Benin: Requests for Disbursement under the Rapid Credit Facility and Purchase under the Rapid Financing Instrument—Debt Sustainability Analysis
Author:
International Monetary Fund. African Dept.
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund. African Dept. in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Requests for Disbursement Under the Rapid Credit Facility and Purchase Under the Rapid Financing Instrument-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Benin

Abstract

Requests for Disbursement Under the Rapid Credit Facility and Purchase Under the Rapid Financing Instrument-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Benin

Benin remains at moderate risk of external and overall debt distress. The rating is unchanged from the previous May 2020 Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA), but risks to debt sustainability have increased. All the projected external debt burden indicators but one are below their thresholds under the baseline.1 The debt service-to-revenue ratio temporarily exceeds its threshold under the baseline (in 2024 and 2025). The breach is short-lived and small, but would also mechanically signal a high risk of debt distress. Nevertheless, given the breaches of the other thresholds (PV of debt-to-exports and debt service-to-exports) under the extreme shock scenarios and Benin’s fiscal path, staff assess the risk of external debt distress to remain at moderate. Benin’s spread is no longer above the market financing module’s benchmark. The issuance of the COVID-19 T-Bill has increased rollover risk. Policy slippages and vulnerabilities due to the COVID-19 and the Nigeria border closure shocks are downside risks to the baseline. Public and publicly guaranteed (PPG) debt (external plus domestic) remains at moderate risk of distress. Nonetheless, the PV of public debt-to-GDP ratio remains below its prudent benchmark in both the baseline and shock scenarios.

Public Debt Coverage

1. In the Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA) of Benin, public debt covers both the debt of the central government as well as the guarantees provided by the central government (Text Table 1).2 The DSA classifies external and domestic debt based on the currency criterion, given data constraints that prevent the use of the residency criterion. Debt to the IMF owed by the Central Bank is included in external debt3

Text Table 1.

Benin: Public Sector Coverage

article image

2. The authorities completed an audit of the stock of unpaid claims held by the private sector on the government in January 2019. They identified a stock of arrears to suppliers of 0.2 percent GDP, incurred before 2016. This amount of arrears was added to the 2019 debt stock. The current fiscal projections also assume a gradual clearance of the arrears over 2020–22 at a pace of 0.1 percent of GDP per year.

3. The guaranteed debt of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) is included in the baseline analysis. Because SOEs can entail contingent liabilities for the government and create fiscal risks, it is important to have an exhaustive overview of their financial situation.4 The authorities have made progress in the area of monitoring in past years, by collecting financial information on SOEs. In early 2019, they produced an estimate of 0.6 percent of GDP for the non-guaranteed commercial debt of 13 state-owned companies at end-2018.5 For end-2019, SOE non-guaranteed commercial debt is estimated at 0.5 percent of GDP. To address contingent liability risks, the authorities adopted a new law on SOEs in July 2020, which was promulgated on September 2, 2020.6 The new law aimed at improving SOE’s governance and indirectly economic and financial performance. In the context of the current DSA, the following approach is taken:

  • All guaranteed SOE debt is included in the debt stock in the baseline.

  • Non-guaranteed SOE debt is captured as contingent liability shock (Text Table 2). This shock is set at 0.5 percent of GDP (to reflect the information collected on SOE debt).

  • Further work is needed to properly and fully incorporate SOEs in the DSA baseline, including consolidating the general government fiscal accounts with the financial statements of the SOEs (both on the revenue and expenditure sides).7 The authorities see this consolidation as a prerequisite before incorporating SOE debt into total debt (in the baseline) and are working with AFRITAC WEST to establish a work program.

Text Table 2.

Benin: Magnitude of the Contingent Liability Tailored Stress Test

article image

The default shock of 2% of GDP will be triggered for countries whose government-guaranteed debt is not fully captured under the country’s public debt definition (1.). If it is already included in the government debt (1.) and risks associated with SoE’s debt not guaranteed by the government is assessed to be negligible, a country team may reduce this to 0%.

Background on Debt

4. Benin’s public debt has increased rapidly since 2014. Total public debt (external plus domestic) increased from 22.3 percent in 2014 to 30.9 percent in 2015 and, at a slower pace subsequently, to 41.2 percent in 2019 (Text Figure 1).8 The increase was primarily due to higher domestic debt, which tripled over three years, growing from 7.8 percent of GDP in 2014 to 23.7 percent of GDP in 2017. This rise was partly driven by the scaling-up of public investment. Over 2015–17, the authorities have increasingly relied on the domestic and regional financial market to finance public investment projects at non-concessional terms.

Text Figure 1.
Text Figure 1.

Benin: Total Public Debt, 2010–19

(Percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2021, 014; 10.5089/9781513566856.002.A002

5. The increase in Benin’s public debt has accelerated during the first three quarters of 2020 in response to the COVID-19 shock and the border closure with Nigeria. Total public debt increased from 41.2 percent of GDP at end-2019 to 48.7 percent of GDP at end-September 2020 (Text Table 3). Customs revenue dropped significantly in 2020 due to the border closure with Nigeria, lower trade due to the impact of the pandemic, and tax measures to support the economy. At the same time, public expenditure increased to accommodate the health response to COVID-19 and spending measures to support vulnerable households and businesses. Consequently, the fiscal deficit (commitment basis, including grants) has increased compared to pre-COVID-19 target at end-December 2020 (1.8 percent of GDP) and the sixth review under the ECF-support arrangement (3.5 percent of GDP). It is estimated at 4.1 percent of GDP at end-September 2020.

Text Table 3.

Benin: Evolution of public outstanding debt, March 2018 to September 2020

(CFAF billion, unless otherwise specified)

article image
Source: Beninese authorities; IMF staff calculations.

6. The debt service burden is relatively high in Benin. The external debt service to revenue ratio stood at 6.9 percent in 2019 but is expected to steeply increase to nearly 20 percent in 2024 (because of the amortization of the Eurobond), before declining to around 7 percent in the long-term. The ratio of debt service-to-revenue stood at 49.9 percent in 2019 and is expected to increase to around 74 percent on average in the medium term, before declining to around 46 percent on average in the long term (2030–40).

7. Conditions on the regional and sovereign security markets have remained broadly favorable as the BCEAO took preemptive measures to limit the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Broad money growth had remained buoyant in 2019 on the back of a pickup of net foreign assets while credit to the private sector outpaced nominal GDP. The weighted average auction rate on the money market remained at the top of the BCEAO’s monetary policy corridor (4.5 percent) in the first quarter of 2019 before hovering around 3 percent during the rest of the year, in part due to a small increase in liquidity supply by the BCEAO. Meanwhile access on the regional sovereign security market remained good with some lowering of yields and lengthening of the average maturity in 2019. These broadly favorable liquidity conditions have persisted year-to-date as the BCEAO took preemptive steps to better satisfy banks’ demand for liquidity and mitigate the negative impact of the pandemic on economic activity. In late March, the BCEAO further raised the amount of liquidity auctioned to banks before adopting a fixed-rate full-allotment strategy thereby allowing banks to satisfy their liquidity needs fully at the minimum policy rate of 2.5 percent, that is about 25 basis points lower than hitherto.

8. Benin issued a 3-month COVID-19 T-Bill amounting to CFAF 133 billion (1.5 percent of GDP) in May 2020. In April 2020, the BCEAO launched a special 3-month refinancing window at a fixed rate of 2.5 percent for limited amounts of 3-month “COVID-19 T-Bills” to be issued by each WAEMU sovereign to help meet immediate funding needs related to the current pandemic without creating undue pressures on the regional market. Benin was able to roll over its original COVID-19 T-Bills issuance in July 2020 through a new 3-months COVID-19 T-Bills that banks may refinance with the BCEAO for their term to maturity at 2 percent, and then in November 2020 through a one-month COVID-19 T-Bills. (Text Table 4).

Text Table 4.

Benin: COVID-19 T-Bill Issuances, 2020

article image
Source: UMOA-Titres

Structure of Debt

9. The 2019 Eurobond, combined with the 2018 debt reprofiling, has tilted the composition of the public debt towards external debt. In 2016 and 2017, Benin’s domestic debt accounted for more than half of total debt (about 60 percent of total debt at end-2017). The October 2018 debt reprofiling operation, which issued cheaper and long-term external debt to buy back more expensive and shorter maturity domestic debt, started to rebalance the composition of the debt stock.9 In addition, Benin issued its first Eurobond in March 2019. The Eurobond amounted to EUR 500 million (equivalent to 3.9 percent of 2019 GDP). The issuance was done at favorable terms. As of end-December 2019, external debt represented 58.1 percent of the total debt.

10. Benin’s external public debt is essentially owed to multilateral and commercial creditors. As of end-2019, Benin’s external debt owed to multilateral creditors represented around 57 percent of total external debt against about 31 percent and 12 percent held by commercial and bilateral creditors respectively. However, the share of the multilateral debt decreased after the issuance of the Eurobond (which is commercial debt) in March 2019. The share of concessional loans represented 54 percent of total external debt at end-2019. Total external debt amounted to CFAF 2,021 billion (about US$ 3.4 billion) and CFAF 2,293 billion (about US$ 4 billion) at end-2019 and end-September 2020 respectively (Text Table 5).

Text Table 5.

Benin: Structure of External Debt at end-2019 and end-September 2020

(CFAF billion)

article image
Source: Beninese authorities; IMF staff calculation.

11. Domestic public debt is dominated by government securities issued on the regional bond market. Benin’s domestic public debt has increased significantly between 2014 and 2017, driven mainly by the increasing reliance on the regional bond markets. About 82 percent of domestic liabilities consisted of government securities issued on the regional financial market at end-2019. Such debt is non-concessional and is associated with roll-over and interest rate risks. Total domestic debt amounted to CFAF 1,455.9 billion as of end-2019 (Text Table 6).

Text Table 6.

Benin: Structure of Domestic debt at end-2019 and end-September 2020

(CFAF billion)

article image
Source: Beninese authorities; IMF staff calculation.

12. The structure of Benin’s debt portfolio has not fundamentally changed at end-September 2020. The share of external debt to total debt stood at 53.4 percent at end-September 2020 compared to 55.6 percent at end-September 2019. The issuance of the 3-month COVID-19 T-Bill (CFAF 133 billion) has shortened the average maturity of Benin’s domestic debt portfolio, thus increasing rollover risk.

Background on Macroeconomic Forecasts

13. Macroeconomic assumptions have been updated compared to the May 2020 DSA (Text Table 7).

  • Benin’s GDP growth was revised from 3.2 to 2 percent as a result of the slowdown of the economic activity due to COVID-19, and, to a lesser extent, the prolonged border closure with Nigeria. Medium-term prospects are favorable, driven by the growth in agricultural and cotton exports, improvement in business climate, and development of new sectors such as tourism and digital economy.

  • The primary fiscal balance10 was revised down from -1.6 percent of GDP to -3 percent of GDP in 2020 because of the extended border closure and the COVID-19 pandemic on revenue collection as well as an increase in public expenditure to support the health sector and affected households and businesses. However, the fiscal position will gradually improve after the shock, with the primary balance estimated at around 0.2 percent of GDP in 2025.

  • The non-interest current account deficit is expected to stabilize in the medium to long term, thanks to the implementation of the fiscal consolidation plan and structural reforms to boost competitiveness. Higher exports would result from larger cotton production. Imports should also remain contained due to the scaling-down of public investment and the increase in agricultural production, which should reduce food imports.

  • The grant assistance for debt relief under the Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCRT) has been reflected in the DSA.11 The eligible debt service for relief from the CCRT amounts to SDR 13.8 million (about CFAF 11 billion), covering the period between April 14, 2020 and April 13, 2021. The CCRT debt relief is reflected under exceptional financing in Table 1 and under debt relief (HIPC and other) in Table 2.

  • To date, the authorities declined to participate in the Debt Service Suspension Initiative (DSSI). Debt service relief covered by the DSSI amounts to US$ 16.1 million (0.1 percent of GDP) for the period end-April to end-December 2020 and to US$ 15 million (0.1 percent of GDP) for the eligible period of 2021.12

  • World Bank financial support to the COVID-19 crisis has also been reflected in the DSA. On April 27, 2020 the World Bank Board adopted the Benin COVID-19 Preparedness and Response project of US$ 10.4 million under the Fast-Track COVID-19 Facility. The Bank also approved a Supplemental Financing DPO (US$50 million) to support the health sector on June 26, 2020.

Text Table 7.

Benin: Macroeconomic Projections

article image
Sources: Beninese authorities; IMF staff calculations and projections.
Table 1.

Benin: External Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2017–40

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ Includes both public and private sector external debt. 2/ Derived as [r- g – p(1 + g)]/(1 +g+p+gp) times previous period debt ratio, with r = nominal interest rate; g = real GDP growth rate, and p = growth rate of GDP deflator in U.S. dollar terms. 3/ Includes exceptional financing (i.e., changes in arrears and debt relief); changes in gross foreign assets; and valuation adjustments. For projections also includes contribution from price and exchange rate changes. 4/ Current-year interest payments divided by previous period debt stock 5/ Defined as grants, concessional loans, and debt relief. 6/ Grant-equivalent financing includes grants provided directly to the government and through new borrowing (difference between the face value and the PV of new debt). 7/ Assumes that PV of private sector debt is equivalent to its face value. 8/ Historical averages are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability, whereas projections averages are over the first year of projection and the next 10 years.
Table 2.

Benin: Public Sector Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2017–40

(in percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections. 1/ Coverage of debt: The central government, central bank, government-guaranteed debt. Definition of external debt is Currency-based. 2/ The underlying PV of external debt-to-GDP ratio under the public DSA differs from the external DSAwith the size of differences depending on exchange rates projections. 3/ Debt service is defined as the sum of interest and amortization of medium and long-term, and short-term debt. 4/ Gross financing need is defined as the primary deficit plus debt service plus the stock of short-term debt at the end of the last period and other debt creating/reducing flows. 5/ Defined as a primary deficit minus a change in the public debt-to-GDP ratio ((-):a primary surplus), which would stabilizes the debt ratio only in the year in question. 6/ Historical averages are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability, whereas projections averages are over the first year of projection and the next 10 years.

14. The perimeter of exports has been expanded in the context of this DSA.13 As a result of statistical improvements carried out by the BCEAO, including a new survey on cross-border trade activities in 2019, the measurement of informal trade has been enhanced. As a result, informal exports are now included in the perimeter of exports in the DSA and the Balance of Payments. This is consistent with the recently published Balance of Payments data.14

15. Risks to the baseline are tilted to the downside. A deeper and more severe COVID-19 shock, an extended closure of the border with Nigeria, unresolved banking sector problems, and a possible contagion of security risks could all worsen Benin’s fiscal position. Other risks include extra spending pressures and lower revenue collection related to the political cycle. On growth, achieving the expected performance will require that the authorities rigorously implement measures that intent to increase the agricultural production capacity and structural reforms that aim at improving business environment and governance.

16. The fiscal policy path is assessed to be realistic (Figure 4). The fiscal path is in the middle of the historical distribution. The change with respect to the previous DSA is due to the fact that the fiscal deficit is revised upwards to accommodate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

17. The growth projection for 2020 is below the path predicted by the growth and fiscal adjustment tool (Figure 4). The deviation between baseline projections and the growth path with LIC’s typical multiplier of 0.4 is explained by the negative effect of the COVID-19 on the economic activity. However, GDP growth is expected to rebound in 2021.

18. The contribution of public investment to real GDP growth is also realistic. The current projection of the contribution of public investment to growth is in par with the previous DSA’s projections.

Country Classification and Determination of Scenario Stress Tests

19. Benin’s debt carrying capacity remains medium. The values of the components of the Composite Indicator (CI) score are based on the October 2020 WEO (Text Table 9). Thus, the thresholds to assess debt sustainability have remained unchanged compared to the previous DSA. The main contributors to the score are the CPIA value, which measures the quality of institutions and policies, as well as the import coverage of reserves.

Text Table 8.

Benin: Standardized Stress Tests

article image
Text Table 9.

Benin: Debt Carrying Capacity and Thresholds

article image

20. Stress tests follow standardized settings, with the addition of a market financing shock. The standardized stress tests apply the default settings (Text Table 8). The market financing shock is the only tailored stress test that applies to Benin due to the existence of an outstanding Eurobond. The test assumes a temporary increase in the cost of new commercial external borrowing by 400 basis points combined with a nominal depreciation of 15 percent of the CFAF vis-à-vis the US$ and a shortening of maturities and of grace periods.15

External Debt Sustainability Results

21. All the external debt burden indicators but one remain below the policy-dependent thresholds in the baseline scenario. A temporary small breach (two years) is observed in the case of the debt service-to-revenue ratio in 2024 and 2025. This is mainly explained by the repayment of the Eurobond in 2024 onwards. The PV of total PPG external debt is expected to stabilize at about 18.9 percent of GDP on average over 2021–25, reaching 5.3 percent of GDP in 2039. It would remain below the corresponding threshold of 40 percent of GDP throughout the projection period.

22. The ratio of debt service-to-revenue, debt service-to-exports, and PV of debt-to-exports exceed their threshold in the case of a shock (Text table 8), implying a moderate risk of external debt distress. The PV of debt-to-export ratio breaches its threshold in 2022–27 in case of shock on exports. This reflects the recent shock to exports due to the border closure with Nigeria and trade disruptions cause by the pandemic. Similarly, the debt service-to-export ratio breaches its threshold in 2024 onward in case of a shock to exports or a combination of shocks. The debt service-to-revenue ratio breaches its threshold in 2024–26 for all shocks. This is mainly explained by the repayment of the Eurobond in 2024–26 and lower revenue mobilization in 2019 and 2020. Finally, the PV of debt-to-GDP remains well below its threshold under the extreme shock scenarios. Breaches of the PV of debt-to-exports, debt service-to-exports, and debt service-to-revenue ratio under stress tests are the reasons behind the assessment of moderate risk for external debt.

23. The supplementary module, which allows qualifying the moderate category for the debt distress risk, indicates that Benin has very limited space to absorb shocks (Figure 5). To add granularity to the moderate risk rating, Benin is assessed as having “limited space” to absorb shocks in the current DSA because at least one baseline debt burden indicator is close enough to its respective threshold that occurrence of the median observed shock would result in a downgrade to high risk. There is a deterioration compared to the May 2020 DSA report, even though Benin was already assessed as having ‘’limited space’’ to absorb shocks.

Overall Risk of Public Debt Distress

24. Total PPG debt (external plus domestic) remains below its respective benchmark under the baseline and shock scenarios. The overall risk of debt distress remains moderate. Total debt does not show any breach in the baseline and shock scenarios.

25. Despite the absence of breaches, the moderate risk rating for PPG external debt motivates the moderate risk rating for total debt. Other factors of vulnerability include: the higher uncertainty surrounding the projections against the background of the COVID-19 pandemic; the fast increase in domestic debt in past years; the relatively high ratio of debt service to revenue; the increase in spreads; the possibility of contingent liabilities related to SOEs; revenue losses induced by the effect of the COVID-19 on the economic activity.

Market Module

26. The market-financing module shows a small and temporary breach of the policy-dependent thresholds (Figure 6). The external debt service-to-revenue ratio breaches the threshold under the baseline in 2024 and 2025. In the macroeconomic framework presented in the RCF/RFI request staff report, it is assumed that the 2019 Eurobond will be partially rolled over with commercial external borrowing. Benin’s EMBI spread (estimated at around 438 bps. as of November 23, 2020) no longer breaches the benchmark of 570 bps.16 Benin’s spread was nearly always above the market financing module’s benchmark between March 9, 2020 and November 1, 2020, which means that Benin remains vulnerable to liquidity pressures. Benin’s spread peaked on March 23, 2020 at around 944 bps.

Conclusion

27. The updated DSA finds that Benin stands at moderate risk of external and overall public debt distress, despite a small and temporary breach of a threshold in the baseline scenario. The ratings are unchanged relative to the May 2020 Staff Report. While the model mechanically signals a high risk to debt distress rating, staff assesses that it is appropriate to discount the breach because of its temporary (two years) and small nature and given Benin’s fiscal path. Moreover, Benin’s solid debt management capacity, including on asset and liability management operations, and public debt reporting, are significant mitigating factors. However, marginal breaches should be viewed as indicating risk. In this case, the breach highlights Benin’s low revenue collection path and emphasizes the need for the authorities to continue and accelerate the implementation of structural reforms in the area of tax policy and tax and customs administration. It is also important that the authorities prioritize external financing with longer maturities and on concessional terms to reduce the debt service burden. Medium-term fiscal consolidation and improved debt management are needed to maintain debt sustainability.

28. The macroeconomic and fiscal projections are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The DSA results could change given the rapidly evolving developments related to the COVID-19 shock. If the pandemic persists and spreads further, the 2020 and 2021 macroeconomic and budgetary performances may worsen further.

29. The authorities concur broadly with staff’s assessment. The authorities remain committed to strengthening debt sustainability by adhering to medium-term fiscal consolidation, conducting sound public investment management, and enhancing debt management capacity, including on the establishment of a framework to manage risks stemming from government guarantees.17

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Benin: Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt under Alternatives Scenarios, 2020–2030

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2021, 014; 10.5089/9781513566856.002.A002

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections1/ The most extreme stress test that yields the highest ratio in or before 2030. The stress test with a one-off breach is also presented (if any), while the one-off breach is deemed away for mechanical signals. When a stress test with a one-off breach happens to be the most extreme shock even after disregarding the on-off breach, only that stress test (with a one-off breach) would be presented.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Benin: Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternative Scenarios, 2020–2030

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2021, 014; 10.5089/9781513566856.002.A002

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in or before 2030. The stress test with a one-off breach is also presented (if any), while the one-off breach is deemed away for mechanical signals. When a stress test with a one-off breach happens to be the most exterme shock even after disregarding the one-off breach, only that stress test (with a one-off breach) would be presented.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Benin: Driver of Debt Dynamics – Baseline Scenario

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2021, 014; 10.5089/9781513566856.002.A002

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ Difference between anticipated and actual contributions on debt ratios.2/ Distribution across LICs for which LIC DSAs were produced.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Benin: Realism Tools

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2021, 014; 10.5089/9781513566856.002.A002

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.Note: the nominal private investment-to-GDP rate increase (relative to the previous DSA) is mainly due to a change in methodology for the projection of the private investment deflator.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Benin: Qualification of the Moderate Category, 2020–30 1/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2021, 014; 10.5089/9781513566856.002.A002

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ For the PV debt/GDP and PV debt/exports thresholds, x is 20 percent and y is 40 percent. For debt service/Exports and debt service/revenue thresholds, x is 12 percent and y is 35 percent.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Benin: Market-Financing Risk Indicators

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2021, 014; 10.5089/9781513566856.002.A002

Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.
Table 3.

Benin: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt, 2020–30

(Percent)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.

A bold value indicates a breach of the threshold.

Variables include real GDP growth, GDP deflator (in U.S. dollar terms), non-interest current account in percent of GDP, and non-debt creating flows.

Includes official and private transfers and FDI.

Table 4.

Benin: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public Debt, 2020–30

(Percent)

article image
Sources: Country authorities; and staff estimates and projections.

A bold value indicates a breach of the benchmark.

Variables include real GDP growth, GDP deflator and primary deficit in percent of GDP.

Includes official and private transfers and FDI.

1

The DSA follows the IMF and World Bank Staff Guidance Note on the Application of the Joint Fund-Bank Debt Sustainability Framework (DSF) for Low-Income Countries (LICs) (February 2018). Benin retains a medium-rated debt-carrying capacity, given the 2.9 Composite Indicator, which is based on the 2020 October WEO and the 2019 CPIA released in July 2020 (Text Table 9). Benin’s CPIA rating improved due to higher economic and public sector management ratings.

2

Government domestic arrears are also included, see below.

3

This refers to Benin’s share of IMF debt owed by Central Bank.

4

In the context of the Government Action Program, the authorities are contemplating several key projects of infrastructure, including some conducted through SOEs.

5

Guarantees on SOE debt provided by the central government are already included in public debt.

6

As part of the Sustainable Development Policy Framework of IDA19, the authorities have agreed to publish the commercial debt outstanding of SOEs annually, and no later than by June 30 of the following year.

7

While the stock of non-guaranteed debt has been estimated at 0.5 percent of GDP at end-2019, further work is necessary to fully capture the terms.

8

In this paper, debt stocks are measured at the end of the year. For instance, 2019 debt refers to the debt stock at the end of 2019.

9

The World Bank’s Policy-Based Guarantee (PBG) used US$ 45 million of IDA funds to secure commercial loans for EUR 387 million at favorable terms (about 4 percent and a maturity of about 12 years), of which EUR 260 million were used to replace short-term domestic debt.

10

Including grants.

11

See IMF Policy Paper No. 20/022 and IMF Policy Paper No. 20/045.

12

The eligible period is defined as January 1, 2021 to end-June 2021.

13

The change of perimeter was implemented in the previous DSA (May 2020), but not in the DSA of the fifth review under the ECF-supported arrangement (December 2019).

14

« Balance des Paiements et Position Extérieure Globale », December 2019.

15

The considered shortening of maturities of commercial external borrowing are as follows; (i) if the original maturity is greater than 5 years, the new maturity is set to 5 years; (ii) if the original maturity is less than 5 years, the new maturity is shortened by 0.7 years.

16

Benin’s spread was nearly always above the market financing module’s benchmark between March 9, 2020 and November 1, 2020. Its peak was reached on March 23, 2020 (944 bps.).

17

The World Bank is providing technical assistance on the establishment of a framework to manage risks stemming from government guarantees.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Benin: Requests for Disbursement Under the Rapid Credit Facility and Purchase Under the Rapid Financing Instrument-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Benin
Author:
International Monetary Fund. African Dept.
  • View in gallery
    Text Figure 1.

    Benin: Total Public Debt, 2010–19

    (Percent of GDP)

  • View in gallery
    Figure 1.

    Benin: Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt under Alternatives Scenarios, 2020–2030

  • View in gallery
    Figure 2.

    Benin: Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternative Scenarios, 2020–2030

  • View in gallery
    Figure 3.

    Benin: Driver of Debt Dynamics – Baseline Scenario

  • View in gallery
    Figure 4.

    Benin: Realism Tools

  • View in gallery
    Figure 5.

    Benin: Qualification of the Moderate Category, 2020–30 1/

  • View in gallery
    Figure 6.

    Benin: Market-Financing Risk Indicators