Key Trends in Implementing the Fund's Transparency Policy

At the time of the 2005 review of the Fund’s transparency policy, it was agreed that information on key trends in implementation of the transparency policy would be circulated to the Board regularly, along with lists indicating the publication status of reports discussed by the Board. The set of tables provided in this report updates the last Key Trends with information on documents issued to the Board through December 2013.

Abstract

At the time of the 2005 review of the Fund’s transparency policy, it was agreed that information on key trends in implementation of the transparency policy would be circulated to the Board regularly, along with lists indicating the publication status of reports discussed by the Board. The set of tables provided in this report updates the last Key Trends with information on documents issued to the Board through December 2013.

Table 1.

Trends in Publication Rates (2011–13)1/2/

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g., the publication rate for 2013 refers to documents discussed by the Board in 2013 and published by June 30, 2014.

Data include documents issued for the Board’s consideration in a meeting or on a lapse-of-time basis. SMPs, which are for information only, are also included.

Includes initial ROSC assessments and reassessments produced by the IMF, as well as the World Bank and, in the case of AML/CFT ROSCs, by FATF and FATF-style regional bodies (FSRB), issued on a stand-alone basis or in FSSAs. Does not include assessments under detailed standards assessments. Completions and publications for the three standards led by the World Bank are updated as of February 28, 2009.

This item also includes “Public Information Notices”. However, following the 2013 Review of the Fund’s Transparency Policy, the term “Public Information Notice” (PIN) was discontinued and only press releases are used for external communication.

Does not include authorities’ statements that are included in ROSCs. Includes Executive Directors’ Statements and “right of reply” documents.

Includes LOIs/MEFPs and TMUs issued in the context of SMPs and PSIs.

The presumption of publication does not apply to certain papers dealing with administrative matters, for instance internal audits and papers on personnel and human resource issues.

Table 2.

Trends in Publication Rates of Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2011–13)1/

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g., the publication rate for 2013 refers to the documents discussed by the Board in 2013 and published by June 30, 2014.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions.

Table 3.

Trends in Publication Lags (2011–13) 1/2/

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g., the publication rate for 2013 refers to the documents discussed by the Board in 2013 and published by June 30, 2014.

Data include documents issued for the Board’s consideration in a meeting or on a lapse-of-time basis. It also includes SMPs, which are for information only.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions.

Number of calendar days.

This item also includes “Public Information Notices”. However, following the 2013 Review of the Fund’s Transparency Policy, the term “Public Information Notice” (PIN) was discontinued and only press releases are used for external communication.

Includes LOIs/MEFPs/TMUs issued in the context of SMPs and PSIs.

Only includes policy papers for which publication is presumed.

Table 4a.

Deletions in Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2011–13) 1/2/

article image

Refers to documents considered by the Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g., the publication rate for 2013 refers to the documents discussed by the Board in 2013 and published by June 30, 2014.

Because a single report can have deletions falling into multiple categories, e.g., exchange rate, financial sector and/or other areas, there is no fixed relationship between the second column and the third and fourth column under each year.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions.

Table 4b.

Approved and Rejected Deletions in Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2013) 1/

(Percent of all deletions requested by income group and region, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Figures refer to deletions made to staff reports for Article IV consultations and use of Fund resources that went before the Board from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions.

This aggregate includes deletion requests received by country desks and reviewed by SPR; it does not include requests received and rejected by country teams that were not forwarded to SPR for review. Each deletion is counted separately, implying that there may be multiple deletion requests for each document.

Partially rejected deletions include items where only part of the requested deletion was accepted or where the deletion was reformulated and then accepted.

Deletions may be made on the basis of market sensitivity when the material is not already in the public domain, is market-relevant within the near term, and is sufficiently specific to create a clear risk of triggering a disruptive market reaction if disclosed.

Deletions may be made in rare cases where material is not already in the public domain, the information consists of operational details of a policy the authorities intend to implement, and premature disclosure of the operational details would, in itself, seriously undermine the ability of the authorities to implement it.

Table 5a.

Corrections in Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2011–13) 1/2/

(Percent of all published reports, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Refers to documents considered by the IMF Executive Board during the calendar year, and published within six months of the end of the calendar year; e.g., the publication rate for 2013 refers to the documents discussed by the Board in 2013 and published by June 30, 2014.

Because a single report can have corrections falling into multiple categories, e.g., exchange rate, financial sector and/or other areas, there is no fixed relationship between the second column and the third and fourth column under each year.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions.

Table 5b.

Approved and Rejected Corrections in Article IV and UFR Staff Reports (2013)1/2/

(Percent of all corrections requested by income group and region, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Figures refer to corrections made to staff reports for Article IV consultations and use of Fund resources that went before the Board from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013. They include corrections made both before and after the Board Meeting.

Certain corrections are subject to staff review as per the Transparency Policy and the 2013 Transparency Policy Review. As per the policy, corrections to staff reports cannot be used to improve the presentation, extend staff’s or the authorities arguments, alter staff’s assessment, or introduce any new information.

Based on World Economic Outlook definitions.

This aggregate includes correction requests received by country desks and reviewed by SPR; it does not include requests received and rejected by country teams that were not forwarded to SPR for review. Each correction is counted separately, implying that there may be multiple correction requests for each document.

Partially rejected corrections include items where the requested correction was reclassified or reformulated and then accepted.

Corrections may only be made after the Board date if the correction is brought to the attention of the Board before the conclusion of the Board’s consideration of the document, or the failure to make the correction would undermine the overall value of the publication.

Table 6.

Members Having Published All Article IV and UFR Staff Reports in 2013 1/2/3/4/

article image

Includes groups of members and members’ territories, namely currency unions.

The members listed in this table had published all their Article IV and/or all their UFR staff reports considered by the Board in 2013, by June 30, 2014.

Member countries who published some of their Article IV/UFR staff reports in 2013 are Malawi and Sudan

This list does not reflect the 42 members that did not have an Article IV or UFR document considered by the Board in 2013: Afghanistan, Albania, Angola, Argentina, Australia, Barbados, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bulgaria, Cambodia, Chad, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Croatia, Dominica, Ecuador, Egypt, Eritrea, Finland, Gamia, Grenada, Iran, Israel, Korea, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Marshall Islands, Moldova, Montenegro, Nepal, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Serbia, Slovenia, Somalia, Swaziland, Syria, Taiwan, Timor Leste, Tuvalu, and Venezuela.

Table 7a.

Members Not Publishing Article IV Reports in 2013 1/2/

article image

The countries or groups of member countries listed in this table had Article IV documents considered by the Board in 2013, but had not published these documents by June 30, 2014.

For the Board meetings in 2013, all these countries published Press Releases except Maldives, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Tajikistan.

Table 7b.

Members Not Publishing Any UFR Staff Reports in 2013 1/2/

article image

The countries or groups of member countries listed in this table had UFR staff reports considered by the Board in 2013, but had not published all these documents by June 30, 2014.

For the Board meetings in 2013, all these countries published Press Releases.

Table 8.

Longest and Shortest Publication Lags for 2013 1/2/3/

article image

Publication refers to Article IV and UFR documents considered by the Board in 2013, and published by June 30, 2014.

Publication lags refer to calendar days between the Board date and the publication date.

Includes groups of member countries

Key Trends in Implementing the Fund's Transparency Policy
Author: International Monetary Fund