Review of The Institutional View on The Liberalization and Management of Capital Flows — Background Note on Using the IPF Analytical Toolkit to Enhance Policy Assessments
Author:
Marcin Kolasa
Search for other papers by Marcin Kolasa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Gurnain Kaur Pasricha null

Search for other papers by Gurnain Kaur Pasricha in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Suman S Basu
Search for other papers by Mr. Suman S Basu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ms. Emine Boz
Search for other papers by Ms. Emine Boz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Dimitre Milkov
Search for other papers by Dimitre Milkov in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Insights from the IPF workstream can help guide the appropriate policy mix during an inflow surge, based on the shock and country characteristics. Inflow surges may be caused by a range of shocks and can take different forms in different countries. The IPF models suggest that warranted macroeconomic policy adjustments depend on the nature of the shock and country characteristics. The IPF models point to shocks and country characteristics that make it difficult to effectively respond to surges using only macroeconomic policy and exchange rate adjustment. The IPF models also suggest that, in the presence of overheating and overvaluation, the use of FXI and CFMs can enhance monetary autonomy in certain circumstances without generating other distortions. The relative costs and benefits of FXI and CFMs depend on country-specific factors. The IPF models also illustrate how surges can lead to a build-up of systemic financial risks. The IPF workstream connects the appropriate mix of MPMs and CFM/MPMs to the structure of the country's financial system.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Policy Papers