Front Matter Page
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
IMF Country Report No. 14/98
April 2014
MALAYSIA
FINANCIAL SECTOR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
FINANCIAL SECTOR PERFORMANCE, VULNERABILITIES AND DERIVATIVES—TECHNICAL NOTE
This Technical Note on Financial Sector performance, Vulnerabilities and Derivatives on Malaysia was prepared by a staff team of the International Monetary Fund as background documentation for the periodic consultation with the member country. It is based on the information available at the time it was completed in February 2013.
The policy of publication of staff reports and other documents by the IMF allows for the deletion of market-sensitive information.
Copies of this report are available to the public from
International Monetary Fund • Publication Services
700 19th Street, N.W. • Washington, D.C. 20431
Telephone: (202) 623-7430 • Telefax: (202) 623-7201
E-mail: publications@imf.org Internet: http://www.imf.org
Price: $18.00 a copy
International Monetary Fund
Washington, D.C.
© 2014 International Monetary Fund
Front Matter Page
Financial Sector Assessment Program
Malaysia
Financial Sector Performance, Vulnerabilities And Derivatives
Technical Note
February 2013
International Monetary Fund
Monetary and Capital Markets Department
Contents
Glossary
Executive Summary
I. Structure of Malaysia’s Financial Sector
II. Performance of Malaysia’s Banking Sector
A. Capital
B. Asset Allocation and Quality
C. Liquidity
D. Earnings Efficiency
III. Financial Derivatives
References
Tables
1. Non-bank Credit Intermediaries
2. Residential Mortgage Asset Quality Under Various Scenarios
Figures
1. Malaysia’s Financial Sector
2. Banking Sector: Assets and Deposits
3. Funds Raised in the Capital Market
4. Herfindahl Index for Banking Sector
5. Shareholding by Government-linked Institutions
6. Institutional Funds
7. Spreads Between 3-month Interbank and T-Bills Rates
8. Banking System Excess Liquidity and Deposit-to-Total Liabilities Ratio
9. European and U.K. Banks’ Claims on Malaysia
10. Share of U.K. Banks’ Claims in Total European Banks’ Claims
11. Regulatory Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets
12. Tier 1 Ratio
13. Capital-to-Total Assets Ratio
14. Hybrids as Proportion of Total Regulatory Capital
15. Tier 2 Capital as Proportion of Total Capital
17. Domestic Banking Groups: Tier 1 Ratios
18. Domestic Banking Groups: Core Tier 1 Ratios
19. Composition of Bank Lending
20. Breakdown of Banking System Loans
21. Breakdown of Lending to Households
22. Gross NPL Ratios
23. Provision Coverage
24. Loans Under Restructuring
25. Regional Comparison: Gross NPL Ratio and Provision Coverage
26. Composition of Non-performing Loans
27. Household Debt, Income
28. Unsecured Lending: Commercial and Islamic Banks
29. Residential Mortgage: Lending and NPL
30. Trends in the Number of Counseling and Debt Management Cases
31. Breakdown of Exposure to Large Borrowers
32. Banks’ Lending to Highly Leverage Companies
33. Banks’ Lending to Highly Leverage Companies
34. Construction Sector Gross NPL Ratios
35. Malaysian Banks: Composition of Overseas Exposure in Asia
36. Liquid Assets-to-Deposits and Short-Term Funding
37. Customer Deposit-to-Total Funding
38. Proportion of CASA and Term Deposits
39. Banking System Deposit by Holders
40. ROA and ROE
41. Efficiency Measures
42. Return on Average Asset (ROAA)
43. Overhead Cost-to-Revenue Ratio
44. Share of Floating Rate Loans to Total Loans
45. Net Interest Margin
46. Breakdown of Derivatives
47. Breakdown of FX Derivatives
48. Breakdown of Interest Rate Derivatives
49. Derivatives Exposures
50. Contribution of Net Gains from Derivatives to Pre-Tax Profit
51. Spread between NDF-Onshore USD/MYR Forward
52. Cross Currency Basis Swap Spreads
53. Weekly Change in Cross Currency Basis Swap Spreads
54. Cross Currency Swap Basis Spreads and Domestic Excess Liquidity
Boxes
1. Malaysia’s Masterplan for the Development of the Financial Sector and Capital Market, 2001-2010
2. Financial System Interlinkages, 2011
3. Do large Malaysian Banks Have Adequate Capital and Liquidity to Absorb European Banks’ Deleveraging?
4. How Much Equity Do Banks Need to Promote Growth and Meet Basel III?
5. Late Credit Cycle
6. Assessing Efficiency Among Commercial and Islamic Banks: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis
Appendices
1. Malaysia’s Financial System
2. Islamic Banking in Malaysia
3. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Methodology
Glossary
| BAFIA |
Banking and Financial Institutions Act |
| BNM |
Bank Negara Malaysia (Central Bank of Malaysia) |
| CMP |
Capital Market Masterplan |
| Commercial Banks |
Non-Islamic Banking institutions (also known as conventional banks) |
| DFIA |
Development Financial Institutions Act |
| D-SIB |
Domestic Systemically Important Banks |
| EPF |
Employees Provident Fund |
| FSMP |
Financial Sector Masterplan |
| FSPSR |
Financial Stability and Payments Systems Report |
| GFSR |
Global Financial Stability Report |
| LGD |
Loss given default |
| NPL |
Non-performing Loan/ Non-performing lending |
| PD |
Probability of Default |
| PIDM |
Malaysian Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| SC |
Securities Commission |
| SME |
Small and Medium Enterprises |
| Takaful |
Syariah-compliant insurance |
Executive Summary
Strong regulatory oversight, coupled with efforts to restructure the banking sector in the aftermath of the Asian financial crisis in 1997–1998, has supported rapid growth in Malaysia’s financial sector over the last decade.1 The banking sector has undergone consolidation while competition has increased following measures implemented under the Financial Sector Master Plan 2001–2010. The financial system weathered the 2008 global financial crisis well; the banking sector remained stable due to healthy capital and liquidity levels, while the impact on the domestic economy was felt primarily through trade channels.
Malaysian banks are presently well capitalized with comfortable tier 1 capital ratios. Domestic banking groups are expected to be able to meet Basel Ill capital requirements, barring any unforeseen tail-risk scenarios. Although the full implementation of Basel Ill only begins in 2019, maintaining high equity capital buffers should enhance stability and enables hybrid capital to be retired when they reach maturity or call dates.
Asset quality has been improving over the last five years. There has been a significant growth in lending to the household sector, driven by sustained economic growth. Personal loans and credit card lending have been growing rapidly, alongside mortgages. Lending to households currently accounts for 55 percent of total bank lending and household debt has risen to 74.2 percent of GDP in 2011, from 66.3 percent of GDP in 2006. While this may not be an immediate concern, potential risks could arise if a global economic downturn adversely affects the labor market and leads to strains in household balance sheets. Nonetheless, BNM, in its Financial Stability and Payments Systems Report 2011, assessed household financial buffers to be at comfortable levels as the growth in household debt has generally been accompanied by a corresponding expansion in household financial assets. The central bank remains vigilant in conducting continuous risk assessment.
Stronger financial positions and risk management capability have enabled domestic banking groups to pursue overseas expansions, mostly within the region. The importance to some banks of overseas assets and earnings is reaching levels which, based on international experience, warrant a review of internal controls. Currently, BNM monitors developments at material overseas operations of banks on a monthly basis and conducts frequent onsite examination on key material overseas outfit.