Morocco: Third Review under the Arrangement under the Precautionary and Liquidity Line (PLL)
Author: International Monetary Fund. Middle East and Central Asia Dept.
Publication Date:
12 Mar 2018
eISBN:
9781484344903
Language:
English
Keywords:
ISCR; CR; market activity; dirham fluctuation band; staff appraisal; market; staff assessment; current account; PLL arrangement; debt service; broad money; central bank; Global; Europe
Download PDF (679.6 KB)

Third Review Under the Arrangement Under the Precautionary and Liquidity Line (PLL)-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Morocco

Abstract

Third Review Under the Arrangement Under the Precautionary and Liquidity Line (PLL)-Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for Morocco

Recent Developments and Performance Under the Program

A. Recent Developments

1. The Executive Board approved a two-year precautionary and liquidity line (PLL) arrangement in July 2016 in the amount of SDR 2.5 billion (280 percent of quota), equivalent to US$3.6 billion. The arrangement supports the authorities’ program to rebuild fiscal and external buffers and promote higher and more inclusive growth. The second review of the arrangement was completed on August 1, 2017. During the 2017 Article IV consultation with Morocco, concluded on December 13, 2017, Executive Directors welcomed the authorities’ commitment to sound fiscal and monetary policies, and encouraged them to step up structural reform efforts, supported by measures to strengthen the social safety net.

2. The government appointed in April 2017 is committed to implement sound policies, and reforms have resumed. The government’s economic program is in line with that of the previous government, especially regarding policy priorities such as fiscal consolidation, exchange rate flexibility, tax reforms, civil service reform, governance, oversight of state owned enterprises, fiscal decentralization, and improvements to the business environment. Increased priority is also put on reducing inequality and increasing access to public services. Following a long pause after the October 2016 elections, reforms have resumed, and their strategic coordination is enhanced through a new commission placed directly under the authority of the Head of Government.

3. Social tensions increased in 2017. These tensions, mostly in the northern region of the Rif, are due to perceptions of corruption and demands for better access to health services, jobs, and greater public investment. In response, the government took steps to accelerate local social programs and investment projects. Also, in October 2017, several high-level officials were dismissed, in a signal that accountability in public service delivery will be enforced going forward. Protests have abated recently, but addressing the sources of social discontent is likely to take time.

4. Growth rebounded in 2017 and is estimated to have reached 4.4 percent, but unemployment remains high. After a sharp slowdown in 2016, growth picked up in 2017, mostly driven by a significant rebound in agriculture, while non-agricultural activity remained subdued. On the demand side, growth has been mainly supported by private consumption, while private investment is recovering gradually following a decline in recent years (from 35.4 to 27.4 percent of GDP between 2008 and 2016). Unemployment increased to 10.6 percent in the third quarter of 2017, from 10.4 percent in the same period last year, and remains high among the youth (29.3 percent), particularly in urban areas (45.2 percent).

5. Fiscal developments were positive in 2017. The fiscal deficit is estimated to have declined to 3.5 percent of GDP (against 4.1 percent in 2016), in line with the authorities’ objective. The end-September 2017 indicative target (IT) under the PLL arrangement was met (deficit of 2.1 percent of GDP against an indicative target of 2.5 percent), despite lower-than-expected grant revenues. This was primarily due to strong revenue performance and continued efforts to contain current spending, while capital spending decelerated. The cyclically-adjusted fiscal deficit is estimated to have declined to 1.8 percent of GDP in 2017 (against 2.2 percent in 2016). Public debt is sustainable and estimated at 64.4 percent of GDP at end 2017.1

6. The current policy mix of gradual fiscal consolidation and accommodative monetary policy is appropriate. Inflation declined further and is estimated at 0.6 percent in 2017, reflecting falling food prices, while core inflation was 1.2 percent (y-o-y). Since Bank-Al-Maghrib (BAM) reduced its policy rate to 2.25 percent in March 2016, lending rates have declined and credit growth has recovered to about 4.8 percent in November 2017 (y-o-y), driven by investment lending to public enterprises and household borrowing (mortgage and consumption). Real estate prices have declined gradually in recent years.

7. The current account improved moderately in 2017. The current account deficit is estimated to have declined to 3.8 percent of GDP (against 4.4 percent in 2016), better than expected at the time of the 2017 Article IV Consultation. The improvement was driven by strong export growth (7.2 percent) – mostly due to the good performance of food products and phosphate and derivative exports, and to the strong recovery in Europe. Imports are estimated to have increased by 5.6 percent, mainly because of higher raw material imports and higher energy prices. Tourism receipts and remittances remained strong, and net FDI flows increased moderately to 1.9 percent of GDP. The real effective exchange rate remained broadly stable in 2017.

8. The losses in international reserves incurred in May-June 2017 were in part recouped. Pressures in the foreign exchange market led to a decline in reserves of about US$ 3.8 billion, to US$ 21.6 billion at end-June, the lowest level in nearly two years. Market confidence was restored in early July, and at end-September, reserves were at US$ 23.4 billion, meeting the IT target. They are estimated to reach US$ 25.8 billion by end-2017, slightly higher than at end-2016, and equivalent to a comfortable six months of imports, or 93 percent of the Assessing Reserve Adequacy (ARA) metric (123 percent of the ARA adjusted for capital controls).2

9. Banks are adequately capitalized, but non-performing loans (NPL), credit concentration, and expansion in Africa remain significant risks. Banks’ regulatory capital ratio was at 13.7 percent at end-June 2017. NPL ratio remains relatively high at 7.7 percent (October 2017), but provisioning levels are comfortable (70 percent) and increasing. Risks from large credit exposures persist and increased slightly in 2017, despite strict regulatory limits. The continued expansion of Moroccan banks in Africa (most recently in Egypt) provides diversification and profit opportunities, but is also a channel of risk transmission.

uA01fig01

Bank Lending Rates and Interest Margin

(Percent)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2018, 058; 10.5089/9781484344903.002.A001

Sources: Bank Al-Maghrib; and IMF staff estimates.
uA01fig02

Contribution to Credit Growth

(Annual percent change)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2018, 058; 10.5089/9781484344903.002.A001

Sources: Bank Al-Maghrib; and IMF staff estimates.

B. Policy Implementation

10. Building on the progress in recent years, additional reforms are needed to cement macro stability and promote higher and inclusive growth and employment, particularly in areas such as tax reform, exchange rate flexibility, the business environment, education and the labor market.

11. Further fiscal reforms will be key to lower public debt and secure space for priority spending in the medium term. The implementation of the organic budget law (OBL) and the recent pension reform, together with contained public wage expenditures, have helped strengthen the fiscal framework and reduce fiscal imbalances. However, bringing public debt to 60 percent of GDP by 2021 while preserving policy space for priority spending will require further efforts. These include: a comprehensive tax reform to promote fairness, simplification, and revenue mobilization (including measures to align reduced VAT rates on manufacturing goods and services with the standard VAT rate, reduce tax exemptions, lower corporate tax rates, and better enforce tax payments by the self-employed and liberal professions); civil service reform; improved public investment management; sound public financial management at the local level as part of fiscal decentralization; and enhanced financial oversight of state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

12. Starting the transition to greater exchange rate flexibility as soon as possible, from a position of strength, would reduce uncertainty. This reform, to which the authorities remain committed, will help the economy to absorb external shocks and preserve price competitiveness. Current conditions remain favorable, as reserves are adequate based on a range of metrics, external debt is relatively low, and other important policy and operational pre-conditions remain in place (e.g., financial sector resilience and limited currency risk exposures). A protracted postponement of this announced reform may introduce uncertainty and put in doubt the strength of the authorities’ commitment.

13. Improvements to the financial sector policy framework have been made and should continue. The authorities have implemented the 2015 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) recommendations in key areas such as the strengthening of supervisory resources and capacity, and introduced a new macro-prudential policy framework. However, continued efforts are needed to safeguard financial soundness considering the remaining risk exposures in the system, its increasing complexity, and the forthcoming introduction of greater exchange rate flexibility. The new central bank law is now expected to be approved by parliament in early 2018.

14. On the structural front, reforms need to be accelerated to raise the growth potential and reduce unemployment, in line with the government’s objectives:

  • Business environment and governance. Reforms in this area helped improve Morocco’s position in the Doing Business ranking from 75th in 2016 to 68th in 2017. Further efforts are needed to reduce chronic payment delays and facilitate access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The operationalization of the competition council created in 2014 is long overdue, and the implementation of the national strategy against corruption adopted in 2015 is another key priority (W-COM.-¶15).3

  • Education and labor market. The government has put a high priority on education, including improving school infrastructure, deploying more teachers in remote areas, and enhancing educational outcomes in rural areas, notably for girls. The authorities are now finalizing the action plan for the 2015–30 national employment strategy, including measures to boost job creation and raise female labor force participation (W-COM.-¶15). Key reforms should include the relaxation of restrictions on fixed-term contract to better integrate young workers in the labor market, while establishing adequate safety nets for the unemployed.

15. It is also important to accelerate improvements to the targeting of social spending. Social programs are large but highly fragmented, and the existing system is ineffective in targeting the most vulnerable and the unemployed. The authorities are working with international partners to address these shortcomings, including through the development of a social registry for identifying the less well-off segments of the population and improve the allocation of social spending.

Outlook and Risks

16. Gradually increasing growth, moderate inflation, and stronger external and fiscal buffers are expected over the medium term. These favorable outcomes are predicated on the sustained implementation of key reforms, including to improve the business environment and boost productivity, and to enhance tax revenues.

  • Growth is expected to slow in 2018 due a negative base effect following a particularly good agricultural season in 2017, and to reach 4.6 percent over the medium term.

  • Inflation is projected to increase to 1.3 percent in 2018 (as domestic food prices rise) and to stabilize around 2 percent over the medium term.

  • The overall fiscal deficit is expected to decline to 3 percent of GDP in 2018 and to stabilize around 2.2 percent of GDP in the medium term, consistent with the authorities’ objective to reduce public debt to 60 percent of GDP by 2021.

  • The current account deficit is expected to decline to 3.7 percent of GDP in 2018 and to reach about 2.5 percent of GDP in the medium term, driven by sustained export growth, tourism receipts and remittances which will offset increasing energy imports. With continued economic growth and diversification, foreign direct investment is expected to increase to 2.7 percent of GDP in the medium term. International reserves are projected to increase steadily and reach 101 percent of the ARA metric by 2022 (about 133 percent of the ARA metric adjusted for capital controls).

17. The balance of risks remains tilted to the downside. On the domestic front, delays in implementing key fiscal and structural reforms could reduce future fiscal space, contribute to social tensions, and adversely affect the external sector (e.g., through lower tourism receipts or remittances), and the expected pickup in potential growth. Also, renewed uncertainty on the transition to greater exchange rate flexibility could lead to market pressures, potentially weakening the external accounts. Externally, weak growth in the euro area could slow economic activity through lower exports, tourism, FDI flows, and remittances, worsening fiscal and external imbalances; geopolitical risks could raise oil prices, reduce tourism activity, and weaken investor confidence; tighter, more volatile financial conditions, global policy uncertainty, and a retreat from cross-border integration could affect global growth, increase borrowing costs, lead to reduced trade and capital flows, and weaken investor confidence more generally. On the upside, lower energy prices would help narrow external and fiscal imbalances more rapidly.

External Stress Index

Background. The external sector index is an indicator of the evolution of the external environment faced by a country. Its use was mandated by the IMF Executive Board for Flexible Credit Line (FCL) and PLL countries at the time of the review of these instruments in June 2014.1 The index is based on: (i) a consideration of the key external risks facing Morocco; (ii) the selection of proxy variables capturing these risks; and (iii) the choice of the weights to apply to each of these variables. The model was first developed at the time of the 2012 PLL request.

uA01fig03

Morocco: External Stress Index

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2018, 058; 10.5089/9781484344903.002.A001

Sources: WEO; and IMF staff estimates

Risks. The main external risks for Morocco based on the July 2017 Global Risk Assessment Matrix (G-RAM), are: (i) a protracted period of slow growth in advanced economies, particularly in Morocco’s main trading partners, resulting in lower exports, FDI, tourism, and remittances; (ii) heightened geopolitical risks resulting in higher oil prices and dislocations to capital flows and tourism receipts; and (iii) tighter global financial conditions, resulting in higher borrowing costs and disruption to portfolio flows.

Proxy variables. (i) Lower exports, remittances, FDI, and tourism receipts from Europe are captured by growth in the euro area, Morocco’s main trading partner (representing more than 50 percent of trade, FDI, and remittances); (ii) higher oil imports are captured by oil prices; and (iii) the impact of global financial volatility on portfolio flows and borrowing costs are captured by the emerging markets volatility index (VXEEM).

Weights. A data-based approach was used to determine the weights for each variable. Weights for each proxy variable are estimated using the balance of payments and IIP data as a share of GDP. The weight on euro area growth (0.580) corresponds to the sum of exports, FDI, remittances, and tourism receipts from Europe, the weights on the VXEEM (0.095) correspond to the stocks of external debt and equity, and the weight on the change in oil price (0.324) corresponds to oil imports; the weights are as of the PLL request stage. The highest weights fall on euro area growth and the oil price (based on their relative contribution to items on the balance of payments/financing needs). The VXEEM has a smaller weight reflecting the small size of portfolio flows in the financial account.

Baseline scenario. The baseline corresponds to the October 2017 World Economic Outlook (WEO) projections for euro area growth and oil prices, while the VXEEM is consistent with volatility index (VIX) futures as of end-October, 2017. The graph suggests that at the current juncture, external economic stresses have declined relative to the July 2016 request (solid lines). This reflects higher oil price path assumptions being largely offset by stronger EA growth and improved VXEEM index projections.

Downside scenario. The downside scenario is broadly consistent with staff’s adverse scenario, and assumes euro area growth that is one percentage point lower than the baseline, a US$15 increase in oil prices relative to the baseline, and an increase in the VXEEM by two standard deviations. The graph suggests that in a downside scenario, external economic stresses are less severe than those at the July 2016 request.

Overall assessment. The external economic stress index for Morocco suggests that external pressures under the baseline have abated in recent years, but increased more recently. However, the model does not include a proxy for geopolitical risk (given the difficulty in choosing such a variable). At present, this would suggest a relatively more heightened stress index.

1 See “The Review of the Flexible Credit Line, the Precautionary and Liquidity Line, and the Rapid Financing Instrument,” IMF Policy Paper, January 2014.

Review of PLL Qualification

18. Staff’s assessment is that Morocco continues to qualify for a PLL arrangement. In line with the generally positive assessment of Morocco’s policies by the Executive Board during the 2017 Article IV consultation and the second review under PLL arrangement, staff’s assessment is that Morocco meets the PLL qualification criteria.

A. General Assessment

19. Morocco’s economic fundamentals and institutional policy frameworks are sound, the country is implementing, and has a track record of implementing, sound policies, and it remains committed to doing so in the future.

  • Macroeconomic developments are broadly positive. Fiscal developments in 2017 were favorable, with strong revenue performance and well contained current and capital expenditures. After a significant weakening in 2016, the current account deficit is estimated to have narrowed in 2017, as capital equipment imports (related to specific infrastructure projects) and food imports stabilized, and phosphate and food exports picked up. Over the medium term, economic growth is expected to gradually increase in a context of low inflation. Both public and external debts are sustainable.

  • The authorities have implemented generally sound policies, although reform implementation was delayed in the past year. During the last Article IV consultation, on December 13, 2017, the Executive Board welcomed the authorities’ commitment to sound policies, and encouraged them to accelerate reform implementation to further reduce vulnerabilities and promote stronger job creation and more inclusive growth.

  • The authorities are committed to maintain sound policies. Public finances are improving, reflecting both the growth recovery and the authorities’ commitments to secure strong revenue performance, contain spending at budgeted levels, and take necessary measures to meet their objectives (W-COM.-¶4). The government is also committed to reduce public debt to 60 percent of GDP by 2021, which will require stabilizing the fiscal deficit around 2.2 percent of GDP in the medium term. The authorities intend to pursue structural reforms to raise potential growth and promote higher and more inclusive growth, including by improving competitiveness and the business environment, strengthening the fight against corruption, and raising human capital.

  • Flexible policy and institutional frameworks allow the authorities to implement needed reforms in the face of shocks. On the fiscal front, budgetary procedures and practices are being enhanced, and are instrumental in maintaining current spending below budgeted levels. More broadly, the authorities met their fiscal objectives in recent years by taking corrective actions in the face of unforeseen grant revenues shortfalls (except in 2016). Indicators of a country’s ability to undertake countercyclical policy in the event of shocks show that Morocco performs well in the fiscal policy area.4 Morocco scores lower in the monetary policy area, but this indicator is less relevant for Morocco given its pegged exchange rate regime.5 Bank al-Maghrib (BAM) has a clear mandate to implement monetary and exchange rate policies, and the authorities are in the process of upgrading their monetary policy regime as part of the transition to greater exchange rate flexibility and inflation targeting. As noted above, this transition should start as soon as possible, since undue delays may raise uncertainty regarding the authorities’ reform commitment and credibility. Lastly, Morocco is in the mid-range of the World Bank’s anti-corruption and government effectiveness ranking.

20. Overall, Morocco meets the qualification criteria for a PLL arrangement and performs strongly in three out of the five PLL qualification areas (financial sector and supervision, monetary policy, and data adequacy), and does not substantially underperform in the other two areas (external position and market access, and fiscal policy). This change from the previous PLL review reflects a worse-than-expected performance in the external sector (see below). Morocco has generally sound economic and institutional policy frameworks, is implementing, and has a track record of implementing sound policies, and remains committed to maintaining such policies in the future (W-COM.-¶1).

B. Assessment of Specific Criteria and Track Record

21. Morocco performs strongly in three out of the five PLL qualification areas (financial sector and supervision, monetary policy, and data adequacy) and does not substantially underperform in the other two areas (external position and market access, and fiscal policy). This marks a deterioration since the second review of the current PLL arrangement, when Morocco was assessed as performing strongly in the external position and market access area. Indeed, staff’s assessment is that the increase in the current account deficit since the time of the PLL request can no longer be attributed to temporary factors; considering updated data and WEO assumptions, and despite the strong export dynamics observed in recent years and the further reduction in fiscal imbalances, the current deficit is now expected to remain at about 3.7 percent of GDP during 2018–19, which signals a worse underlying current account position than initially expected.

External position and market access: Morocco does not substantially underperform in the external position and market access area.

  • Criterion 1. Sustainable external position. Based on the 2017 external balance assessment (EBA), Morocco’s external position is currently weaker than implied by fundamentals. Morocco’s current account deficit narrowed moderately in 2017, after widening substantially in 2016 due to infrastructure developments and factors related to the drought and weaker-than-expected phosphate prices. The moderate current account improvement is supported by good performance of food and phosphate and derivatives exports, as well as exports from emerging sectors (which now account for 33 percent of total exports, relative to 14 percent in 2000), but also to strong tourism and remittance receipts. The current account is expected to gradually improve over the medium term as: (i) exports rise, boosted by increasing external demand particularly due to the stronger recovery in Europe and the expansion of newer, higher value-added export sectors, growth—reflecting strong FDI in the aeronautics and automotive sectors, (ii) import growth slows down starting in 2019 in an environment of moderate commodity prices, and (iii) tourism receipts strengthen, tapping new markets. The external debt sustainability analysis provided in the 2017 Article IV report shows that Morocco’s external debt has increased in recent years but remains relatively low, at 33.7 percent of GDP at end-2017, and is expected to decline below 30 percent of GDP in the medium term. The recent weakness in the trade balance further supports the prompt introduction of greater exchange rate flexibility. The authorities agree that current conditions continue to offer a window of opportunity to implement the transition in a gradual and orderly manner, and that preparations for the reform have essentially been completed.6

  • Criterion 2—Capital account position dominated by private flows. Private capital flows constitute the largest share of the capital account (about 81 percent on average between 2015 and 2017), and FDI is their largest component. Access to international financial markets by nonfinancial corporations remains modest compared to other emerging markets, and private external debt is small (about 10.7 percent of total debt or 3.6 percent of GDP). Loans from bilateral and development partners constitute the bulk of public capital flows.

  • Criterion 3—Track record of steady sovereign access to international capital markets at favorable terms. Morocco has not issued international bonds since 2014,7 but considering the still favorable global interest rate environment, the authorities plan to issue in 2018. Morocco continues to be rated favorably by major ratings agencies and interest rate spreads further declined in 2017, which suggests that Morocco could have tapped international markets on a durable and substantial basis, even though the scale or duration of actual public sector borrowing fell short of the specified thresholds. The average maturity of public external debt was extended to eight years and six months (against seven years and four months in 2009).

  • Criterion 4—A reserve position, which—notwithstanding potential balance of payments (BOP) pressures that justify Fund assistance—remains relatively comfortable. Morocco’s reserves have been below 100 percent of the ARA metric on average over the last three years, at 95 percent. However, they remain adequate according to several metrics (Figure 1): six months of imports, ample coverage of short-term debt and broad money, and 123 percent of the ARA adjusted for capital controls at end 2017. By 2022, reserves are expected to reach about eight months of imports, 101 percent of the standard ARA metric, and 133 percent of the metric adjusted for capital controls.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Morocco: Real and External Developments

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2018, 058; 10.5089/9781484344903.002.A001

uA01fig04

CDS Spreads

(2012–17 basis points)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2018, 058; 10.5089/9781484344903.002.A001

Sources: Bloomberg; and Markit.

Fiscal policy: Morocco does not substantially underperform in the fiscal area.

  • Criterion 5—Sound public finance, including a sustainable public debt position. The authorities remain committed to a sustainable fiscal path and a track record of sound public finances. A deficit of 3 percent of GDP is expected in 2018 and the authorities aim to reduce public debt to 60 percent of GDP by 2021 (against 64.7 percent of GDP in 2016) (W-COM.-¶4), which will require bringing the fiscal deficit to about 2.2 percent of GDP in the medium term.8 Staff assesses Morocco’s public debt to be sustainable with high probability and resilient to various shocks and vulnerabilities despite high gross financing needs, which should decline due to a lengthening of average maturities (from 6 years and 6 months in 2014 to about 7 years and 3 months in 2017). Future fiscal consolidation will benefit from accelerated tax reforms and a comprehensive approach to broaden the tax base, reduce exemptions, boost VAT revenues, and improve corporate taxation. Civil service reform will be needed to generate long-term savings on the wage bill while strengthening the efficiency of the public sector. Fiscal decentralization should ensure sound public financial management at the regional level and preserve fiscal sustainability. To that effect, a range of institutional mechanisms to control risks from fiscal decentralization will need to be put in place as the process advances. Finally, the authorities intend to submit to parliament the draft law to reinforce the governance and oversight of SOEs in early 2018.

Monetary policy: Morocco performs strongly in the monetary policy area.

  • Criterion 6—Low and stable inflation. Morocco has maintained low and stable inflation in the past five years, and this is expected to continue in the medium term, with inflation expectations being well anchored. The policy rate has not changed since March 2016 and supported a nascent credit recovery in 2017, suggesting that monetary transmission is relatively effective. As part of the transition to greater exchange rate flexibility, the authorities remain committed to gradually introduce an inflation targeting regime, but they are still assessing the right moment to start the transition (W-COM.-¶14). Further exchange rate flexibility will help to absorb external shocks and preserve price competitiveness, and the transition is likely to proceed smoothly.

Financial sector soundness and supervision: Morocco performs strongly in the financial sector area.

  • Criterion 7—Sound financial system and absence of solvency problems that may threaten systemic stability. Banks have adequate capital buffers and benefit from stable funding (mainly non-remunerated deposits). NPLs remain relatively high at 7.7 percent, but provisioning levels are comfortable (70 percent) and increasing. Risks from large credit exposures persist and increased slightly in 2017 despite strict regulatory limits. Moroccan banks’ expansion into Africa provides diversification and profit opportunities, but is also a channel of risk transmission. The 2015 FSAP stress tests showed that the banking system could withstand severe shocks.

  • Criterion 8—Effective financial sector supervision. Bank supervision capacity is improving along the lines of the 2015 FSAP recommendations. Together with recent enhancements to the macroprudential policy framework, the oversight of Moroccan banks expanding into Africa has intensified, in close collaboration with supervisory agencies in host countries (W-COM.-¶13). More broadly, bank supervision is moving to a more risk-based and forward-looking approach (including about AML/CFT-related risks).

Data adequacy: Data provision and quality are adequate.

  • Criterion 9—Data transparency and integrity. Morocco subscribes to the Special Data Dissemination Standard. Overall, data quality continues to be adequate to conduct effective surveillance and program monitoring despite shortcomings in the provision of certain data, such as household survey data (timeliness), or the exclusion of third-party deposits at Treasury from public debt data (as is the case in several members). The authorities are determined to increase the coverage of public finance statistics from central to general government (with Fund TA support), and to produce new fiscal and public debt data by the second semester of 2018 and align public sector statistics with international standards.

22. Morocco has a track record of sound policies. Morocco has met the PLL qualification standard since 2012. Staff’s assessment of the relevant core indicators over the five most recent years confirms this assessment.

Other Program Issues and Post-PLL Strategy

23. The end-September 2017 IT for the fiscal deficit and for net international reserves were met. The end-September 2017 fiscal deficit IT was met without adjustments, and with a substantial margin once the adjustor for grants is considered. The end-September 2017 NIR IT was met, reflecting the moderate narrowing of the current account deficit since July 2017, due in part to strong export performance and the stabilization of import of capital equipment.

24. Should Morocco draw on the entire amount available, it would have adequate capacity to repay the Fund, and credit and liquidity risks to the Fund would remain low (Table 6).9 Whereas the authorities continue to treat the PLL arrangement as precautionary, in the event of a drawdown, Fund obligations would represent a small share of Morocco’s total external debt (a maximum of 7.1 percent over the projection period), gross international reserves (13.1 percent), and exports (nine percent). In addition, the impact of the PLL arrangement on the Fund’s liquidity and potential exposure remains moderate. The commitment to Morocco is modest, and the PLL arrangement reduces the Fund’s forward commitment capacity only marginally.

Table 1.

Morocco: Selected Economic Indicators, 2012–22

article image
Sources: Moroccan authorities; and IMF staff estimates.

Refers to the macro framework for the Seconnd Review Under PLL Arrangement in Country Report No. 17/264.

Based on revised ARA weights.

Table 2a.

Morocco: Budgetary Central Government Finance, 2012–22

(Billions of dirhams)

article image
Sources: Ministry of Economy and Finance; and IMF staff estimates.

Refers to the macro framework for the Second Review Under the PLL Arrangement in Country Report No. 17/264.

Includes capital transfers to public entities.

Table 2b.

Morocco: Budgetary Central Government Finance, 2012–22

(Percent of GDP)

article image
Sources: Ministry of Economy and Finance; and IMF staff estimates.

Refers to the macro framework for the Second Review Under the PLL Arrangement in Country Report No. 17/264.

Includes capital transfers to public entities.

Does not include deposits at the Treasury from third parties (SOEs, private entities and individuals).

Table 3.

Morocco: Balance of Payments, 2012–22

(In billions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Ministry of Finance; Office des Changes; and IMF staff estimates and projections.

Refers to the macro framework for the Second Review Under the PLL Arrangement in Country Report No. 17/264.

Based on WEO data for actual and projections.

Excluding the reserve position in the Fund.

Based on revised ARA weights.

Public and publicly guaranteed debt.