The African Continental Free Trade Area: Potential Economic Impact and Challenges
Author:
Mr. Lisandro Abregonull

Search for other papers by Mr. Lisandro Abrego in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mr. Mario de Zamaroczy
Search for other papers by Mr. Mario de Zamaroczy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tunc Gursoynull

Search for other papers by Tunc Gursoy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Garth P. Nichollsnull

Search for other papers by Garth P. Nicholls in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hector Perez-Saiznull

Search for other papers by Hector Perez-Saiz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-636X
, and
Jose-Nicolas Rosasnull

Search for other papers by Jose-Nicolas Rosas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Political momentum towards Africa-wide free trade has been intensifying. In March 2018, over 40 countries signed the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) agreement. Once fully implemented, the AfCFTA is expected to cover all 55 African countries, with a combined GDP of about US$2.2 trillion. This SDN takes stock of recent trade developments in Sub-Saharan Africa and assesses the potential benefits and costs of the AfCFTA, as well as challenges to its successful implementation. In addition to increased trade flows both in existing and new products, the AfCFTA has the potential to generate substantial economic benefits for African countries. These benefits include higher income arising from increased efficiency and productivity from improved resource allocation, higher cross-border investment flows, and technology transfers. Besides lowering import tariffs, to ensure these benefits, African countries will need reduce other trade barriers by making more efficient their customs procedures, reducing their wide infrastructure gaps, and improving their business climates. At the same time, policy measures should be taken to mitigate the differential impact of trade liberalization on certain groups as resources are reallocated in the economy and activities migrate to locations with comparatively lower costs.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Staff Discussion Notes