Germany: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Germany
Author:
International Monetary Fund. European Dept.
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund. European Dept. in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

1. Before the war in Ukraine, activity was firming up. The German economy lost steam in the second half of 2021, with global supply bottlenecks hampering manufacturing production and surging COVID-19 infections holding back service spending. By the end of 2021 and in early 2022, easing semiconductor shortages allowed auto production to pick up, while reduced caution and the elimination of almost all pandemic restrictions helped services PMIs and consumer confidence to regain some strength. Nonetheless, output remained 1.1 percent below its pre-pandemic level in the last quarter of 2021.

Abstract

1. Before the war in Ukraine, activity was firming up. The German economy lost steam in the second half of 2021, with global supply bottlenecks hampering manufacturing production and surging COVID-19 infections holding back service spending. By the end of 2021 and in early 2022, easing semiconductor shortages allowed auto production to pick up, while reduced caution and the elimination of almost all pandemic restrictions helped services PMIs and consumer confidence to regain some strength. Nonetheless, output remained 1.1 percent below its pre-pandemic level in the last quarter of 2021.

Context and Recent Developments

1. Before the war in Ukraine, activity was firming up. The German economy lost steam in the second half of 2021, with global supply bottlenecks hampering manufacturing production and surging COVID-19 infections holding back service spending. By the end of 2021 and in early 2022, easing semiconductor shortages allowed auto production to pick up, while reduced caution and the elimination of almost all pandemic restrictions helped services PMIs and consumer confidence to regain some strength. Nonetheless, output remained 1.1 percent below its pre-pandemic level in the last quarter of 2021.

Text Figure 1.
Text Figure 1.

Germany: Activity Indicators and Auto Production

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

2. The fallout from the war in Ukraine is posing new headwinds to the German economy. Near-term impacts run through a surge in energy prices and associated losses in purchasing power and profits, shortages of a range of products and commodities used in manufacturing, weaker external demand and confidence, and uncertainty surrounding the continuation of natural gas flows from Russia. At end-April 2022, 35 percent of Germany’s natural gas was pipelined from Russia, down from 55 percent in 2021. In mid-June, Russian supplies through Nord Stream 1 and the Czech Republic were cut by about two-thirds (a decline of about a quarter to a third of Germany’s natural gas imports). Natural gas accounts for 9 percent of economy-wide energy consumption. Authorities and staff expect that in the event of a complete stoppage, imports from Russia cannot be fully replaced until 2024.

3. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine caused significant changes to some German policies. In December 2021, Germany swore in a new coalition government comprising the Social Democrats, Greens, and Free Democrats. The Coalition Treaty displays broad continuity with the agenda of the previous government while seeking to enhance green investments and digitalization, introduce a higher minimum wage, and promote skilled immigration. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Germany suspended its approval of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, announced its intention to wean itself of energy imports from Russia by 2024, and to increase defense spending to exceed NATO’s benchmark. In line with EU-wide agreements, Germany has imposed sanctions on Russia, including on Russia’s central bank and selected banks, and restricted imports of Russian coal and oil.1 The need to bolster energy security is strengthening the determination to exit from fossil fuels, but the reliance on coal is increasing in the short run as natural gas becomes scarce.

4. Fiscal policy is geared towards supporting the economy and attaining strategic objectives. Key COVID-19 relief measures, such as the expansion of the short-time work benefits program (Kurzarbeit) and grants to firms, were repeatedly extended over the course of 2021, but the headline deficit shrank to 3.7 percent of GDP (from 4.3 percent in 2020) as revenues rebounded and the demand for COVID-19 relief measures declined.2 Despite the sizable overall deficit and additional borrowing of about 1.7 percent of GDP to boost the “Energy and Climate Fund,” the public debt-to-GDP ratio increased by a modest 1.5 percentage points in 2021 given a favorable interest rate-growth differential.3 A broadly neutral fiscal stance is expected in 2022, with 1.2 percent of GDP in new spending to cushion higher energy prices, increase defense spending, and support refugees, together with higher climate-related spending, broadly offsetting the impact of the phase-out of most COVID-19 relief measures (Figure 2).4 To avoid a conflict between the announced hike in defense spending by about ½ percentage point of GDP per year and the constitutional debt brake that is scheduled to come back into effect in 2023, the government also announced additional borrowing of around €100 billion (2.6 percent of GDP) to be injected into a newly created Special Defense Fund. Public debt in 2022, however, is projected at 70.4 percent of GDP, broadly unchanged from 2021 reflecting once again a favorable interest-growth differential.

Text Figure 2.
Text Figure 2.

Germany: Cyclically-Adjusted Fiscal Balance in 2022

(Difference from levels in 2019 and 2021, percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

5. The financial sector has weathered the pandemic well, and the impact of the war has so far been limited. High pre-crisis capital and liquidity buffers, strong public and private sector balance sheets, and sizable policy support for firms and workers helped German financial institutions weather the pandemic. Solvency, liquidity, and non-performing loans were stable in 2021, with regulatory capital of 18.8 percent of risk-weighted assets, a liquidity coverage ratio of about 160 percent, and non-performing loans of 1.5 percent of gross loans. Germany’s immediate financial risks from the war in Ukraine appear manageable, given small financial links with Russia and Ukraine.5 Nevertheless, some individual financial institutions could have material exposures to Russia, Ukraine, or other hard-hit banks in Europe. Moreover, non-performing loans could rise, and property prices could fall if spillovers from the war intensify, while high inflation is likely to affect operating costs, interest margins and insurance claims. The war has also raised malicious cyber activity, with recent attacks affecting German wind turbines and oil pipelines. Financial conditions have tightened in 2022, with 10-year Bund yields rising 180 basis points and DAX stock prices falling 18 percent.

6. Labor markets are tight, reflecting demographic change and policy support. As of April 2022, the unemployment rate (3.0 percent based on the ILO/European definition) had fallen below its pre-pandemic lows, and the ratio of vacancies to the unemployed reached 60 percent—10 percentage points higher than in 2019. These tight conditions partly stem from weaker labor force participation relative to 2019, as the trend increase in participation rates—which used to offset the ongoing drag from population aging in the pre-pandemic years—has come to a halt (Text Figure 8, top right). That said, the labor market continues to benefit from policy support; with the number of workers on Kurzarbeit in March 2022—about 11/4 percent of the workforce—four times larger than the maximum level in 2019.

7. Rising energy costs and supply bottlenecks have pushed inflation to multi-decade highs. Harmonized consumer price (HICP) inflation reached 8.7 percent in May. Energy goods contributed about 3/5 of the increase in HICP inflation this year relative to the pre-pandemic years (2017–19). Non-energy goods accounted for 1/4 of the increase, and services for the rest (Text Figure 3), with the former reflecting ongoing supply constraints in manufacturing and passthrough from energy inflation.6 Higher services inflation appears to reflect catch-up with forgone price adjustments during the pandemic, and more recently, passthrough from the surge in goods price inflation—a sign that price pressures are becoming more widespread. Medium-term inflation expectations have been fluctuating but remain around 2 percent (Text Figure 3). Wage inflation has been more muted; wages per hour—both with and without one-off payments such as bonuses—have increased about 6.5 percent between 2020Q1 and 2022Q1, slightly higher than the 5.8 percent increase in the GDP deflator but lower than the 7.7 percent rise in the CPI over the same period.7 Negotiated wages (excluding one-off payments and ancillary benefits) have risen by 1.6 percent in 2022Q1 relative to same quarter last year, more slowly than the 2.5 percent growth in 2019.

Text Figure 3.
Text Figure 3.

Germany: Inflation Decomposition and Expectations

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

8. The current account surplus widened marginally in 2021, and the external position is assessed as stronger than the level implied by medium-term fundamentals and desirable policies (Annex I). The current account surplus came in at 7.4 percent of GDP in 2021—compared with 7.1 percent in 2020 and 7.8 percent on average over 2017–19—driven by a recovery of earnings on foreign direct investment, within the primary income balance, as economies recovered from the pandemic slump. While the goods trade balance remained weaker than pre-pandemic levels, largely due to costlier energy imports, the services trade balance remained stronger, due to elevated licensing fees for COVID-19 vaccines and still subdued outlays for tourism and travel services. Overall, the 2021 current account is assessed to be between 3.1 and 4.1 percent of GDP above the norm implied by fundamentals and desirable policies (Annex I).

9. Germany remains a major greenhouse gas (GHG) emitter. Over the last decade, Germany reduced its GHG emissions significantly, thanks to increased use of renewables in electricity generation and reduced emissions by industry and buildings (Text Figure 4).8 Germany’s per capita carbon emissions exceed those of its European peers because of relatively higher emissions by residences, electricity generation, and agriculture.

Text Figure 4.
Text Figure 4.

Germany: Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Outlook and Risks

10. The baseline forecast is for a sharp growth slowdown in 2022 and some pickup next year. GDP growth is projected at 1.5 percent in 2022 and 1.9 percent in 2023. The war is estimated to have lowered GDP by about 2.5 percent in 2022; of which around 0.5 percentage points would be offset by the fiscal measures announced since February. The revisions to the growth forecasts relative to the pre-war forecasts reflect the following considerations:

Text Table 1.

Germany: Macroeconomic Projections, 2021-23

article image
Text Figure 5.
Text Figure 5.

Germany: HICP Prices of Selected Energy Products

(Percent change since January 2021)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

  • Energy prices: The increases in international energy prices since January have alone reduced projections for growth in 2022 by about 1¼ percentage points, based on historical relationships between international oil and gas prices, Germany’s energy import prices, and growth.9 Retail prices of electricity and gas are expected to continue climbing in 2023, given a gradual passthrough of higher input costs to consumers on annual utility contracts.

  • Sanctions and reduced trade: The sanctions introduced against Russia and Belarus are assumed to remain unchanged (Annex II).10 Weaker activity in Russia, Ukraine, and Germany’s key trading partners is expected to lower net exports and reduce growth.11

  • Supply bottlenecks: With Russia and Ukraine being among the leading suppliers of certain critical raw materials, such as nickel, palladium, and some inert gases used for semiconductor production, as well as intermediate products like wire harnesses for autos, the war is expected to hinder manufacturing activity, and extend supply bottlenecks into 2023.12

  • Monetary and financial conditions: The ECB is assumed to reduce net asset purchases to zero in 2022Q3 and raise the policy interest rate by at least 1 percentage point by end-2022, followed by another 1 percentage point increase in 2023. Financial market indicators, which tightened after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, are thus expected to tighten further, to a moderate degree, leaving conditions still accommodative.

  • Sentiment: Uncertainty, impaired confidence, and slightly tighter financial conditions are assumed to depress consumption and investment.

  • Fiscal support: Measures introduced since February to alleviate the impact of higher energy prices on households and firms and increase defense spending are estimated to add about 1 percent of GDP to the fiscal deficit and to lift output by around half a percentage point.

  • Base effects and the overall growth revision for 2022: Economic activity in 2022Q1 was stronger than expected pre-war. Together with a gross impact of -2.5 percentage points from the war, an offset from fiscal policy of 0.5 percentage point, and the adverse impact from the lockdowns in China, this brings the overall downward growth revision to over 2 percentage points for 2022. Thus, projected growth is revised down from 3.8 percent expected before the war to 1.5 percent now.

  • Growth projected for 2023: With sanctions expected to persist and only a partial reversal projected for energy prices and supply disruptions, growth is expected to firm up modestly to 1.9 percent in 2023. Production is expected to gain steam on the back of easing bottlenecks to meet a large stock of unfilled orders, and consumption would strengthen with energy inflation abating and infection rates falling.

Text Figure 6.
Text Figure 6.

Germany: Response of Growth to Energy Price Changes

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

11. Ample policy support will partially limit the impact of the pandemic and war on the economy’s productive potential. Relief measures introduced since 2020 supported employment and kept businesses afloat, helping to limit losses in human and physical capital. Nonetheless, some loss in medium-term output (close to 1.5 percent by 2027, of which 1/3 is from the pandemic and 2/3 from the war in Ukraine) is projected due to the underutilization of resources during the pandemic, headwinds to private investment in Germany’s energy-intensive manufacturing sector from elevated energy prices, weaker external demand, and greater economic and geopolitical uncertainty following the war. Moreover, Germany’s potential growth is projected to decline steadily in the coming years because of population aging, with small offsets expected from a mild recovery in labor force participation and some productivity gains from digitalization. The output gap is projected at about 1 percent in 2022 and to close in 2025 (2024 in pre-war forecasts).

12. High inflation will likely persist into 2023 and moderate afterwards. Inflation is projected at about 7½ and 4½ percent in 2022 and 2023, respectively, materially higher than pre-war forecasts. The spike in international oil and gas prices account for the bulk of the revision relative to pre-war forecasts (passthrough into consumer energy prices tends to be stronger for large increases in oil and gas prices, as discussed in the accompanying Selected Issues Paper). Core inflation forecasts are also higher, by about 1¾ percentage points relative to pre-war projections, at about 4 percent in 2022 and 2023, respectively (end-year projections are 4.2 and 3.7 percent, respectively; headline inflation is projected to peak in 2022Q2). The revision to core inflation reflects the passthrough from higher energy costs and supply bottlenecks for non-energy goods, offset to a small degree by a more negative output gap. Inflation is projected to moderate in 2023 as energy prices and supply disruptions subside, and to fall back to the ECB’s target of 2 percent in the medium run.

13. Wage growth should pick up to some extent in the next couple of years, but is expected to stay reasonably contained. The 15 percent increase in the minimum wage that takes place in October (to €12/hour from €10.45/hour now) is expected to push up aggregate wages by 0.6–0.8 percent in 2023, mostly due to direct impacts. New rounds of negotiations with large trade unions start in late 2022; these will likely entail some catch-up in wages with recent price increases, but the tendency of trade unions to negotiate using the ECB’s inflation target and downside risks to activity limit the risks of a wage-price spiral. Nonetheless, the possibility that wage growth significantly outstrips inflation is a risk.

14. The current account surplus is expected to shrink as energy imports surge, and supply constraints and weaker external demand curtail exports. The current account surplus is expected to narrow in 2022 by 1.3 percentage points, to 6.1 percent of GDP, given the surge in energy prices, and higher volumes of natural gas imports to raise storage levels to 90 percent by end-November. Furthermore, sanctions are expected to lower exports to Russia and the war in Ukraine is disrupting the supplies of some parts used in auto production. The current account surplus is projected to rebound in 2023 and 2024 as energy prices and supply bottlenecks ease, before declining over the medium term on reduced competitiveness and revived domestic demand.

15. Uncertainty is very high, with risks to the baseline growth forecast skewed downward and risks to the inflation forecast skewed upward (see Annex III):

  • The greatest threat is a persistent and full shut-off of Russia’s gas exports to Germany and Europe more broadly. This would likely force the German authorities to ration gas to industry to safeguard household consumption, leading to a sizable loss in output and employment (see Paragraph 19 and the accompanying Selected Issues Paper). After the reduction of flows through the Nord Stream 1 pipeline in mid-June, the possibility of gas shortages has increased. Persistently elevated energy prices in such a scenario could shift existing energy-intensive production abroad and discourage new investment in these industries. The government has taken actions to limit the possibility of gas shortages and mitigate their economic impacts (Annex IV and V). Even without a cut-off in Russia’s gas exports, the war in Ukraine can trigger further supply disruptions, higher energy prices, and a greater hit to confidence.

  • A prolonged war, accompanied by an escalation of sanctions, could cause deglobalization, higher commodity prices, extended supply disruptions, and persistently lower external demand. These effects would weigh on productivity and growth and push potential below the current baseline, especially given Germany’s high level of trade integration.

  • If COVID-19 infections resurge, possibly with more dangerous and highly contagious variants, consumer confidence and spending could weaken, and supply bottlenecks intensify further (supply chains are already under pressure from lockdowns in China as well as the fallout from the war). Persistently-high inflation and fears of a de-anchoring of inflation expectations can prompt major central banks to tighten policies faster than currently expected, potentially triggering a sharp tightening in financial conditions and corrections in asset prices. These risks can amplify each other. On the upside, a waning of the pandemic would help rebalance global demand from goods to services, allowing supply bottlenecks to ease and Germany’s manufacturing firms to catch up with a historically high backlog of orders.

  • External factors pose upside risks to inflation. Inflation can climb higher and persist for longer if global commodity prices shoot up further, or if gas shortages and other global supply bottlenecks intensify. Risks from domestic factors are broadly balanced. While a stronger recovery in aggregate domestic demand than currently expected (e.g., due to large scale energy sector investments and the stock of excess household savings) could bolster inflation, especially if wages grow strongly, hampered confidence could weaken it.

  • Over the medium term, delays in securing renewable energy supply or in enhancing digitalization could weigh on Germany's potential growth. A more permanent fragmentation of the world economy would entail high adjustment costs and efficiency losses for the German economy, including from reconfiguration of supply chains and increased barriers in cross-border investment and trade. The most imminent threat to supply chains is the risk of a full shutoff of Russian gas supplies to Europe, which is analyzed in an accompanying Selected Issues Paper.

Authorities’ Views

16. The authorities broadly shared staff’s assessment of outlook and risks. They expect the recovery to regain momentum by mid-2022 when supply bottlenecks and energy prices begin to ease. The envisaged fiscal consolidation in 2023 is driven by the automatic phasing out of the temporary measures to mitigate the impact of the pandemic and high energy prices, thus would have limited impact on growth. They agreed that prolonged supply bottlenecks and surging energy prices would keep inflation elevated in 2022–23, and expect core inflation to remain higher than 2 percent in 2023 due to lagged transmission from international energy and raw material prices. They view the labor market as resilient and expect wage growth to pick up significantly in the second half of 2022 when major wage negotiations start, but noted that real wage gains were unlikely given the downside risks ahead. Nevertheless, they expressed concerns of a potential wage-price spiral if surprises in inflation outturns feed into persistently high inflation expectations, especially given firms’ high profits and the tight labor market. The views on other risks were broadly aligned. The authorities noted upside risks to growth, such as the use of excess household savings accumulated during the pandemic and record-high outstanding orders at manufacturing firms. Both the authorities and private sector contacts noted the possibility of a reconfiguration of supply chains due to a fragmentation of the world economy, but agreed that it may be too early to see evidence of such a trend.

Policy Discussions

A. Cushioning the Impact of Spiking Energy Prices and Supply Disruptions, and Enhancing Energy Security

17. The German government has responded to the fallout from the war with timely and generally well-designed measures (Annex IV and V).

  • Households. Higher consumer prices are reducing households’ real disposable income, especially among low- and middle-income groups that tend to spend a greater share of their incomes on energy. The government has introduced several measures to help, including various forms of income support for vulnerable households, a one-time payment to the employed, a cut in the “renewable energy surcharge” (a surcharge on electricity bills that helped finance the subsidies for renewable energy generation)13, and a temporary cut in the fixed excise taxes for gasoline and diesel (taking effect between June and August). Providing one-off income support payments to vulnerable individuals while allowing high energy import prices to pass through onto domestic prices are the ideal way to help the economy as they provide temporary relief to those with the least means to cope with the shock while preserving incentives to conserve energy. By contrast, cuts to the renewable energy surcharge or the energy tax are not targeted and thus an inefficient way of supporting the vulnerable, and they blunt the incentives to save energy. The fuel tax cut should be phased out after three months as planned and the government should strive to rely on income support measures for lower income groups should additional relief become necessary. The work being done to develop a comprehensive information system on households will in the future allow the government to deliver relief to a broader group than only those that are currently receiving social assistance benefits, which can be also helpful during the green transition.

  • Firms. The war has led to an abrupt surge in the prices of energy commodities, which, in the case of natural gas, has been more pronounced for European economies. Futures markets suggest that the price increase is likely to be partially reversed. Even if temporary, the surge in energy costs and intensified supply disruptions may damage firms’ balance sheets, discourage new investments and/or lead to unwanted bankruptcies of otherwise viable firms, scarring economic potential. In this context, the government has sketched a new plan for liquidity support to firms that includes loans through KfW (the state-owned development bank) on favorable terms, an extension of the pandemic-era loan guarantee programs, and loans to energy producers to post margins on their hedging contracts.14 Staff agree with the need to prepare contingent plans and, by being available for firms to draw on if severe downside risks are realized, these facilities can help to put a floor under the economy in such circumstances. However, the government has also announced that it would offer temporary and targeted subsidies for firms’ increased energy costs over the summer.15 Given the need to accumulate gas reserves as soon as possible, which would be easier if consumption were to be reduced, such energy subsidies should be dropped.

18. The immediate priority for Germany is to secure energy supplies and build resilience. Germany plans to stop its imports of Russian coal by the fall of 2022 and oil by end-2022. At the same time, it also aims to reduce its imports of Russian gas by half this year and terminate them by 2024. To diversify sources of gas imports and lessen dependence on gas, the government is securing additional LNG supplies, establishing facilities to re-gasify LNG, requiring operators to fill their storage tanks before the winter, reactivating previously shuttered coal-fired power stations, and encouraging voluntary reductions in energy demand. Activating the first stage of the national emergency plan for gas allowed intensive monitoring of the market. Laws were amended to allow the government to take control of critical energy infrastructure and order retail price adjustments. However, infrastructure bottlenecks under gas shut-off scenarios remain unclear—more transparency would be helpful to plan the necessary investment and help firms develop their crisis plans. Cooperation with other EU countries, including in the context of the REPowerEU, is key to secure additional gas supplies, and to ensure that infrastructure and legal frameworks are adequate to share gas between members in the event of a shortage. Germany has signed solidary agreements with Denmark and Austria, and a Memorandum of Understanding with other neighboring countries, including to ensure adequate supplies in land-locked countries dependent on flows through Germany. A program could be offered to exchange gas heaters for heat pumps. To encourage voluntary gas-saving behavior and build gas reserves, meaningful financial incentives—such as rebates or block tariffs, which would depend on technical feasibility constraints—could be considered. Following the curtailment of gas supplies from Russia in mid-June, the authorities declared the second phase of the three-stage emergency gas plan and took measures to accelerate the filling of storage facilities, reduce the use of gas for power generation (which will raise reliance on coal-fired plants), and announced their intention to develop an auction mechanism that could encourage further gas savings by firms.

19. A Russian gas shutoff can entail substantial costs, requiring additional policy support. Most existing studies put the output loss at up to 6 percent of yearly GDP, spread over one to two years, with the wide range of estimates partly reflecting uncertainty around the potential amount of gas shortages and how the economy can adjust. Staff assess that the impact of production constraints, downstream amplification, and elevated uncertainty alone could reduce GDP by about 1.5 percent in 2022, 2.7 percent in 2023 and 0.4 percent in 2024, with output then converging to its baseline level in subsequent years (for details, see the accompanying Selected Issues Paper). Depending on how much European wholesale gas prices rise, German headline inflation could be 2 percentage points higher on average in 2022 and 2023. To protect vulnerable households and workers, automatic stabilizers would be the first line of defense. To help ensure the solvency of energy companies, which is important to prevent financial constraints from exacerbating the shortages, the government might allow energy companies to pass on cost increases to end-users on otherwise fixed-price contracts. If that happens, it should be complemented with further targeted support for vulnerable households. Also, firms’ demand for the government’s liquidity support facilities would grow, and further discretionary financial support to firms might be necessary. The authorities’ ongoing assessments of the economic and financial implications of this scenario will help to plan such support. If rationing becomes necessary, macroeconomic implications should be considered alongside technical, legal, and social dimensions. The authorities’ ongoing efforts to plan the distribution of gas in a potential emergency are welcome.

Authorities’ Views

20. The government agreed that international energy prices should be allowed to pass through onto domestic prices while the vulnerable should be protected with targeted support, but also highlighted that the need for a quick deployment of relief measures currently warranted certain less targeted measures. Cuts to fuel taxes, which are under the control of the Ministry of Finance, can be enacted quickly and the associated relief can begin to unfold immediately. The government also pointed out that a lump-sum income-taxable transfer to all the employed, another quick measure, is progressive because the fixed lump-sum is more material for lower-income households and progressive income taxation means that the after-tax benefit is greater for lower income groups. The abolition of the renewable surcharge is also progressive because the relief for lower income households is greater as a percentage of income. The government is concerned that households are vulnerable to higher energy prices, thus it is developing an information system to allow even more targeted relief measures in the future. The government considers temporary support to firms justifiable to cushion the immediate impact of the war, the associated economic impact of sanctions, and higher energy prices. In the authorities’ view, subsidies for firms’ gas and electricity costs would not materially disincentivize energy saving because they have strict eligibility criteria (including a doubling of energy prices relative to one year ago), last only until September, cover only a portion of the increased energy cost, and they also decline over time.

21. The government is putting significant efforts into enhancing energy security, analyzing the economic impact of a potential Russian gas shutoff, and developing contingency plans. The authorities agreed that the economic impact of a shut-off of Russian gas would be sizable but emphasized that difficulties in substituting gas and energy-intensive intermediate inputs could lead to even larger impacts than estimated by staff. To build resilience against a gas shutoff scenario, the government is in discussions with neighboring countries about concluding further solidarity agreements. It agreed that financial incentives could be offered to encourage gas saving behavior, which would allow gas inventories to build faster ahead of next winter. However, the government expressed concerns about implementation constraints, such as the lack of smart meters for households to monitor consumption in real time and technical constraints on the ability to vary supply to different users. The authorities agreed that additional fiscal support would be needed in the event a Russian gas shutoff. The government noted that it aimed to spare households from rationing, and that market mechanisms would be used as much as possible to distribute gas in a way that minimizes the economic effects of rationing. The energy regulator is actively working on such plans, including by surveying and interviewing firms on how they use gas.

B. Mitigating Climate Change

22. A green investment push is a key priority to achieve Germany’s climate and energy-security goals and boost its potential growth, which requires an improved public investment management system. The Coalition Treaty sets out numerous goals in line with Germany’s emissions targets, some of which have been made more stringent recently in a bid to boost energy security (Annex VI). Much of additional green investment must be undertaken by the private sector, for which strong carbon pricing is key. However, public green investment—e.g., upgrades to the electricity transmission system and an expansion of electric-vehicle charging stations—is vital to tackle network externalities and crowd-in private investments. Several experts estimate that additional investment spending of €72 bn (1.3 percent of GDP) per year over a decade is needed to achieve Germany’s emissions targets.16 The Energy and Climate Fund is the federal government’s key vehicle for financing green projects, which is currently expected to provide €157 bn (3.8 percent of GDP) during the period 2022–25. The government also plans to transform the state-owned development bank KfW to a major co-risk capital provider for the private sector and leverage the balance sheet of public corporations, such as the state-owned railway company. Scaling up public investment has been proven challenging in recent years as Germany lacks a multi-year public plan to set out a clear national vision for the priority public investments and an institutional framework that would ensure its implementation. To boost public investment in energy security and decarbonization, digitization, and transportation infrastructure, the government should urgently simplify administration and enhance planning capacity, financing, and coordination across different levels of governments. This investment would also help reduce Germany’s large external imbalances.

23. Additional measures could enhance the cost-effectiveness of the climate change mitigation strategy.17 The introduction of a national Emission Trading System (ETS) in 2021 for the transportation and building sectors was an important step, ahead of the introduction of EU ETS2 under the “Fit for 55” initiative, which is expected to cover these sectors. However, national carbon price (€30/tonne) is considerably lower than EU ETS carbon prices (fluctuating around €80–90/tonne in May) and also lower than the levels needed to decarbonize these sectors. Measures to raise the carbon prices for buildings and transportation to equalize them with the levels of the EU ETS carbon prices would not only help decarbonize these sectors faster, but also help ensure that abatement occurs where marginal costs are lowest. If international fossil fuel prices decline (as implied by futures markets), it would become possible to raise the level of national carbon pricing without increasing retail energy prices relative to previous levels. In addition, introducing feebates and enhancing support for improving the energy efficiency of buildings could be an additional helpful tool in hard-to-decarbonize sectors. Germany has been making commendable efforts to boost international cooperation on climate, such as Chancellor Scholz’s proposal of an “international climate club,” which seeks agreement with large emitters on minimum standards for emissions-measurement and carbon pricing. Further enhancing the venture capital market and reduce administrative red tape can also promote green innovation and, more broadly, private investment.

Authorities’ Views

24. The authorities agreed that removing obstacles to investment is key to a green investment push and emphasized the government’s commitment to addressing the issue. The government is keenly aware of the obstacles to ramping up investment even faster—e.g., cumbersome administrative procedures, legal hurdles related to environmental regulations, lack of planning capacity, labor and material shortages, and difficulties in coordination across different levels of government—and highlighted that a working group has been set up in the Chancellery to address or at least reduce them. In addition, the government has been expanding the publicly-owned consultancy firm Partnerschaft Deutschland, which provides consultancy services for all levels of government (federal, state, and local) to supplement their planning and procurement capacity. Regarding climate-change mitigation policy, the “Easter package” contains an omnibus of legislative changes to accelerate the expansion of renewable energy. The “summer package” will contain another bundle of decarbonization measures in transport, building, and agriculture. The finance ministry highlighted that carbon pricing is the most efficient and effective instrument to reduce emissions and saw merit in having a single carbon price in the EU. It also emphasized the importance of the predictability of carbon pricing, and thus is reluctant to alter the already-planned path of national carbon pricing (for transportation and buildings) through 2026. The government continues to focus on enhancing the funding possibilities of start-ups for the capital-intensive scaling-up phase. In this context, as part of the 10 billion Euro Future Fund, the government has commissioned KfW Capital, a 100 percent subsidiary of KfW Group, to implement a growth fund as a market-conforming, non-aid venture capital fund of funds, aiming to broaden the investor base in the venture capital market.

C. Ensuring a Dynamic Labor Market

Boosting Participation in the Labor Market

25. Germany’s labor force will continue to shrink amidst population aging unless labor force participation rises meaningfully or immigration rebounds. In the last quarter of 2021, the labor force participation rate was 0.5 to 1 percentage point smaller than two years ago (depending on the data source used), in contrast to the gains observed in some peers during the pandemic period (Text Figure 7). Much of the drop in Germany’s labor force can be explained by demography: a decline in the share of the German population in the prime-age group and an increase in the share of the population older than 60 years, where participation rates tend to be lower. In the pre-pandemic years, within-group participation rates had been rising and partially offsetting the effects of aging. By contrast, participation rates weakened in 2021, contributing to the drop in the overall labor force participation rate. Unless participation rates (especially for those 40 and older) resume their pre-pandemic upward trend, or a recovery in immigration augments the share of the working-age population, Germany will have to confront a rapidly diminishing labor force, a growing dependency-ratio, and lessened per capita potential growth in the years ahead.

Text Figure 7.
Text Figure 7.

Germany: Real GDP

(Index, 2019=100)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: Destatis and IMF staff calculations.
Text Figure 8.
Text Figure 8.

Germany: Labor Force Dynamics

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

1/ The economy wide participation rate is given by the population-weighted average of cohort-specific participation rates. The decomposition splits the change in the eeconomy-wide participation rate to parts coming from shifts in population shares (driven by demographics) and shifts in the participation rates of different cohorts.

26. The government should continue its efforts to boost participation, especially via removing the obstacles and disincentives to work.

  • Expanding high-quality childcare and strengthening incentives to work for secondary earners— e.g., by reducing the high effective marginal tax rate for secondary earners within couples (IMF, 2019)—can promote labor-force participation by females and increase their working hours.

  • Training to reskill/upskill workers, especially in the context of accelerated digitalization, can encourage higher participation rates among older workers.

  • The Federal Employment Agency estimates that 400 thousand immigrants are needed each year to replace those retiring from the workforce. In this context, the new government’s plan to address the shortage of skilled workers by further easing immigration rules is welcome. To continue supporting job-seeking refugees, including Ukrainians, integration programs paused during the pandemic, such as language training and vocational training, should swiftly resume.

  • Reducing the labor tax for lower-skilled workers would boost their disposable income and stimulate their labor supply at the same time. Such a measure would be ideally accompanied by a permanent increase in revenue.

Authorities’ Views

27. The authorities agreed that tax and structural reforms should provide incentives for labor force participation. Expanding the provision of needs-based and high-quality childcare facilities is key to increasing working hours and participation of female workers. In this context, besides the newly-introduced measures (e.g., an investment program “Childcare Financing”), the government is planning additional investment programs to further improve childcare facilities, such as the Act on Providing All-Day Care and Education for Primary School Children. To address the high effective marginal tax rate for secondary earners, the government plans to promote the use of the tax class IV/IV with improved factor procedure for married couples,18 in which both earners face the same marginal tax rate on the first euro earned, thus increasing net income for the secondary earner (although net income for the primary earner decreases). The planned increase in the social security contribution threshold for mini and midi jobs in October would partly reduce the labor tax wedge for low-income earners and could incentivize their labor supply. While acknowledging the merits of increasing the statutory retirement age in boosting labor force participation, the government noted that prolonging working years within the current statutory retirement age—e.g., by promoting life-long learning and disincentivizing early retirement—would be useful. It also reiterated their commitment to further enhancing integration programs for migrants.

Boosting Skills and Human Capital

28. Long-standing skill mismatches and the efforts to green the economy and jobs call for policy actions to boost training and reskilling. Information Communication Technology (ICT) specialists were already scarce before the pandemic. The pandemic accelerated digitalization and enhanced skills mismatches. To mitigate shortages in digital skills and facilitate adaption to new technologies, it will be crucial to provide workers with lifelong learning opportunities in collaboration with employers, leveraging digital learning formats that could ease time and location constraints. Curricula reforms to include computer programming and upgrades in ICT equipment in schools would foster the acquisition of digital skills. Transition from internal combustion engine production to EVs will require prime-age workers to transition into greener occupations. Targeted training programs can facilitate the needed reallocations, and stepped-up efforts would help to make up the learning deficits caused by the pandemic.

29. The authorities acknowledged the need for up- and re-skilling of workers to facilitate structural transformation. They assess that the green transition would increase labor demand, most notably in the construction sector and in the areas of battery production and digitalization of the automotive sector. A decrease of labor demand will take place in the automotive sector that produces parts for the internal combustion engine and in some basic business-related services (e.g., travel agencies). While highlighting the role of the National Skills Strategy with the goal to reform, systematize, and strengthen Continuing Education and Training (CET) policies, the government noted weak pockets such as lower participation in CET programs among workers in SMEs and shortages in teachers in digital training. To address the weakness, the government has launched the “Hubs for Tomorrow” program to support companies and employees in shaping digital change and is currently working on a national user-centered one-stop shop CET platform.

Text Figure 9.
Text Figure 9.

Skill Constraints

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

D. Putting It All Together—Fiscal Policy

30. Faced with a new shock of uncertain duration and intensity, the government has been appropriately vigilant and flexible in setting fiscal policy in 2022. It has introduced generally well-designed and time-bound support to the economy and launched measures that can help avert an adverse macro-financial feedback loop in a potential gas cut-off scenario. The broadly neutral overall fiscal stance is appropriate for 2022, striking a balance between supporting the economy through generally well-targeted relief measures and not adding too much to inflationary pressures. Near-term fiscal plans may have to be revised again to accommodate any other spending needs stemming from the fallout from the war, including assistance for refugees. The government has already stepped-up humanitarian support for refugees, with a budget allocation of €4 billion (0.1 percent of GDP), and more may be needed.

Digitalization of the German Economy—Status Quo

The pandemic has accelerated the expansion of high-speed internet and boosted demand for data-driven services. The necessity for work-from-home during the pandemic has advanced the availability of broadband, yet the availability outside large cities and towns remains relatively limited (Box Figure 1). At the same time, German firms have lagged in adopting key ICT tools required to create value with data (see the 2021 Article IV Staff Report). Further expanding the coverage of fiber optic connections and the 5G mobile network is important to enhance productivity and innovation.1 The expansion will be driven mostly by the private sector,2 but in rural and sparsely populated regions where market-driven expansion is weak, the federal government is promoting the expansion of digital infrastructures with additional financing via the “digital infrastructure” special fund (BMWK 2022). To accelerate the expansion of the broadband network, the government has helpfully streamlined digital application and approval procedures, standardized alternative laying techniques, and established a nationwide gigabit land register.

Promoting the development of a modern, digital, and innovative economy requires a multi-faceted strategy. To strengthen technological sovereignty, the Coalition Treaty indicates that the EU’s digital single market should be deepened, data infrastructure further developed in accordance with European standards, and digital skills and innovation promoted. At the same time, to secure a safe data-driven economy, the Treaty also calls for secure data access and trading, as well as effective and fair competition on digital marketplaces, as is intended with the Digital Markets Act. It is also advisable to expand ICT training for teachers and to introduce computers and programming earlier in curricula (OECD 2020).

1/ The government is also considering the development of a 6G mobile network. 2/ At least €43 billion are available for the commercial expansion of fiber optic networks in Germany over the next five years (BMWK 2022).

31. Fiscal policy should remain flexible in 2023. The draft federal budget for 2023 assumes a return to complying with the debt brake rule that limits new borrowing to 0.35 percent of GDP. Yet, the government can carry a deficit exceeding that amount in the coming years, since spending to be financed by general reserves and special funds (totaling €240 bn or 6.7 percent of GDP)19, including the Energy and Climate Fund and Special Defense Fund, is not bound by the debt rule. The government’s plan is to reduce the general government deficit by 1¾ percentage of GDP to 2 percent of GDP in 2023 by letting the relief measures introduced for the pandemic and high energy prices expire at the end of the year. This adjustment is manageable under the baseline economic forecast where international energy prices would soften, and the take-up of the programs introduced during the pandemic would drop autonomously as private demand strengthens. However, if downside risks materialize, such as higher commodity prices and weaker growth, further relief measures would be called for. In particular, the government would likely extend relief to vulnerable households for coping with higher energy costs, maintain the expanded Kurzarbeit program to avert layoffs, and prolong the pandemic-era grant program for firms. Given high inflation, continuing with targeted relief measures rather than broad-based fiscal support would be of the essence. In a severe downside scenario, postponing the reactivation of the debt-brake rule by a year might be called for, to ensure that fiscal policy can be sufficiently supportive.

Text Table 2.

Germany: Fiscal Balances

(Percent of GDP)

article image
Sources: Destatis, Federal Ministry of Finance, and IMF staff.

32. Extensive use of extra-budgetary funds can undermine the credibility of the fiscal framework over time, and should therefore be minimized. Given a political commitment to return to Germany’s debt-brake rule, the government is increasingly leveraging extra-budgetary vehicles for boosting investments in decarbonization and defense spending. All associated spending is reported above the line in the general government accounts under the EU Stability and Growth Pact standards. Nonetheless, extensive use of extra-budgetary funds to bypass the debt-brake rule may undermine the credibility of the fiscal framework, and erode support for the reforms and transformation the funds are meant to facilitate. Further use of extrabudgetary funds should therefore be minimized. To further enhance fiscal transparency and risk management, the Ministry of Finance could provide a consolidated report of fiscal risks, covering the contingent liabilities associated with the quasi-fiscal activities undertaken by state-owned banks (e.g., KfW) and public corporations, based on analysis by line ministries on the public corporations under their respective span of control. The expected cost and maximum probable loss of contingent liabilities should be quantified in this report.

33. Germany continues to have ample fiscal space that it can use to invest to enhance its growth potential and resilience. Higher spending compared to the pre-pandemic era—on childcare, decarbonization, defense, energy security, innovation, and digitalization—and some tax reduction (e.g., partial abolition of the solidarity surcharge) have narrowed the room for maneuver within the constitutional debt brake rule (which limits the federal deficit to 0.35 percent of GDP in the medium term).20 Despite heightened spending, however, Germany’s public debt is projected to resume its downward trajectory from 2023 onwards, declining to its pre-pandemic level of about 60 percent of GDP by 2027 (Annex VIII). In addition to tapping into the remaining room within the rule, the government could review Germany’s overall fiscal framework—including the level and composition of expenditures and revenues, and the design of the debt-brake rule—to ensure that fiscal policy can continue to respond to structural needs.

Text Figure 10.
Text Figure 10.

Germany: Nonresidential Investment

(Percent of GDP, average 2017–21)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Authorities’ Views

34. The government generally shared staff’s assessment of the fiscal stance and agreed that fiscal policy should be tuned to help cushion the economic effects of the war and the pandemic, while still supporting the green and digital transformation. They concurred that the fiscal stance in 2022 would be broadly neutral, and such a fiscal stance under the baseline, with vulnerable households and firms receiving generally well-targeted support, should add little to inflation pressures. The government noted that once resources in the defense fund are used up and climate and defense spending are fully brought under the coverage of the debt limit, fiscal space (under the national debt-brake rule) would be largely exhausted. While the government does not plan to modify the debt brake rule by amending the constitution, the government suggested that technical modifications—such as the method of adjusting fiscal variables for the business cycle and symmetric use of the control account—could create additional fiscal space. They noted that line ministries are primarily in charge of managing fiscal risk related to public corporations, yet the finance ministry reports public corporations’ financial conditions in a collective manner on an annual basis.

E. Ensuring Financial Sector Stability

35. Staff assess the German banking sector to be generally resilient to shocks, but pockets of vulnerability require close monitoring and some additional action. In the FSAP, staff assessed that overall bank capital is generally sufficient to withstand a severe adverse scenario including a three-standard deviation shock to growth over two years. Stress tests also confirmed that the banking system is resilient to liquidity shocks. Yet, the stress tests identified shortfalls of capital and US dollar liquidity at some individual banks under severe adverse scenarios. Furthermore, structurally low bank profitability remains a persistent source of vulnerability. To address vulnerabilities identified in the stress tests, the FSAP has suggested that the authorities continue to closely monitor prudential ratios for large, systemically important commercial banks, establish additional bank-specific buffers for less capitalized banks as needed, and strengthen data collection at less systemically-important institutions about remaining maturity of retail deposits, wholesale funding, and interest-bearing assets to allow them to perform their own top-down stress tests of interest rate risk. The authorities should also review the design of the fragmented deposit insurance system and consolidate existing mandatory schemes into a single scheme with a government liquidity backstop, which would facilitate greater risk pooling and diversification.

36. Further analysis of the financial stability implications of the war, sanctions, and rising energy prices would be useful. The authorities’ preliminary analyses suggest that exposures of the financial sector to energy-intensive firms will be manageable. The authorities are analyzing the financial stability implications of gas shutoff scenarios, which would be useful to develop a full stress test.

37. The authorities have appropriately tightened macroprudential policy in the face of house price risks, but further actions are needed. Rapid rises in housing prices (12.4 percent between 2021Q4 and 2020Q4) have led to residential real estate valuations above fundamental levels for Germany overall, and even greater misalignment in larger cities. Nationwide, price-to-rent and price-to-income indicators suggested deviations from the long-run average of about 37 and 21 percent, respectively at end-2021,21 while estimates of an econometric model suggest overvaluations of 10–15 percent at 2021Q3. Meanwhile, a city-level panel model suggests greater overvaluation in the largest cities.22 Mortgage origination has also been strong and lending standards appear somewhat loose in certain segments. For example, according to different private sector data sources, between 7 and 20 percent of mortgage loans exceed the underlying property value (e.g., Text Figure 11).23 With these vulnerabilities in mind, the authorities appropriately raised the counter-cyclical capital buffer to 0.75 percent, from zero previously, and introduced a sectoral systemic risk buffer of two percent on loans secured by domestic residential real estate to apply from February 1, 2023. The authorities have also cautioned banks against taking excessive risks in mortgage lending. However, legal concerns and a lack of comprehensive data on lending standards remain obstacles to the activation of borrower-based measures, like the imposition of limits on loan-to-value ratios on new lending. As noted in the FSAP, precautionary use of borrower-based measures is warranted, and the authorities should remove obstacles to their activation by modifying the law on borrower-based measures, while in the interim strengthening guidance on lending standards (for example, encouraging banks to adhere to loan-to-value ratio limits through issuing a Guidance Note to banks). The authorities are also urged to accelerate the closure of data gaps and add income-based measures into the macroprudential toolkit.

Text Figure 11.
Text Figure 11.

Germany: Mortgages in Excess of the Property Value

(Percent of mortgages)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: Europace and Vdp.

Authorities’ Views

38. While generally sharing staff’s assessment of financial sector health and recommendations, the authorities assessed that risks in the housing market do not warrant the activation of borrower-based measures at this juncture. The authorities appreciated the FSAP’s stress tests of bank solvency and liquidity and found the results to be in line with their expectations. They are aware of U.S. dollar liquidity risks at some LSIs but judge that these are already sufficiently managed in the supervisory process. They emphasized the risk-sharing that takes place between savings and cooperative banks and their regional wholesale bank partners. The authorities highlighted the appropriateness of the macroprudential policy package announced by BaFin in January 2022. They noted that important data gaps on lending standards will be closed in 2023 and legislative proposals are being drafted to add income-based instruments to the toolkit. Furthermore, the Bundesbank has set up a project dedicated to monitoring the effects of the macroprudential policy package—inter alia its effects on lending standards. Existing private sector data on LTV and DSTI ratios currently provide mixed signals. On financial safety nets, the authorities considered that maintaining the existing multiple deposit guarantee schemes appropriately reflects the three-pillar structure of the German banking system.

F. Governance and Transparency

39. FATF indicated in 2010 and 2014 that Germany’s anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) measures are generally sound, but implementation needs strengthening in some areas. Preventive measures relevant for helping prevent foreign officials from laundering the proceeds of corruption largely comply with the AML/CFT standards and are well implemented by most, especially larger, financial institutions but some smaller non-financial businesses find such implementation challenging. Information on beneficial ownership of companies and trusts is available (through a Transparency Register) for use by the private sector and by the authorities in investigations, and to provide to foreign partners but some gaps exist. Germany provides good assistance to other countries in foreign corruption cases and prosecutes and obtains convictions for ML related to corruption, as well as freezes and confiscates proceeds of foreign corruption. The authorities should continue to strengthen the AML/CFT system, by: (i) continuing to focus, in AML/CFT supervision, on enhancing compliance with customer due diligence requirements and reporting of suspicious transactions as well as using more remedial actions and sanctions to deal with non-compliance; (ii) strengthening AML/CFT supervision of sectors favored by foreign corrupt actors such as lawyers and trust and company service providers; (iii) continuing to improve the availability of beneficial ownership information in the Transparency Register; and (iv) putting more emphasis during criminal investigation on pursuing money laundering independently of the underlying crime.

40. The government has taken measures to reduce fraud cases related to the COVID relief measures, which would also be useful for future firm subsidy programs, including envisaged energy subsidies. The implementation of COVID-related firm support programs and associated criminal proceedings are carried out by Länder governments. Through March 2022, Länder reported about 24,000 cases in which investigation proceedings were open, with the majority pertaining to the first Immediate Assistance Programme in 2020. To reduce misuse in the assistance programs, the government has refined the approval process and enhanced screening criteria within the process (e.g., applications for companies were required to be made by tax consultants, auditors, or lawyers in order to guarantee an additional assessment of admissibility). Furthermore, it also introduced an automated comparison of application data with the data of tax authorities.

Authorities’ Views

41. The authorities agreed with staff’s assessment on the AML/CFT system and noted a range of ongoing initiatives to further strengthen the system. In 2021, the government implemented the FATF “Travel Rule,” requiring virtual asset providers to collect and share customer data for transactions over a certain threshold. In March, BaFin restructured its AML department, aiming to focus on specific issues (e.g., banks, non-bank financial institution, digital supervision, strategy, and national coordination). BaFin has also been stepping up targeted training of AML/CFT supervisory staff and enhancing information exchanges across government entities. Federal and Lander coordinating offices are currently conducting in-depth analysis of AML/CFT risks in the domestic real estate sector, aiming to update the National Risk Assessment (NRA) by end-2022. The government also intends to reflect on findings of the June 2022 FATF assessment.

Staff Appraisal

42. The war in Ukraine has clouded the outlook for the German economy. After a likely sharp slowdown in 2022, a tepid recovery is expected for next year. Inflation is expected to stay elevated before moderating in 2023, though remaining well above target. However, growth could prove weaker and inflation higher than in the baseline. The greatest threat is a persistent and complete shut-off of Russia’s gas exports to Germany and Europe more broadly. Other risks include greater impacts from the war and COVID-related restrictions, both of which can intensify global supply bottlenecks, make inflation more persistent, de-anchor inflation expectations and spark asset price corrections. Furthermore, fragmentation of global value chains or delays in securing renewable energy supply or in enhancing digitalization could weigh on Germany's potential growth.

43. In this highly uncertain environment, fiscal policy should remain flexible. The broadly neutral fiscal stance in 2022 is appropriate under the baseline, with well-targeted support adding little to inflation. Also, the government’s plan to return to the debt brake rule in 2023 should be manageable under the baseline. However, if downside risks materialize, the government should allow automatic stabilizers to operate fully, continue to flexibly provide targeted support, and consider activating the escape clause of the debt break rule for another year.

44. The immediate policy priority is to cushion the spillovers from the war and limit scarring effects on potential growth. The government’s package of measures to support households and firms in the face of high energy prices is generally well-designed—especially its one-off income support payments to vulnerable individuals. However, cuts to fuel taxes should be phased out as planned because they are distortive and costly. Better targeting will be possible once information on households’ income and energy use has been integrated.

45. Efforts should continue to boost energy security and build resilience. The government’s efforts to diversify sources of gas, financing of facilities to re-gasify LNG, requirements to fill gas storage facilities, and additional emergency powers are welcome steps. However, more transparency about infrastructure bottlenecks in gas shortfall scenarios is needed to encourage investment and help firms develop their crisis plans. Cooperation with other EU countries, including in the context of the REPowerEU, is key to secure additional gas supplies, and to ensure that infrastructure and legal frameworks are adequate to share gas between members in the event of a shortage. Subsidies for firms’ energy expenditures outlined in early April should be kept temporary as planned. In addition, meaningful financial incentives could be considered to encourage further voluntary gas-saving behavior.

46. In a full gas shutoff scenario, the economy will need more policy support as the impact will likely be sizable. Automatic stabilizers would be the first line of defense. In addition, it would be important to ensure the solvency of energy companies to prevent financial constraints from exacerbating shortages. The plan to allow energy companies to pass on cost increases to end-users would help in this regard and would have to be complemented with further targeted income support for vulnerable households. The authorities’ ongoing assessments of the economic and financial implications of this scenario will help plan any additional support for firms. Should rationing become necessary, macroeconomic implications should be considered alongside technical, legal, and social dimensions.

47. Removing obstacles to public investment is essential for a green investment push, which is a key priority in view of Germany’s climate and energy-security goals. Germany’s ambitious emissions goals are laudable, and staff welcomes the Easter package of legislative initiatives to expand renewable energy. Much of the additional green investment must be undertaken by the private sector, but scaling up public green investment is also vital to tackle network externalities and crowd in private investment. Therefore, the government should urgently simplify administration and enhance planning capacity, financing, and coordination across different levels of governments. This investment would also help reduce Germany’s large external imbalances, since the external position is assessed as stronger than the level implied by medium-term fundamentals and desirable policies.

48. Increasing labor force participation is critical to counter population aging, and boosting skills would facilitate structural transformation. Expanding high-quality childcare and strengthening incentives to work for secondary earners can further promote female labor-force participation and working hours. The government’s plan to address the shortage of skilled workers by further easing immigration rules is welcome, and should be complemented with continued efforts to integrate immigrants. Reducing the labor tax for lower-skilled workers would boost their disposable income and labor supply. At the same time, enhancing training and up- or re-skilling workers are key to address skill mismatches, facilitate efforts to green the economy and jobs, and adapt to digitalization.

49. Looking ahead, Germany should continue to use its fiscal space to invest in its growth potential and resilience. Staff welcomes spending on energy security and the transition to net zero emissions, and encourages further investments in life-long learning, digitalization, innovation, labor supply, and social protection. Meanwhile, extensive use of extra-budgetary funds outside the core federal budget—to create borrowing allowances in view of unforeseen needs associated with the pandemic and the war—may undermine the credibility of Germany’s fiscal framework. Therefore, structural increases in spending for strategic priorities should be integrated into the core budget over time.

50. The German banking sector was assessed in the FSAP as generally resilient to shocks, but pockets of vulnerability warrant continued close monitoring and some additional action. Stress tests undertaken in the context of the 2022 FSAP find that overall bank capital is generally sufficient. However, to address vulnerabilities, the FSAP has suggested that the authorities continue to closely monitor prudential ratios for large, systemically important commercial banks, establish additional bank-specific buffers for less capitalized banks as needed, and strengthen data collection at less systemically-important institutions. The authorities should also review the design of the fragmented deposit insurance system and consolidate existing mandatory schemes into a single scheme, which would facilitate greater risk pooling and diversification.

51. The authorities have appropriately tightened macroprudential policy in the face of elevated and rising house prices, but further actions are needed. Staff welcome the counter-cyclical capital buffer increase and the introduction of a sectoral systemic risk buffer on loans secured by domestic residential real estate. Nevertheless, with house prices estimated to be above fundamentals, precautionary use of borrower-based measures is warranted, and the authorities should address obstacles to their activation by modifying the law on borrower-based measures, while in the interim strengthening guidance on lending standards. The authorities are also encouraged to accelerate the closure of data gaps and add income-based measures into the macroprudential toolkit.

52. It is recommended that the next Article IV consultation take place on the regular 12-month cycle.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Germany: Real Activity

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: BMWK, Destatis, Deutsche Bundesbank, European Commission, Eurostat, Haver Analytics, IFO Institute, Markit, Oxford University, and IMF staff calculations.1/ Manufacturing PMI is a composite index based on a weighted combination of new orders, output, employment, suppliers' delivery times, and stocks of materials purchased.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Germany: Prices and Labor Market

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: Bundesbank, Eurostat, Federal Statistical Office, Haver Analytics, and IMF staff calculations.1/ Employment and the unemployment rate are National Accounts Concepts.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Germany: Fiscal Developments and Outlook

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: Federal Statistical Office, Ministry of Finance, and IMF staff calculations and projections.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Germany: Balance of Payments

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: Bundesbank, DOTS, GDS, Haver Analytics, IMF World Economic Outlook, and IMF staff calculations.1/ The ULC-based REER is measured using ULC statistics for the manufacturing sector in Germany and 37 trading partners, using the OECD System of Unit Labor Cost Indicators.Note: EA5= Euro area economies (Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain) with high borrowing spreads during the 2010-11 sovereign debt crisis.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Germany: Credit Conditions and Asset Prices

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: Bundesbank, ECB, Haver Analytics, Tullett Prebon Information, and IMF staff calculations.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Germany: Housing Market Developments

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: bulwiengesa AG, Destatis, Deutsche Bundesbank, Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community, vdpResearch, Local Real Estate Surveyor Commission, Haver Analytics, OECD, and IMF staff calculations.1/ Berlin, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt am Main, Hamburg, Cologne, Munich, and Stuttgart.2/ The estimate by the Federal Ministry for the Environment for 2016-18 and by the Federal Ministry of Interior for 2019-20.3/ CRE sectors proxied by construction, housing corporations, and other real estate activities.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.

Germany: Recent Developments in the German Banking Sector

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P., ECB, IFS, S&P Global Market Intelligence, and IMF staff calculations.1/ Leverage ratio is defined as common equity net of intangibles as a percent of total assets net of intangibles.
Table 1.

Germany: Selected Economic Indicators, 2019–23

article image
article image
Sources: Deutsche Bundesbank, Federal Statistical Office, IMF staff estimates and projections.

Contribution to GDP growth.

ILO definition.

National Accounts Concepts.

Deflated by national accounts deflator for private consumption; not SWDA.

Net lending/borrowing.

Excluding supplementary trade items.

Data refer to end of December.

Data reflect Germany's contribution to M3 of the euro area.

Nominal effective exchange rate, all countries.

Real effective exchange rate, CPI based, all countries.

Table 2.

Germany: General Government Operations, 2018–27

(Percent of GDP)

article image
Sources: Bundesbank, Federal Statistical Office, Ministry of Finance, and IMF staff estimates and projections.
Table 3.

Germany: Medium Term Projections, 2018–27

article image
Sources: Federal Statistical Office, Bundesbank, and IMF staff estimates.
Table 4.

Germany: Balance of Payments, 2018–27 1/

(Percent of GDP)

article image
Sources: Bundesbank, Federal Statistical Office, IMF Statistics Department, and IMF staff estimates.

Based on Balance of Payments Manual 6.

Table 5.

Germany: International Investment Position, 2013–21 1/

(Percent of GDP)

article image
Sources: Deutsche Bundesbank, IMF Statistics Department, and IMF staff calculations.

Based on Balance of Payments Manual 6.

Table 6.

Germany: Core Financial Soundness Indicators for Banks, 2016–21

(Percent, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
article image
Source: Deutsche Bundesbank. The authorities provide annual data only and disseminate them once a year.
Table 7.

Germany: Additional Financial Soundness Indicators, 2016–21

(Percent, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
article image
Source: Deutsche Bundesbank. The authorities provide annual data only and disseminate them once a year.

Spread between highest and lowest three month money market rates as reported by Frankfurt banks (basis points). The value for 2018 is missing due to the methodology change in Q4 2018.

Spread in basis points.

Profits after tax devided by equity.

Indicator compiled according to definitions of the Compilation Guide on FSIs.

Excluding principal payments.

Resident enterprises that filed for bankruptcy.

Residential property price index (yearly average, 2016 = 100); source: Bundesbank calculations based on price data provided by bulwiengesa AG for 127 towns and cities, weighted by transactions.

Residential property price index (yearly average, 2010 = 100, long time series); source: Bundesbank calculations based on varying data providers (until 2005: bulwiengesa AG, from 2006 onwards: vdpResearch, from 2014 onwards: Federal Statistical Office); varying composition of regions and housing types.

Commercial property price index (office and retail property, yearly average, 2010 = 100); source: capital growth data provided by bulwiengesa AG for 127 towns and cities; separate indices are calculated for office property and retail property.

Annex I. External Sector Assessment

article image

Annex II. Selected Sanctions on Russia and Belarus

In response to the invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, the EU introduced sanctions against Russia and Belarus. A full list of the EU’s sanctions are available at the following link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/international-relations/restrictive-measures-sanctions/sanctions-adopted-following-russias-military-aggression-against-ukraine_en.

In addition to implementing these sanctions, Germany suspended the certification process for the Nord Stream 2 Pipeline.

Annex III. Risk Assessment Matrix1

article image
article image
article image

Annex IV. Measures Taken to Mitigate the Impact of Higher Energy Prices

Measures to Mitigate the Price Effect

  • Reduced the renewable energy surcharge from 3.7 cents per kWh to zero.

  • Reduced the energy tax on fuel products to the EU minimum during June-August.

Income Support Measures

  • One-off heating allowance for those receiving housing benefits, students, and trainees (€270 for a single-person household, €350 for a two-person household, and €70 for each additional family member).

  • One-off energy price lump sum of €300 for all employees as a salary supplement.

  • One-off grant of €100 for recipients of unemployment benefits and €200 for recipients of social benefits.

  • One-off family allowance of €100 for each child via the family benefits.

  • Temporary incentive for the use of public transportation (monthly public transportation pass costing €9 euros/month during June-August).

  • Increase benefits for children receiving social benefits by €20/month starting from July 1, 2022.

  • Tax reliefs:

    • Increased permanently employee allowance for income tax from €1000 euros to €1200.

    • Increased permanently the basic personal income tax allowance from €9984 to €10,347

    • Allowed long-distance commuters to claim 38 cents per kilometer in tax relief, retrospectively from the beginning of the year, from the 21st kilometer. The increase will also provide relief for low-income earners through the mobility premium.

Measures to Support Firms

  • A proposed KfW credit program to secure the liquidity of companies in the short term. Companies of all sizes gain access to low-interest, non-liability loans. The program will have a volume of approximately up to seven billion euros.

  • Individual extensions to the federal and state guarantee programs for companies demonstrably affected by the war in Ukraine, which were already introduced during the corona pandemic, are to be continued.

Planned Measures to Promote Energy Savings

  • Amended Building Energy Act later this year to make the efficiency standard 55 binding in new buildings from January 1, 2023.

  • Modified the subsidy rates of the federal program for efficient buildings (BEG) to reflect greenhouse gas emissions per square meter of living space and life cycle costs.

  • Stipulated by law that from January 1, 2024, every newly installed heating system should be operated with 65 percent renewable energies. To do so, the government will launch a heat pump drive in industry, trade, and private households.

  • The government will introduce nationwide municipal heat planning and anchor it as a central coordination instrument for local, efficient use of heat.

  • At least 50 percent of district heating will become climate-neutral by 2030.

  • Introduce a gas auction mechanism in the summer, which will encourage industrial gas consumers to save gas.

Annex V. Measures Taken to Secure Energy Supply

Short Term

  • Required Germany’s privately-operated gas storage facilities to augment gas in storage to 90 percent of capacity by November 1, compared with 80 percent proposed by the European Commission for 2022 (90 percent for the EU also starting in 2023). Gas Storage Act was passed on April 8 and to take effect from May 1. The legislation leaves open the possibility of public subsidies. On June 23, the government announced its plan to make additional KfW credit lines available, which will initially provide the market area manager Trading Hub Europe GmbH with the liquidity needed to purchase gas and press ahead with filling the storage facilities. The loan is secured by a guarantee from the German government.

  • One-off allocation of EUR 1.5 bn for immediate procurement of gas of 0.7 bn m3(8 percent of Germany’s annual gas consumption in 2020).

  • The EU agreed with the U.S. that the latter would supply 15 billion cubic meters of LNG in 2022.

  • Exploring the charter of up to three floating storage and regasification terminals, which can increase the capacity to import LNG to 27 bn m3 (31 percent of Germany’s annual gas consumption in 2020) and can be deployed within a year.

  • German gas utility company Uniper will increase its LNG import capacity rights at the Gate terminal in Rotterdam, Netherlands, by one bcm/year.

  • Activated the national gas security emergency plan, setting the crisis level to “early warning,” which allows enhanced monitoring of gas flows and storage levels. The regulator sought contingency plans from large industrial firms. Following a cut in gas supplies from Russia via the Nord Stream 1 pipeline, the government on June 23 raised the crisis to the second stage.

  • Reactivate previously shuttered coal-fired power stations.

  • A campaign asking residents to conserve energy voluntarily.

  • The Ministry of Economy and Climate Protection, which regulated energy markets, has put the German subsidiary of Gazprom into administration by a trust overseen by the Federal Network Agency.

Medium Term

  • Agreed a long-term gas supply partnership with Qatar.

  • Announced an intention to accelerate the construction of three new regasification terminals for the import of LNG, at Wilhelmshaven (10 bcm/year), Brunsbüttel (8 bcm/year) and Stade (12 bcm/year), which could take 2–5 years to complete. These are to be partly financed by KfW and built by the private sector. A memorandum of understanding for the first terminal in Brunsbüttel has been signed by the parties, with plans for operation in 2026.

  • Target 100 percent of electricity supply with renewables by 2035, from “well before 2040” previously. Evaluated the costs and benefits of prolonging the lives of three nuclear power plants that are due to be closed this year. The government decided against it, judging that the costs and risks outweigh the benefits.

  • A KfW program to exchange electric heat pumps for gas furnaces.

Annex VI. Germany’s Key Climate Goals and Measures

The following measures are contained in the Coalition Treaty and Easter package.

Electricity sector:

  • 80 percent of electricity demand will be met with renewables by 2030, from 42 percent in 2021, and reach 100 percent renewable electricity by 2035. The Easter Package envisages 215 gigawatts (96 percent of Germany’s installed production capacity in 2020) of solar power and at least 30 (13.5 percent) gigawatts of offshore wind power by 2030. To achieve these goals, the Package outlines a number of measures.

    • Electrolyze 10 gigawatts (4.5 percent of Germany’s installed production capacity in 2020) of green hydrogen by 2030, and to ensure that all new natural gas power plants are compatible with future hydrogen fuel sources.

    • Increase the subsidy rates for rooftop photovoltaic (PV), with privileges being given to systems that feed all electricity into the grid.

    • For onshore wind, suspend the degression of the maximum values of the feed-in tariff for two years; improve the reference yield model for low-wind locations; lift the size limit for pilot plants; allow municipalities to financially participate in onshore and ground-mounted wind turbines.

    • Increase tenders for biomethane to 600 MW per year from 2023, while reducing those for biomass.

    • Enhance subsidies for innovation and storage.

    • Introduce a new tender segment "Renewables + Hydrogen" to provide additional support for ramping up the hydrogen economy.

    • The new Energy Allocation Act (EnUG) regulates that in the future, levies will only be payable for withdrawal from the grid. Self-consumption, direct delivery and, heat pumps in general will be exempt from paying surcharges.

  • Aim to bring forward the coal phase-out to 2030, from 2038 previously.

  • Increase targets and tender volumes of offshore wind energy.

  • Develop strategies for alternative energy sources, including bioenergy and geothermal.

  • Accelerate the expansion of grid networks and aligning it with the GHG neutrality goal.

1. Carbon pricing: Introduce a minimum carbon price of €60 per tonne domestically, even if Europe-wide prices fall below this level.1

2. Transport: 15 million fully electric cars on the roads (31 percent of total registered cars in 2021), one million public charging stations, and to electrify three-quarters of the rail network, by 2030. Phase out internal combustion engine cars by 2035, electrify rail transport, and create incentives to route more freight and passenger traffic from roads and air to railways, which are more carbon efficient.

3. Building: 65 percent of energy used by newly installed heating systems should be renewable from 2025, half of all energy used to heat buildings should be climate-neutral by 2030, solar panels will be required on new commercial buildings.

Annex VII. Governance and Transparency

1. FATF indicated in 2010 and 2014 that Germany’s anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) measures relevant for helping prevent foreign officials from laundering the proceeds of corruption are generally sound.1 Since FATF’s assessment, Germany has taken many initiatives to strengthen its AML/CFT system. Those most relevant to combating the laundering of proceeds of foreign corruption include: introducing, in 2017, a Transparency Register to provide better access to information on the beneficial ownership of companies and trusts; legislating to allow for non-conviction based asset confiscation; and, in 2019, publishing an ML/TF risk assessment that identified corruption as a medium risk and specifically flagged the potential that issuance of golden passports by some EU members may facilitate the laundering of proceeds of foreign corruption.

2. Preventive measures largely comply with the AML/CFT standards and are well implemented by most, especially larger, financial institutions but some smaller non-financial businesses find such implementation challenging. As part of that implementation, banks typically use software to screen for foreign politically exposed persons (PEPs). Smaller non-financial businesses have less financial resources to use software solutions to determine PEP status or beneficial ownership, and the implementation of prevention measures is therefore a challenge, in particular as regards customer due diligence (CDD) requirements, including PEPs, and reporting suspicious transactions.

3. Information on beneficial ownership of companies and trusts is available (through a Transparency Register) for use by the private sector and by the authorities in investigations, and to provide to foreign partners but some gaps exist. While the Transparency Register has increased access to this type of information, some information not yet entered in the Transparency Register itself is available only through interlinked other registries, not all the information is verified, and some data is in older registers.

4. Germany has a very good legal and operational framework for cooperating with other countries in foreign corruption cases and provides good assistance. This includes forming joint investigation teams with foreign counterparts to investigate cases where proceeds of foreign corruption are suspected of having been laundered in Germany.

5. Germany has a robust legal framework, prosecutes and obtains convictions for different types of ML, including related to corruption, and freezes and confiscates proceeds of foreign corruption. There are specialized units within law enforcement agencies that investigate cases of corruption. From 2016 to 2020, the authorities have frozen almost €280 million in corruption cases2, some of which related to foreign cases. However, Germany tends to pursue the underlying crimes rather than the related ML. As a result, there may not be sufficient focus on the identification and pursuit of some, particularly complex, cases of laundering of proceeds of foreign corruption in Germany.

6. The authorities should continue efforts to strengthen the AML/CFT system. They should continue focusing, in AML/CFT supervision for all obliged entities, on enhancing compliance with CDD requirements, including those related to PEPs and obtaining suspicious transaction reports of better quality. This includes using more remedial actions and sanctions to deal with non-compliance. There needs to be more resources applied and better coordination to strengthen supervision in the non-financial sector, especially exposed to risks from foreign corrupt actors, such as lawyers and trust and company service providers. The authorities should also continue efforts to improve the effectiveness of the Transparency Register, such as verifying more of its information. Law enforcement should put more emphasis on pursuing ML independently of the underlying crime, as this is particularly relevant for cases involving proceeds of foreign corruption.

Annex VIII. Public Debt Sustainability Analysis

After rising by nearly 10 percent of GDP in 2020, Germany’s public debt increased by 1.5 percent of GDP in 2021 to 70.2 percent of GDP. The increase last year was driven by continued extraordinary COVID-19 fiscal support measures and the repurposing of the unspent debt envelope permitted for the COVID-19 measures to expand the Climate Transformation Fund, together with the lackluster economic recovery due to supply bottlenecks and repeated COVID-19 waves. Public debt is expected to broadly stabilize in 2022 due to high nominal GDP growth and elevated inflation, despite the assumed 100 bn (2.6 percent of GDP) new borrowing to create the Special Defense Fund and fiscal measures to cushion higher energy prices, increase defense spending, support Ukrainian refugees. Given the temporary nature of the relief measures for COVID-19 and high energy prices, the expected economic recovery, and low borrowing costs, Germany’s debt sustainability will not be jeopardized. The debt ratio is projected to fall afterwards, returning to below 60 percent of GDP by 2027. A negative growth shock and a combined macro-fiscal shock represent the largest risk to the debt outlook. However, in both cases, debt would return to a downward trajectory after the shock.

A. Baseline Scenario

1. Macroeconomic assumptions. After contracting by 4.8 percent, the economy grew by 2.8 percent 2021, weaker than expected due to supply bottlenecks and repeated COVID-19 waves. Real GDP is projected to grow by 1.5 percent in 2022 and pick up in 2023 to about 2 percent if energy prices and supply bottlenecks subside, and COVID infections remain under control. Growth should converge to its potential over the medium run, estimated at just above 1 percent per year. Inflation—measured by the GDP deflator—is projected to rise to 5.8 percent in 2022 and return to around 2 percent only in 2025 onwards. On the back of heightened inflation and associated expectation in monetary policy tightening, 10-year bund yields rose by nearly 200 basis points from a year ago. Yet, effective interest rates are projected to rise only gradually, remaining around 1 percent through 2027.1

2. Germany’s temporarily high level of public debt warrants use of the high scrutiny framework. Public gross debt in 2022 is expected to be above the indicative DSA threshold (60 percent of GDP) for high scrutiny. Debt is projected to start declining in 2023, reflecting the phase-out of the extraordinary COVID-19 fiscal measures and measures to cushion the impact of high energy prices. Due to the temporary nature of the policy measures and the expected economic recovery, the debt ratio is projected to fall back to 59.3 percent of GDP by 2027. Estimated gross financing needs should decline from about 19 percent of GDP in 2022 to around 9 percent of GDP in 2027.

3. The realism of baseline assumptions. Previous forecasts of macro-fiscal variables have been conservative. The median forecast error for real GDP growth during 2012–20 is close to zero. The median forecast error for inflation (GDP deflator) is 0.33 percent, suggesting that inflation tended to be underestimated in the past. The median forecast bias for the primary balance is 0.5 percent of GDP (implying better than projected performance), relatively conservative for surveillance countries.

4. The projected fiscal adjustment is feasible. The maximum 3-year adjustment of the cyclically-adjusted primary balance (CAPB) lies just below the top quartile of historical and cross-country experience. However, this adjustment mainly reflects the phasing-out of the sizable and temporary fiscal measures adopted in response to the pandemic and higher energy prices.

B. Shocks and Stress Tests Through the Medium Term

5. Germany’s government debt could rise above the 2022 peak to around 72½ percent of GDP under the combined macro-fiscal shocks, while gross financing needs should continue to fall to around 12 percent of GDP or below by 2027. Under all considered macro-fiscal stress tests, both the debt-to-GDP ratio and gross financing needs either continue to drop or return to a downward path after the shock. Temporary shocks to real GDP growth or a combined macro-fiscal shock would drive a temporary increase in debt. At the same time, gross financing needs would continue to decrease throughout the projection period. Given the historical variability of growth, Germany's debt dynamics are most sensitive to growth shocks (detailed results below).

List of Shocks and Stress Tests2

  • Growth shock. Under this scenario, real output growth rates are lower than in the baseline by one standard deviation over 2023–24 (i.e., by 2.2 percentage points). The assumed decline in growth leads to lower inflation (0.25 percentage points per 1 percentage point decrease in GDP growth), and the interest rate on new debt is assumed to increase 25 basis points for every 1 percent of GDP worsening of the primary balance. Debt would peak at 72.1 percent of GDP in 2024 in this case, but decline to around 66 percent of GDP by 2027.

  • Primary balance shock. This scenario examines the effect of a dual shock of lower revenues and a rise in the interest rate, leading to a cumulative deterioration in the primary balance by 2.4 percent of GDP over 2023–24. The shock would result in a modest deterioration of debt dynamics, yet the debt ratio is projected to continue to decline throughout the projection period.

  • Interest rate shock. This scenario assumes an increase of 327 basis points in debt servicing costs during 2023–27, mimicking the historical maximum real interest rate experienced since 2012. The effect on public debt and gross financing needs would also be relatively modest.

  • Additional stress test. The combined macro-fiscal shock scenario tests combined shocks to growth, the interest rate, and the primary balance; while avoiding double-counting the effects of individual shocks. The impact on debt dynamics is slightly worse than that of a growth shock.

  • Additional stress test. This contingent fiscal shock scenario assumes a cumulative 3 percent of GDP (about 120 billion euros) additional fiscal cost for public guarantees called over 2023–24 based on the assumption that contracted guarantees will double from the level of end-2021, and about one-third of the guarantees contracted will be called. The scenario also assumes a higher funding cost—25 bps compared to the baseline scenario per year—for 2023–27. The shock would raise debt to 80 percent of GDP in 2023, which would decline over the medium time yet remain above the pre-shock level.

Figure AVIII.1.
Figure AVIII.1.

Germany: Public Sector Debt Sustainability Analysis—Baseline Scenario

(in percent of GDP unless otherwise indicated)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Source: IMF staff.1/ Public sector is defined as general government.2/ Based on available data.3/ Long-term bond spread over German bonds.4/ Defined as interest payments divided by debt stock (excluding guarantees) at the end of previous year.5/ Derived as [(r - π(1+g) - g + ae(1+r)]/(1+g+π+gπ)) times previous period debt ratio, with r = interest rate; π = growth rate of GDP deflator; g = real GDP growth rate; a = share of foreign-currency denominated debt; and e = nominal exchange rate depreciation (measured by increase in local currency value of U.S. dollar).6/ The real interest rate contribution is derived from the numerator in footnote 5 as r - π (1+g) and the real growth contribution as -g.7/ The exchange rate contribution is derived from the numerator in footnote 5 as ae(1+r).8/ Positive entries for 2021 and 2022 reflect the accumulation of debt to create the Energy and Climate Fund (60 bn) and Special Defense Fund (100 bn), respectively. Negative entries for 2023-26 reflect deficits financed by these funds and general reserves.9/ Includes asset changes and interest revenues (if any). For projections, includes exchange rate changes during the projection period.10/ Assumes that key variables (real GDP growth, real interest rate, and other identified debt-creating flows) remain at the level of the last projection year.
Figure AVIII.2.
Figure AVIII.2.

Germany: Public Debt Sustainability Analysis—Composition of Public Debt and Alternative Scenarios

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Source: IMF staff.
Figure AVIII.3.
Figure AVIII.3.

Germany: Public Debt Sustainability Analysis—Realism of Baseline Assumptions

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Source : IMF Staff.1/ Plotted distribution includes surveillance countries, percentile rank refers to all countries.2/ Projections made in the spring WEO vintage of the preceding year.3/ Not applicable for Germany, as it meets neither the positive output gap criterion nor the private credit growth criterion.4/ Data cover annual obervations from 1990 to 2011 for advanced and emerging economies with debt greater than 60 percent of GDP. Percent of sample on vertical axis.
Figure AVIII.4.
Figure AVIII.4.

Germany: Public Debt Sustainability Analysis —Stress Tests

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Source: IMF staff.
Figure AVIII.5.
Figure AVIII.5.

Germany: Public Debt Sustainability Analysis Risk Assessment

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 229; 10.5089/9798400216497.002.A001

Source: IMF staff.1/ The cell is highlighted in green if debt burden benchmark of 85% is not exceeded under the specific shock or baseline, yellow if exceeded under specific shock but not baseline, red if benchmark is exceeded under baseline, white if stress test is not relevant.2/ The cell is highlighted in green if gross financing needs benchmark of 20% is not exceeded under the specific shock or baseline, yellow if exceeded under specific shock but not baseline, red if benchmark is exceeded under baseline, white if stress test is not relevant.3/ The cell is highlighted in green if country value is less than the lower risk-assessment benchmark, red if country value exceeds the upper risk-assessment benchmark, yellow if country value is between the lower and upper risk-assessment benchmarks. If data are unavailable or indicator is not relevant, cell is white.Lower and upper risk-assessment benchmarks are:400 and 600 basis points for bond spreads; 17 and 25 percent of GDP for external financing requirement; 1 and 1.5 percent for change in the share of short-term debt; 30 and 45 percent for the public debt held by non-residents.4/ Long-term bond spread over German bonds, an average over the last 3 months, 25-Mar-22 through 23-Jun-22.5/ External financing requirement is defined as the sum of current account deficit, amortization of medium and long-term total external debt, and short-term total external debt at the end of previous period.

Annex IX. Authorities’ Response to Past IMF Policy Recommendations

article image
article image
1

The list of EU sanctions adopted following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is available on the European Commission website. An analysis of the global spillovers of sanctions can be found in the April 2022 World Economic Outlook. In line with the recently revised Institutional View on the liberalization and management of capital flows, some of the sanctions imposed on Russia can be capital flow management measures (CFMs) imposed for national and international security reasons.

2

The general government budget released in April 2021 had envisaged a deficit of 9 percent of GDP.

3

Unspent funds appropriated for COVID-19 measures were repurposed and injected into the Energy and Climate Fund in December 2021. Disbursements from the special fund are recorded as part of general government spending in accordance with the European System of National and Regional Accounts 2010 standards, but the associated borrowing (recorded as part of federal public debt) is not bound by the national debt-brake rule.

4

At least 780,000 Ukrainians fleeing the war had registered as refugees in Germany by early-June.

5

For example, German banks' cross-border claims and liabilities towards Russia are each about 1.5 percent of their capital and Germany's portfolio investment claims on Russia are 0.12 percent of GDP.

6

Celasun et al. (2022) estimate that supply shocks contributed about half the increase in manufacturing PPI inflation between the pre-pandemic years and the second half of 2021, and added 0.5 percentage point to core CPI inflation in the first three quarters of 2021.

7

Real output per hour worked grew close to 2 percent over the same period.

8

To adhere to the 2015 Paris Agreement commitments in an inter-generationally fair manner, in June 2021 the German government raised its targeted reduction in GHG emissions between 1990 and 2030 to 65 percent and advanced its net zero emissions target to 2045. The Climate Change Act (2021) sets annual aggregate emissions targets through 2040 and sectoral targets through 2030.

9

The historical relationship between energy import prices and growth suggests that a 10 percent increase in oil or natural gas import prices erodes growth by 0.2 percentage points.

10

The immediate economic impact of the suspension of Nord Stream 2 in Germany and other countries is limited as the pipeline had not been operating yet. Gas pipelined through Nord Stream 2 would have replaced flows through other pipelines. Spillovers from EU sanctions on Russia and Belarus will be analyzed in the staff report for the 2022 Article IV consultation with the euro area.

11

Prior to the war, value added exports to Russia were 0.7 percent of total exports.

12

Celasun et al. (2022) estimate that post-pandemic supply constraints reduced 2021 real GDP growth by 2.5 percentage points.

13

The subsidies for renewable energy producers will be instead covered by the federal budget going forward.

14

Energy producers guarantee their sales prices ahead of time by selling their products (e.g., gas or electricity) through forward contracts. When the spot price rises above their contracted forward price, they have to post a security deposit (margin) that increases with the price difference. By financing the margin calls that have followed sharp increases, the government is preventing financial stress in energy producing firms.

15

Germany’s measures are designed to comply with the EC’s temporary state aid framework to address the fallout from the war in Ukraine, which was adopted on March 23.

17

See Chen, R., A. Mineshima, S. Black, V. Mylonas, I. Parry, and D. Prihardini, “Enhancing Climate Mitigation Policy in Germany.” IMF Working Paper 21/241.

18

Under the “tax class IV/IV with improved factor procedure,” married couples where both spouses earn income are taxed individually but with a factor accounting for their income splitting tax benefits.

19

Special funds include: (i) the Special Fund for Defense (€100 billion); (ii) the Energy and Climate Fund (€60 billion); (iii) the Refugee Fund from 2015 (€40 billion); and (iv) other miscellaneous funds (€40 billion).

20

Staff analysis in the 2021 Article IV suggests that a permanent 1 percent of GDP expansion of public investment from 2022 onwards would boost private productivity and increase real GDP by more than 2 percent in the long run, narrowing scarring from the pandemic and war, while still allowing Germany’s debt-to-GDP ratio to trend down over time.

21

Price-to-rent deviation from the long-run average, however, is less indicative for Germany due to rent controls.

22

Bundesbank’s estimates suggest an overvaluation in residential real estate prices of 20–35 percent nationwide, and 15–40 percent in cities, in 2021.

23

The true percentage will only be known in 2023, when official data become available.

1

The Risk Assessment Matrix (RAM) shows events that could materially alter the baseline path. The relative likelihood is the staff’s subjective assessment of the risks surrounding the baseline (“low” is meant to indicate a probability below 10 percent, “medium” a probability between 10 and 30 percent, and “high” a probability between 30 and 50 percent). The RAM reflects staff views on the source of risks and overall level of concern as of the time of discussions with the authorities. Non-mutually exclusive risks may interact and materialize jointly. The conjunctural shocks and scenario highlight risks that may materialize over a shorter horizon (between 12 to 18 months) given the current baseline. Structural risks are those that are likely to remain salient over a longer horizon.

1

The minimum carbon price is currently planned to be applied the sectors covered by the EU ETS. Germany’s national carbon price (for transportation and buildings) is scheduled to be raised in a stepwise manner from €30 per tonne in 2022 to €55 per tonne in 2025; in 2026 auctions will be introduced alongside a price collar of €55-65 per tonne CO2.

1

The last comprehensive assessment of Germany’s AML/CFT framework was conducted in 2010 with an update provided in 2014. The update is available at: http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/mer/FUR-Germany-2014.pdf. The measures relevant for helping prevent the laundering of the proceeds of foreign corruption are those related to implementing preventive measures, transparency of legal persons and arrangements, investigating and prosecuting money laundering, and providing international legal cooperation. The findings of the next comprehensive assessment, against the current FATF methodology using the 2013 methodology, which focuses on the effectiveness of the AML/CFT system, are due to be discussed in June 2022 and published by September 2022.

2

Figures for 2021 are not yet available.

1

The interest rate on new borrowing is derived from forecasts of the real interest rate and inflation, and it does not necessarily match market-based interest rate forecasts. Using market-based forecasts would make little difference to the debt sustainability analysis.

2

Given that virtually all outstanding sovereign debt is denominated in euros, the scenario of a real exchange rate shock would not have a relevant effect on debt and is therefore not discussed.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Germany: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Germany
Author:
International Monetary Fund. European Dept.