A Capital Market Union for Europe
Author:
Mr. Ashok Vir Bhatia null

Search for other papers by Mr. Ashok Vir Bhatia in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ms. Srobona Mitra
Search for other papers by Ms. Srobona Mitra in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Shekhar Aiyar
Search for other papers by Mr. Shekhar Aiyar in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Luiza Antoun de Almeida null

Search for other papers by Luiza Antoun de Almeida in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Cristina Cuervo null

Search for other papers by Cristina Cuervo in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Andre O Santos
Search for other papers by Mr. Andre O Santos in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Tryggvi Gudmundsson
Search for other papers by Tryggvi Gudmundsson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
This note weighs the merits of a capital market union (CMU) for Europe, identifies major obstacles in its path, and recommends a set of carefully targeted policy actions. European capital markets are relatively small, resulting in strong bank-dependence, and are split sharply along national lines. Results include an uneven playing field in terms of corporate funding costs, the rationing out of collateral-constrained firms, and limited shock absorption. The benefits of integration center on expanding financial choice, ultimately to support capital formation and resilience. Capital market development and integration would support a healthy diversity in European finance. Proceeding methodically, the note identifies three key barriers to greater capital market integration in Europe: transparency, regulatory quality, and insolvency practices. Based on these findings, the note urges three policy priorities, focused on the three barriers. There is no roadblock—such steps should prove feasible without a new grand bargain.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
Staff Discussion Notes