained about constant thereafter, which is consistent with the notion that the bust may reflect a tightening of monetary policy. Housing price busts also were associated with important adverse effects on the banking sector, as banks faced deterioration in the quality of their portfolios, a decline in profits, and solvency problems. Indeed, there is evidence that all major banking crises in industrial countries during the postwar period coincided with housing price busts. Not surprisingly, bank-based financial systems tended to suffer larger output losses than market-based financial systems during housing price busts, given the high exposure of banks to real estate lending.
Should policymakers react to large housing (or, more generally, asset) price movements to control the damaging effects associated with price busts? This is an area hotly debated. Some researchers argue that the monetary authority should not pay attention to the movements of asset prices per se, except if these prices contain information on future inflation (Bernanke and Gertler, 2001. Others argue in favor of a more proactive policy stance to changes in asset prices—for instance, Bordo and Jeanne (2002) make the case that monetary policy should react to large changes in asset prices as insurance against the risk of an economic dislocation associated with an asset price bust, which is a low-probability event. Although this approach has some appeal, one important problem is how to make it operational. Hunt (2005) suggests that in the event of sharp reduction in housing prices (i.e., by 30 percent), strong policy action—preferably through a large reduction in interest rates—helps mitigate the negative effects on the economy. While the balance of opinion has been tilting in favor of a monetary policy geared only toward controlling inflation, it may not be sensible to overlook sharp movements in housing prices. This is certainly an area for further research.
References
Bayoumi, Tamin, and Hali Edison, 2003, “Is Wealth Increasingly Driving Consumption?” De Nederlandsche Bank Staff Report No. 101.
Bernanke, Ben, and Mark Gertler, 2001, “Should Central Banks Respond to Movements in Asset Prices?” American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 2, pp. 253–57.
Bordo, Michael, and Olivier Jeanne, 2002, “Monetary Policy and Asset Prices: Does ‘Benign Neglect’ Make Sense?” IMF Working Paper 02/225.
Campbell, John, and Joao Cocco, 2004, “How do House Prices Affect Consumption? Evidence from Micro Data,” Department of Economics, Harvard University. Mimeo.
Edison, Hali, 2002, “Is Wealth Increasingly Driving Consumption?” in World Economic Outlook May 2004 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Faulkner-MacDonagh, Chris, and Martin Mühleisen, 2004, “Are U.S. Households Living Beyond Their Means?” Finance Development, Vol. 41, No. 1 (March).
Girouard, Nathalie, and Sveinbjörn Blöndal, 2001,“House Prices and Economic Activity,” Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation Working Paper No. 279.
Helbling, Thomas, 2004, “Housing Price Bubbles—A Tale Based on Housing Price Booms and Busts,” Bank for International Settlements Papers No. 21 (April).
Helbling, Thomas, and Marco Terrones, 2003a, “Real and Financial Effects of Bursting Asset Price Bubbles” in World Economic Outlook April 2003 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Helbling, Thomas, and Marco Terrones, 2003b, “Asset Price Booms and Busts—Stylized Facts from the Last Three Decades of the 20th Century,” paper presented at a European Central Bank workshop entitled “Asset Prices and Monetary Policy,” Frankfurt, 11–12 December.
Hunt, Ben, 2005, “How Should Policymakers Respond to a Decline in House Prices?” in United Kingdom: Selected Issues, IMF Country Report No. 05/81 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Kodres, Laura, 2004, “Adjustable- or Fixed-Rate Mortgages: What Influences a Country’s Choices?” in World Economic Outlook September 2004 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Ludwig, Alexander, and Torsten Sløk, 2002, “The Impact of Changes in Stock Prices and House Prices on Consumption in OECD Countries,” IMF Working Paper 02/1.
Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria, and Laura Kodres, 2004, “Housing Markets in Industrial Countries,” World Economic Outlook May 2004 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Otrok, Christopher, and Marco E. Terrones, forthcoming, “House Prices, Interest Rates and Macroeconomic Fluctuations: International Evidence,” IMF Working Paper.
Schnure, Calvin, 2005, “Boom-Bust Cycles in Housing: The Changing Role of Financial Structure,” IMF Working Paper 05/200.
Terrones, Marco, 2004, “What Explains the Recent Run-Up in House Prices?” in World Economic Outlook September 2004 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Terrones, Marco, and Chris Otrok, 2004, “The Global House Price Boom,” in World Economic Outlook September 2004 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Sign up at www.imf.org (e-mail notification) for new issues of the IMF Research Bulletin and information about other IMF publications of your choice.