This debt sustainability analysis (DSA) updates the joint IMF/World Bank DSA of May 4, 2011, and reflects the most recent macroeconomic developments, including the authorities’ plans to scale up infrastructure investment.1 The analysis shows Ghana’s external debt burden indicators remaining below their respective indicative thresholds, provided the programmed fiscal consolidation is achieved. However, the risk of external debt distress remains moderate, unchanged from the May DSA. The main vulnerabilities related to a high debt service-to-revenue ratio and continuing risks to the fiscal outlook. Indeed, while overall public sector debt is projected to remain broadly unchanged in relation to GDP, a ratio of 40 percent does not provide strong buffers against shocks, suggesting a case for further gradual consolidation and additional revenue mobilization over the medium term.

Abstract

This debt sustainability analysis (DSA) updates the joint IMF/World Bank DSA of May 4, 2011, and reflects the most recent macroeconomic developments, including the authorities’ plans to scale up infrastructure investment.1 The analysis shows Ghana’s external debt burden indicators remaining below their respective indicative thresholds, provided the programmed fiscal consolidation is achieved. However, the risk of external debt distress remains moderate, unchanged from the May DSA. The main vulnerabilities related to a high debt service-to-revenue ratio and continuing risks to the fiscal outlook. Indeed, while overall public sector debt is projected to remain broadly unchanged in relation to GDP, a ratio of 40 percent does not provide strong buffers against shocks, suggesting a case for further gradual consolidation and additional revenue mobilization over the medium term.

I. Assumptions Underlying the DSA

Baseline macroeconomic assumptions

1. This DSA is consistent with the macroeconomic framework outlined in the IMF Staff Report for the Fifth Review under the Extended Credit Facility. Compared to the previous DSA (see Text Table 1 and Box 1),2 this update is based on:

  • A revised macroeconomic framework. A combination of fiscal consolidation and disinflation has supported the favorable macroeconomic setting in 2011, and the outlook going forward remains positive. Inflation has stabilized at 8½ percent, and the government is on track to reduce the fiscal deficit (after arrears clearance) by about 2¼ percentage points of (non-oil) GDP. The DSA assumes implementation of agreed policies in 2012 and unchanged policies thereafter, corresponding to a primary fiscal deficit of ½ percent of GDP from 2013 onward. Despite significant export growth, the external current account deficit for 2011 is projected to remain broadly unchanged at 8¼ percent of GDP, reflecting a strong rebound in imports, and to gradually improve in the long run.

  • A revised public investment profile. The Ghanaian authorities are planning a significant scaling up of infrastructure investment and have negotiated a large financing package of US$3 billion on nonconcessional terms to finance critical investments. The loan amounts are assumed to be disbursed in equal installments of US$750 million a year over a four-year period. Beyond this loan, it is assumed that there will be a general shift toward more nonconcessional external borrowing (NCB) than previously projected.

  • Revised grant financing projections. Consistent with Ghana’s lower middle-income status, it is expected that grant financing will continue to fall over the projection period.

Text Table 1.

Key Macroeconomic Assumptions

article image
Sources: Ghanaian authorities and IMF staff estimates and projections.

Baseline Macroeconomic Assumptions

Real GDP growth: Growth has been strong, rising from 4 percent in 2009 to an estimated 13½ percent in 2011, boosted by oil production and robust expansion of the non-oil economy. The overall economy is projected to grow by more than 8 percent in 2012 with a gradual decline to an average of 5½ percent in the long term. Real growth projections are higher than in the previous DSA, but remain conservative. Despite the scaling up of infrastructure investment and the prospect for new oil and gas discoveries to come on stream, average long-term growth is assumed to stay below the 10-year historical average of 5.8 percent..

Inflation: Inflation has fallen to single digits from its peak of more than 20 percent in June 2009. It is expected to remain broadly stable at around 8-9 percent in 2011 and gradually decline to 5½ percent in the long term.

Government balances: Based on the strong performance—particularly on the revenue side—during the first three quarters of the year, the 2011 fiscal deficit target is projected to decline below 5 percent of (non-oil) GDP. After a temporary increase in the deficit in 2012, mainly as a result of one-off retroactive wage payments, it is assumed that the primary deficit will remain unchanged at ½ percent of GDP throughout the projection period.

Current account balance: Ghana’s external balance continues to benefit from strong cocoa and gold exports. The non-interest current account deficit is projected to gradually narrow from around 8 percent of GDP in 2011 to 3–4 percent at the end of the projection period, broadly in line with the current account norm produced by the macroeconomic balance approach. Exports are projected to grow at a robust pace to close to 40 percent of GDP by 2031, increasingly supported by nontraditional exports as infrastructure bottlenecks are reduced. Imports are also projected to rise to around 46 percent of GDP, with a significant portion devoted to equipment for new oil fields and government infrastructure projects in the near term.

FDI: In the financial account, non-debt creating inflows (largely composed of foreign direct investment) are projected to decline from the current high levels (around 8 percent of GDP) to about 3-4 percent in the long-term, as the initial investments in the oil and gas sector abate. The baseline assumes that oil extraction is limited to the Jubilee 1 field, with oil-related investments projected to decelerate. This is a conservative assumption in light of new discoveries.

Debt financing: Concessional financing from official bilateral creditors is expected to decline, and to be gradually replaced by commercial borrowing over the medium to long term. The shift is consistent with Ghana’s recent transition to lower middle-income status. The projected volume of commercial borrowing is higher than in the previous DSA, consistent with Ghana’s plans to scale up infrastructure investment. The DSA assumes that the ECF program limits on contracting of nonconcessional external debt will be fully utilized during 2011–12, with annual disbursements of close to 3 percent of GDP during 2012–15 (Text Table 2). Net foreign financing is projected to remain above 2 percent of GDP annually through the end of the projection period, with net domestic financing as a residual averaging 1¼ percent of GDP during 2012–31. Ghana’s $750 million sovereign bond is expected to be rolled over in 2017 and 2027.

Text Table 2.

Official Public External Borrowing (in US$ millions)

article image
Sources: Ghanaian authorities and IMF staff estimates and projections.

II. External DSA

Baseline scenario

2. Under the baseline scenario, Ghana’s debt indicators are below the relevant indicative debt distress thresholds.3 The projected level and composition of external debt is associated with a small deterioration in the various debt burden indicators, but all remain below their respective thresholds (Text Table 3, Tables 1 and Figure 1). The baseline external debt burden trajectories are less favorable than in the May 2011 DSA, however, reflecting mainly assumptions on increased external borrowing on non-concessional terms.

Text Table 3.

Indicators of External Debt Vulnerabilities (Baseline, in percent)

article image
Sources: IMF staff projections.

All indicatators refer to public and publicly guaranteed external debt.

Table 1:

External Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2008-31 1/

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Ghanaian authorities; and staff estimates and projections.

Includes both public and private sector external debt.

Derived as [r - g - ρ(1+g)]/(1+g+ρ+gρ) times previous period debt ratio, with r = nominal interest rate; g = real GDP growth rate, and ρ = growth rate of GDP deflator in U.S. dollar terms.

Includes exceptional financing (i.e., changes in arrears and debt relief); changes in gross foreign assets; and valuation adjustments. For projections also includes contribution from price and exchange rate changes.

Assumes that PV of private sector debt is equivalent to its face value.

Current-year interest payments divided by previous period debt stock.

Historical averages and standard deviations are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability.

Defined as grants, concessional loans, and debt relief.

Grant-equivalent financing includes grants provided directly to the government and through new borrowing (difference between the face value and the PV of new debt).

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt under Alternative Scenarios, 2011-31 1/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 036; 10.5089/9781463941048.002.A002

Sources: Ghanaian authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2021.

Standard stress tests

3. Standard stress tests confirm a moderate risk of debt distress (Table 2). On the positive side, all three stock indicators remain below their threshold levels under the stress scenarios. However, in the worst stress-test scenario (a one-time 30 percent exchange rate depreciation), the external debt-to-GDP ratio fails to stabilize and approaches its indicative threshold by the end of the projection period. Moreover, the external debt service-to-revenue ratio breaches its threshold under the same stress test, rising to 40 percent by 2031. A permanently higher nominal interest rate on new external borrowing also moves debt burden indicators closer to the thresholds and raises the external debt-service ratio significantly above the threshold to almost 50 percent of revenues by the end of the projection period.4 Keeping key variables at their historical levels, on the other hand, would imply lower debt indicators in the long run, reflecting the baseline assumption of a considerably lower nominal GDP growth rate (in U.S. dollar terms) than the average observed over the past 10 years.5

Table 2.

Ghana: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt, 2011-2031

(In percent)

article image
article image
Sources: Ghanaian authorities; and staff estimates and projections.

Variables include real GDP growth, growth of GDP deflator (in U.S. dollar terms), non-interest current account in percent of GDP, and non-debt creating flows.

Assumes that the interest rate on new borrowing is by 2 percentage points higher than in the baseline., while grace and maturity periods are the same as in the baseline.

Exports values are assumed to remain permanently at the lower level, but the current account as a share of GDP is assumed to return to its baseline level after the shock (implicitly assuming an offsetting adjustment in import levels).

Includes official and private transfers and FDI.

Depreciation is defined as percentage decline in dollar/local currency rate, such that it never exceeds 100 percent.

Applies to all stress scenarios except for A2 (less favorable financing) in which the terms on all new financing are as specified in footnote 2.

III. Public Sector DSA

4. The public debt dynamics, covering both external and domestic liabilities, indicate additional risks (Text Table 4). Although public debt, as a share of GDP, is projected to remain broadly stable in the baseline, a ratio of 40 percent is already sizeable and could rise significantly in the event of shocks or failure to achieve the anticipated consolidation (Table 3 and Figure 2). Indeed, keeping the primary deficit at its projected 2011 level of 1½ percent of GDP, rather than reducing it to ½ percent of GDP from 2013 onward (as assumed in the baseline), would imply a steady rise in the public debt ratio to about 65 percent of GDP by 2031 (Table 4). The debt ratio would rise to almost 80 percent, if the primary balance and real GDP growth were at their historical averages. Moreover, a high and rising debt service-to-revenue ratio, even in the baseline, suggests the need for further reforms to boost revenues over the medium to long term, building on recent successes and new initiatives planned for 2012.

Text Table 4.

Indicators of Public Debt Vulnerabilities (Baseline, in percent)

article image
Sources: IMF staff projections.

All indicatators refer to total public and publicly guaranteed debt.

Revenues are defined inclusive of grants.

Table 3:

Public Sector Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario, 2008-31

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Ghanaian authorities; and staff estimates and projections.

Public sector comprise central government. The concept of net debt is used.

Gross financing need is defined as the primary deficit plus debt service plus the stock of short-term debt at the end of the last period.

Revenues excluding grants.

Debt service is defined as the sum of interest and amortization of medium and long-term debt.

Historical averages and standard deviations are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability.

Figure 2:
Figure 2:

Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternative Scenarios, 2011-2031 1/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2012, 036; 10.5089/9781463941048.002.A002

Sources: Ghanaian authorities; and staff estimates and projections.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2021.2/ Revenues are defined inclusive of grants.

IV. Conclusions

5. The baseline DSA is overall less favorable than in May, but the risks remain moderate. The deterioration in debt burden trajectories mainly reflects higher external borrowing assumptions. Nevertheless, the trajectories of all external debt burden indicators remain within their respective thresholds, even under stress. The most pronounced risks arise from a high debt service-to-revenue ratio and a total public debt ratio that provides limited buffers against shocks.

6. As emphasized in the previous analysis, successful fiscal consolidation and continued robust growth will be essential for achieving the projected debt outcomes. The baseline scenario assumes that the program objectives are achieved, with a small primary deficit of about ½ percent of GDP in 2013 and beyond, and ongoing robust export performance and economic growth. While the growth projections remain conservative based on historical trends, and there is considerable upside potential, unproductive spending could easily derail the debt dynamics onto an unsustainable path. Thus, careful expenditure prioritization toward growth-enhancing investment and ongoing efforts to boost revenues will remain important to keep debt sustainable and create buffers against shocks.

7. Further improvements in debt management capacity will also be essential, especially in light of Ghana’s increasing access to market financing. While the DSA suggests that Ghana can manage a gradual shift toward nonconcessional borrowing, new debts—and the associated projects—need to be selected and managed carefully, with emphasis on favorable terms and sufficiently long maturity to contain rollover risks.

8. The authorities agree with the broad thrust of the analysis, but consider the projections to be on the conservative side. In their view, the projections understate the potential growth dividends from the planned infrastructure investments, particularly in the gas sector. Incorporating such dividends would imply stronger debt indicators.

1

The DSA presented in this document is based on the standard low-income countries (LIC) DSA framework. See “Debt Sustainability in Low-Income Countries: Further Considerations on an Operational Framework, Policy Implications” http://www.imf.org/external/np/pdr/sustain/2004/091004.htm.

3

As in the previous DSA, public debt is determined net of government deposits at the banking system, including the Oil Fund held at the Bank of Ghana. The difference between gross and net debt is about 2½ percent of non-oil GDP. Reflecting a lack of reliable data, nonguaranteed debt of state-owned enterprises is excluded, and private sector external debt data are weak.

4

The standard stress test assumes that the interest rate on new borrowing is two percentage points higher than in the baseline scenario.

5

In the historical scenario, the variables that are kept at their 2001–10 levels are output growth, inflation (measured by dollar GDP deflator), and the non-interest current account balance and FDI in percent of GDP.