RWANDA: Third Review Under the Policy Support Instrument and Request for Modification of Assessment Criteria—Informational Annex
Author:
International Monetary Fund
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

This paper presents key findings of the Third Review under the Policy Support Instrument (PSI) in Rwanda. Program performance was broadly satisfactory. All end-June quantitative assessment criteria were met. Structural benchmarks were partially met as the pace of implementation of structural benchmarks has slowed somewhat either owing to technical difficulties or capacity bottlenecks. Fiscal consolidation in FY2011/12 and FY2012/13 remains on track and is expected to further anchor macroeconomic stability. The authorities have introduced additional revenue measures for FY2012/13 to preserve the revenue objective of the PSI.

Abstract

This paper presents key findings of the Third Review under the Policy Support Instrument (PSI) in Rwanda. Program performance was broadly satisfactory. All end-June quantitative assessment criteria were met. Structural benchmarks were partially met as the pace of implementation of structural benchmarks has slowed somewhat either owing to technical difficulties or capacity bottlenecks. Fiscal consolidation in FY2011/12 and FY2012/13 remains on track and is expected to further anchor macroeconomic stability. The authorities have introduced additional revenue measures for FY2012/13 to preserve the revenue objective of the PSI.

Annex I. Rwanda: Relations with the Fund

(As of October 31, 2011)

I. Membership Status: Joined: September 30, 1963; Article VIII

II. General Resources Account:

article image

III. SDR Department:

article image

IV. Outstanding Purchases and Loans:

article image

V. Latest Financial Arrangements:

article image

VI. Projected Payments to Fund 3

(SDR Million; based on existing use of resources and present holdings of SDRs):

article image

VII. Implementation of HIPC Initiative: Enhanced framework

article image
article image

Decision point—point at which the IMF and the World Bank determine whether a country qualifies for assistance under the HIPC Initiative and decide on the amount of assistance to be committed.

Interim assistance—amount disbursed to a country during the period between decision and completion points, up to 20 percent annually and 60 percent in total of the assistance committed at the decision point (or 25 percent and 75 percent, respectively, in exceptional circumstances).

Completion point—point at which a country receives the remaining balance of its assistance committed at the decision point, together with an additional disbursement of interest income as defined in footnote 4 above. The timing of the completion point is linked to the implementation of pre-agreed key structural reforms (i.e., floating completion point).

VIII. Implementation of Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI)

article image

IX. Implementation of Post-Catastrophe Debt Relief (PCDR): Not Applicable

X. Safeguards Assessments:

The 2007 safeguards update assessment noted that since 2003, the National Bank of Rwanda (NBR) strengthened its own safeguards: External audits were completed on time, the Committee of Auditors became operational, and the Internal Audit Department helped in the strengthening of controls over monetary program data. The update assessment’s priority recommendations concerned timely publication of the audited financial statements, further improving external audit arrangements, and full implementation of IFRS. Safeguards policy does not require an update safeguards assessment in the case of the non-financial arrangement with the Fund. However, such assessment may be voluntary requested by the country, and the NBR has made a formal request for the update assessment.

XI. Exchange System:

The currency of Rwanda is the Rwandan franc. On December 1998, Rwanda accepted the obligations under Article VIII, Sections 2, 3 and 4 of the IMF and maintains a system free of restrictions on the making of payments and transfers for current international transactions. As of October 31, 2011, the official exchange rate was RWF 601.88 per U.S. dollar. The exchange rate has remained stable throughout 2011. Under the revised classification of the exchange rate arrangements, effective May 1, 2011, the de facto exchange rate arrangement has been reclassified to a stabilized arrangement from a crawl-like arrangement. The de jure exchange rate arrangement is classified as floating. With effect from December 27, 2010, the official exchange rate is the weighted average computed from a previous foreign exchange interbank market transaction and an intervention transaction by the National Bank of Rwanda (NBR). The Average Reference Rate, formerly used for the official exchange rate, was eliminated. The NBR applies a margin of +/-0.8 percent to the official rate to derive a customer rate. With a view to introducing more flexibility in its exchange rate policy, since March 24, 2010, NBR introduced an exchange rate corridor framework.

XII. Article IV Consultation:

Rwanda is on the revised 24-month consultation cycle. The Executive Board discussed the staff report for the 2010 Article IV consultation (IMF Country Report No. 11/19) on December 20, 2010.

XIII. FSAP Participation, ROSCs, and OFC Assessments:

A Report on Observance of Standards and Codes on Fiscal Transparency (ROSC) was issued in July 2003. A Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) took place in February 2005, and a FSAP update was completed in June 2011. Rwanda has not had an Offshore Financial Center (OFC) assessment.

XIV. Policy Support Instrument (PSI):

A three-year PSI program was approved on June 16, 2010, with an effective date of June 30, 2010. The second review under the PSI was completed on June 23, 2011.

XV. Technical Assistance and Future Priorities:

List of Technical Assistance Missions (2010–)

article image
article image

Future priorities

The priorities for the Fund’s technical assistance will remain in the area of monetary and exchange rate management, supervision of bank and nonbank financial institutions, public finance management, tax policy and administration, and compilation of national account statistics.

XVI. Resident Representative:

Mr. Dmitry Gershenson assumed his duties as Resident Representative in February 2009.

XVII. Management Visit:

The Deputy Managing Director, Mr. Portugal, visited Rwanda during May 3–5, 2007.

Annex II. Rwanda: Joint Bank-Fund Work Program December 2010–June 2012

article image
article image
article image

1

Now known as Extended Credit Facility (ECF).

2

On June 4, the PRGF was extended from June 11, 2009 to August 14, 2009, to allow time for the completion of the sixth and final review, and for making the final disbursement under the PRGT arrangement.

3

When a member has overdue financial obligations outstanding for more than three months, the amount of such arrears will be shown in this section.

4

Assistance committed under the original framework is expressed in net present value (NPV) terms at the completion point, and assistance committed under the enhanced framework is expressed in NPV terms at the decision point. Hence these two amounts cannot be added.

5

Under the enhanced framework, an additional disbursement is made at the completion point corresponding to interest income earned on the amount committed at the decision point but not disbursed during the interim period.

6

The Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) provides 100 percent debt relief to eligible member countries that are qualified for the assistance. The debt relief covers the full stock of debt owed to the Fund as of end-2004 which remains outstanding at the time the member qualifies for such debt relief. The MDRI is financed by bilateral contributions and the Fund’s own resources, as well as the resources already disbursed to the member under the HIPC Initiative (see Section VII above).

  • Collapse
  • Expand