Côte D’Ivoire: Staff Report for the 2022 Article IV Consultation—Debt Sustainability Analysis
Author:
International Monetary Fund. African Dept.
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund. African Dept. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

CÔTE D’IVOIRE

Abstract

CÔTE D’IVOIRE

Title Page

CÔTE D’IVOIRE

STAFF REPORT FOR THE 2022 ARTICLE IV CONSULTATION—DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS1

May 31, 2022

Approved by

Montfort Mlachila and Natalia Tamirisa (IMF); and Marcello Estevão and Abebe Adugna Dadi (IDA)

Prepared by the International Monetary Fund and the International Development Association

Côte d’Ivoire remains at moderate risk of external debt distress. The external debt service to revenue indicator remains below but close to the threshold, and the other projected external debt burden indicators are below their thresholds under the baseline, with the most extreme shock being the one related to exports. Several indicators exceed their thresholds in the case of the most severe standard shocks. The space to absorb shocks remains limited. The overall risk of public debt distress is also moderate, with public debt expected to remain generally stable over the projection horizon.

Côte d’Ivoire: Joint Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Analysis

article image

Public Debt Coverage

1. Public debt covers both the debt of the central government, as well as the guarantees provided by the central government, including those guarantees that pertain to state-owned enterprises (SOEs) debt (Text Table 1). The DSA classifies external and domestic debt based on the currency criterion, given data constraints that prevent the use of the residency criterion.2 The debt of local governments is excluded from the DSA coverage. Local governments are authorized to borrow within limits and under conditions set by decree. There is no available information on this debt. On SOE debt, the authorities continue to improve debt coverage and monitoring in past years. At end-2021, SOE guaranteed and non-guaranteed commercial debt amounted to respectively 1.3 and 0.8 percent of GDP. In the context of the current DSA, the following approach is taken:

  • All guaranteed SOE debt and on-lent debt is included in the debt stock in the baseline.

  • Non-guaranteed SOE debt is captured as a contingent liability shock – this shock is set at the default 2 percent of GDP.3

Text Table 1.

Côte d’Ivoire: Coverage of Public Sector Debt

article image

2. Efforts to increase the government’s capacity to record and monitor public debt and contingent liabilities continue. Further work is needed to enhance data coverage of SOEs in the DSA baseline, including consolidating the general government fiscal accounts with the financial statements of the SOEs (both on the revenue, expenditure, and financing sides) and corresponding 20-year projections. The authorities see this consolidation as a prerequisite for incorporating SOE debt into total debt (in the baseline) and have received technical assistance (TA) to advance this task. Additionally, further work on data reconciliation with the World Bank Debt Reporting System is ongoing. As part of the IDA Sustainable Development Finance Policy (SDFP), authorities have created a new portal providing updated information on public debt, including the quarterly debt bulletins, increasing transparency.

3. The magnitude of the shock in the contingent liability stress test applied in the sensitivity analysis reflects potential additional liabilities. The LIC-DSF default settings are applied for the contingent liabilities shock. They could emanate from SOE debt not captured in the data coverage, especially from non-guaranteed debt and domestic arrears, public-private partnership agreements, and the financial sector. Total contingent liabilities for the CL test are estimated at 9.3 percent of GDP (Text Table 2). The stock of public private partnerships represents about 6.6 percent of GDP at end-2021, with more than half of investment commitments in the energy sector.

Text Table 2.

Côte d’Ivoire: Magnitude of the Contingent Liability Stress Test

article image

The default shock of 2% of GDP will be triggered for countries whose government-guaranteed debt is not fully captured under the country’s public debt definition (1.). If it is already included in the government debt (1.) and risks associated with SoE’s debt not guaranteed by the government is assessed to be negligible, a country team may reduce this to 0%.

Debt Background

4. Public debt increased significantly over the last few years with external debt growing as a share of total debt.4 The increase in indebtedness over 2017–2021 was driven by higher recourse to external debt including to finance an increase in investment and social spending in the context of the National Development Plan 2015–2020 and the COVID-19 crisis. The medium-term debt strategy 2019–2023 updated in the 2022 finance law envisaged that 64 percent of new financing would come from external sources and favor borrowing in euros and CFA francs to limit exchange rate risk. Already a large share of external borrowing is denominated in euros. Public debt stood at 53.5 percent of GDP at end-2021, compared with 33.3 percent in 2017. External debt stood at 33 percent of GDP, compared to 19 percent in 2017— representing 62 percent of total debt in end-2021 as opposed to 57 percent in 2017.

Text Figure 1.
Text Figure 1.

Côte d’Ivoire: Evolution of Public Debt

(Percentage of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Ivorian authorities; and IMF staff calculations.

5. Most of the domestic debt is in the form of CFAF-denominated securities. Those securities have a maturity between 3 months and 15 years and are held by domestic and other WAEMU investors. The authorities are mindful of the fact that an excessive recourse to the regional market would run the risk of a tightening of financing constraints and a crowding-out of private sector credit, given the financing needs across WAEMU countries.

6. Within external debt (excluding guarantees), commercial creditors hold more than half of the external debt stock. Close to 90 percent of commercial debt is in the form of eurobonds. The authorities undertook a liability management operation in 2020 to reduce exchange rate risks and lengthen maturity. Multilateral creditors have increased their share of debt since 2020 and represented 29 percent of external debt in 2021, as Côte d’Ivoire mobilized substantial concessional external financing to fund its response to the pandemic. The IMF and the World Bank jointly satisfied more than a third of the country’s financing needs in 2021. On the other hand, the share of bilateral creditors has decreased since 2016, accounting for less than 16 percent of the external debt stock at end-2021 compared to 21 percent in 2017. The remaining shares are associated with commercial creditors (51 percent) and guaranteed debt (4 percent).

Text Figure 2.
Text Figure 2.

Côte d’Ivoire: Composition of Domestic Debt

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Ivorian authorities; and IMF staff calculations.

7. The authorities joined the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI) in 2020. The authorities received positive answers from the Paris Club creditors and Eximbank India for 2020 and 2021 and the Kuwait fund for 2020. Nevertheless, since a significant share of external debt falling due in 2020 and 2021 has been forgiven by bilateral creditors under the C2D (see footnote 4), the benefit of DSSI is limited. Suspended payments amounted to around 5 percent of total debt service (including C2D) in 2020 and 0.4 percent in 2021.

Text Figure 3.
Text Figure 3.

Côte d’Ivoire: Composition of External Debt

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Ivorian authorities; and IMF staff calculations.

Recent Developments and Underlying Assumptions

8. Côte d’Ivoire continues to show resilience to the pandemic and signs of recovery. Growth in 2021 is estimated at about 7 percent, which is higher than in most Sub-Saharan African frontier market economies. This economic performance was underpinned by strong pre-crisis fundamentals, a rapid policy response, and a relatively lower dependency on sectors most vulnerable to the pandemic. The country experienced a short-lived spike of Omicron in 2021 and beginning 2022, but the fatalities remain modest compared to peers with about 800 deaths since the beginning of the pandemic until beginning of May 2022. Vaccination began in March 2021 and adoption rate of the vaccine by the population has picked up, after a slow start. As mid-May 2022, 12.6 million doses have been administered with about 40 percent of the targeted population (12 years-old and over) having received a first dose. Inflation reached to 4.2 percent in 2021 reflecting mostly surge in global prices.

9. The assumptions in the baseline scenario are consistent with the macroeconomic framework outlined below (Text Tables 2 and 3). These include a growth path converging to 6 percent over the medium term from 7 percent in 2021, inflation returning to subdued level in the medium term thanks to the exchange rate peg to the euro, a gradual improvement in the external position, and a gradual fiscal consolidation to reach the 3 percent of GDP regional fiscal deficit norm by 2024 Projections also assume a balanced recourse to domestic and external debt.

  • GDP growth trajectory fluctuating between 6 and 6.7 percent through the medium term similarly to the previous DSA. Real GDP recovered from 2 percent in 2020 to 7 percent in 2021 as global conditions improve and domestic demand recovered from the COVID shock, despite short-term electricity shortages. Staff projects output growth to slow to 6 percent in 2022 as a result of war in Ukraine, to rebound to around 6½ in the following years, and to converge to 6 percent over the medium term. The cumulative path is comparable to what projected at the time of the 2021 Article IV. The implementation of a strong reform agenda from the National Development Plan (NDP) and recent oil discovery could however catalyze stronger confidence and investment and further lift productivity and growth, while persistent insecurity in the north of the country and uncertain global developments represent downside risks.

  • Gradual return to subdued inflation over the medium term. Annual average inflation is projected to reach 5.5 percent in 2022, reflecting an increase in commodity prices, supply chain disruptions following containment measures, and border closures along with the impact of electricity rationing in some sectors in 2021. However, it is expected to remain low at around 2 percent in the medium term, benefiting from the exchange rate peg to the euro.

  • Wider budget deficits in the short term. The need for a continued policy response to counter the pandemic and insecurity in the north led to a widening of the primary and overall fiscal deficits to respectively 3 and 5.1 percent of GDP in 2021. A wider deficit in 2022 of 5.3 percent of GDP is expected due to the response of the effects of the war in Ukraine and higher security spending to respond to insecurity in the north and the public investment plan fueled by the implementation of NDP over the next few years. While the NDP prominently focuses on an increase in private sector investment, it also has goals for public investment and debt financed public investment projects. The authorities still plan to converge to the 3 percent of GDP regional target over the medium term.

  • Similar tax revenue projections. The tax revenue projection is broadly similar to the previous DSA, which takes into consideration the relatively weak revenue mobilization. However, 2021 revenue outcome was better than forecasted due to strengthened digitalization and tax administration. Tax revenue is assumed to increase from 12.3 percent of GDP in 2022 to above 13 percent of GDP from 2024 onwards and remain at that level. Efforts to strengthen domestic revenue mobilization are expected to continue. They should focus on eliminating VAT tax exemptions, accelerating the removal of business tax exemptions, streamlining the personal income tax regime, improving property regime, fully rolling out new IT system and pursuing public finances management reforms.

  • A narrowing current account deficit. The external current account deficit is expected to moderately narrow from 4.8 percent of GDP in 2022 to 3.6 percent of GDP in 2027. Exports are expected to grow more than imports thanks to the implementation of NDP and Côte d’Ivoire 2030 policies, especially on private sector development and export diversification.

  • Risks. These assumptions are subject to downside risks including from possible unfavorable terms-of-trade shocks and weaker-than-expected global growth in the context of the pandemic, war in Ukraine and rising protectionism. The upside risks consist mainly of the confirmation of the oil discovery potential and the strict implementation of the NDP.

Text Table 3.

Côte d’Ivoire: LIC DSA Macroeconomic Assumptions

article image
Sources: Ivorian authorities, World Bank, and IMF staff estimates and projections .

10. The authorities’ debt management strategy aims to meet gross financing needs while ensuring debt sustainability, based on a balanced mix of external and domestic financing instruments. Consistent with the authorities’ medium-term debt management strategy, Côte d’Ivoire’s financing needs are expected to be met by relying on a mix of sources in domestic and foreign currencies in 2022. The authorities communicated their aim to borrow externally in line with their medium-term debt strategy. The level of external commercial borrowing is set close to projected external commercial debt service. Multilateral and bilateral financing is projected to gradually decline from 2 percent of GDP in 2022 to 1.5 percent in 2042. Those numbers account for the most recent IDA disbursement projections, whose share of total multilateral financing is projected to increase in the short run from 70 percent in 2022 to 79 percent in 2026, before declining to 23 percent in 2042. In the short term, the government is expected to rely on both concessional and non-concessional borrowing to meet its financing needs. The authorities also intend to balance the recourse to the international and regional markets given the potential crowding-out effect at the regional level. Domestic financing is assumed to rely on issuances of CFAF securities with the following maturities: less than one-year (12 percent of issuances), one to three years (8 percent), three to seven years (46 percent) and more than seven years (34 percent).5 The regional and eurobonds’ interest rates are projected to average 5.4 and 5.5 percent respectively over the projections’ period, which are above historical paths. The authorities are continuing to strengthen processes related to debt management, with World Bank support.

Text Table 4.

Côte d’Ivoire: Changes in Economic Assumptions

article image
Sources: Ivorian authorities, World Bank, and IMF staff estimates and projections.

11. The macroeconomic framework is broadly plausible (Figure 4). The projected medium-term debt-creating flows are below those observed in the past five years which were driven by a sizable residual. The 1.2 percent of GDP residual calculated for 2021 mostly reflects a different recording of project loan disbursements in the fiscal accounts and the debt statistics, as well as the non-integration in the fiscal accounts of the flows associated with new debt contracted by the government and on-lent to SOEs, which is included in public debt.

Text Figure 4.
Text Figure 4.

Côte d’Ivoire: Implied Interest Rates

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Ivorian authorities, World Bank, and IMF staff calculations.

Country Classification and Determination of Scenario Stress Tests

12. Côte d’Ivoire is assessed to have medium debt-carrying capacity. Based on the April 2022 WEO macroeconomic framework and the World Bank’s 2020 CPIA index, Côte d’Ivoire’s composite indicator is 2.96 (above the lower cut-off of 2.69 but below the strong capacity cut-off value of 3.05) confirming the medium debt carrying capacity assessment used in previous DSA.6 The relevant thresholds are used to assess debt risk rating.

Text Table 5.

Côte d’Ivoire: CI Score

article image

13. Given Côte d’Ivoire’s reliance on global capital markets, a tailored test for international market financing was conducted. Côte d’Ivoire issued sizeable eurobonds both in 2020 and early 2021 (for about US$1.2 billion and US$1 billion, respectively) and used about half of the 2020 issuance to buy back bonds with shorter maturities and reduce the currency risk. Its debt management strategy aims at leveraging global capital markets to finance part of the country’s gross financing needs over the next five years. A tailored test for market financing assumes a temporary increase in the cost of new commercial external borrowing by 400 basis points combined with a nominal depreciation of 15 percent of the CFAF vis-à-vis the US$ and a shortening of maturities and of grace periods.7

14. A contingent liability tailored shock was conducted to capture potential fiscal risks arising from SOEs, PPPs, and the financial market. This tailored stress test includes the standardized 2 percent of GDP for risks related to SOEs, a 2.3 percent of GDP shock to accommodate potential fiscal risks on 35 percent of the PPP capital stock, and a financial sector shock of 5 percent of GDP.

15. Standard stress tests on real GDP growth, primary balance, exports, current transfers, foreign exchange (FX) depreciation, and a tailored test on commodity prices have also been applied. The first four shocks set each of the above variables to the lower of its historical average minus one standard deviation, or its baseline projection minus one standard deviation. The FX depreciation considers a nominal depreciation of 30 percent of the CFAF vis-à-vis the US$ in the first year of the projection. The commodity price shock captures the impact of a sudden one standard deviation decline in commodity prices.

External Debt Sustainability Analysis

16. The country remains at moderate risk of debt distress despite remaining very close to the threshold of debt service to revenue ratio. The debt service-to-revenue ratio remains below the 18 percent threshold during the projection period. It peaks at 17.9 percent in 2024 before decreasing to 14.3 percent in 2027. On the one hand, the deterioration of the ratio came mainly from the exchange rate depreciation and to a lesser extent from the BOAD reclassification from domestic to external creditor. On the other hand, an offsetting factor arose from the positive effect of inflation on revenues as well as an upward revision of revenue projections.

Text Table 6.

Explanation of Deterioration of Debt Service to Revenue Ratio

(2022 AIV vs 2021 AIV)

article image
Sources: Ivorian authorities, World Bank, and IMF staff estimates and projections.

assumptions of debt service repayment and new borrowing.

17. All PPG debt indicators are below their corresponding thresholds for the next ten years in the baseline scenario. The PV of external debt-to-GDP is expected to decrease from 28.3 percent in 2022 to 21.3 percent in 2032 (Table 1 and Figure 1), well below the relevant threshold of 40.8 The PV of external debt to exports peaks at 127.1 percent at the beginning of the projection period before decreasing and the debt service-to-exports ratio is expected to reach 11.9 percent in 2032, with thresholds respectively at 180 and 15 percent. After the 2024–25 spike, the debt-service-to-revenue ratio is expected to remain below the threshold throughout the following years. The trajectory of the debt-service-to-revenue ratio underscores the criticality of improving domestic revenue mobilization to provide the authorities with a sustainable source of funding for their important development needs and to provide buffers on debt service.

18. Exports and market financing shocks would have a significant negative impact on Côte d’Ivoire’s external debt sustainability. An export shock would cause the PV of external debt-to-export ratio and debt service-to-export ratio to breach the threshold from 2024 onward, while most shocks would cause the debt-service-to-revenue indicator to breach the threshold starting in 2024. Exports of cocoa products represent more than one third of total exports, which makes Côte d’Ivoire particularly sensitive to its price fluctuation. This highlights the importance of accelerating policies aiming at diversification, in order to strengthen the resilience of the Ivoirian economy to shocks. The market financing risk analysis suggests that the EMBI spread has increased to 365 bpm from 350 bpm in the last staff report. While GFN and EMBI spread remain below the benchmarks, the debt service-to-revenue indicator would breach the threshold for prolonged periods should market financing risk materialize (Figure 6). These results underscore downside risks for debt sustainability from potential exports shocks or rollover risks that could result from a deterioration in global risk sentiment or from a shortening of maturities of new external commercial borrowing.

Public Debt Sustainability Analysis

19. Under the baseline scenario, the PV of public debt-to-GDP ratio is below its threshold of 55 percent (Figure 4). The PV of public debt-to-GDP is expected to slightly decline over the projection period, to around 45 percent by 2032. Meanwhile, the PV of debt-to-revenue and grants ratio would decline marginally from around 339 percent in 2022 to 285 percent in 2032. Finally, the debt service-to-revenue and grants ratio is projected to soar to 57.5 percent in 2024 and remain above 54 percent for the projection period (from 34 percent in 2021). This again underscores the importance of strengthening domestic revenue mobilization.

20. Stress tests highlight that Côte d’Ivoire’s most extreme public debt vulnerability would emerge from a shock to commodity prices (Figure 2 and Table 4). Under the standard commodity price stress test, the PV of public debt-to-GDP would breach its corresponding threshold of 55 percent starting in 2025 and would continue growing afterwards. This shock would lead to an explosive pattern of the three debt and debt service indicators, which could be exacerbated if commodity prices were to increase even further. A contingent liability shock would trigger a temporary breach of the PV of debt-to-GDP threshold for five years.

Risk Rating and Vulnerabilities

21. The new debt sustainability analysis indicates that Côte d’Ivoire remains at moderate risk of external debt distress as in the July 2021 DSA and with limited capacity to absorb shocks. The debt service-to-revenue ratio remains still below but very close to its corresponding threshold under the baseline scenario, and the other debt indicators stay below their thresholds. Standard stress tests show that the PV of external debt-to-exports ratio, debt service-to-export ratio, and debt service-to-revenue ratio would cross the threshold in the most extreme shock scenarios. The granularity analysis confirms limited space to absorb shocks with the external debt-service-to-revenue ratio breaching and then remaining below but very close to the threshold during the projection period (Figure 5). This reinforces the urgency to intensify revenue mobilization and diversify the export base through structural transformation over the medium term. It is also crucial to have a prudent external borrowing strategy aimed at balancing the costs and risks of new loans to preserve Côte d’Ivoire’s borrowing space and medium-term debt sustainability. The authorities will have to evaluate the desirability and timing of tapping the external market, as the EMBI spread deteriorated since the 2021 DSA as well as limiting the issuance amount. They are also looking at alternative sources of external borrowings such as IFIs guaranteed commercial loans.

22. This DSA also indicates that the overall risk of debt distress remains moderate, but stress tests highlight high vulnerabilities of external and total debt to shocks. While the overall debt sustainability risk remains moderate, the PV of public debt-to-GDP breaches its threshold of 55 percent starting in 2025 under the most extreme shock (commodity price) arising from the standard stress tests. Three out of four external debt indicators would breach their threshold under the most extreme shocks (exports and market financing). Risks have been exacerbated by the COVID environment and now the war in Ukraine, as the global growth recovery, and hence that of Ivorian exports, could prove weaker than currently projected.

23. The authorities need to build resilience against shocks to debt sustainability. The DSA results highlight the need to carefully monitor debt indicators, conduct prudent GDP growth projections, create fiscal space, implement judicious policies to preserve macroeconomic stability and have full oversight of SOE debt contracting. Within this context, the authorities should work toward fully integrating SOE debt in their debt sustainability assessment. To create fiscal space, the authorities also critically need to accelerate efforts to mobilize domestic revenue while remaining committed to containing medium-term public expenditure. A careful debt management, including balancing domestic and external debt equilibrium, will be crucial to preserve debt sustainability.

Authorities’ Views

24. The authorities agreed that Côte d’Ivoire remains at moderate risk of debt distress. The authorities are strongly committed to keeping the country at moderate risk of debt distress. They are aware that the external debt service to revenue ratio is extremely close to the threshold. To that extent, they are monitoring closely the concessionality of new contracts and the pace of disbursement to remain in the same debt distress category. They expressed discontent regarding what they saw as a sudden reclassification of the BOAD debt (issued in CFAF) from domestic to external debt which could affect the capacity to borrow externally. They noted that this reclassification will be addressed by a forthcoming Council of Ministers of the WAEMU. Given the increasing costs of borrowing in the markets, they are looking for alternative sources of financing, including increasing fiscal revenue mobilization, to keep their debt sustainable.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Côte d’Ivoire: Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt Under

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in or before 2032. The stress test with a one-off breach is also presented (if any), while the one-off breach is deemed away for mechanical signals. When a stress test with a one-off breach happens to be the most exterme shock even after disregarding the one-off breach, only that stress test (with a one-off breach) would be presented.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Côte d’Ivoire: Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternative Scenarios, 2022–32

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in or before 2032. The stress test with a one-off breach is also presented (if any), while the one-off breach is deemed away for mechanical signals. When a stress test with a one-off breach happens to be the most exterme shock even after disregarding the one-off breach, only that stress test (with a one-off breach) would be presented.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Côte d’Ivoire: Drivers of Debt Dynamics – Baseline Scenario

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

1/ Difference between anticipated and actual contributions on debt ratios.2/ Distribution across LICs for which LIC DSAs were produced.3/ Given the relatively low private external debt for average low -income countries, a ppt change in PPG external debt should be largely explained by the drivers of the external debt dynamics equation.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Côte d’Ivoire: Realism Tools

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Côte d’Ivoire: Qualification of the Moderate Category, 2021–311/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ For the PV debt/GDP and PV debt/exports thresholds, x is 20 percent and y is 40 percent. For debt service/Exports and debt service/revenue thresholds, x is 12 percent and y is 35 percent.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Côte d’Ivoire: Market-Financing Risk Indicators

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2022, 205; 10.5089/9798400213892.002.A003

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.
Table 1.

Côte d’Ivoire: External Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2019–42

(Percent of GDP; unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ Includes both public and private sector external debt. 2/ Derived as [r – g – ρ(1+g)]/(1+g+ρ+gρ) times previous period debt ratio, with r = nominal interest rate; g = real GDP growth rate, and ρ = growth rate of GDP deflator in U.S. dollar terms. 3/ Includes exceptional financing (i.e., changes in arrears and debt relief); changes in gross foreign assets; and valuation adjustments. For projections also includes contribution from price and exchange rate changes. 4/ Current-year interest payments divided by previous period debt stock. 5/ Defined as grants, concessional loans, and debt relief. 6/ Grant-equivalent financing includes grants provided directly to the government and through new borrowing (difference between the face value and the PV of new debt). 7/ Assumes that PV of private sector debt is equivalent to its face value. 8/ Historical averages are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability, whereas projections averages are over the first year of projection and the next 10 years.
Table 2.

Côte d’Ivoire: Public Sector Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2019–42

(Percent of GDP; unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ Coverage of debt: The central government, central bank, government-guaranteed debt. Definition of external debt is Curr ency-based. 2/ The underlying PV of external debt-to-GDP ratio under the public DSA differs from the external DSA with the size of differences depending on exchange rates projections. 3/ Debt service is defined as the sum of interest and amortization of medium and long-term, and short-term debt. 4/ Gross financing need is defined as the primary deficit plus debt service plus the stock of short-term debt at the end of the last period and other debt creating/reducing flows. 5/ Defined as a primary deficit minus a change in the public debt-to-GDP ratio ((-): a primary surplus), which would stabilizes the debt ratio only in the year in question. 6/ Historical averages are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability, whereas projections averages are over the first year of projection and the next 10 years.
Table 3.

Côte d’Ivoire: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt, 2022–32

(Percent)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.

A bold value indicates a breach of the threshold.

Variables include real GDP growth, GDP deflator (in U.S. dollar terms), non-interest current account in percent of GDP, and non-debt creating flows.

Includes official and private transfers and FDI.

Table 4.

Côte d’Ivoire: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public Debt, 2022–32

(Percent)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.

A bold value indicates a breach of the benchmark.

Variables include real GDP growth, GDP deflator and primary deficit in percent of GDP.

Includes official and private transfers and FDI.

1

Under the revised Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries, Côte d’Ivoire’s Composite Indicator (CI) is 2.96 based on the April 2022 WEO and the 2020 CPIA, corresponding to a medium debt carrying capacity.

2

The debt owed to the West-African Development Bank (BOAD) was reclassified from domestic to external debt to harmonize the treatment of BOAD debt in the WAEMU region. The CFAF issuance in the regional market is still classified as domestic due to lack of data. This DSA continues to exclude external private debt from external debt due to limited information on the outstanding stock of external private debt and related payments. The SDR use is recorded as domestic debt due to the lending arrangement between the government and the BECAO.

3

Non-guaranteed SOE debt is not included in the baseline because of limited information.

4

In this DSA, Public and Publicly Guaranteed external debt excludes claims under Debt Reduction-Development Contract (C2D), which were cancelled in the context of HIPC debt relief. The C2D is a debt restructuring tool under which Côte d’Ivoire continues to service its bilateral debts to France and Spain until repayment. The amount corresponding to this bilateral debt service is transferred back to the country as grants to finance poverty reduction programs. Flows associated with the C2D process are included by IMF staff in the external and fiscal accounts to capture gross cash flows (debt service and grants). See IMF Country Report no14/358 and Supp.1, 11/21/2014 for a detailed discussion.

5

The projected increase in domestic financing would require significant purchases of Ivoirian securities by WAEMU residents, with potential crowding out of smaller borrowers. Though the share of Côte d’Ivoire in the regional market would only increase slightly from 36 in 2021 to 38 percent in 2026. If those purchases were not to happen, external commercial financing would have to increase to fill the gap. Domestic borrowing assumptions hinge on Côte d’Ivoire’s capacity to increase by 35 percent the volume of domestic issuances with the next 4 years (from around FCFA billion 2,600 projected in 2022 to 3,500 in 2026) at the current yields.

6

The other variables from the macroeconomic framework consist of five variables: real GDP growth, remittances, import coverage of reserves, the square of import coverage of reserves, and world economic growth. The composite indicator uses ten years of data (5 years of history and 5 years of projections) to smooth out economic cycles.

7

The share of USD denominated debt is estimated to be decreasing over time. The considered shortening of maturities of commercial external borrowing are as follows: if the original maturity is greater than 5 years, the new maturity is set to 5 years; if the original maturity is less than 5 years, the new maturity is shortened by 2/3.

8

The November 2020 liability management operation, which involved the buy-back of USD 486 million dollar-denominated bonds maturing in 2028 and 2032 and EUR 85 million euro-denominated bonds maturing in 2025, led to a small improvement in liquidity indicators.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Côte d’Ivoire: 2022 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; and Staff Report
Author:
International Monetary Fund. African Dept.
  • View in gallery
    Text Figure 1.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Evolution of Public Debt

    (Percentage of GDP)

  • View in gallery
    Text Figure 2.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Composition of Domestic Debt

  • View in gallery
    Text Figure 3.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Composition of External Debt

  • View in gallery
    Text Figure 4.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Implied Interest Rates

  • View in gallery
    Figure 1.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt Under

  • View in gallery
    Figure 2.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternative Scenarios, 2022–32

  • View in gallery
    Figure 3.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Drivers of Debt Dynamics – Baseline Scenario

  • View in gallery
    Figure 4.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Realism Tools

  • View in gallery
    Figure 5.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Qualification of the Moderate Category, 2021–311/

  • View in gallery
    Figure 6.

    Côte d’Ivoire: Market-Financing Risk Indicators