Sweden
2011 Article IV Consultation: Staff Report; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Sweden

In this study, economic developments and policies used for the recovery of financial stability of Sweden against global recession are discussed. The low inflation is reached by increasing Riksbank policy rate. The role of fiscal policy council is explained. The Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) recommendations are endorsed on financial institutions. These include merging the stability and deposit insurance funds, establishing a special bank resolution regime, and increasing further the Financial Supervisory Agency’s capacity. Also, the Basel III capital regulations are supported by the authorities.

Abstract

In this study, economic developments and policies used for the recovery of financial stability of Sweden against global recession are discussed. The low inflation is reached by increasing Riksbank policy rate. The role of fiscal policy council is explained. The Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) recommendations are endorsed on financial institutions. These include merging the stability and deposit insurance funds, establishing a special bank resolution regime, and increasing further the Financial Supervisory Agency’s capacity. Also, the Basel III capital regulations are supported by the authorities.

I. A Strong Recovery

Sweden grew 5½ percent in 2010, a leader among advanced economies

1. Real GDP growth rose at a fast clip from mid-2009, exceeding recoveries elsewhere among advanced economies (Table 1 and Figures 1 & 2). In part this was because the downturn had been cushioned by the krona’s sharp depreciation—from levels that were already somewhat undervalued—boosting exports once global demand began to recover. At the same time, consumption was supported by monetary and fiscal stimulus. Exports have risen by 20 percent, investment by 14 percent and total consumption by 5½ percent since early-2009. And supported by steady lending growth to the household sector, house prices continued rising—even through the financial crisis—contrary to the corrections experienced elsewhere (Figure 3). According to staff’s estimates, the negative output gap, nearly -6 percent in 2009, narrowed to -3 percent in 2010.

Table 1.

Sweden: Selected Economic and Social Indicators, 2005–12

article image

Staff Estimates

Based on relative unit labor costs in manufacturing.

Sources: Statistics Sweden; Riksbank; Ministry of Finance; Datastream; INS; and IMF staff estimates.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Sweden: The Long View, 1996–2011

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2011, 171; 10.5089/9781462300181.002.A001

1/ In thousands.Sources: Haver Analytics; Konjunkturinstitutet; Statistics Sweden; and IMF staff calculations.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Sweden: A Strong Recovery, 2007–11

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2011, 171; 10.5089/9781462300181.002.A001

1/ Crisis: 2008Q2 -2009Q1; Recovery: 2009Q1 -2010Q4.2/ REER index; 2005 = 100, + = appreciation, - = depreciation.Sources: Haver; INS; and IMF staff calculations.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Sweden: Household Balance Sheets and Consumption, 2004–11

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2011, 171; 10.5089/9781462300181.002.A001

Sources: Eurostat; Haver; Statistics Sweden; and IMF staff calculations.1/ Data for Ireland starts in 2001.
A01ufig01

The Swedish economy is above pre-crisis levels.

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2011, 171; 10.5089/9781462300181.002.A001

2. All this has surprised on the upside (text table).

Real GDP growth forecasts for 2010

(percent)

article image

Published September 2009

3. Total employment has regained pre-crisis levels, with both temporary and permanent employment rising since 2009Q4. But the unemployment rate remains elevated, at close to 8 percent in April 2011, suggesting remaining spare capacity.

4. Momentum continued, albeit slowing somewhat into 2011Q1. GDP rose 0.8 percent quarter-on-quarter, with consumption slowing more markedly. Inventories continued strong increases.

5. With improved macroeconomic conditions, the financial system has regained strength (Tables 2, 3,& 4). Stock market indices are approaching pre-crisis peaks (Figure 4). Money market spreads have remained above pre-crisis levels following the withdrawal of official emergency liquidity support. Bank capital adequacy ratios have strengthened, and bank credit default swap spreads remain well below the average of other European banks.

Table 2.

Sweden: Financial System Structure, 2002–10

article image

Including foreign branches.

Not including minor local companies.

Market value of funds.

Number of institutions is computed on unconsolidated basis.

Sources: Riksbank; Financial Supevisory Authority; and IMF staff estimates.
Table 3.

Sweden: Financial Soundness Indicators: Banks, 2003–11

article image
Sources: Financial Supervisory Authority, Riksbank, and IMF staff estimates.

From 2007, the calculation of capital base follows rules under Basel II.

On consolidated basis

From 2010 onward, exposures to credit institutions are included.

Table 4.

Sweden: Financial Soundness Indicators: Non-Banks, 2003–10

article image
Sources: Financial Supervisory Authority; Riksbank; and IMF staff estimates.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Sweden: Selected Financial Markets Indicators, 2007–11

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2011, 171; 10.5089/9781462300181.002.A001

Sources: Thomson Financial/Datastream; Bloomberg; and Haver.

This has been achieved in the context of a measured withdrawal of policy stimulus

6. Exit from the crisis intervention measures commenced in the Spring of 2010. The Riksbank stopped offering 3 and 6 month loans, replaced by 28 day loans with a penal rate and was among the first of advanced economy central banks to begin a tightening cycle, in July 2010, after the global crisis. The policy rate was raised by 150 basis points to 1¾ percent (Figure 5). By the end of 2010, the Riksbank had terminated all crisis-time liquidity measures and its balance sheet had contracted markedly. The government has kept the bank debt guarantee and bank recapitalization programs open, but currently there is no use of these programs.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Sweden: Inflation and Monetary Policy, 2007–11

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2011, 171; 10.5089/9781462300181.002.A001

Sources: Thomson Financial/Datastream; Bloomberg; Haver, and Riksbank.

7. Rather than widening to over 2 percent of GDP as projected by both staff and the authorities, the fiscal deficit narrowed from 0.9 percent of GDP in 2009 to 0.3 percent of GDP in 2010, largely as automatic stabilizers responded to record growth (Tables 5 & 6 and Figure 6). Hence, the fiscal is estimated to have been broadly neutral, 1½ a percentage point of GDP smaller-than-projected.

Table 5.

Sweden: General Government Financial Accounts, 2007–2014

article image
Sources: 2008, 2009 and 2010 Fiscal Policy Bills and IMF staff estimates.

Staff measure

Authorities’ measure

Table 6.

Sweden: Public Sector Balance Sheet, 2003–11

article image

Two scenarios: one with aging costs of 2.2 percent of GDP through 2050; and a second with aging costs of 8.0 percent of GDP through 2050.

Stream of discounted projected future primary fiscal balances under current policies and with the indicated aging costs. Discount rate is the average cost of government funding.

Considers only financial assets and liabilities (i.e. excludes capital stock). This measure is a liquidity indicator whereas the comprehensive net worth is a solvency indicator.

Sources: Swedisch authorities; and Fund staff calculations.