At the time of the 2005 Review of the Fund’s Transparency Policy, the Executive Board requested regular updates on trends in implementing the transparency policy. The tables in this report provide an overview of recent developments, reflecting information on documents considered by the Board in 2017 and updating the previous annual report on Key Trends. Deeper analysis of these trends is undertaken in the context of periodic reviews of the Fund’s Transparency Policy.

Abstract

At the time of the 2005 Review of the Fund’s Transparency Policy, the Executive Board requested regular updates on trends in implementing the transparency policy. The tables in this report provide an overview of recent developments, reflecting information on documents considered by the Board in 2017 and updating the previous annual report on Key Trends. Deeper analysis of these trends is undertaken in the context of periodic reviews of the Fund’s Transparency Policy.

At the time of the 2005 Review of the Fund’s Transparency Policy, the Executive Board requested regular updates on trends in implementing the transparency policy. The tables in this report provide an overview of recent developments, reflecting information on documents considered by the Board in 2017 and updating the previous annual report on Key Trends. Deeper analysis of these trends is undertaken in the context of periodic reviews of the Fund’s Transparency Policy.

Table 1.

Trends in Publication Rates (2016–18) 1/2/

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g. the publication rate for 2018 refers to documents discussed by the Board in 2018 and published by June 30, 2019. SMPs, which are for information only, are also included.

Data include documents issued for the Board’s consideration in a meeting or on a lapse-of-time basis.

Includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

For the purposes of this table and for the application of the stronger presumption of publication, UFR staff reports include requests and reviews but exclude extensions and modifications, in accordance with the Transparency Policy.

Includes initial ROSC assessments and reassessments produced by the IMF, as well as the World Bank and, in the case of AML/CFT ROSCs, by FATF and FATF-style

Includes Executive Directors’ Statements and “right of reply” documents. Does not include authorities’ statements that are included in ROSCs.

Includes LOIs/MEFPs/Program Statements and TMUs issued in the context of SMPs, PSIs, and PCIs.

Following the reform of the Fund’s policy on poverty reduction strategies (PRS) in its engagement with low-income countries in 2015, PRS documentation requirements have been replaced with Economic Development documents (EDD).

The presumption of publication does not apply to certain papers dealing with administrative matters, for instance internal audits and papers on personnel and human resource issues.

Table 2.

Trends in Publication Rates of Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2016–18) 1/

(By economic and regional characteristics)

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g. the publication rate for 2018 refers to the documents discussed by the Board in 2018 and published by June 30, 2019.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions. Includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

Table 3.

Trends in Publication Lags (2016–18) 1/2/

(By type of reports, and by economic and regional characteristics)

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g. the publication rate for 2018 refers to the documents discussed by the Board in 2018 and published by June 30, 2019. Publication lags refer to calendar days between the Board date and the publication date.

Data include documents issued for the Board’s consideration in a meeting or on a lapse-of-time basis. It also includes SMPs, which are for information only.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions. Also includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

Number of calendar days.

Includes LOIs/MEFPs/TMUs/Program Statements issued in the context of SMPs, PSI and PCIs.

Only includes policy papers for which publication is presumed.

Table 4a.

Deletions in Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2016–18) 1/2/

(Percent of all published reports, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Refers to documents considered by the Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g. the publication rate for 2018 refers to the documents discussed by the Board in 2018 and published by June 30, 2019.

Because a single report can have deletions falling into multiple categories, e.g., exchange rate, financial sector and/or other areas, there is no fixed relationship between the second column and the third and fourth column under each year.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions. Also includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

Table 4b.

Deletions in 2018 1/

(Percent of all deletions requested by income group and region, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Figures refer to deletions made to staff reports for Article IV consultations and Use of Fund resources as well as associated documents (e.g. selected issues papers, informational annexes, etc.) that were considered by the Board from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions. Also includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

This aggregate includes deletion requests received by country desks and reviewed by SPR; it does not include requests received and rejected by country teams that were not forwarded to SPR for review. Each deletion is counted separately, implying that there may be multiple deletion requests for each document.

Partially rejected deletions include items where only part of the requested deletion was accepted or where the deletion was reformulated and then accepted.

Deletions may be made on the basis of market sensitivity when the material is not already in the public domain, is market-relevant within the near term, and is sufficiently specific to create a clear risk of triggering a disruptive market

Deletions may be made on the basis of premature disclosure of policy intentions where material is not already in the public domain, the information consists of operational details of a policy the authorities intend to implement, and premature disclosure of the operational details would, in itself, seriously undermine the ability of the authorities to implement it.

Table 5a.

Corrections in Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2016–18) 1/2/

(Percent of all published reports, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g. the publication rate for 2018 refers to the documents discussed by th e Board in 2018 and publish ed by June 30, 2019.

Because a single report can have corrections falling into multiple categories, e.g., exchange rate, financial sector and/or other areas, there is no fixed relationship between the second column and the third and fourth column under each year.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions. Also includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

With the launch of the Transparency Portal on January 1, 2017, modification requests reflect only those for which the authoring departments (ADs) sought SPR sign-off. The correction of typographic errors and inconsequential factual errors by ADs is allowed outside the portal.

Table 5b.

Corrections in 2018 1/2/

(Percent of all corrections requested by income group and region, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Figures refer to corrections made to staff reports for Article IV consultations and Use of Fund resources as well as associated documents (e.g. selected issues papers, informational annexes, etc.) that were considered by the Board from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018.

Certain corrections are subject to Staff review as per the Transparency Policy (http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2009/102609.pdf) and the 2013 Transparency Policy Review (http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2013/051413.pdf). As per the policy, corrections to staff reports cannot be used to improve the presentation, extend staff’s or the authorities arguments, alter staff’s assessment, or introduce any new information.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions. includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

This aggregate includes correction requests received by country desks and reviewed by SPR; it does not include requests received and rejected by country teams that were not forwarded to SPR for review. Each correction is counted separately, implying that there may be multiple correction requests for each document.

Partially rejected corrections include items where the requested correction was reclassified or reformulated and then accepted.

Corrections may only be made after the Board date if the correction is brought to the attention of the Board before the conclusion of the Board’s consideration of the document, or the failure to make the correction would undermine the overall value of the publication.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Trends in Deletions and Corrections 1/

Citation: Policy Papers 2020, 004; 10.5089/9781513529349.007.A001

1/ Data for 2017–18 are not strictly comparable to those from previous years as minor factual corrections are no longer included in the database following the introduction of the transparency portal in 2017.
Table 6.

Members that Published All Article IV/UFR Staff Reports in 2018 1/2/

article image

The members listed in this table had their Article IV and/or all their UFR staff reports considered by the Board in 2018, and published the report by June 30, 2019.

Includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

Table 7a.

Members Not Publishing Article IV Reports in 2018 1/2/

article image

These members had Article IV documents considered by the Board in 2018 (including for discussions with currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with their constituent members), but had not published these documents by June 30, 2019.

All these countries published Press Releases except for Azerbaijan, St. Kitts and Nevis, and Turkmenistan

Table 7b.

Members Not Publishing All UFR Staff Reports in 2018 1/

These members had UFR staff reports considered by the Board in 2018, but had not published all of these documents by June 30, 2019. UFR staff reports include requests and reviews but exclude extensions and modifications, in accordance with the Transparency Policy.

Table 8.

Longest and Shortest Publication Lags for 2018 1/2/3/

article image

Publication refers to Article IV and UFR documents considered by the Board in 2018, and published by June 30, 2019.

Publication lags refer to calendar days between the Board date and the publication date.

Includes discussions held with respect to members’ territories and currency unions in the context of Article IV consultations with members.

Table 9.

Members Requesting Explicit Consent Prior to Publication 1/

article image

Under the Transparency Policy, a member’s consent to publish is typically obtained on a “nonobjection” basis. However, a member may “opt out” of the “non-objection” system, in which case the member’s explicit consent is required prior to publication of its country and related policy intention documents. See: http://www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2014/040714.pdf.

Key Trends in Implementing The Fund's Transparency Policy
Author: International Monetary Fund. Strategy, Policy, &, Review Department, and International Monetary Fund. Secretary's Department