Union of the Comoros: Joint IMF/World Bank Debt Sustainability Analysis 2008

This paper discusses the Union of Comoros’ 2008 Article IV Consultation and request for Emergency Post-Conflict Assistance and disbursement under the Rapid-Access Component of the Exogenous Shocks Facility. Real GDP growth has been well below the regional average, and per-capita income has steadily declined. Rising food and energy costs have worsened the external position, and the external debt burden is far above the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries threshold. To reverse the deteriorating trend, the authorities have initiated measures in 2008 to contain the fiscal deficit and begin to address macroeconomic and structural impediments to growth.

Abstract

This paper discusses the Union of Comoros’ 2008 Article IV Consultation and request for Emergency Post-Conflict Assistance and disbursement under the Rapid-Access Component of the Exogenous Shocks Facility. Real GDP growth has been well below the regional average, and per-capita income has steadily declined. Rising food and energy costs have worsened the external position, and the external debt burden is far above the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries threshold. To reverse the deteriorating trend, the authorities have initiated measures in 2008 to contain the fiscal deficit and begin to address macroeconomic and structural impediments to growth.

Comoros is in debt distress. The debt sustainability analysis (DSA) shows that Comoros would remain in debt distress under the baseline scenario, even in the absence of shocks. In the alternative scenario, which for illustrative purposes assumes an hypothetical access to HIPC/MDRI debt relief within the next 3 years, debt would become manageable, including under a variety of stress tests.1

I. Background

1. Following cancellation in 2007 of US $34.5 million of arrears to the African Development Bank (AfDB)2, the stock of Comoros’ public external debt declined to 56.7 percent of GDP (US$ 276 million), from 67.4 percent at end-2006. Eight tenths of the debt stock is owed to multilateral creditors, the largest creditor is the International Development Association (IDA)—which accounts for 45 percent of total debt, followed by the African Development Bank (AfDB)—15 percent, and BADEA—12 percent. Among the bilateral creditors, the Kuwaiti and Saudi Funds jointly account for about 15 percent of the debt stock, compared with 2 percent for France, the only Paris Club creditor. Comoros owes no debt to the IMF. With more than two thirds of the total debt stock denominated in SDR, 12 percent in U.S. dollar, and 16 percent in currencies that are linked to the U.S. dollar, the country’s debt situation in local currency is highly vulnerable to fluctuations in the Euro (to which the Comorian Franc is pegged) exchange rate to the U.S. dollar.3 In 2007, domestic public debt, including unpaid short-term central bank advances to the treasury, amounted to the equivalent of US$16.6 million (3.3 percent of GDP).

Text Table 1.

Comoros: External Debt and Arrears, Official Creditors, 2007

article image
Source: Comorian authorities. Data not reconciled with creditor statements.

2. Progress in clearing external debt arrears has been uneven. In addition to the AfDB arrears cancellation, the country obtained favorable rescheduling terms in 2007 on arrears to BADEA (US $26.7 million)4, the Kuwaiti Fund (US$27.7 million) and the Saudi Funds (US$14.1 million). However, for various reasons, including lack of resources to carry out payments set under the arrears settlement arrangements, the final agreements remain pending in the case of the Islamic Development Bank, the OPEC Fund, the European Investment Bank, the Arab Monetary Fund, the United Arab Emirates, and France. The Comorian authorities have indicated that they remain engaged with these creditors, most of which have reportedly expressed willingness to reach favorable understandings regarding the unsettled arrears situations.

3. Comoros’ NPV-based external debt indicators are above all indicative policy-dependent thresholds 5 The joint Bank-Fund debt sustainability framework (DSF) for low-income countries classifies Comoros as a “poor performer”, reflecting the poor quality of the country’s policies and institutions as measured by the 3-year average of the World Bank’s CPIA ratings (Table 2).6 Within this framework, the ratios of all relevant external debt indicators, in NPV terms, were above the indicative policy-dependent thresholds for Comoros at end-2007; in particular, the ratio to exports of goods and services was more than double (271 percent) the threshold. However, debt service ratios to exports and revenues were below relevant indicative thresholds, reflecting mainly the impact of the AfDB arrears cancellation and favorable rescheduling terms (delayed principal repayments) from other creditors.

Text Table 2.

Policy Dependent Debt Burden Thresholds under the DSF

article image
Sources: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs estimates.

Weak policy refers to low income countries whose 3-year average CPIA rating is below 3.25.

II. Underlying DSA Assumptions

4. Staffs performed a debt sustainability analysis under a baseline and an alternative scenario. The baseline scenario is identical to the alternative, but without the hypothetical assumption of an HIPC/MDRI debt relief. The alternative scenario is predicated on steady post-conflict economic recovery underpinned by full restoration of inter-island cooperation, good progress on fiscal consolidation, and implementation of key growth-supporting reforms. The scenario also assumes that the completion point under the HIPC Initiative would be reached over the next three years and that Comoros would also benefit from relief under the MDRI. Under such conditions, (i) real GDP growth would gradually pick up from near stagnation in 2007, settling around 4 percent over the medium term; (ii) the primary fiscal balance would steadily improve from a deficit (an average 1.7 percent of GDP on during 2007–11) to a surplus of 0.3 percent of GDP during 2012–27, reflecting improved revenue collection and enhanced control over current expenditure. The scenario also assumes the resumption of external assistance in 2008 in the context of economic programs supported by the IMF under the Emergency Post Conflict Assistance and Exogenous Shocks Facility and, in late 2009, under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility. This LIC-DSA assumes that all other arrears, including to Paris Club Creditors, would be rescheduled on respective creditors’ standard terms.7

5. The previous external DSA (2006 DSA) for Comoros assumed similar GDP growth rates, but with much more favorable external and fiscal positions (Text Table 3). Real GDP growth was projected to average 3.5 percent for the first five years (2006–10) and 4 percent for the remainder of the period; the new estimates are 2.4 for 2007–11, and 4 percent for 2012-28. The downward revision of the growth projections in the first five years reflects weaker than expected growth performance in 2007 on the back of crisis political conditions and more pronounced terms of trade deterioration. The last DSA projected export growth of 16.4 percent on average for the initial five years and 8 percent thereafter, compared with a more modest 10 percent and 3.7 percent on average, respectively, in the new DSA, reflecting less optimistic prospects for world prices of Comoros’ key export commodities. The 2006 DSA assumed a current account deficit (including grants) of percent of GDP on average for (2006–10), whereas the current DSA projects a higher average deficit (9.4 percent of GDP for 2007-2011) driven mainly by high world prices of oil and food. The current account deficits are projected to gradually decline to 6 percent of GDP by the end of 2028. Like the previous one, this DSA assumes that the bulk of the identified fiscal financing requirements will be met with grants. The political crisis of 2007 contributed to a shortfall in government revenues, a fact that underpins lower projected revenue in this DSA compared to the old. Despite these developments, the reduction in the debt stock resulting from arrears cancellation, coupled with favorable rescheduling terms, has improved debt dynamics under the current DSA, compared to the previous DSA.

Text Table 3.

Comoros. 2006 and 2008 DSA Comparative Assumptions

(Percent, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs estimates and projections.
Text Table 4.

Comoros: Medium-term Scenarios: Baseline and Alternative, 2007-13

article image
Sources: Comorian authorities and IMF and World Bank staffs estimates and projections.

It reflects political crisis resolved in 2008, EPCAand ESF approved by Q4 2008, PRGF in place by Q3 2009, external assistance in line with I-PRSP.

Assumes debt relief under HIPC/MDRI in 2011.

Macroeconomic Assumptions

Real GDP growth: GDP growth in 2008 is projected to stagnate at 0.5 percent, with a sustained recovery projected to start in 2009 from a growth rate of 1 percent, accelerating gradually to a peak of 4 percent in 2013. For the period of 2014–28, real GDP growth rate averages 4 percent, close to the rate registered in 2005 following the previous secessionist crisis. Growth during the recovery phase through 2012 would be underpinned by a good agricultural supply response to higher food prices, renewed confidence and enhanced political stability; stable terms of trade; and new FDI-led investments, especially in tourism and public infrastructure. Longer-term growth would be driven by enhanced investment in key sectors and by structural reforms aimed at enhancing competitiveness.

Inflation: Average inflation is projected to rise to 5.9 in 2008 from 4.5 in 2007, driven mainly by high oil and fuel prices. In the absence of significant second round effects in 2009, average annual inflation will settle at around 3 percent over the longer-term horizon.

Real exchange rate and terms of trade: After a modest appreciation in 2008, the real effective exchange rate is projected to be broadly stable throughout the remainder of the projection period; the terms of trade are expected to worsen further in 2008, before improving somewhat through 2010, and remaining broadly constant thereafter.

Current account balance: The current account balance (including official transfers) is projected to initially deteriorate from a deficit of 6.7 percent of GDP in 2007 to 10.8 percent in 2011 followed by gradual improvements to about 6 of GDP by 2028. The initial worsening of the current account balance would result from a further deterioration of the terms of trade and strong import growth (especially for investment) outpacing exports. Service export is expected to pick up steadily at an annual average of 10 percent, in response to improved hotel infrastructure when the Galawa and other tourism resorts are completed by 2012, compared with 5 percent during 1998–07.

Government balance: The primary balance (total revenue and grants less non-interest expenditure) is projected to worsen slightly to a deficit of 2.7 percent of GDP in 2008 from 2.2 percent in 2007, and to gradually move into surplus beginning in 2013, as revenue gradually increases and more efforts are made to maintain spending under control.

External assistance, scaling up and concessionality: The framework assumes that up to 2010 external assistance will be exclusively in the form of grants, averaging just under 7 percent of GDP. Over the long-term (2011–28) further assistance will be available, in adequate terms, including from IDA and AfDB.

Domestic borrowing: The scenario assumes no new medium to long-term domestic borrowing beyond Central Bank’s short-term cash advances to the treasury.

III. External DSA

A. Baseline Scenario

6. In the baseline scenario, Comoros’ NPV-based debt burden indicators remain above the indicative thresholds for a prolonged period. Low growth and continued accumulation of payments arrears keep all NPV indicators significantly above the country-specific indicative thresholds for almost a decade, with the ratio of NPV of debt-to-export barely below the threshold by 2028. Any stress test would worsen the situation further. For example, under the stress test defined as a one standard deviation negative shock to historical exports growth, the NPV of debt would reach 378 percent of exports of goods and services in 2010 or three times in excess of the threshold.

7. However, debt service indicators are for the most part below the relevant thresholds, reflecting mainly the impact of highly favorable terms under the arrears rescheduling arrangements of 2007. This is illustrated graphically by a characteristic hump-shape for the debt service-to-exports and to-revenue ratios.

B. Alternative Scenario and Stress Tests

8. In the alternative scenario, with an hypothetical HIPC completion point and MDRI relief assumed over the next three years, Comoros’ external debt indicators would improve substantially. While the savings from the HIPC interim debt relief would be roughly offset by new IMF borrowings (under EPCA and ESF in 2008 and PRGF assumed in 2009), Comoros would greatly benefit from the HIPC and MDRI relief after 2011, when all IDA and AfDB debts, jointly accounting for about 60 percent of the total external debt, are projected to be cancelled. As a result, following the HIPC completion point and additional relief under the MDRI, the NPV of external debt would fall to 84 percent of exports, well below the LIC DSA thresholds and debt service would average about 5 percent of exports.

9. The debt dynamics under the adjustment scenario would be sustainable under a variety of stress tests. Under the most extreme test, defined as combined one-half standard deviation shocks to GDP, exports and non debt creating flows, the NPV of debt to-exports ratio briefly breaches the threshold in 2011, but quickly falls below it thereafter. After the shock, the NPV of debt would decline to 64 percent of exports after 2018; and the debt service ratios would remain below relevant thresholds throughout the horizon.

Text Table 5.

Comoros: External Debt Indicators, 2008 - 2028

(in percent)

article image
Sources: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs estimates and projections.

Simple average.

IV. Public DSA

10. Under the baseline scenario, Comoros’ debt is above LIC DSA thresholds. However, under the alternative scenario, higher revenues and spending restraint will permit achievement of a small primary fiscal surplus, anchoring fiscal consolidation and permitting a gradual reduction of domestic arrears. Both NPV and debt service ratios drop faster towards the end of the projection period than at the beginning, reflecting the impacts of primary surpluses in the later years as well as repayment of the bulk of principal due to larger creditors (IDA and AfDB).

V. Debt Distress qualification and Conclusions

11. In the baseline scenario, Comoros is shown to be in debt distress, as evidenced by recurrent arrears accumulation and prolonged breaches of the NPV of debt thresholds. As in the previous DSA, under the baseline scenario the external NPV of debt ratios are above country-specific indicative thresholds for most of 2008–24. The updated public DSA for 2008 does not change this assessment. However, an alternative scenario which assumes HIPC/MDRI debt relief points to a significant improvement of the debt outlook. The debt dynamics are somewhat vulnerable to lower real GDP growth and lower export growth. These vulnerabilities underscore the importance of export diversification and continued reform efforts.

12. The authorities generally concurred with the thrust of this DSA. They therefore expressed readiness to take the steps needed to facilitate Comoros’ eligibility to the enhanced HIPC Initiative, including steadfast implementation of donor-supported reforms and measures to address weak debt management capacity.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Comoros: Baseline (Non HIPC/MDRI) Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt under Alternatives Scenarios, 2008-2028 1/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2009, 042; 10.5089/9781451809190.002.A003

Source: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs projections and simulations.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2018. In figure b. it corresponds to a One-time depreciation shock; in c. to a Exports shock; in d. to a One-time depreciation shock; in e. to a Exports shock and in picture f. to a One-time depreciation shock
Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Comoros: Baseline (Non HIPC/MDRI) Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternatives Scenarios, 2008-2028 1/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2009, 042; 10.5089/9781451809190.002.A003

Sources: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs estimates and projections.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2018.2/ Revenues are defined inclusive of grants.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Comoros: Alternative (HIPC/MDRI) Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt under Alternatives Scenarios, 2008-2028 1/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2009, 042; 10.5089/9781451809190.002.A003

Source: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs projections and simulations.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2018. In figure b. it corresponds to a Non-debt flows shock; in c. to a Exports shock; in d. to a Non-debt flows shock; in e. to a Exports shock and in picture f. to a Non-debt flows shock
Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Comoros: Alternative (HIPC/MDRI) Indicators of Public Debt Under Alternatives Scenarios, 2008-2028 1/

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2009, 042; 10.5089/9781451809190.002.A003

Sources: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs estimates and projections.1/ The most extreme stress test is the test that yields the highest ratio in 2018.2/ Revenues are defined inclusive of grants.
Table 1a.:

External Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario (Non HIPC/MDRI), 2005-2028 1/

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Source: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs simulations.

Includes both public and private sector external debt.

Derived as [r - g - r(1+g)]/(1+g+r+gr) times previous period debt ratio, with r = nominal interest rate; g = real GDP growth rate, and r = growth rate of GDP deflator in U.S. dollar terms.

Includes exceptional financing (i.e., changes in arrears and debt relief); changes in gross foreign assets; and valuation adjustments. For projections also includes contribution from price and exchange rate changes.

Assumes that PV of private sector debt is equivalent to its face value.

Current-year interest payments divided by previous period debt stock.

Historical averages and standard deviations are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability.

Defined as grants, concessional loans, and debt relief.

Grant-equivalent financing includes grants provided directly to the government and through new borrowing (difference between the face value and the PV of new debt).

Table 1b.

Comoros: Sensitivity Analysis for Key Indicators of Public and Publicly Guaranteed External Debt, 2008-202

(In percent)

article image
article image
Source: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs projections and simulations.

Variables include real GDP growth, growth of GDP deflator (in U.S. dollar terms), non-interest current account in percent of GDP, and non-debt creating flows.

Assumes that the interest rate on new borrowing is by 2 percentage points higher than in the baseline., while grace and maturity periods are the same as in the baseline.

Exports values are assumed to remain permanently at the lower level, but the current account as a share of GDP is assumed to return to its baseline level after the shock (implicitly assuming an offsetting adjustment in import levels).

Includes official and private transfers and FDI.

Depreciation is defined as percentage decline in dollar/local currency rate, such that it never exceeds 100 percent.

Applies to all stress scenarios except for A2 (less favorable financing) in which the terms on all new financing are as specified in footnote 2.

Table 2a.

Comoros: Public Sector Debt Sustainability Framework, Baseline Scenario (Non HIPC/MDRI), 2005-2028

(In percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: Comorian authorities; and IMF and World Bank staffs estimates and projections.

[Indicate coverage of public sector, e.g., general government or nonfinancial public sector. Also whether net or gross debt is used.]

Gross financing need is defined as the primary deficit plus debt service plus the stock of short-term debt at the end of the last period.

Revenues excluding grants.

Debt service is defined as the sum of interest and amortization of medium and long-term debt.

Historical averages and standard deviations are generally derived over the past 10 years, subject to data availability.