Philippines
Staff Report for the 2011 Article IV Consultation
Author:
International Monetary Fund
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

This 2011 Article IV Consultation reports that the Philippines is being affected along with other countries in the region by the fragile global environment. The key challenge is to navigate through the period of global uncertainty to maintain macroeconomic stability while building the foundations for faster and more inclusive growth. Domestic demand should support growth in 2012, as public spending picks up after a sharp decline in 2011, and IMF staff expects growth to rise from 3.7 percent in 2011 to 4.2 percent in 2012.

Abstract

This 2011 Article IV Consultation reports that the Philippines is being affected along with other countries in the region by the fragile global environment. The key challenge is to navigate through the period of global uncertainty to maintain macroeconomic stability while building the foundations for faster and more inclusive growth. Domestic demand should support growth in 2012, as public spending picks up after a sharp decline in 2011, and IMF staff expects growth to rise from 3.7 percent in 2011 to 4.2 percent in 2012.

INTRODUCTION

1. The Philippines is being affected along with other countries in the region by the fragile global environment. After reaching 7.6 percent in 2010, growth slowed to 3.6 percent (y/y) during the first three quarters of 2011. But macroeconomic conditions have remained generally sound, with inflation within the official target range, the national government deficit low, the balance of payments in surplus, and the financial sector withstanding the global stress. The authorities’ policy management and focus on strengthening governance and other pillars of growth and inclusiveness have helped confidence domestically and among foreign investors, as reflected in positive business and consumer sentiment, capital inflows, and ratings upgrades by Fitch and Moody’s in 2011.

2. In concluding the 2010 Article IV consultation, Executive Directors saw a need for carefully managing the exit from stimulus policies in a challenging external environment while moving ahead with reforms to strengthen medium-term growth. Monetary policy has indeed responded flexibly to circumstances, fiscal policy will combine medium-term consolidation with support for near-term growth, and the Philippines Development Plan lays out a multi-pronged growth strategy. Meanwhile, the authorities continue to make progress in following up on the recommendations of the 2010 Financial Sector Stability Assessment (FSSA) update.

3. Against this background, the discussions focused on the challenge of navigating through the global uncertainty to maintain macroeconomic stability while building the foundations for stronger inclusive growth. The authorities and staff agreed that policies are appropriately focused on supporting growth while keeping inflation manageable, strengthening medium-term public finances while continuing to build infrastructure and social safety nets, and monitoring proactively the resilience of the financial sector. The global turbulence represents a clear downside risk to the outlook, but the authorities have built up space for a wide-ranging policy response should further negative shocks occur. Looking ahead, it will be important for the authorities to give life to the vision of the medium-term Philippines Development Plan (PDP) to strengthen the structural basis for inclusive growth.

ECONOMIC CONTEXT

A. Developments: Growth Has Slowed but Macroeconomic Conditions Are Generally Sound

4. Economic activity slowed down during the first three quarters of 2011 (Figure 1). The slowdown reflected a fall in electronics exports, particularly of semiconductors, and lower public construction. Exports were subdued by the weak global environment and by supply chain disruptions following the March 2011 Japan earthquake tragedy. Public construction fell as a result of improved budget processes that temporarily slowed down project approvals and also reduced costs. Inventories have built up as demand turned out to be weaker than businesses envisaged earlier in the year. Unemployment and underemployment remain relatively high, at over 7 percent and 19 percent, respectively. Private consumption, however, has been well supported by robust remittances. On the supply side, services growth has remained strong, reflecting a continued expansion in business-process outsourcing (BPO) and real estate activity. But the export weakness has led to a slowing in manufacturing growth, while twin typhoons in September 2011 caused extensive damage to agricultural output. For the economy as a whole, the output gap has now turned negative.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Philippines—Real Sector

Main Message: Growth slowed down in 2011 and high frequency indicators suggest that it remained moderate in recent months. Growth would need to be faster and more inclusive to make a dent in poverty and reduce high-income inequality.

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: CEIC Data Company Ltd.; and IMF, WEO database.
A01ufig01

Contributions to GDP Growth

(Year-on-year percent change)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

5. Financial conditions have remained supportive of growth (Figure 2). The authorities have unwound crisis-related liquidity support measures and started to tighten monetary policy since March 2011. Real policy rates have turned positive and reserve money has been kept in check by partially sterilizing the rise in net foreign assets through the BSP’s special deposit accounts (SDA), which have risen to very high levels. In recent months, amid elevated global uncertainties and low core inflation, monetary tightening has paused. Real lending rates, however, are well below pre-crisis levels, interbank and short-term government bond yields remain below policy rates, and credit growth is rapid (22 percent, y/y, as of November). These monetary conditions have not, however, led to inflation pressure because of the emerging slack in the economy.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Philippines—Monetary Policy and Inflation

Main Message: Monetary conditions remain accommodative although policy rates have risen. A pause in tightening is now underway amid elevated global uncertainty.

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: Bloomberg; CEIC Data Company Ltd.; IMF, Asia and Pacific Regional Economic Outlook (October 2011)

6. Core inflation pressures have remained moderate. Headline inflation has generally held steady at around 4½ percent (y/y) through November 2011, slightly above the midpoint of the 3-5 percent target range. Core inflation (excluding volatile food and energy items) has been contained in the 3½-4 percent range.

7. Fiscal policy has contracted more sharply than the authorities envisaged (Figure 3). The national government deficit during January-November (P 96 billion; 1 percent of GDP) fell substantially short of the annual budget objective (P 300 billion; 3 percent of GDP) mainly reflecting lower capital expenditure, particularly on public construction. In October, the government announced a fast-tracking of spending of about 0.7 percent of GDP on infrastructure, local government transfers, and job training that has provided a stimulus to growth in late 2011. However, for the year as a whole the staff expects the deficit to fall to 1½ percent of GDP, which would represent a fiscal withdrawal of 1.8 percent of GDP.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Philippines—Public Finances

Main Message: The authorities are moving forward with a revenue-led fiscal consolidation strategy over the medium term while reorienting spending towards social sectors and infrastructure.

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: CEIC Data Company Ltd.; IMF, WEO database; and IMF staff calculations.

8. The balance of payments remains in sizable surplus, reflecting both the current and capital account (Figure 4). Remittances, BPO exports, and capital inflows have offset the impact of lower electronics exports. During 2011, international reserves rose by $12.9 billion to $75.3 billion (11 months of imports). The BSP forward book, meanwhile, declined by $10 billion during January-November, with most of the decline occurring in September when the Philippines was among the Asian economies affected by the rise in global risk aversion and reversal of capital flows from emerging markets. The episode also led to a temporary drop in reserves and the exchange rate and a jump in sovereign spreads. During January-November, the peso appreciated by 0.7 percent in real effective terms.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Philippines—Balance of Payments and External Adjustment

Main Message: The balance of payments has remained strong. Exports have been weak and capital inflows have moderated since August, but remittances have been resilient.

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: CEIC Data Company Ltd.; IMF, WEO database; and IMF staff calculations.

B. Outlook: Domestic Demand Should Support Growth, but External Environment is a Downside Risk

Staff Views

9. Domestic demand should support growth in 2012, offsetting sluggish external demand. Growth is projected to rise from 3.7 percent in 2011 to 4.2 percent in 2012 as public and private demand strengthen, reflecting a recovery in government spending, the start of long-awaited public-private partnerships (PPPs), supportive monetary conditions, and robust remittances. With external demand still weak, net exports will continue to make a negative contribution to growth in 2012, although the drag should be smaller than in 2011 as the unwinding of inventories reduces import growth. The balance of payments is likely to remain in surplus as remittances and service exports fuel the current account, and positive growth and yield differentials versus advanced countries attract capital inflows. Inflation should move toward the mid-point of the BSP’s target range in the absence of food and fuel price shocks, as the negative output gap holds down price pressures.

10. The outlook is subject to significant downside risks that arise mainly from global spillovers. Measures to revitalize investment may increase growth relative to the staff’s forecast, but on balance the global economy represents a clear downside risk. Renewed shocks to global activity, or a prolonged period of sluggish growth, could have substantial spillovers to the domestic economy through goods and services exports, financial flows, and remittances (Box 1). At home, low lending rates may continue to fuel credit demand, and banks may face pressure to loosen lending standards as excess reserves build up and rates on alternative assets (such as Treasury bills) remain low.

11. Over the medium term, growth is projected to recover to its potential rate of around 5 percent. Although external demand may remain sluggish for some time, the impact on net exports would be mitigated by the fact that electronics (the main export) rely to a significant extent on imported inputs. Domestic demand should be supported by remittances and a continued expansion of BPO, tourism, and other sectors. The staff’s growth projection is lower than the authorities’ 7-8 percent growth target, which in the staff’s view would require additional measures to attain. Measures would be needed in particular to further strengthen the investment environment and public infrastructure, as well as job creation and productivity. The balance of payments should remain in surplus as remittances and export diversification contribute to a current account surplus of nearly 2 percent of GDP and structural drivers continue to attract capital inflows.

Authorities’ Views

12. The authorities shared the staff’s outlook and assessment of risks, although they expected growth to be somewhat higher. Agriculture, tourism, BPOs, construction, and a resumption of the Asian supply chain could contribute to a recovery in growth to 5 percent or higher in 2012 and, combined with measures to boost investment, toward the 7-8 percent target over the medium term. However, the authorities broadly shared the staff’s views on the risks to the outlook, and noted the significant impact that negative shocks from advanced economies were already having on the Philippines. The BSP was actively monitoring risks to macroeconomic stability through its early warning and financial stress exercises and found the system to be resilient to a range of potential shocks.

Philippines: Spillovers from the Global Economy 1/

As a small open economy, the Philippines is influenced by global developments through both trade and financial channels. Weaker global growth causes demand for exports to decline, which in turn also affects consumption and investment. The financial system has only limited exposure to Europe and little reliance on foreign wholesale funding, but contagion could still occur through pullbacks of credit by European banks to the domestic corporate sector or a retreat by foreign investors from local equity and bond markets.

Exports, remittances, and portfolio and other capital flows are important transmission channels for external shocks. The share of goods and services exports in GDP is about 50 percent, making trade a key channel. Supply chain disruptions can have significant effects, as seen in the aftermath of the natural disasters in Japan. Philippine exports have benefited in recent years from rising demand by China, which has become an important trade partner. By the same token, a slowdown in China would affect the Philippines. The euro area has also become more important as a destination for Philippine intermediate goods exports and its share is twice as large as in ASEAN peers. More generally, the euro area and United States are key trading partners, each accounting for around 15 percent of merchandise exports, and are important destinations for Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs). Remittances are equivalent to around 10 percent of GDP and, although they held up well during 2008-2009, a global downturn would hurt the earnings on which they are based. Non-FDI capital flows have increased in importance, driven by portfolio inflows.

A01ufig02

Philippines: Exports, Remittances, and Non-FDI Capital Flows

(In percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

The staff estimates that in a downside global scenario Philippine growth could drop by about two thirds of the decline in external growth before any fiscal and monetary response. The trade channel is more important than the financial channels. In an illustrative scenario, the output gap would turn negative, contributing to a decline in inflation, and the fiscal balance would deteriorate due to revenue automatic stabilizers. The impact on exports and fixed investment is larger than the impact on private consumption, reflecting the resilience of remittances. The current account balance falls at first as exports decline faster than imports, and then rises as weaker domestic demand leads to lower imports.

A01ufig03

Philippines: Deviations from Baseline in Downside Scenario 1/

(In percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

1/ Assumes a -3.5 percent shock to output in the euro area and -1 percent in the United States for two years. Incorporates effects on other major economies based on the Global Integrated Monetary and Fiscal (GIMF) model.
1/ See selected issues paper for details.

MAINTAINING MACROECONOMIC STABILITY IN AN UNCERTAIN GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT

A. Monetary Policy: Supporting Growth While Keeping Inflation Manageable

Staff Views

13. Monetary policy has responded well to changing circumstances. The start of monetary tightening in early 2011 helped to forestall inflation pressures. The pause in recent months has been justified by heightened global downside risks, low core inflation, and the relatively short lags in the Philippines between policy moves and inflation. Policy easing is, however, not needed at this time because monetary conditions are still supportive of growth. At the same time, the authorities would need to respond proactively if inflation and activity were to show signs of picking up faster than anticipated.

14. The monetary transmission mechanism is hampered by the fall in short-term Treasury and interbank rates below policy rates. 1 In particular, moves in the policy rate might have only a limited impact on lending rates, which are influenced by interbank and Treasury rates. The BSP’s ability to mop up excess liquidity associated with large external inflows is constrained by its small remaining holdings of treasury securities for repo operations and its lack of legal authority to issue central bank securities for monetary policy operations. It is important in this context for the BSP to have the tools necessary for active liquidity management, including the ability to issue its own bills. In the interim, a close coordination of Treasury issuances and monetary policy could help strengthen the monetary mechanism.

Authorities Views

15. The authorities agreed with the staff’s characterization of monetary policy. In particular, they appreciated the staff’s view that the pause in monetary tightening was warranted. They viewed inflation pressures as moderate but felt that monetary easing was not needed at this juncture, because monetary policy was already supportive of growth and fiscal policy was expected to provide stimulus in the near term. Monetary policy could be eased if growth prospects were to deteriorate further. They agreed that it would be helpful for the BSP to be allowed to issue its own bills to enhance the effectiveness of monetary policy.

B. Reserves and Exchange Rate: A Cushion for Dealing with Adverse Shocks

Background

16. The authorities have used a varied toolkit for managing external inflows to the Philippines in recent years. The exchange rate has appreciated in real effective terms. Meanwhile, international reserves have risen rapidly, including during the global financial crisis, and are well above standard precautionary metrics as well as the Fund’s new adequacy metric. The BSP has sterilized much of the reserve buildup in order to avoid an undue expansion in monetary aggregates, and sterilization costs have increased owing to domestic-foreign interest differentials. The authorities have liberalized controls on capital outflows, prepaid some external debt, and had in place for some years macro-prudential measures that have worked well. Effective January 2012, the BSP raised market risk weights on banks’ nondeliverable forward (NDF) positions, which were considered to be large in size and speculative in nature. The move was seen as a macro-prudential measure to forestall systemic risk to the banking system from exchange market volatility.

Philippines: Net International Reserves, End-2010

article image
Sources: CEIC Data Company Ltd; IMF, WEO database; IMF Policy Papers, Assessing Reserve Adequacy (February 2011); and IMF staff calculations.

Staff’s View

17. Reserves and exchange rate flexibility can provide a cushion against external shocks while facilitating adjustment to sustained external inflows. The real exchange rate remains broadly in line with its medium-term fundamentals based on the standard approaches as well as an alternative estimation that takes into account long-term trends in remittances and the current account that may differ from medium-term outcomes.2 The staff supports the authorities’ stated policy of limiting foreign exchange market intervention to smoothing operations and allowing the exchange rate to adjust to market pressures. In this context, should volatile outflows occur, there is scope to use reserves to smooth the effects of such outflows. The regulatory move with respect to NDFs could be a useful part of the macro-prudential toolkit and help avoid disruptions to the onshore foreign exchange market. With the exchange rate not overvalued, sustained inflow pressures over the medium term, however, would need to be met by exchange rate adjustment.

A01ufig04

Real Exchange Rate Assessments 1/

(Deviation from equilibrium, in percent)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Source: IMF staff estimates.1/ This approach derives a current account norm by smoothing remittance income to yield a constant real income stream per capita.

Authorities’ Views

18. The authorities emphasized that their response to external inflows was based on striking a balance among a range of measures in the toolkit. Reserves were high but not, they felt, as excessive as the Fund’s adequacy metric would suggest since the insurance value was hard to measure. Reserves had provided an important buffer during the global crisis as well as the turbulence during 2011. Moreover, markets and rating agencies tended to react negatively toward emerging economies whose reserve levels fell abruptly.

C. Fiscal Policy: Medium-Term Consolidation Plans Allow for Near-Term Expansion

Background

19. The authorities remain committed to pursuing a gradual fiscal consolidation over the medium term. The fiscal plan announced in 2010 envisaged a gradual reduction in the national government deficit from 3½ percent of GDP in 2010 to 2 percent of GDP from 2013 onwards. In 2011, the deficit has fallen significantly below the targeted 3 percent of GDP, but the authorities have retained the deficit targets for 2012 (2.6 percent of GDP) and the medium term. Under the envisaged path, fiscal consolidation over the medium term would allow for a stimulus in 2012 as expenditures pick up after their temporary drop in 2011. Over the medium term, the consolidation path would generate primary surpluses of about 1 percent of GDP and reduce the public debt to GDP ratio from 51 percent in 2011 to 44 percent by 2016.

A01ufig05

Public Sector Debt 1/

(In percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook; and IMF staff estimates.1/ The coverage of the public sector is as follows. Nonfinancial public sector for Philippines; general government for Thailand and Malaysia; central government for China and Indonesia.
A01ufig06

Public Sector Primary Balance 1/

(In percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook; and IMF staff estimates.1/ The coverage of the public sector is as follows. Nonfinancial public sector for Philippines; general government for Thailand and Malaysia; central government for China and Indonesia.

20. The main elements of the authorities’ fiscal strategy are stronger tax administration, a reorientation of expenditure toward social sectors and infrastructure, and a public debt management strategy that reduces exchange rate and maturity risk. Tax administration efforts are being supported by technical assistance from the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation compact and the Fund, and are estimated to have generated a substantial gain in revenue in 2011 (½ percent of GDP). Expenditure plans include a greater emphasis on basic education, an expansion of conditional cash transfers (CCTs) that directly benefit vulnerable people, and wider health care coverage. The PPP projects to develop infrastructure will start from 2012. The civil service wage bill, however, will continue to rise in 2012 as a result of wage adjustments under the ongoing 2009-2012 Salary Standardization exercise and will account for 40 percent of primary expenditure. The debt profile is sustainable under a range of shocks and, to reduce vulnerabilities further, the authorities have continued to issue peso-denominated global bonds and conduct debt swaps that, respectively, reduce the shares of foreign currency and short-term debt.

Staff’s Views

21. The staff supports the government’s intention to follow a revenue-based fiscal consolidation over the medium term that nonetheless allows for a supportive stance in the near term.3 Notwithstanding the rise in the deficit in 2012, the medium-term debt path would still be lower than the original plan envisaged, owing to the greater than intended debt reduction in 2011. The planned medium-term consolidation would help to expand the space for the budget to deal effectively with potential shocks including frequent natural disasters, further anchor expectations, and reduce the government’s gross financing requirement. Given the Philippines’ substantial social and infrastructure needs for building faster and more inclusive growth, it is appropriate that consolidation efforts are focusing on raising the (low) ratio of revenue to GDP while reorienting expenditure toward priority areas. Once the current round of civil service wage adjustments is completed, the civil service wage bill should be carefully managed in order to avoid crowding out other priority spending.

22. Achieving the authorities’ fiscal objectives will require a sizable tax effort. The staff supports the authorities’ initial focus on improving tax administration that should help over time to enhance revenue collection. Early actions to simplify the tax system and broaden the base should complement the planned tax administration measures, whose full benefit is hard to predict and will take time to materialize. In 2012, in order for the budgeted expenditure and deficit objectives to be achieved, an increase in revenue will be required equivalent to 1½ percent of GDP. The authorities estimate, and the staff agrees, that tax administration improvements could yield revenue increases equivalent to ½ percent of GDP. Consequently, additional tax measures are likely needed, such as measures to reform excises, rationalize fiscal incentives, and address inefficiencies in the VAT to broaden the tax base.4 Such measures would also make the tax system more equitable and easier to administer. In this context, the staff welcomes the authorities’ recent submission of bills to Congress to rationalize “sin taxes” and streamline tax incentives that would go some way toward raising the additional revenue needed.

23. The authorities continue to make important progress in strengthening the fiscal framework. Key recent initiatives include passage of the Government-Owned and Controlled Corporation (GOCC) reform act, and the introduction of zero-based budgeting and a fiscal risk statement.5 These initiatives will also complement the authorities’ efforts to limit rice and transport subsidies by GOCCs and move instead to better targeted CCTs, and efforts to monitor GOCCs’ contingent liabilities. The planned PPPs should be helpful for building infrastructure, but their fiscal risks should be monitored carefully and reflected in the fiscal accounts.6 The pension system for uniformed personnel is due to experience a substantial increase in benefit payments over the coming years that needs to be managed in a fiscally sustainable way.

Authorities’ Views

24. The authorities reiterated their firm commitment to medium-term fiscal consolidation. This commitment and the improvement in the public debt profile over the past year as a result of debt management operations to reduce currency and rollover risks had helped to improve the credibility of the fiscal framework and been recognized by markets and rating agencies. The authorities continued to view their fiscal plans as achieving a good balance between fiscal consolidation and an appropriate level of development spending.

25. The authorities will continue to reorient expenditure toward key priorities for inclusive growth such as social safety nets, human capital, and infrastructure. With new budget processes in place and greater transparency in public spending, the execution of public projects should be easier and less costly to implement in future, allowing budget spending to rise toward targeted levels. The PPPs that would start in 2012 would gather pace in future years. The authorities may consider introduction of a performance-based compensation system for civil servants that would enhance efficiency of the service and could help to keep in check the wage bill. The authorities were considering options to put the pension system for uniformed personnel on a sustainable footing.

26. The increase in revenue that would be required for fulfilling the 2012 deficit and expenditure objectives would be delivered by the improvements in tax administration and the sin tax and incentives measures. Other tax reforms were not planned at this time, reflecting both the authorities’ desire to first maximize the gains from improving tax administration and simplifying the tax system and the fact that the appetite for tax measures in the legislature may wane as the May 2013 mid-term elections approach. Should these revenue gains prove insufficient for meeting the fiscal objectives, the authorities would reduce nonpriority expenditure or speed up privatization to provide additional resources to support spending.8

D. Financial Sector: Monitoring Spillover Risks and Vulnerabilities and Maintaining Resilience

Background

27. The financial sector has been resilient to the global turbulence so far. Banking sector indicators remain consistent with the 2010 Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) of the sector’s soundness.7 The BSP’s recent bank stress testing exercise suggested that the banking sector is well placed to withstand the direct effects of a range of shocks. Asset price overheating has not been a concern, with equity price earnings ratios broadly in line with historical averages and property price increases moderate. Financial markets were buffeted during the period of emerging market stress in August-September, but recovered in subsequent months.

A01ufig07

Selected Asia: Debt to Equity Ratio

(Market capitalization weighted average)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: Worldscope database; and IMF staff calculations.

Staff’s Views

28. The staff welcomes the authorities’ careful monitoring of risks to the financial sector. Potential spillovers from global financial disruptions, real estate exposures, rapid credit growth, and concentration and interest rate risk represent some of the key vulnerabilities.9 The financial system has only limited exposure to Europe (1½ percent of total assets), but contagion could occur through pullbacks of credit by European banks, whose lending is equivalent to nearly 10 percent of GDP, or a retreat by foreign investors from local markets. The prominent role of conglomerates as recipients of bank credit and as owners of banks, as well as the high leverage in parts of the corporate sector, call for a close monitoring of conglomerates and of potential feedback loops among banks. Rapid credit growth may pose risks for lending standards and asset quality as the credit cycle matures. In the real estate sector, anecdotal evidence of a rise in vacancy rates and softening of rents in certain niche segments may be a sign of emerging excess supply. The real estate exposures of nonbank financial institutions, and of property developers who fall outside the regulatory purview, could be an emerging vulnerability that requires close coordination among regulators. A contingency plan may be useful for preparing how to deal with a potential tail event.

29. The authorities have continued to strengthen the supervisory and regulatory framework in recent years, and have built on the progress noted in the 2010 FSSA update. The improvements have helped the financial sector to stay resilient through the global crisis and more recent strains. An important next step for bank supervision will be prompt Congressional approval of the amendments to the New Central Banking Act (NCBA) that would enhance supervision by providing supervisors with greater legal powers and protecting them from litigation, lifting the remaining constraints of bank secrecy laws on examiners, and further strengthening the prompt corrective action and bank resolution framework, as the FSSA Update recommended. The amendments would also allow the BSP to issue its own debt securities, providing a much-needed instrument to strengthen liquidity management. With respect to the AML/CFT regime, the authorities are committed to addressing the gaps noted by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and are awaiting Congressional approval of bills that they have submitted with legislative amendments to adequately criminalize money laundering and terrorist financing.

Authorities’ Views

30. The authorities broadly shared the staff’s assessment of financial sector soundness and vulnerabilities. They noted, however, that European banks in the Philippines were liquid, had access to a large local deposit base, and had not displayed undue signs of stress during recent episodes of global turbulence. Trade finance and dollar funding, for example, had not been interrupted. They noted that conglomerates’ revenue was well diversified across different business lines, which mitigated concentration risk, and that supervisors continued to pay close attention to the way systemically important conglomerates interface with banks. Regulators were coordinating closely to monitor potential vulnerabilities related to real estate.

E. Response to Renewed Global Shocks

Staff’s Views

31. Further negative global shocks could have substantial spillovers to the Philippines, but there is policy space to respond across a broad front. Many of the measures that were used successfully during the 2008-2009 global crisis could be reactivated. Reserves can be used to smooth the impact, and the exchange rate can also absorb part of the shock. Monetary tightening could be recalibrated or even temporarily reversed if needed. Fiscal policy will anyway provide a stimulus to growth in 2012, and there is scope to let the automatic stabilizers operate. If necessary, expenditures could temporarily be boosted faster than currently planned subject to appropriate expenditure management safeguards and within a strategy for medium-term consolidation. The fiscal multipliers would appear to have a larger impact than easier monetary conditions at this juncture, possibly because interest rates are already relatively low and lending conditions accommodative (Box 2). Financial market liquidity could be supported by special facilities, foreign exchange swaps, and lower reserve requirements.

Authorities’ Views

32. The authorities were also of the view that policy space exists for a strong response to further shocks. They had already prepared contingency plans and agreed that the 2008-2009 toolkit remained useful. Current policy settings were seen as supportive of growth, with the monetary stance not restrictive and fiscal policy set to expand in 2012.

Philippines: The Effectiveness of Macroeconomic Policy Responses to Global Shocks

It is important for macroeconomic policy to stand ready to respond flexibly to changing circumstances given heightened global uncertainties. A key policy issue is the relative strengths of monetary and fiscal policy in affecting short-term output developments in the context of the flexible exchange rate regime. Headline inflation is also susceptible to volatile commodity prices. The standard policy response to commodity price shocks, particularly in advanced economies, is to accommodate the first round effects of food and energy price swings on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) but not the second round effects on other CPI components and inflation expectations.

The GDP impact of macroeconomic policies and the second-round effects of commodity prices for the Philippines are estimated by an extended Global Projection Model (GPM) using Bayesian techniques.1/ The key results are:

  • The short-term impact of a 1 percent of GDP fiscal stimulus is slightly greater than the combined impact of a 100 basis points change in the policy interest rates and lending conditions (measured as the spread between the 91-day T-bill rate and the policy rate).2/ The impact of exchange rate depreciation is relatively weak.

  • Global fuel and food prices can have a significant impact on headline inflation and significant second-round effects, which suggest a need to take account of the impact of volatile commodity prices when evaluating the inflation forecast and the monetary stance.

article image

Fiscal policy would be more effective than monetary policy in supporting economic activity in the current juncture. In particular, a cut in policy rates would only have a modest impact of economic activity without a concomitant easing of lending conditions. With T-bill rates close to the lower bound and lending rates already at historical lows, the scope for a substantial easing of lending conditions is limited.

1/ The extended GPM model-based results in IMF Country Report No. 11/58 and the selected issues paper estimate the impact of monetary and fiscal policies as well as the role of global commodity prices and macro-financial linkages through a lending conditions variable. 2/ The estimates of the fiscal and monetary impact were also comparable to a simple recursive VAR analysis.

BUILDING FASTER AND MORE INCLUSIVE GROWTH

Background

33. The Philippines faces a difficult challenge with respect to poverty reduction. In recent decades, poverty has fallen, but it has done so relatively slowly and during the 2000s some of this progress was even reversed. The limited progress in poverty reduction has owed to both the relatively slow pace of growth in the Philippines, which historically has lagged its Asian neighbors, and rising income inequality, which has blunted the impact of growth on the living standards of the poor (Box 3).

34. Low investment is a long-standing impediment to higher growth in the Philippines. Low fiscal revenue has constrained public investment, and business climate perceptions, infrastructure limitations, and costly power have held back private investment. In addition, employment and underemployment remain high, particularly among young people.

Staff’s Views

35. In order to raise living standards across the board, it will be necessary both to raise the pace of growth and to ensure that the benefits of growth are shared more widely. The authorities’ emphasis on raising revenue in order to expand public investment and on improving governance and the business climate is well placed. Also appropriate is the emphasis on strengthening human capital, job training, and job search assistance, which will help employment. The most sustainable source of faster growth is higher total factor productivity, which would be helped by improvements in human capital and institutional quality, and by greater agricultural productivity and an expansion of the industrial and service sectors that would also expand employment.

36. In order to be more inclusive, higher growth will need to be accompanied by a set of mutual reinforcing policies. The staff supports the emphasis in the PDP on policies to complement efforts to strengthen growth, and in particular to strengthen social safety nets, infrastructure, governance, and human capital as well as to improve the access to finance by the poor. The ongoing reorientation of public spending in the 2012 budget is very helpful in this regard. Cross-country experience suggests that higher health and education spending, for example, helps to increase the inclusiveness of growth. Experience suggests that higher agricultural productivity and a shift to labor-intensive manufacturing and service sectors are also associated with greater inclusiveness.

A01ufig08

Public Health Spending in Emerging Economies, 1995-2007

(In percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Source: World Health Organization.

Philippines: Building Inclusive Growth 1/

Poverty in the Philippines has fallen in recent decades. Poverty reduction has, however, been relatively limited owing to both relatively slow growth and a low elasticity of poverty reduction with respect to growth. The low elasticity may owe in part to high and rising inequality, which reflects unequal distribution of growth and regional development, rapid population growth, declines in the relative price of labor provided by the poor, and limited access by the poor to social and financial services.

As the Philippine Development Plan 2011-2016 notes, a strong and sustainable rise in living standards requires growth to be both faster and more inclusive. The PDP notes that growth has been slow compared with others in the region; the benefits of economic and social progress have not been broadly shared; and corruption and governance concerns have at times undermined the public’s sense of ownership and control over public policy. It emphasizes infrastructure, governance, human capital, and social safety net as key for strong and inclusive growth.

Rapid and sustained growth requires strengthening all three pillars of potential growth. Staff analysis suggests that higher investment in better institutional quality and human capital, and a transition of economic activity from agriculture to industry and services could raise potential growth in the Philippines. In addition, redundancy costs are relatively high, and active labor market measures such as job training and search assistance may be helpful to reduce mismatches in the labor market as well as to increase employment.

A set of mutually reinforcing policies will likely be needed to increase the inclusiveness of growth. Staff cross-country analysis shows that high inflation is detrimental to inclusiveness.2/ Greater productivity in agriculture, possibly through better rural infrastructure and extension services, and a shift in labor towards services, such as BPO and tourism, could help to reduce inequality. The relatively low share of education, health, and pension spending in GDP in the Philippines also points to an important role for fiscal policy in strengthening inclusiveness.

Philippines: Estimation of the Model, Full Sample 1/

(Dependent variable: Ratio of the bottom quintile to mean per capita income)

article image
Source: IMF staff calculations.

t statistics are in parentheses; The asterisks *, **, *** denote significant at the 10 percent, 5 percent, and 1 percent levels, respectively.

A01ufig09

Philippines: Degree of Inclusiveness Versus Health Spending

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

1/ See selected issues paper for details. 2/ The degree of inclusiveness is measured by the ratio of “the poor”—the income of the bottom quintile of the income distribution—and mean per capita income.

Authorities’ Views

37. The authorities emphasized that their focus was on achieving not just faster but more inclusive growth. Improvements in the investment climate, the PPP projects, and a diversification of economic activity would see a rise in growth over time. In addition, the priorities in the PDP would be implemented and would enhance inclusiveness.

STAFF APPRAISAL

38. The Philippines is being affected along with other countries in the region by the fragile global economic environment, but macroeconomic conditions remain generally sound. The authorities’ policy management is supporting confidence and has built up room for a strong response should further negative shocks occur.

39. In 2012, domestic demand should drive a modest pickup in growth, notwithstanding sluggish external demand. The staff expects GDP growth to rise from 3.7 percent in 2011 to 4.2 percent in 2012 based on a recovery in public spending, supportive monetary conditions, and robust remittances. Over the medium term, growth should recover to around 5 percent. Inflation should remain within the 3-5 percent official target range.

40. The outlook is subject to significant downside risks that arise mainly from the global economy. The staff welcomes the authorities’ efforts to monitor actively the risks to macroeconomic stability through early warning and financial stress exercises. Renewed shocks to global markets or activity, or a prolonged period of sluggish world growth, would hurt Philippine goods and services exports, financial flows, and remittances. At home, rapid credit growth may pose risks for lending standards and asset quality as the credit cycle matures.

41. A key policy challenge for the Philippine authorities is to navigate through the uncertain global environment to maintain macroeconomic stability and build strong inclusive growth. The authorities’ macroeconomic policies are appropriately focused on supporting growth while keeping inflation manageable, strengthening medium-term public finances while continuing to build infrastructure and social safety nets, and improving governance.

42. Monetary policy has responded well to changing circumstances. Policy tightening in early 2011 helped to forestall inflation pressures, while the pause in tightening in recent months is justified in view of extreme global downside risks and low core inflation. Policy easing, however, is not needed at this time because monetary conditions are still supportive of growth. Monetary policy could be recalibrated if global downside risks were to materialize.

43. International reserves and exchange rate flexibility provide a cushion against external shocks while facilitating the adjustment to sustained inflows. The staff estimates the real effective exchange rate to be broadly in line with medium-term fundamentals. Meanwhile, reserve levels are well above standard precautionary metrics and, should volatile outflows occur, there is scope to use reserves to smooth the effects of such outflows. Over time, with the exchange rate not overvalued, there is scope to rely more on exchange rate flexibility in response to sustained inflows.

44. Fiscal policy focuses appropriately on consolidation in the medium term while providing welcome support for growth in 2012. In 2012, expenditure should pick up under more efficient and transparent budget processes. Over the medium term, the planned consolidation would strengthen the ability of the budget to respond to future shocks, including natural disasters. Expenditure is being appropriately reoriented toward social and infrastructure priorities for inclusive growth. Higher revenue will be needed to meet the government’s deficit and expenditure objectives. The authorities’ emphasis on strengthening tax administration is appropriate and the Fund continues to support these efforts through technical assistance. In addition, it will be important to reform excises, rationalize fiscal incentives, and broaden the tax base. The staff welcomes the continuing progress being made to strengthen the fiscal framework.

45. The financial sector has been resilient to the global turbulence so far. The staff welcomes the authorities’ continued attention to monitoring key vulnerabilities, including concentration risk, interest rate risk, and potential spillovers from global financial disruptions. Real estate exposures of nonbank financial institutions and property developers bear monitoring and close coordination among regulators.

46. To further strengthen banking supervision, an important next step will be to approve promptly amendments to the New Central Banking Act. The amendments should also allow the BSP to issue its own debt securities, providing a much-needed instrument to strengthen liquidity management.

47. In the event of a further negative global shock that spills over to the Philippines, the staff agrees with the authorities that a range of policy tools could be deployed in response. Many measures that were successfully used during the 2008-2009 global crisis could be reactivated. Reserves can be used to smooth the impact, and the exchange rate can also absorb part of the shock. Monetary policy could be eased if needed. Fiscal policy will anyway provide a stimulus to growth in 2012. There is scope to let the automatic stabilizers operate and, if necessary, temporarily to boost expenditures, subject to sound expenditure management and within a strategy for medium-term consolidation. Financial market liquidity could be supported by special facilities, foreign exchange swaps, and lower reserve requirements.

48. The staff fully supports the authorities’ emphasis on building faster and more inclusive growth. A broad-based improvement in living standards requires both faster growth and a set of mutually reinforcing policies to increase inclusiveness. The reorientation of government spending toward social priorities, the Philippine Development Plan (PDP)’s focus on improving governance, infrastructure, human capital, and social safety nets, and efforts to broaden the access to finance are very appropriate. Progress in these areas, along with higher government revenue, will help to raise private and public investment and boost inclusive growth.

49. It is recommended that the next Article IV consultation take place on the standard 12-month cycle.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Philippines—Monetary Policy and Inflation

Main Message: The financial sector remains sound. P/E ratios have increased in recent months, while property prices and credit to the real estate sector have remained moderate.

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: Bloomberg L.P.; CEIC Data Company Ltd.; and Philippine authorities.
Table 1.

Philippines: Selected Economic Indicators, 2008-13

Nominal GDP (2010): P 9,003 billion ($199.6 billion)

Population (2010): 94.0 million

GDP per capita (2010): $2,123

Poverty headcount ratio at $2 a day at PPP (2006): 45 percent

IMF quota: SDR 1,019.3 million

Main products and exports: Electronics and agricultural products

Unemployment rate (July 2011): 7.1 percent

article image
Sources: Philippine authorities; and IMF staff projections.

The saving rate (percent of GDP) is calculated as the sum of the investment rate (percent of GDP) and the current account (percent of GDP).

Fund definition. Excludes privatization receipts and includes deficit from restructuring of the central bank (Central Bank-Board of Liquidators).

Includes the national government, Central Bank-Board of Liquidators, 14 monitored government-owned enterprises, social security institutions, and local governments.

Excludes public financial institutions and privatization receipts.

November 2011 (year-on-year).

Secondary market rate.

December 2011.

Commercial Banks Loans excluding BSP Reverse Repurchase Agreements.

November 2011.

Includes liabilities of foreign banks in the Philippines to their headquarters, branches and agencies, external debt not registered with the central bank, and private capital lease agreements.

In percent of exports of goods and nonfactor services.

Adjusted for gold and securities pledged as collateral against short-term liabilities.

Short-term liabilities include medium- and long-term debt due in the following year.

Table 2.

Philippines: National Government Cash Accounts, 2008-13

(In billions of pesos, unless otherwise noted)

article image
Sources: Philippine authorities; and IMF staff projections.

Projections include possible gains from tax administrative measures for 2012 and 2013.

Includes other percentage taxes, documentary stamp tax, and noncash collections. Noncash collections are also reflected as tax expenditures under current expenditures.

Excludes purchase of National Power Corporation (NPC) securities and other on lending; includes capital transfers to local government units (LGUs). May exceed public investment in years when capital transfers to LGUs exceed their reported capital spending.

Includes privatization receipts as revenue and excludes the operations of the Central Bank-Board of Liquidators (CB-BOL)

Table 3.

Philippines: National Government Cash Accounts, 2008-13

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise noted)

article image
Sources: Philippine authorities; and IMF staff projections.

Projections include possible gains from tax administrative measures for 2012 and 2013.

Includes other percentage taxes, documentary stamp tax, and noncash collections. Noncash collections are also reflected as tax expenditures under current expenditures.

Excludes purchase of National Power Corporation (NPC) securities and other on lending; includes capital transfers to local government units (LGUs). May exceed public investment in years when capital transfers to LGUs exceed their reported capital spending.

Includes privatization receipts as revenue and excludes the operations of the Central Bank-Board of Liquidators (CB-BOL).

Excludes privatization receipts from revenue.

Consolidated (net of national government debt held by the sinking fund) and excluding contingent/guaranteed debt.

Nonfinancial public sector includes the national government, CB-BOL, 14 monitored government-owned enterprises, social security institutions, and local governments. Debt is consolidated (net of intra-nonfinancial public sector holdings of debt).

Defined as the deficit, plus amortization of medium- and long-term debt, plus the stock of short-term debt at the end of the last period, plus market financing on behalf of NPC.

Table 4.

Philippines: Depository Survey, 2008-11

(In billions of pesos, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Philippine authoriites, New Depository Corporation Survey; and CEIC Data Co., Ltd.
Table 5.

Philippines: Balance of Payments, 2008-2013

(In billions of U.S. dollars)

article image
Sources: Philippine authorities; and Fund staff projections.

The 2003-04 revisions to the data separate remittances made by Filipino residents working abroad (income), and nonresident workers’ remittances (transfers).

Gross reserves less gold and securities pledged as collateral against short term liabilities.

As a percent of short-term debt, excluding pledged assets of the central bank.

Monitored external liabilities are defined as external debt plus liabilities of foreign banks in the Philippines to their headquarters, branches and agencies, some external debt not registered with the central bank and private capital lease agreements.

In percent of goods and nonfactor services exports.

Defined as the current account deficit, plus amortization on medium- and long-term debt, plus short-term debt at the end of the previous period.

Table 6.

Philippines: Baseline Medium-Term Outlook, 2008-16

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Philippine authorities; and IMF staff projections.

The saving rate is calculated as the sum of the investment rate and the current account balance (all as a percent of GDP).

Nonfinancial public sector includes the national government, CB-BOL, 14 monitored government-owned enterprises, social security institutions, and local governments.

The sum of all nonfinancial public sector revenue net of intra-public sector payments. It is assumed that 80 percent of Bureau of Treasury revenue represents interest and dividends from other parts of the nonfinancial public sector. Privatization receipts are

Defined as the difference between nonfinancial public sector revenue and primary balance.

Excludes privatization receipts of the national government, and includes net deficit from restructuring the central bank.

Net of intra-nonfinancial public sector holdings of debt.

Gross reserves less gold and securities pledged as collateral against short-term liabilities.

Reserves as a percent of short-term debt (including medium- and long-term debt due in the following year). Both reserves and debt were adjusted for gold-backed loans.

Current account deficit, plus amortization on medium- and long-term debt, plus short-term debt at the end of the previous period.

Defined as external debt plus liabilities of foreign banks in the Philippines to their headquarters, branches and agencies, some external debt not registered with the central bank and private capital lease agreements.

Table 7.

Philippines: Banking Sector Indicators, 2008-11 1/

(In percent)

article image
Source: Philippines authorities, Status Report on the Philippines Financial System.

ROPA = Real and Other Property Acquired. ROPA is a measure of the stock of foreclosed properties held by a bank.

Based on the new framework, universal/commercial banks are to incorporate operational risk in addition to credit and market risks.

Nonperforming loans (NPL) over total loan portfolio excluding interbank loans (IBL).

(Nonperforming loans + ROPA) over total gross assets.

Ratio of (NPLs + Gross ROPA + current restructured loans) to (Gross total loan portfolio + Gross ROPA).

Ratio of loan loss reserves to NPLs.

Ratio of valuation reserves (for loans and ROPA) to NPAs.

Table 8.

Philippines: Indicators of External Vulnerability, 2008-12

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Philippine authorities; and IMF staff projections.

Gross reserves less gold and securities pledged as collateral against short-term liabilities.

As of June, 2010.

APPENDIX I: —DEBT SUSTAINABILITY ANALYSIS

1. The outlook for public debt dynamics is favorable. Nonfinancial sector public debt has been steadily declining from 96 percent of GDP in 2003 to 53.5 percent of GDP in 2010. Based on the government’s medium-term objective of a national government deficit to 2 percent of GDP, public debt is projected to continue this declining trend to 44 percent of GDP by 2016. Gross financing need is also expected to decline from 15 percent of GDP in 2010 to 9 percent of GDP by 2016. If the deficit were to remain 1 percent of GDP higher than currently projected or if medium-term growth were lower by 1 percent, the decline in public debt will be more gradual and debt levels would remain at around 50 percent of GDP through 2016. Given the high share of foreign currency debt, the main vulnerability arises from exchange rate risk.

2. Projected external debt dynamics are stable. In recent years, external debt has steadily declined, from nearly 80 percent of GDP in 2001 to below 40 percent of GDP at end-2010. Under the staff’s baseline scenario, the external debt ratio is projected to decline slightly, a result of current account surpluses. Further, the debt dynamics appear to be relatively resilient to various shocks: one-half standard deviation shocks to interest rates, growth, and the current account lead to only a modest deterioration in the debt ratios over the medium term. However, exchange rate volatility remains a vulnerability as a one-time real depreciation of 30 percent would entail a 14 percent jump in the external debt ratio from its end-2010 level.

Figure I.1.
Figure I.1.

Philippines: Public Debt Sustainability: Bound Tests 1/ 2/

(Public debt, in percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: International Monetary Fund, country desk data; and staff estimates.1/ Shaded areas represent actual data. Individual shocks are permanent one-half standard deviation shocks. Figures in the boxes represent average projections for the respective variables in the baseline and scenario being presented. Ten-year historical average for the variable is also shown.2/ For historical scenarios, the historical averages are calculated over the ten-year period, and the information is used to project debt dynamics five years ahead.3/ Permanent 1/4 standard deviation shocks applied to real interest rate, growth rate, and primary balance.4/ One-time real depreciation of 30 percent and 10 percent of GDP shock to contingent liabilities occur in 2010, with real depreciation defined as nominal depreciation (measured by percentage fall in dollar value of local currency) minus domestic inflation (based on GDP deflator).
Figure I.2.
Figure I.2.

Philippines: External Debt Sustainability: Bound Tests 1/ 2/

(External debt, in percent of GDP)

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 049; 10.5089/9781463939731.002.A001

Sources: International Monetary Fund, Country desk data, and staff estimates.1/ Shaded areas represent actual data. Individual shocks are permanent one-half standard deviation shocks. Figures in the boxes represent average projections for the respective variables in the baseline and scenario being presented. Ten-year historical average for the variable is also2/ For historical scenarios, the historical averages are calculated over the ten-year period, and the information is used to project debt dynamicsPermanent 1/4 standard deviation shocks applied to real interest rate, growth rate, and current account balance.One-time real depreciation of 30 percent occurs in 2010.
Table I.1.

Philippines: Public Sector Debt Sustainability Framework, 2006?2016

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Coverage of public sector is for non-financial public sector gross debt.

Derived as [(r - p(1+g) - g + ae(1+r)]/(1+g+p+gp)) times previous period debt ratio, with r = interest rate; p = growth rate of GDP deflator; g = real GDP growth rate; a = share of foreign denominated debt; and e = nominal exchange rate depreciation (measured by increase in local currency value of U.S. dollar).

The real interest rate contribution is derived from the denominator in footnote 2/ as r -π(1+g) and the real growth contribution as -g.

The exchange rate contribution is derived from the numerator in footnote 2/ as ae(1+r).

For projections, this line includes exchange rate changes.

Defined as public sector deficit, plus amortization of medium and long-term public sector debt, plus short-term debt at end of previous period.

The key variables include real GDP growth; real interest rate; and primary balance in percent of GDP.

Derived as nominal interest expenditure divided by previous period debt stock.

Assumes that key variables (real GDP growth, real interest rate, and other identified debt-creating flows) remain at the level of the last projection year.

Table I.2.

Philippines: External Debt Sustainability Framework, 2006-2016

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image

Derived as [r - g - r(1 + g) + ea(1 + r)]/(1+g + r + gr) times previous period debt stock, with r = nominal effective interest rate on external debt; r = change in domestic GDP deflator in U.S. dollar terms, g = real GDP growth rate, e = nominal appreciation (increase in dollar value of domestic currency), and a = share of domestic-currency denominated debt in total external debt.

The contribution from price and exchange rate changes is defined as [-r(1 + g) + ea(1+r)]/(1+g + r+gr) times previous period debt stock, r increases with an appreciating domestic currency (e > 0) and rising inflation

For projection, line includes the impact of price and exchange rate changes.

Defined as current account deficit, plus amortization on medium- and long-term debt, plus short-term debt at end of previous period.

The key variables include real GDP growth; nominal interest rate; dollar deflator growth; and both non-interest current account and non-debt inflows in percent of GDP.

Long-run, constant balance that stabilizes the debt ratio assuming that key variables (real GDP growth, nominal interest rate, dollar deflator growth, and non-debt inflows in percent of GDP) remain at their levels of the last projection year.

APPENDIX II: —TRANSITION TO GFSM 2001

The presentation of national government operations in the main text of the staff report follows the GFSM 1986 format (on a cash basis). To promote international compatibility of government operations, preliminary data consolidated to the general government level in a GFSM 2001 format is presented in this Appendix. The authorities are in the process of improving the coverage and reporting of fiscal data.

Table II.1.

Philippines: General Government Operations, 2007-11

(In percent of GDP)

article image
Sources: Philippine authorities; and IMF staff projections.

National government only. The expense item related to SSIs and local governments are not separately available and are included in the amount for expense not elsewhere classified.

1

Chapter 2 of the selected issues paper provides further analysis.

2

Box 2 of IMF Country Report No. 11/59 provides further background on the alternative estimation.

3

On a cyclically-adjusted basis, fiscal policy would provide a 0.8 percent of GDP stimulus in 2012.

4

A reform of excises on alcohol and tobacco (so-called “sin taxes”), for example, could potentially yield additional revenue of ¼ percent of GDP in 2012 and 1 percent of GDP in 2013.

5

Under zero-based budgeting, proposed expenditures are justified afresh each year instead of as an increase to the previous year’s expenditure. The fiscal risk statement is an official government document that contains quantitative and qualitative evaluations of major fiscal risks.

6

The existing PPP framework includes a Build Operate Transfer law and a centralized PPP knowledge center that provide a good foundation for PPPs. The next steps could include further strengthening the stringency of gateway safeguards.

7

Universal and commercial banks’ nonperforming loan ratios have remained low (2.6 percent) and banks’ capital adequacy ratios high (16.4 percent) as of June 2011 (latest data available).

8

The latter option would, however, be reflected in a higher deficit under IMF definitions, which view privatization proceeds as financing items rather than revenue. Also, while privatization can provide resources in the short term, it does not diminish the need for sustainable tax revenue increases over time.

9

Concentration and interest rate risk are structural features of the Philippine financial system, owing to the dominant role of conglomerates in corporate and bank ownership (which magnifies “connected” lending in banks’ portfolios) and the large shares of securities in banks’ assets. Single borrower limits contain banks’ exposure to conglomerates but are subject to exemptions such as higher limits for petroleum-related enterprises.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Philippines: Staff Report for the 2011 Article IV Consultation
Author:
International Monetary Fund
  • Figure 1.

    Philippines—Real Sector

    Main Message: Growth slowed down in 2011 and high frequency indicators suggest that it remained moderate in recent months. Growth would need to be faster and more inclusive to make a dent in poverty and reduce high-income inequality.

  • Contributions to GDP Growth

    (Year-on-year percent change)

  • Figure 2.

    Philippines—Monetary Policy and Inflation

    Main Message: Monetary conditions remain accommodative although policy rates have risen. A pause in tightening is now underway amid elevated global uncertainty.

  • Figure 3.

    Philippines—Public Finances

    Main Message: The authorities are moving forward with a revenue-led fiscal consolidation strategy over the medium term while reorienting spending towards social sectors and infrastructure.

  • Figure 4.

    Philippines—Balance of Payments and External Adjustment

    Main Message: The balance of payments has remained strong. Exports have been weak and capital inflows have moderated since August, but remittances have been resilient.

  • Philippines: Exports, Remittances, and Non-FDI Capital Flows

    (In percent of GDP)

  • Philippines: Deviations from Baseline in Downside Scenario 1/

    (In percent of GDP)

  • Real Exchange Rate Assessments 1/

    (Deviation from equilibrium, in percent)

  • Public Sector Debt 1/

    (In percent of GDP)

  • Public Sector Primary Balance 1/

    (In percent of GDP)

  • Selected Asia: Debt to Equity Ratio

    (Market capitalization weighted average)

  • Public Health Spending in Emerging Economies, 1995-2007

    (In percent of GDP)

  • Philippines: Degree of Inclusiveness Versus Health Spending

  • Figure 5.

    Philippines—Monetary Policy and Inflation

    Main Message: The financial sector remains sound. P/E ratios have increased in recent months, while property prices and credit to the real estate sector have remained moderate.

  • Figure I.1.

    Philippines: Public Debt Sustainability: Bound Tests 1/ 2/

    (Public debt, in percent of GDP)

  • Figure I.2.

    Philippines: External Debt Sustainability: Bound Tests 1/ 2/

    (External debt, in percent of GDP)