South Africa
Financial Sector Assessment Program-Reforms in the OTC Derivatives Market-Technical Note

This Technical Note analyzes over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market reforms in South Africa and identifies vulnerabilities that may potentially impact financial stability. South Africa is committed to reform its OTC derivatives market to reduce vulnerabilities and increase transparency. Reforms are being implemented through the Financial Market Act and Regulations for banks, reflecting the Basel III capital requirements. Swift progress on the consultation and issuance of FMA regulations, trade repository regulations, and related notices are warranted to proceed with reforming the OTC derivatives market. Secondary legislation still needs to be finalized and will contain requirements for financial market infrastructures.

Abstract

This Technical Note analyzes over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market reforms in South Africa and identifies vulnerabilities that may potentially impact financial stability. South Africa is committed to reform its OTC derivatives market to reduce vulnerabilities and increase transparency. Reforms are being implemented through the Financial Market Act and Regulations for banks, reflecting the Basel III capital requirements. Swift progress on the consultation and issuance of FMA regulations, trade repository regulations, and related notices are warranted to proceed with reforming the OTC derivatives market. Secondary legislation still needs to be finalized and will contain requirements for financial market infrastructures.

Introduction1

1. The objective of this note is to analyze the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market reforms in South Africa and identify vulnerabilities that may potentially impact financial stability. The note analyzes the progress of OTC derivatives reforms in South Africa, bilateral and central clearing of OTC derivatives transactions, and the regulatory, supervisory and oversight framework.

2. The financial crisis that started in 2007-2008 exposed weaknesses in the structure and operations of the OTC derivatives markets that contributed to global systemic risk. Although the crisis did not originate in these markets, the size, interconnectedness, and lack of transparency exaggerated financial stress. In 2009, G20 leaders in Pittsburgh called for reforms in the OTC derivatives markets, and agreed that all standardized OTC derivatives should be traded on exchanges or electronic trading platforms, where appropriate, and cleared through Central Counterparties (CCPs). OTC derivative contracts should be reported to trade repositories. Non-centrally cleared contracts should be subject to higher capital requirements. In November 2011, the G20 leaders agreed to add the development of margin requirements on non-centrally cleared derivatives to the reform program. The primary objective of the OTC derivatives reforms is to reduce systemic risk by strengthening these markets to withstand extreme shocks, improve transparency, and protect against market abuse.

3. The OTC derivatives market in South Africa functioned properly during the financial crisis. Nevertheless, as a G20 member, South Africa is committed to reform its OTC derivatives market to reduce vulnerabilities and increase transparency. South Africa has started implementing reforms in the OTC derivatives market. An assessment undertaken by the Financial Stability Board analyzed the status of the reforms in 2012. Appendix 1 lists the various recommendations of the Financial Stability Board, and also summarizes the recommendations of the 2008 FSAP report regarding the OTC derivatives market in South Africa.

4. Reforming the OTC derivatives market entails possible risks. The model in Figure 1 illustrates the different risks that may prevail in the three phases of the OTC derivatives market reform process.

  • Decentralized phase: This phase involves bilateral trading and clearing of OTC derivatives transactions, and the potential risks are a lack of proper risk mitigation and a lack of transparency.

  • Reform phase: Risks in this phase may concern regulatory uncertainty and unintended consequences for the market, resulting in regulatory arbitrage and risks shifting to other parts of the financial system.

  • Centralized phase: This phase involves trading on platforms, clearing through CCPs, and reporting to trade repositories, and the potential risks are an increase of concentration risk within CCPs, inefficiencies of central clearing resulting in increased costs, impediments to accessing a CCP or trade repository, and risks related to collateral restrictions.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Possible Risks in Reforming OTC Derivatives Markets

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2015, 052; 10.5089/9781498393287.002.A001

Source: Staff, Financial Stability Board 7th progress report on OTC derivatives market reforms, ISDA

In all three phases, there is the risk that regulation, supervision, and oversight are inadequate, for example, because local authorities have insufficient opportunities to regulate non-domestic CCPs and access trade repositories.

5. This note is organized as follows: section II describes the OTC derivatives market in South Africa, section III contains a risk analysis of the reforms in the OTC derivatives market, and section IV concludes with policy recommendations. The analysis of risks in section III addresses the different types of risks as illustrated in Figure 1, i.e. risks related to (i) the decentralized phase and the reform process, (ii) central clearing, and (iii) regulation, supervision, and oversight. The regulatory, supervisory, and oversight arrangements for Financial Market Infrastructures (FMIs),2 including CCPs and trade repositories, are addressed using the five responsibilities of the CPSS-IOSCO Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI). In addition, the note analyzes the safety and efficiency of Safcom – the exchange-traded derivatives CCP – based on a selection of principles of the PFMI.

The OTC Derivatives Market in South Africa Products

6. The OTC derivatives market in South Africa is substantial. The gross notional outstanding value was approximately ZAR 27 trillion (USD 3 trillion) in June 2012.3 Trading volumes represent 7.5 percent of GDP, which is large compared to other emerging economies.4 Currency derivatives and interest rate derivatives are the most actively traded products. Volumes keep growing, stimulated by volatility, relatively high interest rates, and high participation of offshore dealers and investors. The figures in Appendix 2 illustrate the size and growth of the OTC derivatives market in South Africa in comparison to other emerging countries.

7. The largest exposures are in interest rate derivatives, while currency derivatives are the most actively traded. A study of 20125 shows that around 85 percent of the notional outstanding amounts in the books of the largest five South African banks represent interest rate contracts. Banks typically keep these derivatives to maturity. Foreign exchange (FX) contracts represent 12 percent of the notional outstanding amount, whereas the outstanding amounts of OTC traded equity, credit, and commodities derivatives are relatively small. Equity derivatives are typically traded on the JSE. Nearly all OTC derivatives traded between local counterparties are South African Rand (ZAR) denominated.

A. Market Participants

8. Banks are the most active players in the OTC derivatives market, followed by other financial institutions. Banks use OTC derivatives to speculate on exchange rates and interest rates and to hedge their own risks and risks of their clients. Other financial institutions, such as pension and insurance funds, asset managers and corporate treasurers use OTC derivatives predominantly to serve as insurance against unwanted price movements to reduce the volatility of their company’s cash flow. In 2012, the share of banks in the OTC derivatives market was highest, whereas the share of other financial institutions was a third of the notional outstanding amount (Table 2). The share of corporate investors was very small.

Table 2.

Distribution of Notional Outstanding Value Among Participants

article image
Source: Price Waterhouse Coopers, 2012

9. Interbank trading between South African and offshore banks constitutes a significant part of transactions in the OTC derivative market. Similar to other emerging economies, OTC derivative contracts in ZAR are heavily traded off-shore, in particular in the UK.6 In 2012, more than half of interbank interest rate transactions of the large South African banks involved a foreign counterparty. Foreign dealers are typically the global systemically important financial institutions (G-SIFIs). Domestic banks use foreign dealers primarily to offset risk exposures assumed from domestic nonbank financial institutions.

B. Financial Market Infrastructures

10. FMIs aim to support the safe and efficient clearing and settlement of payment, securities, and derivatives transactions. The South African Multiple Option Settlement (SAMOS) system is an automated interbank settlement system operated by the SARB. SAMOS settles large-value payments on a real-time gross settlement basis, while retail payments are settled as a batch on a deferred basis by BankServ. Securities traded on the JSE are cleared and settled by the CSD Strate. The JSE operates a CCP for exchange-traded derivatives through its subsidiary Safcom. FX transactions have been settled via the Continuous Linked Settlement (CLS) system since the ZAR became a CLS eligible currency in 2004. Appendix 3 illustrates the different FMIs operating in South Africa. No CCP for OTC derivatives contracts or trade repository has been established in South Africa.

11. Safcom is the local CCP for exchange-traded derivatives. Safcom operates as a CCP by becoming the buyer to sellers and seller to buyers for futures and options contracts traded on the JSE. It has ten clearing members, of which eight are banks and two are non-banks. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of the JSE and has mandated the JSE, through service level agreements (SLAs), to perform its operating functions, its risk management and clearing services, as well as decision-making regarding the declaration of defaulting participants. The registrar of securities services of the FSB has approved Safcom as a qualifying CCP. Safcom made a formal application for recognition by the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA) in September 2013.

C. OTC Derivatives Market Reforms

12. Reforms are implemented through the FMA and Regulations for banks, reflecting the Basel III capital requirements. The FMA was passed by Parliament in early January 2013 and was promulgated in June 2013. The FMA establishes a licensing and recognition regime for domestic and foreign CCPs and trade repositories that provide services to entities in South Africa. The Banks Act regulations aim to introduce additional capital and margining requirements in due course, in line with the Basel III requirements, to address the higher risks related to non-centrally cleared transactions, and incentivize banks to use CCPs. Appendix 4 contains a detailed description of the progress in OTC derivatives market reforms so far.

13. Secondary legislation is in the drafting and consultation phase. The National Treasury, together with the FSB and SARB, has developed regulations and FSB notices on assets and resources for CCPs, trade repositories, CSDs, and exchanges. The draft regulations also contain the concept of an OTC derivatives provider (ODP) as a new category of regulated person under the FMA for professional entities active in the OTC derivatives market. ODPs are persons who, as a regular feature to their business and for their own account, initiate an OTC derivatives contract or make a market in them. Draft regulations will also include reporting obligations and additional duties for a trade repository. FSB notices will govern criteria for authorization of ODPs and a code of conduct for authorized ODPs. A first set of regulations has been issued for consultation in July 2014. Other regulations and board notices are expected to be issued for consultation later in 2014. The margining requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives are planned to be implemented by the end of 2015.

14. The reform of the OTC derivatives is at a relatively early stage. The vast majority of OTC derivatives are still bilaterally traded and cleared. There is no mandatory clearing requirement. In the absence of secondary legislation, no CCP (other than Safcom for exchange-traded derivatives) or trade repository has received a license under the FMA and no ODPs have been identified. Margining requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives are not yet implemented. Transactions of banks with local counterparts are exempted from an additional capital charge for non-centrally cleared derivatives until the end of 2014. There is also no mandatory requirement for certain standardized derivatives to be traded on exchanges or trading platforms.

D. Regulatory, Supervisory and Oversight Framework

15. Currently, the FSB is the responsible authority under the FMA, whereas the SARB is responsible for the implementation of the Regulations for banks and the oversight of payment systems. Under the FMA, the register for securities services, whose responsibilities are executed through the capital markets department of the FSB, is the regulator and supervisor of nonbank financial institutions and securities markets, including ODPs, CCPs, CSDs, exchanges and trade repositories. The bank supervision department (BSD) of the SARB is responsible for the implementation of capital and margin requirements at banks to cover exposures related to non-centrally cleared derivatives. The national payment system department (NPSD) within SARB regulates and oversees the safety and efficiency of the payment system pursuant to the SARB Act. The payment system oversight division is responsible for oversight within the NPSD. The NPSD also operates the SAMOS system through its payment system operations division. Operations of payment systems are governed by the National Payment System Act. Table 3 provides an overview of the FMIs that are subject to regulation, supervision and oversight of the SARB and the FSB respectively. Strate is the only FMI that is subject to supervision and oversight of both the FSB and the SARB. The SARB’s responsibilities are limited to the payment and settlement leg of securities transactions. The SARB and FSB have concluded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to coordinate the supervisory and oversight activities of both authorities. Appendix 5 describes the regulatory, supervisory and oversight practices in more detail.

Table 3.

Current Responsibilities of the FSB and the SARB for FMIs

article image
Source: FSB and SARB

16. With the introduction of the Twin Peaks regulatory structure the responsibilities regarding the OTC derivatives market and FMIs will shift. Current proposals discuss the establishment of a prudential authority, while the FSB will become the market conduct authority. Oversight of payment systems will still be the responsibility of the SARB-payment system oversight division.

Risk Analysis—Risks in The OTC Derivatives Market

17. As the large majority of derivatives contracts in South Africa are bilaterally traded and cleared, it is important that credit risks among counterparts are sufficiently mitigated and authorities have sufficient information to analyze risks in the OTC derivatives market. The financial crisis in 2007 and 2008 showed that insufficient risk management and opacity in bilaterally cleared markets may contribute to financial stress. Several initiatives of market participants in South Africa have contributed to the safety of the market, such as increased settlement matching through SWIFT and MarkITWire and participation in portfolio compression exercises.

18. Risk exposures among local and global participants are currently partly covered, making the market vulnerable to a potential failure of one of the banks. Margining practices are unevenly adopted in the OTC derivatives market in South Africa. Most interbank trades are subject to variation margin calls with cash as collateral, but thresholds are frequently applied (meaning that no margin is collected until a certain threshold is reached) and potential future exposures are not covered. A combination of high exposures and volatile markets would make participants vulnerable to losses following a failure of one or more of their counterparts.

19. There is room to improve surveillance practices. As noted in the 2008 FSAP, improving surveillance of the OTC derivatives market is warranted given the stability risks it entails. The monthly information collected by the SARB provides insight into the size and positions of banks in the OTC derivatives market. More information is needed, however, to obtain the timely and comprehensive overview of transactions and positions as suggested by the G20 reform agenda. In particular, information about participants other than banks such as non-bank financial institutions and corporate users active in the OTC derivatives market.

20. A trade repository will potentially significantly improve the ability of South African authorities to identify and evaluate potential risks in a timely and consistent manner. It is therefore important to adopt the regulations for trade repositories and swiftly start with the application and licensing procedure to establish a trade repository. The data provided by the trade repository will increase the understanding of the OTC derivatives market in South Africa and allow a comprehensive overview of it. The FMA and draft regulations allow for more than one trade repository in the country. It is however recommended to establish no more than one trade repository to avoid operational complexities that may result in overlap and duplication of data and delayed access to data. Full reliance on a foreign trade repository is possible, as long as the South African authorities do not face legal or operational impediments to obtain access to data that are relevant for the South African market under their respective mandates.

21. Trading platforms may further increase the safety and efficiency of the derivatives market by offering price transparency and effective competition. The FMA and draft FMA regulations contain requirements for exchanges, but there is currently no mandatory trading requirement for standardized derivatives. There are significant differences across jurisdictions in the timing of implementation and regulatory design of the reforms, either underway or being contemplated.7 South African authorities may further consider whether specific requirements in this area are appropriate for the markets in their jurisdiction.

22. A potential unintended consequence of reforming the OTC derivatives market is that the hedging activities of corporate investors decline due to increased cost. Potentially increased capital and margining requirements increase the cost for banks, non-bank financial institutions and corporate users. Anecdotal evidence suggests that this does not impact hedging activities of banks, non-bank financial institutions and the largest corporate investor, but for other corporate investors the increased cost may outweigh the benefits. Reduced hedging makes these companies vulnerable to exchange rate and interest rate volatility.

23. So far, risks related to international regulatory uncertainty seem to be limited as the South African market is focused on compliance with European legislation. The global regulatory reforms for OTC derivative markets expose the South African market potentially to legal uncertainty due to inconsistencies and overlap among requirements of different jurisdictions as well as extra-territorial measures. So far, legal uncertainty seems to be limited as the FMA reflects a similar interpretation of the PFMI as the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR). Safcom has no plans to apply for a status under the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act in addition to its recognition by ESMA. Where inconsistencies may arise, the South African authorities are encouraged to strive for a joint approach with relevant foreign authorities to prevent any negative implications of inconsistent legislation and extraterritorialities.

A. Central Clearing

24. A CCP can limit contagion and credit risk in the OTC derivatives market, but only if the CCP itself is safe. Through multilateral netting and strict risk management arrangements, a CCP can substantially reduce counterparty credit risk in a market. A CCP that is well capitalized will act as a firewall. In case one of its participants defaults, the CCP will stop contagion of losses and liquidity shocks in the market that it clears. The CCP does, however, increase concentration risk by substituting for a whole network of financial institutions. It cannot be excluded that in extreme circumstances a CCP may fail with systemic implications, exposing its participants to unexpected credit losses and liquidity shortages. To reduce the probability of default, the CCP should comply with increased international standards and be subject to strict and comprehensive regulation, supervision and oversight.

25. The largest South African banks are increasingly moving towards central clearing of OTC derivatives transactions in London. South African banks are not subject to mandatory clearing requirements8, but their foreign counterparts will be subject to mandatory clearing requirements under EMIR, effectively forcing the largest South African banks to clear interest rate derivatives and FX derivatives transactions via LCH.Clearnet Ltd in London. South African banks are currently indirect clearing members, but have the possibility to become direct clearing members in the future.

26. The use of a global CCP9 reduces risk exposures of South African banks in several ways. Clearing through a CCP allows banks to benefit from multilateral netting, which reduces the bank’s counterparty credit risk exposures. Another risk reducing feature of a global CCP is that it will generally have more opportunities to manage a default of a clearing member, for example, because there are more potential surviving clearing participants that can help the CCP in hedging and liquidating the positions of the defaulter.

27. Clearing through a global CCP does, however, expose the South African market to global shocks. South African banks will be exposed to the major international banks via the default fund of the global CCP and thus to shocks arising from a default originating in other jurisdictions. South African banks will also be exposed to the unlikely, but not impossible failure of the global CCP that may default in extreme situations, for example following the default of several large clearing participants. South African banks may be confronted with residual losses through loss-sharing arrangements or other recovery and resolutions tools.

28. The use of a global CCP reduces the capacity of South African authorities to supervise and oversee the CCP. Under the FMA, the relevant South African authorities have responsibilities regarding the supervision of CCPs. A foreign CCP may be recognized under the FMA and a cooperative oversight arrangement with the home regulator should be pursued. However, the use of a global CCP will complicate exercising the responsibilities under the FMA, as South African authorities are not the primary regulator. This may result in limited powers to obtain timely information, induce change or enforce corrective action. South African authorities may also have limited capacity to intervene during a crisis and mitigate shocks that (potentially) affect financial stability in South Africa; for example, in case the authorities have conflicting interests.10 The multitude of jurisdictions with an interest in the global CCP will increase complexities during crisis events.

29. Clearing through a global CCP is difficult to combine with exchange controls and may reduce the efficiency of the OTC derivatives market in South Africa. LCH.Clearnet Ltd accepts ZAR to cover variation margin obligations; however, deposits in ZAR are not in line with exchange controls. Deposits of initial and variation margin in global currencies conflict also with exchange controls if a bank reaches its macro-prudential limit, although estimates about the amount of margin that South African banks have to deposit for clearing at LCH.Clearnet Ltd do suggest that the potential impact of those calls on the exchange rate is not significant. Competition issues may arise if only a very limited number of South African banks can offer access to the global CCP. Exchange controls will limit other South African banks, financial institutions and corporate investors to access the global CCP through a foreign bank.

30. A second option is that authorities could require the use of only a local CCP. In this option the authorities would legally require the use of a local CCP for the clearing of specific derivatives contracts, for example all standardized ZAR denominated derivatives contracts. This option would provide the authorities with the capacity to supervise the CCP. It would also provide clearing members with full netting benefits. However, an important drawback of this option is that cost will increase for foreign banks, which may result in their retrenchment and which would have a significant negative impact on market liquidity in the local OTC derivatives market.

31. As a third option, a local CCP can be introduced on a competitive basis in addition to a global CCP. Such a local CCP could compete with a global CCP by developing a clearing service that is offering specific benefits to the local market.11 The use of the local CCP should however not be required by regulation. The local CCP may reduce the drawbacks of using only a global CCP to the extent that the local CCP is used. A local CCP may limit the exposure of South African banks to foreign shocks and allows the relevant South African authorities to have direct supervision over the local CCP in normal and crisis circumstances. Clearing through a local CCP is not complicated by exchange controls and collateral can be deposited in ZAR. A higher number of clearing members is expected to increase competition and keep cost low. However, a local CCP may also reduce efficiencies for local banks that decide to participate in both a global and local CCP. They will see a split in their positions, reduced netting opportunities and increased cost. Table 4 compares the benefits and risks of a global and local CCP.

Table 4.

Benefits and Drawbacks of a Global and Local CCP

article image
Source: IMF staff

32. A fourth option is a hybrid model in which a local CCP becomes a clearing member of a global CCP. Although this option will optimize netting for all market participants, it does not reduce the disadvantages of a global CCP. In fact, the default of a global CCP may have an immediate and direct consequence on the stability of the local CCP, potentially impacting the financial stability of all markets that are served by the local CCP by creating a new channel for risk propagation. Such a link between CCPs may require additional credit and liquidity buffers, reducing efficiency gains for the market.12

33. There is no obvious international best practice concerning the establishment of a local CCP for OTC derivatives. In Australia, Singapore and potentially Mexico, clearing members have the option to use either a local CCP or a global CCP to clear OTC derivatives transactions, dependent on their preferences and needs. Both CCPs co-exist and there is no legal obligation to use the local CCP for derivative contracts denominated in the local currency. The global and local CCPs have different value propositions depending on the scale, scope and nature of their participant’s business and offer market participants a choice and promote competition (third option in this section). In Canada, the authorities and market participants have balanced safety and efficiency issues and decided that global clearing provides for the most efficient and safe solution if certain conditions are met (first option).13 In Brazil, market participants are required to clear OTC derivatives transactions through the local CCP BM&FBOVESPA as the local currency is non-convertible (second option). To date, no practical experience exists on how links among CCPs clearing OTC derivatives trades should be configured and risks monitored and managed (fourth option).

34. Specific risks of a local CCP should be effectively mitigated. To reduce concentration risk, it is crucial that any local CCP is safe and complies with international standards. The highly interconnected financial system of South Africa poses a challenge to a local CCP to be a true firewall in stopping contagion following the default of one of its members. A default of a large local bank will generally place a high burden on the few surviving clearing members to help the CCP in hedging and liquidating the positions of the defaulter and to help maintain the operations of the CCP. In case an existing financial market participant develops a local CCP for OTC derivatives clearing, it will be exposed to additional business risks and the relevant South African authorities should closely monitor whether there is a potential spill-over to other market infrastructures operated by that market participant.

35. To further enhance resilience, CCPs in South Africa could pursue access to central bank services. A local CCP and the SARB could discuss the possible provision of central bank services to the CCP, in particular the CCP’s direct access to the central bank operated payment system SAMOS, by opening an account in the system. In addition, the CCP may obtain routine access to intraday liquidity and benefit from collateral services provided by the SARB. All these measures will help to reduce the CCP’s dependence on commercial banks. Several central banks in Europe, for example de Nederlandsche Bank and the National Bank of Belgium, provide not only a direct account to the CCPs in their jurisdiction, but also manage their collateral through direct accounts of eligible clearing members and the CCP in TARGET2. Intraday liquidity is provided under certain conditions and a link with the national central securities depository enables the use of securities as collateral. Box 1 provides information about Safcom’s observance of the PFMI and its interconnectedness with local banks.

Safcom’s Observance of the PFMI

During the last couple of years the JSE has made important improvements to increase compliance of its exchange-traded derivatives CCP Safcom with the PFMI. Safcom’s legal framework is sound and its risk management committee is independent from its executive management. An enterprise-wide risk management framework identifies and mitigates risks in a comprehensive manner. A ‘risk waterfall’ is in place to protect the CCP against losses following the default of one of its clearing participants. The JSE is currently working on further improvements to its risk management framework, in particular fine-tuning the determination of margin and default fund contributions as well as further development of its liquidity risk management framework. Appendix 6 describes the risk management framework, rules, procedures and practices of Safcom in more detail.

Further work is needed to fully comply with the requirements of the PFMI. Further developments should improve the robustness of Safcom’s risk waterfall, taking into account the specific liquidation periods for products and counterparty risks per clearing member. Safcom should further continue developing its liquidity risk management and apply daily stress testing. Operational risk management could be enhanced, for example by including a recovery time objective of two hours and reducing data loss in case of a failure. Also important is the development of a recovery plan to sustain critical services of the FMI. In line with the PFMI and additional guidance from CPMI-IOSCO14, Safcom should identify scenarios that may potentially prevent it from continuing operations. The scenarios may cover extreme but plausible events, such as the default of one or more large participants that fulfill various roles in the clearing and settlement processes. The service level agreements (SLAs) between Safcom and the JSE should provide details of which staff, systems and other assets and resources are dedicated to the CCP and should be available in case of extreme circumstances to ensure continuation of critical operations.15 Although not specifically required by the PFMI, Safcom could further reduce its reliance on Fitch in its investment decisions.16

A main challenge for Safcom is to manage the risks related to its high interconnectedness with its four clearing members. The CCP should reduce its dependency on its largest clearing participants. The large four banks fulfill various roles that may prevent the CCP from stopping contagion of losses in case one of the large four banks would default. The banks fulfill the roles of general clearing member (clearing for clients), liquidity provider, deposit-taking bank, custodian and settlement bank for Safcom. They are also crucial during a default of a clearing member in helping the CCP to liquidate and hedge the defaulter’s positions and take over the positions of the defaulter’s clients. The CCP may lose access to collateral in case the defaulter is also one of the CCP’s investment banks, it may lose access to one of its credit lines, it may face operational problems due to the loss of one of its settlement banks etc. To reduce these dependencies the JSE should find alternative solutions for the services provided by the largest banks. It has already started to invest collateral in government securities; however, more should be done, for example by pursuing efforts to open an account in SAMOS and gain access to central bank services. It may seek to (partly) replace its commercial credit lines by a credit line with the SARB. In addition, Safcom may open a direct account at Strate.

Source: IMF staff, FSB and JSE

36. In addition, the SARB may determine its approach towards emergency liquidity assistance to CCPs. In normal market circumstances, a CCP manages its liquidity risk by accepting only high quality liquid collateral, monitoring payment flows, conducting stress tests, maintaining committed credit lines with commercial banks, and, if available, with central banks through routine access to the central bank’s intraday liquidity facility. In extreme circumstances, the commercial bank’s credit lines may however be unable to provide timely and sufficient liquidity to the CCP. A CCP is vulnerable to wrong-way risk in the sense that it is most likely to be under stress at the same time as its clearing participants and liquidity providers. Providing CCPs with access to emergency liquidity assistance ensures that the CCP can continue to make payments to counterparties and would thereby maintain the stability of the market. To manage potential risk related to the default of a CCP, central banks are increasingly developing policies to provide emergency liquidity assistance to CCPs.17 In determining its approach, the SARB may take into account the importance of providing liquidity only to CCPs that are sound and adhere to the international principles. It is therefore important that the oversight division within the SARB has good understanding and knowledge of the adherence of the CCP to the PFMI. No commitment to provide emergency liquidity should be made to reduce moral hazard.18

37. Finally, the team found that the different roles of the JSE in the South African market hamper the cooperation and coordination among relevant market participants in developing the South African financial markets. The JSE has at least three different roles in the financial markets of South Africa, i.e. regulating market participants as a self-regulatory organization (SRO), managing a for-profit business that sometimes results in competition with market participants, and providing a clearing and settlement infrastructure. Although regulations, procedures and policies exist19 to manage and mitigate potential conflicts of interest, in practice the different roles of the JSE seem to hamper the development of the markets. The South African authorities have started to further investigate the effectiveness of the JSE as an SRO.

B. Effective Supervision and Oversight

38. The supervision and oversight of FMIs is generally appropriate, but more staff is needed with a good understanding of CCPs and the OTC derivatives market. The regulation, supervision and oversight of the FSB and SARB are based on statutory law. Relevant laws and policies are publicly available. The recently adopted FMA reflects the PFMI and all systemically important FMIs have been assessed, or are in the process of being assessed, against the new principles. Under the current regulatory framework, the authorities have sufficient powers and resources, including fining powers.20 The number of staff with specific knowledge of CCPs and OTC derivatives markets should however be increased, both within the FSB as well as within the SARB. The authorities cooperate and coordinate sufficiently with regard to their supervisory and oversight activities (Appendix 5).

39. The move to a twin peaks regulatory structure is expected to contribute to comprehensive supervision and oversight of CCPs; coordination and cooperation among the authorities is essential. The FMA and secondary regulations bring the supervisory and oversight requirements for CCPs and other financial market infrastructures in line with international standards. Under the twin peaks regulatory structure, the SARB is expected to strengthen the oversight of CCPs, which is expected to contribute to their resilience. Responsibilities may be distributed among two supervisory entities, with the national payment system oversight division responsible for the oversight of FMIs, and the future Market Conduct Authority responsible for market conduct supervision of FMIs. Coordination and cooperation arrangements should be developed, which, among others, identify a coordinating authority. The oversight function of the SARB should be further separated from the payment operations division. There should at least be a separate reporting line from the oversight division directly to another department within the SARB, for example the risk management and compliance department, to manage and mitigate potential conflicts of interest. Oversight responsibilities for CCPs, CSDs and trade repositories should also be clearly defined in the legal and regulatory framework supporting the oversight function of the SARB, in line with Responsibility A of the PFMI and international best practices. The oversight division should actively seek to enhance its resources to oversee CCPs, CSDs and TRs and ensure that staff has the appropriate knowledge and understanding of these FMIs.

40. Regulation and supervision of ODPs will have to be proportional upon the activity of the ODP and the risks it poses to the OTC derivatives market. ODPs will comprise of different types of institutions, including banks and smaller financial intermediaries. Before the implementation of the twin peaks model, the FSB will be the sole regulator and supervisor of ODPs, but under twin peaks a prudential authority will be responsible for prudential supervision, whereas the FSB will be responsible for market conduct supervision. The challenge for authorities will be to apply the same requirements to different types of entities and combine the requirements for ODPs with other legal requirements for other types of regulated entities.

41. The parallel implementation of the OTC derivatives reforms and the twin peaks model requires careful planning to ensure sufficient capacity at all stages of the reform process. These two large reform initiatives coincide, challenging the authorities to ensure a smooth transition of responsibilities and simultaneously ensure a sufficient number of staff with appropriate knowledge during different stages of the reform implementation. This requires structural preparations with plans that analyze the numbers and profiles of staff that are needed under different implementation scenarios. This is currently being developed under the Prudential Authority Implementation Working Group, a joint task force made up of organizations with a stake in the future Prudential Authority.

42. FMIs should be included in legislation on resolution regimes. In line with the international guidance on resolution frameworks for FMIs, led by the FSB, the South African authorities should plan for a dedicated resolution regime for systemically important FMIs, in particular CCPs, and designate the SARB to be the resolution authority.

Policy Recommendations

A. Recommendations to Reduce Risks in the Bilaterally Traded and Cleared OTC Derivatives Market

43. Make swift progress on the consultation and issuance of FMA regulations, trade repository regulations and other regulations and notices related to OTC derivatives reforms to create transparency and proceed with reforming the OTC derivatives market.

44. Improve surveillance activities of the OTC derivatives market in anticipation of its financial stability mandate by collecting information from non-bank financial institutions and corporate users, in addition to the periodic information SARB receives from banks, as well as information about exposures to offshore counterparts. This will allow the authorities to obtain a comprehensive overview of OTC derivatives transactions and positions and an understanding of potential vulnerabilities in the market. The information should be useful in preparing for the collection and analysis of data to be provided by the trade repository.

45. Further implement capital and margining requirements, while continuously balancing the risk mitigation capacity of these measures. This will reduce risks in the non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives market, while limiting potential unintended consequences, such as a reduction in the use of derivatives to hedge financial and corporate risks. Also, early implementation may encourage the use of a global CCP, in the absence of a local CCP, leaving a potential local CCP with fewer opportunities to develop a competitive offer. Therefore, the authorities should carefully plan (exemptions to) regulations.

46. Analyze whether mandating trading of standardized derivatives on exchanges would contribute to the safety and efficiency of the OTC derivatives market. It is recommended to first implement the twin peaks and mandatory clearing reforms to enable market participants to adopt the reforms gradually and to control unintended consequences of reforms.

B. Recommendations to Reduce Risks Related to Central Clearing

47. The FSB should mitigate risks related to a global CCP by establishing a solid recognition procedure under the FMA and concluding a cooperation agreement with the authorities of global CCPs. The FSB should develop equivalence provisions for recognition of non-local FMIs that provide services in South Africa. The objective should be to strengthen the responsible authorities’ capacity to supervise and oversee non-local FMIs, such as global CCPs.21 In addition, cooperation agreements should be concluded with the authorities of global CCPs that offer services to South African banks and other regulated market participants. The SARB should be included as one of the signatories with an eye on the implementation of the twin peaks regulatory structure. The cooperation agreement should contain the formal intention that the South African authorities are informed about all relevant changes regarding the functioning and operations of the global CCP. The South African authorities should also be part of a crisis management framework for the global CCP. This should provide the FSB with comfort that the global CCP observes the PFMI and that they will receive timely and relevant information about the safety and efficiency of the global CCP.

48. Consider the benefits of establishing a local CCP, in addition to a global CCP, to reduce risks related to a global CCP. The authorities may encourage the development of a local CCP, to be offered by a local CCP or the local branch of a global CCP. Authorities should ensure that the CCP is safe. Business risks should be for the potential operator of the CCP.

49. Mandate central clearing through regulation, leaving market participants a choice as to the CCP through which they clear. The regulation in South Africa should mandate central clearing in line with international practices, allowing for competition among different CCPs under the FMA.

50. The JSE should increase the compliance of Safcom with the PFMI. In particular, it should i) reduce its dependency on the large four banks by directly using services of the central bank and local CSD; ii) further enhance the robustness of its risk waterfall, taking into account liquidation periods per product and specific risks of clearing members; iii) further develop liquidity risk management by including daily stress testing; iv) include a recovery time objective of two hours in its operational risk management framework and reduce data loss in case of system failures; and v) develop a recovery plan in line with the PFMI and additional CPSS-IOSCO guidance, specifying, in the SLAs with the JSE, which staff, systems and other assets and resources are dedicated to the CCP and should be available in case of extreme circumstances to ensure continuation of critical operations.

51. Consider giving a local CCP access to central bank liquidity and collateral services to further enhance financial stability. A local CCP could have its own account in the SAMOS system to reduce its dependency on settlement banks. It may have access to intraday central bank liquidity using the CCP’s collateral and capital as eligible collateral. To that purpose, legal and operational barriers should be removed. Preferably, the local CCP is able to keep cash collateral at an account at the SARB. The SARB may use the securities collateral of Safcom deposited at the local CSD, if eligible, to collateralize intraday credit. The SARB is further encouraged to continue discussions with the market to enable the use of ZAR denominated collateral for the purpose of the global CCP.

52. Further investigate the effectiveness of the multiple roles of the JSE in the South African market and ensure that conflicts of interest are sufficiently managed and mitigated.

C. Recommendations to Reduce Risks related to Regulation, Supervision and Oversight of FMIs

53. Consider distributing responsibilities for FMIs among two supervisory entities, as part of the twin peak reforms, with the national payment system oversight division responsible for the oversight of FMIs, and the future market conduct authority responsible for market conduct supervision. The legal and regulatory framework of the national payment system oversight division should be adapted to support the increased oversight responsibilities in line with responsibility A of the PFMI and international best practices.

54. Start structural preparations for the simultaneous implementation of OTC derivatives reforms and the twin peaks regulatory structure by the SARB and FSB, and prepare for effective coordination and cooperation to ensure a sufficient number of staff with appropriate skills is available at all stages of the reforms.

55. Increase the number of staff with specific knowledge of CCPs and OTC derivatives markets, both within the FSB as well as within the SARB-payment system oversight division. The FSB has built capacity through assessing Safcom and Strate against the PFMI. Further capacity is needed to regulate and supervise CCPs and ODPs active in the OTC derivatives market. The payment system oversight department should increase the number of staff with appropriate knowledge and understanding of these entities.

56. Include systemically important FMIs in legislation on resolution regimes in line with international guidance from the FSB.

Appendix I. Recommendations of the 2008 FSAP and Financial Stability Board Peer Review

article image

Appendix II. Statistics of OTC Derivatives Market South Africa

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Trading Volumes, Daily Average Notional Amount, in Millions of USD

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2015, 052; 10.5089/9781498393287.002.A001

Source: BIS, Triennial central Bank Survey, 2013.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.

OTC Derivatives Averages Daily Turnover in 2013, as percentage of GDP

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2015, 052; 10.5089/9781498393287.002.A001

Source: BIS, Triennial central Bank Survey, 2013.

Appendix III. Financial Market Infrastructure Landscape22

Appendix IV. Progress in OTC Derivatives Market Reforms

article image
article image
Source: National Treasury, FSB and SARB

Appendix V. Regulation, Supervision and Oversight of FMIs23

article image
article image
article image
article image

Appendix VI. Risk Management and Governance of Safcom25,26

article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
1

This note was prepared by Froukelien Wendt, Senior Financial Sector Expert from the IMF Monetary and Capital Markets department, for the 2014 South Africa FSAP. Her analysis was based on publicly available information, background documentation provided by the authorities, as well as discussions with the National Treasury, SARB, FSB, JSE, banks and other relevant market participants.

2

In this note, FMIs cover payment systems, securities settlement systems, the Central Securities Depository, CCPs, and trade repositories. The CSD is an entity that provides securities accounts, central safekeeping services, and asset services. A CCP is an entity that interposes itself between counterparties to contracts traded in one or more financial markets, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer, and thereby ensuring the performance of open contracts. A trade repository is an entity that maintains a centralized electronic record database of transaction data.

3

The gross notional values may be exaggerated due to double counting of swap transactions.

4

BIS, Triennial central Bank Survey, 2013.

5

Study by Price Waterhouse Coopers for the National Treasury of South Africa.

6

See Jacob Gyntelberg and Christian Upper, the OTC interest rate derivatives market in 2013, BIS Quarterly Review December 2013

7

See Financial Stability Board 7th Progress report on OTC derivatives market reforms.

8

South Africa has an incentives based system, relying on financial incentives to motivate market participants to use a CCP.

9

In this note, a global CCP is a CCP located outside South Africa with clearing members originating from multiple jurisdictions. Several global CCPs are relevant for the South African market, for example the UK based LCH.Clearnet Ltd and the US based Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Both CCPs clear high volumes of interest rate swap transactions.

10

The home authority may pursue the safety of the CCP, whereas the local CCP pursues the global stability of its country. For example, increased country risk resulting in credit downgrades of South African banks may trigger margin calls by the CCP, with increased haircuts on collateral, which may negatively impact the liquidity position of the South African banks, which may further increase margin calls and haircuts. Pro-cyclical effects may be more prevalent in case South African banks use collateral denominated in ZAR.

11

A local CCP in South Africa may for example offer a broader product range in local currency derivatives, margin off-sets between exchange traded derivatives and OTC derivatives and local collateral solutions with the local CSD.

12

See also CGFS Papers No 46, The macrofinancial implications of alternative configurations for access to central counterparties in OTC derivatives markets, November 2011

13

Canada has no exchange controls and more large banks that are direct clearing members of the global CCP.

14

See CPMI-IOSCO guidance for recovery of financial market infrastructures, October 2014.

15

ESMA has suggested that the connectedness of a CCP and exchange does pose additional risk. Article 14 (3) of EMIR (the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation) states that, “Authorisation shall only be granted for activities linked to clearing and shall specify the services or activities which the CCP is authorised to provide or perform including the classes of financial instruments covered by such authorisation.”

16

At the St Petersburg G20 Summit the G20 has called on national authorities to accelerate progress in reducing mechanistic reliance on credit rating agency ratings in accordance with the FSB roadmap agreed in October 2012. Financial institutions, including CCPs, should develop their own credit risk assessment capabilities and use multiple indicators for determining creditworthiness before investing in certain assets.

17

In 2012 the Economic Consultative Committee publicly stated that central banks are working towards a regime that ensures there are no technical obstacles for the timely provision of emergency liquidity assistance by central banks to solvent and viable CCPs, without pre-committing to the provision of this liquidity. See Financial Stability Board third progress report on implementation of the OTC derivative markets reforms referencing to one of the “four safeguards” of the Financial Stability Board for global CCPs concerning “appropriate liquidity arrangements”.

18

Expectations that a firm will not be allowed to fail creates moral hazard as the CCP and its clearing participants expect that the CCP’s failure will be prevented. They may therefore take greater risks than otherwise because they are shielded from the negative consequences of those risks at the taxpayers’ expense.

19

See for example principle 9 of the FSAP IOSCO assessment 2014.

20

Fining powers have been added to the set of enforcement tools at the recommendation of the Financial Stability Board’s peer review report of February 2013.

21

See for example the equivalence provisions of the Reserve bank of Australia on overseas equivalence.

22

In addition, the SADC Integrated Regional Electronic Settlement System (SIRESS) is an automated, real time gross, cross border settlement system for SADC Member Countries. Currently the system is operated in Lesotho, Namibia, South Africa and Swaziland as a pilot project.

23

Based on the five responsibilities of the CPSS-IOSCO Principles for FMIs, 2012

24

South Africa follows a SRO model where the exchange, CSD and independent clearing house are responsible for the licensing and supervision of its members with the FMA and its rules and directives. The SRO model may only enforce its rules and the FSB is responsible for enforcing the provisions of the FMA.

25

Based on a selection of principles from the CPSS-IOSCO Principles for FMIs, 2012.

26

Partly based on the ‘assessment report on the observance of the principles for Safcom as a qualifying CCP’ by the FSB, December 2012, additional documentation and discussions with the FSB, SARB, the JSE and market participants.

South Africa: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Reforms in the OTC Derivatives Market-Technical Note
Author: International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department