Liberia
2008 Article IV Consultation, First Review Under the Three-Year Arrangement Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility, Financing Assurances Review, and Request for Waiver and Modification of Performance Criteria: Staff Report; Public Information Notice and Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Liberia

This paper presents the staff report for the combined Liberia’s 2008 Article IV Consultation and the first review under the Three-Year Arrangement under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility. The international community is supporting the Liberian government’s efforts to reform the economy. Increases in international commodity prices have contributed to a significant acceleration in inflation in Liberia, where increases have largely been allowed to pass through to the domestic economy. Liberia has been particularly affected by increases in the price of rice, which accounts for 50 percent of the daily caloric intake of households.

Abstract

This paper presents the staff report for the combined Liberia’s 2008 Article IV Consultation and the first review under the Three-Year Arrangement under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility. The international community is supporting the Liberian government’s efforts to reform the economy. Increases in international commodity prices have contributed to a significant acceleration in inflation in Liberia, where increases have largely been allowed to pass through to the domestic economy. Liberia has been particularly affected by increases in the price of rice, which accounts for 50 percent of the daily caloric intake of households.

I. Introduction

1. Liberia is a post-conflict country with unsustainable debt. In March 2008, after a major fund-raising effort, its long standing arrears to the IMF were cleared, voting rights were restored, and large Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) and Extended Fund Facility (EFF) arrangements were approved. At the same time Liberia reached the decision point for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative. Liberia is receiving substantial interim assistance from the IMF to keep cash debt service payments to manageable levels until the completion point, currently projected for 2010.

2. Liberia has made significant progress with its economic reforms since the 2006 Article IV consultation. A number of 2006 Article IV recommendations, addressed as part of the 2006-2007 Staff-Monitored Program, have been implemented (Box 1), and the three-year Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP), which the PRGF is now supporting, lays out a strategy to sustain higher economic growth by maintaining macroeconomic stability, encouraging private sector investment and improving infrastructure, governance and security.

2006 Article IV Recommendations

article image

3. The international community is supporting the Liberian government’s efforts to reform the economy. A June 2008 partners conference, which focused on infrastructure, confirmed that donor support for Liberia is still high at US$85-$100 per capita. However, little support is provided through the budget. The challenge therefore is to align donor activities with the PRSP and to continue reinforcing public finance management (PFM) to attract more budget support. The government maintains regular dialogue with donors through the Liberia Reconstruction and Development Committee and the Governance and Economic Management Assistance Program.

II. Recent Economic Developments and Program Performance

4. Although real GDP growth remains buoyant, it eased in 2008 to about 7.1 percent.

uA01fig01
Sources: Liberian authorities, and Fund staff calculations and estimates.

5. Higher world commodity prices have pushed up inflation.

uA01fig02
Source: Liberian authorities; and Fund staff calculations.
uA01fig03
Sources: Liberian authorities, and Fund staff calculations.
uA01fig04
Sources: Liberian authorities; and Fund staff calculations and estimates.

6. The L$/US$1 exchange rate was relatively stable in the first nine months of 2008, depreciating by 3.1 percent through September. Liberia’s de facto exchange rate regime was consistent with a conventional peg.

uA01fig05

Daily exchange rate (mid-rate) L$/US$1

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2009, 004; 10.5089/9781451823004.002.A001

7. Performance on the program through June was good, and the program remains on track. All of the quantitative benchmarks and performance criteria (PCs) through June were achieved (MEFP, Table 1), as were all of the structural performance benchmarks and PCs (MEFP, Table 2), albeit some with a delay. Because legislation to approve the merger of the Bureau of the Budget into the Ministry of Finance (an end-June PC) was not approved until September, the authorities are requesting a waiver.

Table 1.

Liberia: Selected Economic and Financial Indicators, 2007-13

article image
Sources: Liberian authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.

Country Report No. 08/108, February 28, 2008

The Monrovia CPI was replaced in February 2007 with a more comprehensive Harmonized CPI.

The U.S. dollar-denominated GDP deflator is derived mainly from the change in the domestic CPI, the L$/US$ exchange rate, and international commodity prices in a few selected sub-sectors.

Fiscal year basis (July-June). Commitment basis starting in 2006/07.

Reflects projected debt relief under the HIPC Initiative.

Defined as Liberian currrency outside banks plus demand, time, and savings deposits in Liberian and U.S. dollars.

Table 2.

Liberia: Balance of Payments, 2007-13

article image
Sources: Liberian authorities; and IMF staff estimates and projections.

The cost is net of estimated value of goods and services purchased by UNMIL (and its staff) in Liberia.

Up to 2007 interest payments are charged on total stock of debt. After 2007, they are charged on debt stock after application of traditional debt relief mechanisms.

UNMIL operations are projected to decline in the years ahead, thus impacting negatively on services receipts in the current account.

Data in 2007-2010 donor grants for debt relief. Amount in 2011 reflects IMF charges accrued Nov.-Dec2010 but due February 2011.

Starting in 2007, reflects large investments in mining and forestry.

Assumes full delivery of debt relief on Completion Point in December 2010.

Includes short-term trade credits and private sector operating balances abroad

Includes debt forgiveness from WB and AfDB in Dec. 2007 ($665 m); and Paris Club creditors in April, 2008 ($254 m).

Debt payments falling due to bilateral, multilateral and commercial creditors are deferred in the interim period.

III. Surveillance Issues

8. Policy discussions addressed the following challenges to meeting the authorities’ macroeconomic objectives: (i) coping with higher commodity prices and recent global financial market turmoil; (ii) maintaining external stability; and (iii) challenges posed by Liberia’s dual currency regime.

A. Policy Response to Global Economic Developments

9. Higher food and fuel prices had a major impact on Liberia in 2008. In discussions the staff welcomed the development of a comprehensive food security policy (Box 2). They agreed with the authorities’ decision to temporarily suspend the rice import duty given the importance of rice in household consumption and the prevalence of poverty. In view of limited public resources, including the government’s commitment to a zero borrowing policy, staff welcomed the strong support from the international community to finance the key elements of the strategy, particularly on providing support to the most vulnerable people. Because world rice prices are projected to remain high in 2009, staff and the authorities agreed that the import duties on rice should remain suspended, and that the authorities should continue to seek donor assistance to finance the other elements of their strategy.

10. Medium-term economic prospects are favorable (text table). Real growth is projected to rise to about 13 percent in 2009 with the expected resumption of logging and iron mining operations, inflation is projected to decline to single digits and the current account deficit is likely to narrow as key import prices, especially for oil decline. Reserves coverage, in terms of months of goods and services imports, is projected to remain stable at the current low level over the medium term.1 Staff and the authorities agreed, however, that there are downside risks to the growth forecast since a sharper-than-projected slowdown in global growth or a decline in world commodity prices could reduce demand for Liberia’s key exports, or delay investment activity in these sectors, more than projected. While Liberia’s financial sector is not well integrated with international financial markets, staff emphasized the importance of closely supervising banks, which on average hold about one-fifth of their total assets with overseas banks. Should a portion of these assets become impaired or subject to write-down, it could cause liquidity or solvency problems for Liberian banks. A slow-down in remittances or donor inflows could also negatively impact economic prospects and the exchange rate.

Liberia: Government Response to Commodity Price Increases

Increases in international commodity prices have contributed to a significant acceleration in inflation in Liberia, where increases have largely been allowed to pass through to the domestic economy. Liberia has been particularly affected by increases in the price of rice, which accounts for 50 percent of the daily caloric intake of households; an estimated 66 percent of annual needs is imported.

Higher food and fuel prices contributed to a widening of the trade deficit between 2007 and 2008 by about 18 percent of GDP.2

Responding to these developments is particularly challenging in Liberia because:

  • about 64 percent of the population lives below the poverty line;

  • the government has no access to new borrowing;

  • international reserves are equal to less than one month’s imports; and

  • the scope for active monetary policy is limited since it is anchored on exchange rate stability.

Against this background, the government developed a comprehensive food security strategy to:

  • mitigate the impact of domestic rice price increases and ensure domestic supply: (i) it temporarily suspended import duties on rice (at a cost of US$8.4 million in lost revenues, 0.9 percent of GDP), agricultural and road building equipment, and agricultural materials and supplies; and (ii) it is exploring with other governments long-term supply agreements for rice.

  • ensure access to food for vulnerable households through safety nets. Although targeting vulnerable groups is challenging, the government is instituting: (i) school feeding programs in urban areas; (ii) supplementary feeding programs for women and children; and (iii) food-for-work and cash-for-work programs.

  • promote domestic production through: (i) expanding smallholder production by distributing seeds, fertilizer, and farm tools; (ii) expanding agricultural land and crop diversification; (iii) increasing marketable surpluses through postharvest interventions; and (iv) encouraging large-scale commercial rice farming.

After adopting its food security strategy, the government in June 2008 announced additional measures: it

  • eliminated withholding tax on annual incomes of US$840 and less (although this was consistent with the tax reform strategy);

  • subsidized further gasoline price increases that affect the Monrovia Transit Authority (MTA);

  • directed government ministries and agencies to review fee structures; and

  • provided additional buses to the MTA to add routes.

Substantial support for this strategy has come from the World Food Program (US$25 million), World Bank (US$10 million), Germany (US$20 million) and Libya (US$30 million). Liberia will also receive funding from a UN special fund, and part of a proposed AfDB budget support operation of US$18.5 million will be used to offset the impact of higher food and fuel prices on the budget.

Liberia: Selected Economic Indicators, 2007-11

article image
Sources: Liberian authorities, and Fund staff estimates and projections.

B. Maintaining External Stability

11. Available information does not provide evidence that Liberia’s exchange rate is either under- or overvalued (Box 3). Liberia’s economy is undergoing significant structural change after 14 years of civil war, and a lack of historical data further complicates quantitative analysis of the appropriateness of the exchange rate level. Moreover, Liberia is also highly dollarized (see Box 4), implying that exchange rate policy only has a limited role in bringing about required adjustment to balance of payments imbalances. However, Liberia’s real effective exchange rate (REER) does not appear to be out of line with fundamentals. Following a sharp depreciation in 2000-03, in both Liberian dollar and U.S. dollar terms, the REER has remained relatively stable following the end of the civil war in 2003. Also, Liberia’s terms of trade, on balance, continued to improve up to 2008, while export growth recovered strongly.

12. Large current account deficits since the end of the civil war in 2003 mainly reflect an expansion in imports to assist postwar recovery and reconstruction. While import demand is likely to remain high in the medium term because of continued imports related to reconstruction and foreign direct investment (FDI), it is expected to be offset by accelerating export growth, particularly as production of iron ore and timber resumes. The current account deficit, including grants, is therefore projected to decline substantially over the medium term, supported also by a sharp projected decline in scheduled debt service following the HIPC completion point. The modest spike in the REER in recent months reflects the rise in domestic inflation and the strengthening U.S. dollar. Staff and the authorities agreed that the appreciation of the U.S. dollar, if sustained, could undermine Liberia’s external competitiveness, emphasizing the importance of addressing other factors that impact competitiveness.

13. Liberia’s external debt is currently unsustainable, but is projected to improve. The latest low-income country debt sustainability analysis for Liberia indicates that Liberia is in debt distress, but that debt dynamics are projected to be manageable following full delivery of HIPC, MDRI and IMF beyond-HIPC debt relief at the completion point and moderate new borrowing on highly concessional terms.3

Liberia: Assessing External Competitiveness

uA01fig06
Source: Liberian authorities; and Fund staff calculations and projections.1 Given the high dollarization in Liberia, a U.S. dollar-denominated REER is also calculated.
uA01fig07
Source: Liberian authorities; and Fund staff projections.
uA01fig08
Source: World Bank Doing Business 2009, and Governance Indicators 1996-2007.Percentile rank indicates rank among all countries in the world. Zero value corresponds to lowest rank, and 100 to highest rank.

14. Liberia has the potential to significantly improve its competitiveness, but it must overcome significant structural bottlenecks. In particular, it lacks the infrastructure it needs to exploit its comparative advantage in natural-resource-based export industries. The recent Diagnostic Trade Integration Study confirmed that in order to promote competitive value-added activities in export resource-based products, Liberia will need to also improve its investment climate by investing in physical infrastructure, particularly in usable roads and well functioning ports to facilitate the transport of export goods such as timber, iron ore and cocoa.

15. The institutional environment for private sector development also needs improving. While the World Bank Doing Business report for 2009 reports an improvement in the cost of doing business in 2008, Liberia still ranked only 157th out of 181 countries surveyed. Also, although there has been steady progress in improving governance since 2003, much remains to be done to improve Liberia’s ranking on this indicator.

C. Policy Options in a Dual Currency Regime

16. Liberia operates a dual currency regime, and the authorities have expressed a desire to encourage greater use of the Liberian dollar. In discussions, the staff noted that Liberia has a very long history of using the U.S. dollar as legal tender and that it is one of the world’s most dollarized economies (Box 4). Staff also noted that economic performance since the end of the civil conflict in 2003 has been strong: real growth has accelerated, FDI has resumed, and inflation, except for the recent spike on account of world commodity price increases, has been held in the low double digits. The authorities agreed that policies to strengthen the demand for the Liberian dollar should be market-based, and in particular should be based on enhancing the credibility of economic policy and developing the financial market.

17. Since building policy credibility may take time, staff noted some measures that could be implemented in the interim to strengthen the demand for the Liberian dollar. These include: (i) improving the quality and increasing the denomination of Liberian dollar notes; (ii) increasing the use of the Liberian dollar as the unit of account; (iii) using Liberian dollars more in government transactions; (iv) encouraging agents to hold local-currency-denominated assets, e.g. by allowing interest rates on deposits in local and foreign currency to be market-determined; (v) encouraging the use of the Liberian dollar for payments, e.g., by requiring additional provisioning or capital for U.S. dollar loans to the nontradable sector; (vi) strengthening prudential regulations to ensure that foreign exchange risk is properly managed; and (vii) developing a modern payments system. Staff noted that a higher level of foreign reserves could also help to strengthen the demand for the Liberian dollar by boosting confidence in the currency. Staff warned, however, against trying to force the timetable for dedollarization, which could have destabilizing effects, discouraging dedollarization in the longer run.

IV. Program Discussions

18. Macroeconomic policies for the second year of the program are aimed at making further progress in strengthening PFM, monetary and financial sector policies, and governance, and in improving data availability and quality. Economic prospects in 2009 are generally favorable, although a further significant decline in global growth could adversely affect Liberia’s growth prospects.

Cross-country experience with dedollarization

Liberia has been heavily dollarized since its founding as a country in 1847, although Liberian dollars (mostly coins) have circulated alongside the U.S. dollar. In the recent past, Charles Taylor issued Liberian dollar notes at par with the U.S. dollar during the 1989-97 civil war, and “Liberty” dollars were issued in areas controlled by ECOWAS in 1991 to invalidate notes looted from the central bank, effectively creating two currency zones. In 1997, the Central Bank of Liberia issued a new series of banknotes, after which the exchange rate was devalued to L$43/US$1. The U.S. dollar has remained official legal tender in Liberia.

Liberia is one of the most dollarized economies in the world. According to one measure, a country is considered highly dollarized if the ratio of foreign currency deposits to broad money exceeds 30 percent; in Liberia this ratio was 62 percent in 2007. Staff estimates show that if foreign currency in circulation is taken into consideration, U.S. dollars account on average for about 90 percent of the effective money supply.

Cross-country experience from highly dollarized economies offers important lessons for Liberia as the authorities consider their options for Liberia’s currency regime:

uA01fig09
1 Other neighboring countries (Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, and Togo are members of the BCEAO, and holding of foreign currency deposits by residents is not allowed.Sources: IMF International Financial Statistics; and country desk economists.
  • dollarization is a common phenomenon;

  • dollarization has not precluded satisfactory or even strong economic performance;

  • most dollarized countries have not actively pursued dedollarization;

  • dollarization is not easily reversed, even after the underlying causes have been removed;

  • monetary policy can still be effective at controlling inflation in dollarized economies;

  • results have been mixed for countries that have pursued dedollarization strategies, and only a few countries to date have successfully dedollarized (e.g. Israel, Poland, Chile, and Egypt);

  • dedollarization is facilitated by a careful sequencing of policies—establishing policy credibility is a prerequisite;

  • countries that have pursued a market-based dedollarization strategy were able to avoid costs associated with forced dedollarization, including financial disintermediation and/or capital flight.

A. Fiscal Policy

19. The 2008/09 budget again projects a strong increase in revenues (Table 3).4 The budget targets total spending of US$270.2 million, to be financed from revenues of US$248.9 million (an increase of 24¼ percent over the 2007/08 budget outturn), and a budget deficit of 1.7 percent of GDP to be financed by a drawdown in government cash balances at the Central Bank of Liberia (CBL). Around US$28.5 million of the projected revenues is related to payments from mining concessions yet to be finalized; however, on the upside, direct budget support of about US$19 million to be provided by the World Bank and African Development Bank was not included in the 2008/09 budget. The authorities remain committed to operating a cash-based balanced budget—they will not borrow to finance a deficit or manage liquidity. The authorities have started putting an improved cash flow management framework in place, but it will likely take some time for it to become fully effective. In the meantime, staff and the authorities agreed on the need to identify expenditures that could be reduced if revenue shortfalls materialize.

Table 3a.

Liberia: Summary of Central Government Operations (Commitment Basis), 2007/08-2012/13

article image
Sources: Liberian authorities; and Fund staff estimates and projections.

Starting in 2008/09, this represents debt service due after traditional debt relief mechanisms until the completion point is reached. Projections assume completion point for the second half of 2009/10.

Contributions to the domestic debt trust fund are reported as a financing item.

Until fiscal year 2009/10, budgets are assumed to be balanced on a cash-basis, with borrowing projected to start in 2010/11. Non-zero fiscal balances reported up to 2009/10 are due to some budget expenditures, including payment of arrears, amortization and payments to the domestic debt trust fund, being reported as financing items. Beginning with 2008/09, debt relief in the interim HI PC period is also shown as a financing item. The 2008/09 budget assumes a drawdown of previously accumulated cash balances.

Amount of debt relief expected beyond traditional mechanisms.

Includes pre-NTGL wage and foreign mission arrears.

20. The authorities have drafted a comprehensive set of amendments to the Liberian Revenue Code designed to eliminate discretion in granting tax incentives (MEFP, ¶26). Passage of these amendments is expected in early 2009. The next priority is drafting tax administrative regulations, for which the authorities have requested Fund technical assistance. On the revenue administration side, the authorities are in the process of launching ambitious projects for automating tax and customs administration operations.

21. To provide a strong legal foundation for PFM, the authorities have submitted a comprehensive PFM law to the legislature, with passage expected in early 2009. They have requested Fund technical assistance for drafting implementing regulations; the World Bank will help prepare manuals. Adoption of the regulations is a performance criterion under the program for 2009 (see MEFP Table 4). The authorities have also launched a comprehensive effort to computerize PFM. A computerized accounting system is being deployed to help automate bank reconciliation and implement a double-entry accounting standard in time for the next fiscal year (adoption of accounting standards, together with the expanded chart of accounts, is a program benchmark). Finally, the review of the Public Procurement and Concessions Act has been finalized and will be submitted to the legislature in 2009. In the meantime the authorities have commenced preparation of implementing regulations to provide guidance to ministries and agencies on the correct procurement procedures (a program benchmark).

22. The authorities have finalized validation of outstanding domestic debt and accepted claims totaling US$300.5 million (MEFP, ¶23). About US$268 million of valid claims are held by the CBL, while valid claims amounting to approximately US$51 million to private suppliers have been discounted in accordance with the government’s domestic debt strategy to US$11 million; the remaining claims consist of restructured bank loans and wage arrears.5 6 The 2006 domestic debt strategy envisioned setting up a trust fund to help service this debt, but the authorities are now reconsidering this approach because a large number of claims were rejected, which reduced the funding need, and in light of a low probability of donor support for such a trust fund. Staff advised that the authorities should quickly decide on how they plan to provide the financing required for repaying these debts because they are sizable.

B. Monetary and Financial Sector Policies

23. Agreement was reached on the monetary program for 2009. Monetary policy aims to limit inflation by keeping the exchange rate relatively stable.7 To this end, the CBL uses foreign exchange auctions to manage Liberian dollar liquidity. In the current environment, there is the possibility of increased volatility of flows of U.S. dollars into and out of Liberia, which could put pressure on the exchange rate to depreciate. Staff and the authorities agreed that the authorities should not attempt to hold the exchange rate at a specific level, or to defend it against downward pressure from such exogenous shocks, because foreign reserves are still low.

24. Staff and the authorities also agreed that efforts should continue to strengthen the current monetary policy framework. In this context, it was agreed that the CBL will: (i) relaunch efforts to publicize the current policy framework; (ii) analyze the foreign exchange market to assess developments in the most important sources of supply of and demand for U.S. dollars in order to enhance the efficiency of the foreign exchange auction; and (iii) finalize and publicize the rules and regulations pertaining to the foreign exchange auction (an end-March program benchmark). Regarding the latter, staff suggested that the “special” auctions held occasionally for the foreign exchange bureaus be folded into the regular weekly auctions. In addition, the authorities agreed on the importance of beginning to prepare for eventual reintroduction of short-term securities, starting with the basic operational framework for auctioning and trading these securities. To support the demand for Liberian dollars, the authorities indicated they would consider some of the policy actions identified above (¶17).

25. Substantial progress has been achieved in strengthening the banking sector (see text table), including: (i) adoption of a corporate governance framework; (ii) increasing the regulatory capital adequacy ratio and the minimum capital requirements;8 and (iii) employing regulatory directives under the supervision of the Compliance Committee to ensure that actions are taken to correct identified deficiencies.

Financial soundness indicators

article image

Adjustments to data from December ’06 relates to a reclassification of one bank’s investment in real estate (which was previously deducted from the bank’s assets), and in another bank’s connected lending.

Improvement in prudential indicators on account of restructuring of government loans from LBDI, replacing loans with 10-year bonds.

Source: Central Bank of Liberia (CBL).

26. The authorities indicated their intention to further strengthen the banking sector. Measures have been implemented to improve supervision of the banking system, including a requirement for semiannual on-site examinations of all operating banks (an end-September performance criterion) and a comprehensive system for off-site examinations. The authorities agreed with staff that these arrangements, together with the licensing of another four commercial banks, would impose significant demands on the Banking Supervision Department’s limited capacity, making training of both current and new staff a priority. Staff emphasized that the CBL should enforce all current banking supervision regulations and take firm steps to ensure full compliance, including the increase in capital requirements scheduled for 2009 and beyond. Finally, staff and the authorities agreed that given the supervisory constraints and global financial market uncertainty, the CBL should avoid issuing new banking licenses in the near future. They also agreed that growth in private sector credit would require close supervision of bank credit risk management and loan classification policies.9 Staff also recommended that the authorities seek funding and technical assistance for development of a fast-track commercial court, and for development of the payments system, which remains rudimentary.

27. Staff welcomed the authorities’ focus on strengthening the institutional environment to prevent money laundering. Under current legislation all licensed banks are required to have in place adequate know-your-customer policies, and to report suspicious transactions to the CBL. The authorities have requested assistance from the Inter-Governmental Action Group Against Money Laundering in West Africa to review the current anti-money-laundering/combating financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) legislation to ensure that it is consistent with international best practice. They would welcome Fund review of the draft legislation.

28. Progress has been made in strengthening internal financial controls at the CBL. The CBL received an adverse opinion from its external auditors on the 2007 accounts due to non-compliance with international financial reporting standards, and the Fund’s 2007 interim safeguards assessment identified serious weaknesses. An update safeguards assessment conducted in early 2008 found that while the CBL had largely addressed the measures to increase transparency recommended by the 2007 interim assessment, significant risks exist in the control framework of the Bank. Of particular concern was a delay in assuming co-signing authority for CBL financial matters by the Fund-supported Special Advisor and weak internal audit capacity, including the lack of effective oversight of CBL financial reporting, audit and control systems by the Audit Committee. A special external audit conducted in August 2008 (one of the main safeguards recommendations), indicated that the monetary data submitted by the CBL are accurate and comply with the definitions in the Technical Memorandum of Understanding, and that progress has been made on improving aspects of the general control environment, including the assumption of co–signing authority by the Special Advisor. Staff welcomed the authorities’ commitment to complete by February 2009 a second special external audit covering the period through December 2008. The CBL had also made progress in implementing a number of other major recommendations, including adoption of investment guidelines and segregating the duties of the Banking and Financial Departments regarding placement of CBL financial resources. Staff welcomed progress to date, and urged the CBL to further strengthen internal audit and controls, including appointing an expert to conduct an external assessment of the internal audit function, developing an action plan to implement recommended improvements, and adopting an internal audit charter.

29. The staff welcomed the CBL’s commitment to a cash-based balanced budget for 2009. Staff emphasized the importance of prudent assumptions about the average level of government deposits at the CBL given that the government budget for FY2008/09 targets a draw-down of deposits to finance expenditures.10 On expenditures, the authorities agreed that future capital expenditures on the CBL’s building, completion of which was interrupted by the civil war, should be prioritized in terms of available resources and other important CBL functions.

C. Other Structural Reforms

30. The staff welcomed progress with establishing the independent Liberia Anti-Corruption Commission (LACC). The act, approved in August 2008, gives the LACC independent investigative and prosecutorial powers and mandates that it lead implementation of the government’s anticorrupton strategy. Staff welcomed appointment of the commissioners, but emphasized the importance of finalizing preparations for making the commission operational, especially providing a budget for the remainder of FY2008/09 and appointing the necessary personnel.11 Staff and the authorities agreed on the need to finalize the LACC’s medium-term work program, inclusive of those elements of the national anticorruption strategy directly under the Commission’s control. Staff noted that elements of the strategy outside the LACC’s direct control would require close coordination with other government institutions, such as the General Auditing Commission (GAC).

31. The GAC completed some external audits of public sector institutions in FY2007/08, including a number of state-owned enterprises and the Ministry of Finance. It is commendable that external audits have recommenced after a long hiatus, but staff noted the importance of focusing scarce resources on the audits that are required for Liberia to reach the HIPC Initiative completion point; in this regard, successive audits of the Ministries of Education; Finance; Health; Lands, Mines and Energy; and Public Works would need to be completed (completion of the external audit of the government’s accounts for fiscal year 2007/08 is a performance criterion under the program).

D. Statistical Issues and Fund Technical Assistance

32. Severe data deficiencies hamper surveillance and monitoring of PRSP implementation. Fund technical assistance has been provided in a number of areas and the staff welcomed progress over the past three years in improving fiscal, monetary, price, and balance of payments data. Staff encouraged the authorities to continue implementing recommendations to maintain momentum in improving data availability and quality (completing balance of payments data for 2008 is a program benchmark). The recently finalized National Statistical Development Strategy (NSDS) envisages the resumption of production of national accounts data and a household income and expenditure survey that would improve consumer price statistics (completion of the national accounts establishment survey is a performance criterion, see MEFP, ¶37).

33. The authorities have been very receptive to technical assistance from the Fund (Informational Annex, Appendix I), and Liberia’s development partners. The Fund has provided extensive technical assistance over the past three years in the areas of statistics and fiscal, monetary and financial policies. Staff agreed with the authorities that continued Fund support would be important to further strengthen institutional capacity.

E. Moving toward the HIPC Completion Point

34. Liberia has made progress toward achieving a number of completion point triggers: (i) Liberia’s full PRSP was finalized in April 2008; (ii) performance under the PRGF-supported program has been satisfactory; and (iii) a revised investment incentive code to ban tax exemptions other than those specified in the Liberia Revenue Code has been finalized, and is expected to be submitted for legislative approval in early 2009. The authorities have also: (i) submitted a comprehensive PFM law for legislative approval; (ii) adopted a debt management strategy; (iii) passed legislation to establish an independent anticorruption commission; and (iv) made progress in public reporting of extractive industry financial flows consistent with EITI criteria. Implementation of these triggers for at least twelve months is a requirement for reaching the completion point, and the authorities affirmed their continuing commitment to achieving these completion point triggers expeditiously. Staff considers that the completion point could be reached in 2010, as had been assumed in the decision point debt sustainability analysis.

F. Financing Assurances

35. The program is fully financed through 2009 through existing debt rescheduling agreements. Following clearance of arrears to the World Bank and African Development Bank in December 2007 and the IMF in March 2008, and a rescheduling agreement with the Paris Club in April 2008, the authorities have continued seeking agreement with other multilateral, official and private creditors consistent with the HIPC Initiative. The authorities have continued discussions with private creditors, and expect that an agreement under the World Bank’s Debt Reduction Facility could be reached in early 2009. Discussions have also continued with non-Paris Club and other multilateral creditors—in this regard China has announced its intention to forgive all outstanding claims, while IFAD, the Saudi Fund, OFID, and BADEA have agreed to grant Liberia debt relief on terms fully consistent with the HIPC initiative. Following cabinet approval of a debt management strategy, the authorities have strengthened efforts to expand capacity of the debt management unit, including establishing a mechanism for securing loan documents. Additionally, the authorities are seeking donor support to acquire a debt management software package (a program benchmark).

G. Program Monitoring and Risks

36. The second year of the program will cover the period through December 2009. The program will be monitored on the basis of biannual quantitative performance criteria for June 30 and December 31, 2009, and indicative targets for March 31 and September 30, 2009 (MEFP, Table 3). Structural conditionality is consistent with the government’s PRSP (MEFP, Table 4). Staff and the authorities agreed to eliminate the program conditionality related to the ceiling on CBL expenditure in order to allow the CBL to undertake important capital expenditures if income performance is better than projected.

Table 3b.

Liberia: Summary of Central Government Operations (Cash Basis), 2007/08-2012/13

article image
Sources: Liberian authorities; and Fund staff estimates and projections.

Budget is shown on a cash basis, i.e. debt service payments are shown after all debt relief.

Contributions to the domestic debt trust fund are reported as a financing item.

Until fiscal year 2009/10, budgets are assumed to be balanced on a cash-basis, with borrowing projected to start in 2010/11. Non-zero fiscal balances reported up to 2009/10 are due to some budget expenditures, including payment of arrears, amortization and payments to the domestic debt trust fund, being reported as financing items. The 2008/09 budget assumes a drawdown of previously accumulated cash balances.

Amount of debt relief expected beyond traditional mechanisms.

Includes pre-NTGL wage and foreign mission arrears.