Abstract
The quality of the macroeconomic statistics for Malta has improved significantly in recent years, particularly as a result of the legal and institutional restructuring of the National Statistics Office (NSO). These changes were made in an effort to respond more effectively to the needs of users and to comply with new data-reporting requirements of the European Union (EU). These improvements have brought Malta’s statistical practices in line with internationally accepted standards and practices in a number of statistical areas.
I. Overall Assessment
A. SDDS Assessment
1. In early February 2005, the Maltese authorities expressed interest in subscribing to the Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS).1 During this Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC)—Data Module mission of June 22–July 5, 2005, the Governor of the Central Bank of Malta (CBM) and the Director General (DG) of the National Statistics Office (NSO) voiced their strong commitment to SDDS subscription in the coming months.
2. The authorities post data for most of the prescribed SDDS data categories on the websites of the NSO and the CBM. The NSO plans to post time series for producer price indices and government finance data on its website in the near term. The CBM indicated that it would disseminate data on the international reserves and foreign currency liquidity template and the external debt template on its website.2 A preliminary review of Malta’s observance of the SDDS prescriptions (see Table 4) indicates that Malta meets the specifications for coverage, periodicity, and timeliness for those SDDS data categories that are currently disseminated (see Table 4).
3. The review of the observance of the SDDS also covered the availability of Advance Release Calendars (ARCs). ARCs are available for most of the data categories except for the production and producer price indices, government finance statistics (GFS), gross official reserves, international reserves and foreign currency liquidity template, external debt, and the international investment position (IIP). However, both the NSO and the CBM have indicated that ARCs for all SDDS data categories will be available shortly.
B. ROSC Data Module
4. The quality of the macroeconomic statistics for Malta has improved significantly in recent years, particularly as a result of the legal and institutional restructuring of the NSO. These changes were made in an effort to respond more effectively to the needs of users and to comply with new data-reporting requirements of the European Union (EU). These improvements have brought Malta’s statistical practices in line with internationally accepted standards and practices in a number of statistical areas.
5. The ROSC data module contains in this first section the following main observations. Malta has an effective legal and institutional framework that supports the conduct of a range of statistical functions. Collaboration among statistical agencies in sharing data is effective. These agencies manage their resources flexibly to meet evolving statistical needs, but constraints are emerging, as resources are increasingly stretched to respond to the demands from regional and international statistical institutions. All statistical agencies maintain high professional and ethical standards in carrying out their functions, which have increased public confidence in the statistics. However, improvements can be made to the methodological soundness of the data, particularly regarding scope, to enhance certain data sources and statistical techniques in light of ongoing structural changes in the economy, and improve accessibility of certain data categories. Section II provides a summary assessment by agency and dataset based on a four-part scale. This is followed by staff recommendations in Section III. Practices compared to the SDDS are summarized in Appendix I. The authorities’ response to this report and a volume of detailed assessments are presented in separate documents.
6. In applying the IMF’s Data Quality Assessment Framework (DQAF July 2003), the remainder of this section presents the mission’s main conclusions. The presentation is done at the level of the DQAF’s quality dimensions, by agency for the first two dimensions, and across datasets for the remaining four.
7. Prerequisites of quality and assurances of integrity. The agencies that compile official statistics in Malta are the NSO—for national accounts, consumer price indices (CPIs),3 and GFS—and both the NSO and the CBM for balance of payments.
The Malta Statistics Authority Act XXIV of 2000 (MSA Act) mandates that the Malta Statistics Authority (MSA) regulate and supervise the production of official statistics in accordance with international requirements and standards. It assigns the obligation and authority for collecting, compiling, and disseminating official statistics to the NSO, the executive agency of the MSA. Collaborative data sharing arrangements have been developed with other providers of source data since the establishment of the NSO. Pragmatic management at the NSO has promoted the efficient use of financial and staff resources for discharging existing statistical responsibilities. However, efforts to expand the range of statistics to comply with regional and international standards, and to respond to new data reporting requirements are placing increasing strains on these resources. Consultations with users have resulted in the improvement and diversification of statistical products. Extensive processes are in place to monitor the quality of the statistics that are compiled and disseminated. The NSO operates in an environment that is free of political interference, and current work procedures emphasize professionalism and ethical standards. Transparency in the data dissemination process is supported by the simultaneous release of data to all users.
The CBM derives its legal authority to collect statistics from the Central Bank of Malta Act of 2002 (CBM Act). Following a cooperation agreement signed in 2003, it compiles the balance of payments and IIP statistics in collaboration with the NSO. Resources are adequate for current statistical activities but are now placed under increasing pressure by new reporting requirements of the European Central Bank (ECB), following Malta’s entry into the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. The CBM enjoys statutory independence in the performance of its statistical functions and cultivates an environment of transparency and adherence to ethical standards. Its recruitment and promotion policies are based on professional competence.
8. Methodological soundness. The methodological basis for compiling statistics broadly conforms to international standards for balance of payments and the CPIs. However, the analytical usefulness of national accounts and GFS is limited by shortcomings in the scope of the data. In particular, volume estimates of the gross domestic product (GDP) by type of economic activity and income accounts are not available, and the accounts of the general government do not cover stock positions of non-financial assets and financial assets and liabilities. Other limitations include noncoverage of imputed rentals in the CPIs, nonrecording of transactions of special purpose entities in the balance of payments, and the practice of adjusting cash transactions to the accrual basis only at a very aggregate level in the GFS.
9. Accuracy and reliability. The accuracy and reliability of datasets are generally adequate. However, some shortcomings are identified across all datasets. For national accounts, source data generally support compilation of nominal GDP estimates, except for coverage of service activities, but inadequate timeliness of major source data adversely affects the accuracy of quarterly estimates, resulting in significant revisions, in particular of the first estimates. Moreover, these estimates are not benchmarked to the annual estimates. The absence of a producer price index impedes compilation of volume estimates of GDP by activity. The retail price index (RPI) is affected by weights that are not price updated. With respect to the balance of payments, the magnitude of the errors and omissions item raises questions about the adequacy of coverage of source data. Revision studies are not routinely conducted for balance of payments and national accounts, and little evidence exists that the findings of any studies are used to improve the effectiveness of the statistical processes.
10. Serviceability. Serviceability of macroeconomic statistics is generally good, with periodicity and timeliness of all disseminated data meeting or exceeding the SDDS requirements. Moreover, statistics are broadly consistent over a reasonable time period within individual datasets and are generally consistent across datasets. However, revised data are not clearly identified in most datasets, and greater clarity and adherence to the revisions policies for both quarterly and annual national accounts are needed.
11. Accessibility. Accessibility to macroeconomic statistics is uneven across datasets. Balance of payments statistics and related metadata are readily available and can be downloaded from the official website. National accounts and the price indices are also easily accessible, although the availability of supporting metadata could be enhanced. With regard to the GFS, accessibility to data and metadata is very limited. Only central government data are disseminated in an analytical framework, and there is inadequate documentation that explains concepts and definitions. However, good assistance is provided to users, notably through official websites.
II. Assessment by Agency and Dataset
12. Assessment of the quality of four macroeconomic datasets—national accounts, consumer price indices, government finance, and balance of payments statistics—was conducted using the DQAF July 2003. In this section, the results are presented at the level of the DQAF elements and using a four-point rating scale (Table 1). For the NSO and CBM, assessments of the prerequisites of data quality and the assurances of integrity (Dimensions “0” and “1” of the DQAF) are presented in Tables 2a and 2b. For each dataset, the assessment of methodological soundness, accuracy and reliability, serviceability, and accessibility (Dimensions “2” to “5” of the DQAF) are shown in Tables 3a–d.
13. To complement the Fund staff’s assessment of the quality of statistics produced by Malta, the mission conducted an informal survey of the key users of macroeconomic statistics, with the assistance of the authorities. Questionnaires were sent to 55 users, asking them to evaluate the coverage, periodicity, timeliness, dissemination practices, accessibility, and overall quality of the official statistics. Fifteen responses were received, representing a response rate of 27 percent.
14. The results of the survey and the follow-up discussion indicate that, in general, most users consider the official statistics to be unbiased and accurate and comparable in terms of quality to statistics in other countries of the region. In particular, users were satisfied with the coverage, periodicity, timeliness, and underlying methodology of the official statistics, although several users noted that they would appreciate more timely and more detailed national accounts and government finance statistics.
15. A more detailed analysis of the User’s Survey and the tabulated results are presented in Appendix III of the accompanying document presenting the detailed assessment.
Malta: Data Quality Assessment Framework July 2003—Summary Results
Malta: Data Quality Assessment Framework July 2003—Summary Results
| Key to symbols: O = Practice Observed; LO = Practice Largely Observed; LNO = Practice Largely Not Observed; NO = Practice Not Observed; NA = Not Applicable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datasets | National Accounts | Consumer Price Index | Government Finance Statistics | Balance of Payments Statistics |
| Dimensions/Elements | ||||
| 0. Prerequisites of quality | ||||
| 0.1 Legal and institutional environment | O | O | O | O |
| 0.2 Resources | LO | LO | LO | O |
| 0.3 Relevance | O | O | O | O |
| 0.4 Other quality management | O | O | O | O |
| 1. Assurances of integrity | ||||
| 1.1 Professionalism | O | O | O | O |
| 1.2 Transparency | O | O | O | O |
| 1.3 Ethical standards | O | O | O | O |
| 2. Methodological soundness | ||||
| 2.1 Concepts and definitions | O | O | O | O |
| 2.2 Scope | LNO | LO | LO | LO |
| 2.3 Classification/sectorization | O | O | O | O |
| 2.4 Basis for recording | LO | O | LO | O |
| 3. Accuracy and reliability | ||||
| 3.1 Source data | LO | O | O | LO |
| 3.2 Assessment of source data | O | O | O | O |
| 3.3 Statistical techniques | LO | LO | O | O |
| 3.4 Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs | LO | LO | LO | O |
| 3.5 Revision studies | LO | O | O | LNO |
| 4. Serviceability | ||||
| 4.1 Periodicity and timeliness | O | O | O | O |
| 4.2 Consistency | LO | O | O | O |
| 4.3 Revision policy and practice | LNO | O | LO | LO |
| 5. Accessibility | ||||
| 5.1 Data accessibility | LO | LO | LNO | O |
| 5.2 Metadata accessibility | LO | LO | LNO | O |
| 5.3 Assistance to users | O | O | O | O |
Malta: Data Quality Assessment Framework July 2003—Summary Results
| Key to symbols: O = Practice Observed; LO = Practice Largely Observed; LNO = Practice Largely Not Observed; NO = Practice Not Observed; NA = Not Applicable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datasets | National Accounts | Consumer Price Index | Government Finance Statistics | Balance of Payments Statistics |
| Dimensions/Elements | ||||
| 0. Prerequisites of quality | ||||
| 0.1 Legal and institutional environment | O | O | O | O |
| 0.2 Resources | LO | LO | LO | O |
| 0.3 Relevance | O | O | O | O |
| 0.4 Other quality management | O | O | O | O |
| 1. Assurances of integrity | ||||
| 1.1 Professionalism | O | O | O | O |
| 1.2 Transparency | O | O | O | O |
| 1.3 Ethical standards | O | O | O | O |
| 2. Methodological soundness | ||||
| 2.1 Concepts and definitions | O | O | O | O |
| 2.2 Scope | LNO | LO | LO | LO |
| 2.3 Classification/sectorization | O | O | O | O |
| 2.4 Basis for recording | LO | O | LO | O |
| 3. Accuracy and reliability | ||||
| 3.1 Source data | LO | O | O | LO |
| 3.2 Assessment of source data | O | O | O | O |
| 3.3 Statistical techniques | LO | LO | O | O |
| 3.4 Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs | LO | LO | LO | O |
| 3.5 Revision studies | LO | O | O | LNO |
| 4. Serviceability | ||||
| 4.1 Periodicity and timeliness | O | O | O | O |
| 4.2 Consistency | LO | O | O | O |
| 4.3 Revision policy and practice | LNO | O | LO | LO |
| 5. Accessibility | ||||
| 5.1 Data accessibility | LO | LO | LNO | O |
| 5.2 Metadata accessibility | LO | LO | LNO | O |
| 5.3 Assistance to users | O | O | O | O |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 0 and 1—National Statistical Office
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 0 and 1—National Statistical Office
| 0. Prerequisites of quality | 1. Assurances of integrity |
|---|---|
| Legal and institutional environment The NSO, Malta’s official national statistical agency, was established by virtue of the MSA Act. The NSO is headed by a DG and operates as an independent body. In discharging its functions, the NSO is accountable to the MSA, the supervisory body for the production of official statistics. The MSA Act stipulates the functions and responsibilities of the NSO and provides the NSO with the responsibility for compiling a wide range of official statistics. It states that the DG shall decide on the scope and purpose of statistics, and on the methods and procedures for the collection, compilation, storage, presentation and publication of the data. Malta, as a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), also has to comply with the European law that specifies obligations for compiling and reporting statistics. Coordination and working arrangements between the NSO and other agencies with regard to data collection and production are generally adequate. Concerning the confidentiality of data, the NSO is bound by the provisions of the Data Protection Act of 2000. Resources Staff, facilities, computing resources, and financing are deemed commensurate with the current statistical programs. However, due to increasing demands on the NSO to meet regional requirements and standards (compilation of a producer price index, further improvement of the annual and quarterly national accounts, as well as government finance statistics), there is a recognition of the need for more staff resources combined with a possible reassignment of current staff. Mechanisms, such as an annual staff performance appraisal, could be more effectively used to ensure greater efficiency in implementing statistical processes. Relevance The NSO staff has frequent consultations with main users to explain their statistical products and to gather information on emerging statistical needs. Feedback from users on the quality standards of the NSO statistics was solicited in 2002/3 through a Users Perception Survey. In order to further enhance the practical utility of existing statistics in meeting user needs, the NSO is examining the desirability of establishing more broadly based user committees and consultation groups. Other quality management The MSA Act stipulates the functions and responsibilities necessary to ensure quality considerations in the statistical program. Malta is also a member of the EEA Agreement. Article 76 of this Agreement gives the basis for common methodology, quality standards, and monitoring of outputs in many statistical fields. Methodology, quality standards, and outputs are monitored through regular reporting requirements. | Professionalism The MSA Act provides the legal basis for the NSO’s institutional autonomy and professional independence in carrying out its statistical functions. Professionalism is actively promoted within the institution. Recruitment and promotion practices in the NSO support professionalism. There is a policy in place for dealing with erroneous interpretations or misuse of statistics. This policy does not encourage debates that may be political in nature. Transparency Transparency is fostered by the widespread public availability of the MSA Act in English. The NSO’s publications and website include information on its organization and availability of its products. Hard copies of the MSA Act are also available from the NSO’s library. All products of the NSO are clearly identified. Except in one instance, for the RPI, there is no internal government access to the NSO’s statistics prior to their release. The RPI is pre-released to the Retail Price Index Advisory Board, and the public is notified of this procedure. This RPI Board operates only as a consultative body without any decision making authority. Advance notice is provided for major changes in methodology, source data, and statistical techniques for all disseminated datasets. Ethical standards The code of conduct and practice of the NSO’s employees reinforces the provision of the MSA Act. Each employee is provided with a copy of the Collective Agreement and must sign the “Form of Oath” upon accepting employment with the NSO. Through the renegotiation of NSO’s Collective Agreement, staff are reminded of the code of conduct and practice. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 0 and 1—National Statistical Office
| 0. Prerequisites of quality | 1. Assurances of integrity |
|---|---|
| Legal and institutional environment The NSO, Malta’s official national statistical agency, was established by virtue of the MSA Act. The NSO is headed by a DG and operates as an independent body. In discharging its functions, the NSO is accountable to the MSA, the supervisory body for the production of official statistics. The MSA Act stipulates the functions and responsibilities of the NSO and provides the NSO with the responsibility for compiling a wide range of official statistics. It states that the DG shall decide on the scope and purpose of statistics, and on the methods and procedures for the collection, compilation, storage, presentation and publication of the data. Malta, as a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), also has to comply with the European law that specifies obligations for compiling and reporting statistics. Coordination and working arrangements between the NSO and other agencies with regard to data collection and production are generally adequate. Concerning the confidentiality of data, the NSO is bound by the provisions of the Data Protection Act of 2000. Resources Staff, facilities, computing resources, and financing are deemed commensurate with the current statistical programs. However, due to increasing demands on the NSO to meet regional requirements and standards (compilation of a producer price index, further improvement of the annual and quarterly national accounts, as well as government finance statistics), there is a recognition of the need for more staff resources combined with a possible reassignment of current staff. Mechanisms, such as an annual staff performance appraisal, could be more effectively used to ensure greater efficiency in implementing statistical processes. Relevance The NSO staff has frequent consultations with main users to explain their statistical products and to gather information on emerging statistical needs. Feedback from users on the quality standards of the NSO statistics was solicited in 2002/3 through a Users Perception Survey. In order to further enhance the practical utility of existing statistics in meeting user needs, the NSO is examining the desirability of establishing more broadly based user committees and consultation groups. Other quality management The MSA Act stipulates the functions and responsibilities necessary to ensure quality considerations in the statistical program. Malta is also a member of the EEA Agreement. Article 76 of this Agreement gives the basis for common methodology, quality standards, and monitoring of outputs in many statistical fields. Methodology, quality standards, and outputs are monitored through regular reporting requirements. | Professionalism The MSA Act provides the legal basis for the NSO’s institutional autonomy and professional independence in carrying out its statistical functions. Professionalism is actively promoted within the institution. Recruitment and promotion practices in the NSO support professionalism. There is a policy in place for dealing with erroneous interpretations or misuse of statistics. This policy does not encourage debates that may be political in nature. Transparency Transparency is fostered by the widespread public availability of the MSA Act in English. The NSO’s publications and website include information on its organization and availability of its products. Hard copies of the MSA Act are also available from the NSO’s library. All products of the NSO are clearly identified. Except in one instance, for the RPI, there is no internal government access to the NSO’s statistics prior to their release. The RPI is pre-released to the Retail Price Index Advisory Board, and the public is notified of this procedure. This RPI Board operates only as a consultative body without any decision making authority. Advance notice is provided for major changes in methodology, source data, and statistical techniques for all disseminated datasets. Ethical standards The code of conduct and practice of the NSO’s employees reinforces the provision of the MSA Act. Each employee is provided with a copy of the Collective Agreement and must sign the “Form of Oath” upon accepting employment with the NSO. Through the renegotiation of NSO’s Collective Agreement, staff are reminded of the code of conduct and practice. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 0 and 1—Central Bank of Malta
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 0 and 1—Central Bank of Malta
| 0. Prerequisites of quality | 1. Assurances of integrity |
|---|---|
| Legal and institutional environment The compilation and dissemination of the balance of payments of Malta is a joint responsibility of the NSO and the CBM. This cooperation has been formalized by an agreement in July 2003 between the two institutions. Under this agreement, the NSO is responsible for collecting data from reporting agents in the nonfinancial sectors of the economy as specified in the European System of Accounts 1995 (1995 ESA), while the CBM is responsible for the collection of data from reporting agents in the financial sector. The CBM is authorized to collect data from banks, other financial institutions, and persons under the CBM Act. In practice, there is a complete sharing of information with respect to the collection of balance of payments data between the two institutions. In addition, the CBM has set up a Technical Committee for Financial Statistics, which brings together key representatives of the financial sector (Malta Financial Services Authority, Malta Stock Exchange, Bankers’ Association). Resources Staff resources are generally considered adequate to meet existing objectives, although the new statistical requirements imposed by Eurostat and the ECB, as well as the introduction of a new direct reporting system, have significantly increased the workload of the two units (one in the NSO and another in the CBM) in recent years. Relevance In practice, statistical needs are essentially driven by the requirements of economic and monetary policies, and also by regional and international requirements and standards, in particular those of the ECB. In this connection, the CBM participates regularly in the relevant working groups set up at the European level. Other quality management The CBM’s main aim is to comply with international methodological standards, and to produce timely balance of payments with comprehensive coverage. Quality management processes include validation checks at the level of the processing of primary information sent by respondents, consistency checks at the macro level, and the monitoring of the response rate to questionnaires. | Professionalism The statutory provisions under which the CBM compiles balance of payments statistics are adequate to support its impartiality. The choice of data sources and statistical methods is determined solely by the need to produce analytically meaningful data. Staff recruitment and promotion are made on the basis of required qualifications and experience. Transparency Transparency is primarily ensured by the requirements of the CBM Act. In addition, the balance of payments annual publication forms state the terms and conditions under which the statistics are collected. There is no internal government access to balance of payments data prior to their release. Communication of an advance copy of the CBM’s Quarterly Review to the Ministry of Finance is mentioned in the GDDS metadata. The NSO’s official website is linked to the GDDS metadata. Ethical standards CBM employees are governed by a Code of Ethics, which gives guidance in matters of professional ethics and serves as a reference with regard to the standard of conduct within the CBM. On joining the CBM, employees sign a “Declaration of Secrecy” as required by the By-Laws of the CBM. All CBM employees are bound to respect the confidential nature of information acquired in the course of their employment. This obligation continues to apply notwithstanding that an individual is no longer in employment of the CBM. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 0 and 1—Central Bank of Malta
| 0. Prerequisites of quality | 1. Assurances of integrity |
|---|---|
| Legal and institutional environment The compilation and dissemination of the balance of payments of Malta is a joint responsibility of the NSO and the CBM. This cooperation has been formalized by an agreement in July 2003 between the two institutions. Under this agreement, the NSO is responsible for collecting data from reporting agents in the nonfinancial sectors of the economy as specified in the European System of Accounts 1995 (1995 ESA), while the CBM is responsible for the collection of data from reporting agents in the financial sector. The CBM is authorized to collect data from banks, other financial institutions, and persons under the CBM Act. In practice, there is a complete sharing of information with respect to the collection of balance of payments data between the two institutions. In addition, the CBM has set up a Technical Committee for Financial Statistics, which brings together key representatives of the financial sector (Malta Financial Services Authority, Malta Stock Exchange, Bankers’ Association). Resources Staff resources are generally considered adequate to meet existing objectives, although the new statistical requirements imposed by Eurostat and the ECB, as well as the introduction of a new direct reporting system, have significantly increased the workload of the two units (one in the NSO and another in the CBM) in recent years. Relevance In practice, statistical needs are essentially driven by the requirements of economic and monetary policies, and also by regional and international requirements and standards, in particular those of the ECB. In this connection, the CBM participates regularly in the relevant working groups set up at the European level. Other quality management The CBM’s main aim is to comply with international methodological standards, and to produce timely balance of payments with comprehensive coverage. Quality management processes include validation checks at the level of the processing of primary information sent by respondents, consistency checks at the macro level, and the monitoring of the response rate to questionnaires. | Professionalism The statutory provisions under which the CBM compiles balance of payments statistics are adequate to support its impartiality. The choice of data sources and statistical methods is determined solely by the need to produce analytically meaningful data. Staff recruitment and promotion are made on the basis of required qualifications and experience. Transparency Transparency is primarily ensured by the requirements of the CBM Act. In addition, the balance of payments annual publication forms state the terms and conditions under which the statistics are collected. There is no internal government access to balance of payments data prior to their release. Communication of an advance copy of the CBM’s Quarterly Review to the Ministry of Finance is mentioned in the GDDS metadata. The NSO’s official website is linked to the GDDS metadata. Ethical standards CBM employees are governed by a Code of Ethics, which gives guidance in matters of professional ethics and serves as a reference with regard to the standard of conduct within the CBM. On joining the CBM, employees sign a “Declaration of Secrecy” as required by the By-Laws of the CBM. All CBM employees are bound to respect the confidential nature of information acquired in the course of their employment. This obligation continues to apply notwithstanding that an individual is no longer in employment of the CBM. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—National Accounts
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—National Accounts
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions National accounts follow the conceptual framework of the 1995 ESA. Scope National accounts do not cover all the accounts and tables recommended by the Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts (ISWGNA) as necessary for implementing the System of National Accounts 1993 (1993 SNA)/1995 ESA. In particular, (i) volume estimates of GDP are only compiled for the expenditure categories; (ii) income accounts, the capital account, and the rest of the world accounts are not compiled. However, nominal GDP estimates are compiled from production, expenditure, and income approaches. The production and assets boundaries are broadly in line with the framework. Classification/sectorization Internationally accepted classifications derived from appropriate EU standards are implemented to classify activities, products, government functions, and individual consumption. Work is underway to complete identification of institutional sector accounts. Basis for recording Market prices are used to value flows and stocks. Adjustment to accrual basis for government’s transactions is less precise since it is done at a very aggregated level. No adjustments are made for holding gains/losses. Transactions between establishments in the same enterprise are recorded on a net instead of a gross basis. | Source data Adoption of the 1995 ESA, since 1999, was accompanied by improvements in source data, namely the introduction of new annual and quarterly surveys covering the majority of economic activities, update of the business registry, and improvement of administrative sources to conform to new methodological requirements. However, data are generally available at the enterprise level instead of the establishment one. The range of price indices is too limited to support compilation of reliable volume estimates. In particular, the absence of a producer price index impedes compilation of volume measures for GDP by production. Source data are not timely to allow compilation of supply and use tables (SUT) within a reasonable timeframe. Assessment of source data Administrative and survey data are regularly assessed to identify outliers and inconsistencies, and source data providers are contacted as needed. A special research unit is monitoring surveys. Statistical techniques Statistical techniques are broadly adequate for the current price estimates. The estimates for the non-observed economy are adequate but their coverage could be further improved, in particular for illegal activities. The volume estimates of certain expenditure categories are weak. Quarterly estimates are not benchmarked to the annual estimates. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs SUT were used to balance the estimates for 2000 and 2001, but for the subsequent years, the discrepancy was incorporated into the expenditure estimates (changes in inventories) and not investigated. Revision studies The results of regular revisions are observed and used to inform ongoing work, but no explicit studies are undertaken to identify trends or systematic biases. | Periodicity and timeliness The periodicity and timeliness of the quarterly accounts meet the SDDS requirements. Consistency The estimates at current prices are internally consistent and are reconcilable with the other major datasets (e.g., GFS, balance of payments). However, consistency of the volume estimates of GDP cannot be checked in the absence of a second measure. The magnitude of the statistical discrepancy between the various approaches to compile GDP estimates fluctuates over time. Revision policy and practice There is no revision policy in place for the annual accounts. They are generally considered final when the SUT are released. On the other hand, quarterly accounts are continuously revised as more source data become available without close coordination with the annual accounts. The publications do not document revisions, but users are informed about the major methodological aspects underlying production of the newly published data. | Data accessibility National accounts are published in a clear manner, but information is fragmented across hard copy publications. Data are released to all users at the same time, based on a preannounced schedule that is available on the NSO’s website. Additional details are available upon request. Metadata accessibility The metadata are limited. The updated publication on sources and methods, following the 1995 ESA concepts and methods, is prepared but not yet published. Metadata on quarterly national accounts are limited to brief notes on the seasonal adjustment. Assistance to users The hardcopy publications and the website provide comprehensive information on how users may contact the NSO. A catalog of publications is available. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—National Accounts
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions National accounts follow the conceptual framework of the 1995 ESA. Scope National accounts do not cover all the accounts and tables recommended by the Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts (ISWGNA) as necessary for implementing the System of National Accounts 1993 (1993 SNA)/1995 ESA. In particular, (i) volume estimates of GDP are only compiled for the expenditure categories; (ii) income accounts, the capital account, and the rest of the world accounts are not compiled. However, nominal GDP estimates are compiled from production, expenditure, and income approaches. The production and assets boundaries are broadly in line with the framework. Classification/sectorization Internationally accepted classifications derived from appropriate EU standards are implemented to classify activities, products, government functions, and individual consumption. Work is underway to complete identification of institutional sector accounts. Basis for recording Market prices are used to value flows and stocks. Adjustment to accrual basis for government’s transactions is less precise since it is done at a very aggregated level. No adjustments are made for holding gains/losses. Transactions between establishments in the same enterprise are recorded on a net instead of a gross basis. | Source data Adoption of the 1995 ESA, since 1999, was accompanied by improvements in source data, namely the introduction of new annual and quarterly surveys covering the majority of economic activities, update of the business registry, and improvement of administrative sources to conform to new methodological requirements. However, data are generally available at the enterprise level instead of the establishment one. The range of price indices is too limited to support compilation of reliable volume estimates. In particular, the absence of a producer price index impedes compilation of volume measures for GDP by production. Source data are not timely to allow compilation of supply and use tables (SUT) within a reasonable timeframe. Assessment of source data Administrative and survey data are regularly assessed to identify outliers and inconsistencies, and source data providers are contacted as needed. A special research unit is monitoring surveys. Statistical techniques Statistical techniques are broadly adequate for the current price estimates. The estimates for the non-observed economy are adequate but their coverage could be further improved, in particular for illegal activities. The volume estimates of certain expenditure categories are weak. Quarterly estimates are not benchmarked to the annual estimates. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs SUT were used to balance the estimates for 2000 and 2001, but for the subsequent years, the discrepancy was incorporated into the expenditure estimates (changes in inventories) and not investigated. Revision studies The results of regular revisions are observed and used to inform ongoing work, but no explicit studies are undertaken to identify trends or systematic biases. | Periodicity and timeliness The periodicity and timeliness of the quarterly accounts meet the SDDS requirements. Consistency The estimates at current prices are internally consistent and are reconcilable with the other major datasets (e.g., GFS, balance of payments). However, consistency of the volume estimates of GDP cannot be checked in the absence of a second measure. The magnitude of the statistical discrepancy between the various approaches to compile GDP estimates fluctuates over time. Revision policy and practice There is no revision policy in place for the annual accounts. They are generally considered final when the SUT are released. On the other hand, quarterly accounts are continuously revised as more source data become available without close coordination with the annual accounts. The publications do not document revisions, but users are informed about the major methodological aspects underlying production of the newly published data. | Data accessibility National accounts are published in a clear manner, but information is fragmented across hard copy publications. Data are released to all users at the same time, based on a preannounced schedule that is available on the NSO’s website. Additional details are available upon request. Metadata accessibility The metadata are limited. The updated publication on sources and methods, following the 1995 ESA concepts and methods, is prepared but not yet published. Metadata on quarterly national accounts are limited to brief notes on the seasonal adjustment. Assistance to users The hardcopy publications and the website provide comprehensive information on how users may contact the NSO. A catalog of publications is available. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Consumer Price Index
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Consumer Price Index
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions The RPI and the harmonized index of consumer prices (HICP) broadly follow the concepts and definitions set out in the CPI Manual and 1995 ESA. Scope The RPI and HICP weights cover the expenditures of all resident households. The Maltese HICP, while covering all the subindices laid down in Council Regulation (EC), No. 1687/98, includes social protection services provided within the home, such as home cleaning, meals, and transport for the disabled. All in-scope urban and rural households are covered, as are households of all income levels and occupations. Malta’s RPI and HICP do not cover imputed rentals of owner occupants. Classification/sectorization The RPI and HICP cover noninstitutionalized Maltese households that are consistent with the 1995 ESA definition of household sector. The item weights for the HICP are classified using the Classification of Individual Consumption by Purpose (COICOP), while the RPI employs a modified COICOP that better represents the Maltese economy. The weights of both classifications are consistent with international guidelines. The Statistical Classification of Economic Activities, Rev. 1, is used for classification of retail outlets in the business registry. Basis for recording Market prices are used to value flows and stocks, and the basis for recording follows international best practices. | Source data The Household Budget Survey (HBS) and the business registry provide an adequate basis to compile the RPI and HICP. The data generally approximate the definitions, scope, classifications, valuation, and time of recording. Assessment of source data There are monthly assessments of source data. Sampling, response, and non-sampling errors for each survey are compiled and monitored. Statistical techniques Data compiled employ good quality statistical techniques, though the RPI weights are not price updated. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs Although statistical discrepancies in intermediate RPI data are assessed and investigated, the RPI and HICP data are not validated against other price indices. Revision studies For the HICP, revision studies are routinely conducted, especially on weight updating. The RPI is not frequently revised, but new weights are subject to analysis and validation prior to being incorporated in the index. | Periodicity and timeliness The RPI and HICP are disseminated monthly, two to three weeks after the reference period, and, as a result, dissemination is within the one-month SDDS timeliness requirements. Consistency There are no consistency issues for the RPI and the HICP since all-items aggregate is invariant to geographical classification. Long-term time series exist for the RPI (base year 2000) and for the HICP (base year 1996), which are published with link factors to previous base years. Revision policy and practice Revision policy is known as a result of well designed marketing techniques and promotions, which are designed to educate data users. RPI data are not revised once published other than in exceptional cases to correct the impact on weights of extraordinary price rises for some items. On the other hand, the HICP is revised regularly, since the weights are updated annually. Studies of the annual weight updating of the HICP are conducted and disseminated. | Data accessibility The NSO publishes well designed charts and tables to facilitate analysis. Data for the RPI and HICP are generally accessible, but the series are not published with adequate levels of disaggregation. An ARC is available on the NSO’s website. With the exception of the RPI Advisory Board, data are simultaneously released to all users. The public is informed in detail of the NSO’s data dissemination practices through the NSO website. Metadata accessibility News Release Publications of metadata are available on the NSO’s website, where limited and outdated RPI and HICP methodology descriptions are provided. An updated document on sources and methods is available internally, but not published. There is, however, published information on the survey sources in official statistical publications, that include the response rates, survey monitoring, nonsampling errors, sample frame, sample design, estimation, and imputation techniques. Assistance to users The NSO’s library is the point of contact for data users; it provides NSO’s e-mail and Internet addresses in its statistics publications. If the contact person in the library is unable to answer an inquiry, the user is referred to the Consumer Price Index Unit. The NSO publishes a comprehensive catalog of its publications, which are available either in hard copy, CD-ROM, or other electronic formats. General use information about the RPI and HICP in hardcopy format is not available. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Consumer Price Index
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions The RPI and the harmonized index of consumer prices (HICP) broadly follow the concepts and definitions set out in the CPI Manual and 1995 ESA. Scope The RPI and HICP weights cover the expenditures of all resident households. The Maltese HICP, while covering all the subindices laid down in Council Regulation (EC), No. 1687/98, includes social protection services provided within the home, such as home cleaning, meals, and transport for the disabled. All in-scope urban and rural households are covered, as are households of all income levels and occupations. Malta’s RPI and HICP do not cover imputed rentals of owner occupants. Classification/sectorization The RPI and HICP cover noninstitutionalized Maltese households that are consistent with the 1995 ESA definition of household sector. The item weights for the HICP are classified using the Classification of Individual Consumption by Purpose (COICOP), while the RPI employs a modified COICOP that better represents the Maltese economy. The weights of both classifications are consistent with international guidelines. The Statistical Classification of Economic Activities, Rev. 1, is used for classification of retail outlets in the business registry. Basis for recording Market prices are used to value flows and stocks, and the basis for recording follows international best practices. | Source data The Household Budget Survey (HBS) and the business registry provide an adequate basis to compile the RPI and HICP. The data generally approximate the definitions, scope, classifications, valuation, and time of recording. Assessment of source data There are monthly assessments of source data. Sampling, response, and non-sampling errors for each survey are compiled and monitored. Statistical techniques Data compiled employ good quality statistical techniques, though the RPI weights are not price updated. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs Although statistical discrepancies in intermediate RPI data are assessed and investigated, the RPI and HICP data are not validated against other price indices. Revision studies For the HICP, revision studies are routinely conducted, especially on weight updating. The RPI is not frequently revised, but new weights are subject to analysis and validation prior to being incorporated in the index. | Periodicity and timeliness The RPI and HICP are disseminated monthly, two to three weeks after the reference period, and, as a result, dissemination is within the one-month SDDS timeliness requirements. Consistency There are no consistency issues for the RPI and the HICP since all-items aggregate is invariant to geographical classification. Long-term time series exist for the RPI (base year 2000) and for the HICP (base year 1996), which are published with link factors to previous base years. Revision policy and practice Revision policy is known as a result of well designed marketing techniques and promotions, which are designed to educate data users. RPI data are not revised once published other than in exceptional cases to correct the impact on weights of extraordinary price rises for some items. On the other hand, the HICP is revised regularly, since the weights are updated annually. Studies of the annual weight updating of the HICP are conducted and disseminated. | Data accessibility The NSO publishes well designed charts and tables to facilitate analysis. Data for the RPI and HICP are generally accessible, but the series are not published with adequate levels of disaggregation. An ARC is available on the NSO’s website. With the exception of the RPI Advisory Board, data are simultaneously released to all users. The public is informed in detail of the NSO’s data dissemination practices through the NSO website. Metadata accessibility News Release Publications of metadata are available on the NSO’s website, where limited and outdated RPI and HICP methodology descriptions are provided. An updated document on sources and methods is available internally, but not published. There is, however, published information on the survey sources in official statistical publications, that include the response rates, survey monitoring, nonsampling errors, sample frame, sample design, estimation, and imputation techniques. Assistance to users The NSO’s library is the point of contact for data users; it provides NSO’s e-mail and Internet addresses in its statistics publications. If the contact person in the library is unable to answer an inquiry, the user is referred to the Consumer Price Index Unit. The NSO publishes a comprehensive catalog of its publications, which are available either in hard copy, CD-ROM, or other electronic formats. General use information about the RPI and HICP in hardcopy format is not available. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Government Finance Statistics
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Government Finance Statistics
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions General government statistics are compiled by the NSO in the context of the national accounts based on the 1995 ESA. Therefore, the overall structure of the concepts and definitions closely follow international standards and guidelines. The CBM compiles annual GFS for the central government according to the concepts and definitions prescribed in A Manual on Government Finance Statistics, 1986. Scope General government statistics have full coverage of all government institutions. However, GFS compiled by the NSO do not cover the full set of general government accounts. No data on the stocks of non-financial assets and financial assets and liabilities are compiled. Classification/sectorization The economic and functional classification of the data, as well as the institutional sector classification of the general government, is consistent with the 1995 ESA. Basis for recording Most flows are valued at market prices; however, not all stocks are valued on the same basis. The recording of central government transactions is based on cash accounting principles, and is adjusted to an accrual basis. Yet, these adjustments are not accurate as they are based on an annual survey among the major revenue receiving and spending departments. An exception is the value added tax data where accrual data are made available to the NSO on a monthly basis. | Source data The NSO uses accounting data obtained from the Treasury, Extrabudgetary Units (EBUs), and local authorities. The NSO and CBM obtain source data for the budgetary central government directly from the accounting records. NSO obtains accounting data from the EBUs by means of quarterly surveys. Local councils submit their financial accounts to the NSO. All source data are timely and comprehensive and provide enough detail for reclassification. Government debt data are collected from the MOF, the CBM, and the Malta Stock Exchange. Assessment of source data The final source data are based on audited accounts of all the general government institutions. Statistical techniques Source data are detailed and comprehensive and do not require complex statistical techniques. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs In the compilation of the final general government accounts, audited data based on full institutional coverage are used. All tables are checked for internal consistency before being released. However, as the NSO has not yet compiled the financial account, comparisons cannot be made between data derived from the non-financial accounts and changes in net financial assets/liabilities. Revision studies The reasons for revisions are taken into account and analyzed. These revisions are minimal due to the extensive use of accounting data. | Periodicity and timeliness Malta meets the periodicity and timeliness requirements of the SDDS for central government data. Monthly central government debt data are disseminated within one month, which exceeds the SDDS requirement. Data on general government operations, although compiled and reported to regional statistical institutions consistent with the periodicity and timeliness requirements of the SDDS, are not disseminated in Malta. Consistency Government finance data are internally consistent for the general government account as well as the accounts of the other levels of government. General government data are also consistent with the national accounts, balance of payment, and monetary statistics. Revision policy and practice The revision schedule is predetermined and known to the public. Preliminary data are clearly indicated in the publications; however, no distinction is made between previously published and revised data. | Data accessibility Data on central government operations and debt are disseminated according to the budgetary framework. However, GFS for general government following a comprehensive framework is not disseminated in Malta. The NSO is currently not disseminating any GFS time-series data. However, the ARC for national accounts, which includes general government data, is available on the NSO’s website. General government accounts are released to all users at the same time. Statistics not routinely disseminated are available from the NSO on request. Metadata accessibility For government data, NSO provides some notes on the methodology in its News Release publications. However, the NSO does not provide any detailed metadata on its website or in any publication. Assistance to users The hard copy publications and the website provide comprehensive information on how users can contact the NSO for assistance. A catalog of publications is available. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Government Finance Statistics
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions General government statistics are compiled by the NSO in the context of the national accounts based on the 1995 ESA. Therefore, the overall structure of the concepts and definitions closely follow international standards and guidelines. The CBM compiles annual GFS for the central government according to the concepts and definitions prescribed in A Manual on Government Finance Statistics, 1986. Scope General government statistics have full coverage of all government institutions. However, GFS compiled by the NSO do not cover the full set of general government accounts. No data on the stocks of non-financial assets and financial assets and liabilities are compiled. Classification/sectorization The economic and functional classification of the data, as well as the institutional sector classification of the general government, is consistent with the 1995 ESA. Basis for recording Most flows are valued at market prices; however, not all stocks are valued on the same basis. The recording of central government transactions is based on cash accounting principles, and is adjusted to an accrual basis. Yet, these adjustments are not accurate as they are based on an annual survey among the major revenue receiving and spending departments. An exception is the value added tax data where accrual data are made available to the NSO on a monthly basis. | Source data The NSO uses accounting data obtained from the Treasury, Extrabudgetary Units (EBUs), and local authorities. The NSO and CBM obtain source data for the budgetary central government directly from the accounting records. NSO obtains accounting data from the EBUs by means of quarterly surveys. Local councils submit their financial accounts to the NSO. All source data are timely and comprehensive and provide enough detail for reclassification. Government debt data are collected from the MOF, the CBM, and the Malta Stock Exchange. Assessment of source data The final source data are based on audited accounts of all the general government institutions. Statistical techniques Source data are detailed and comprehensive and do not require complex statistical techniques. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs In the compilation of the final general government accounts, audited data based on full institutional coverage are used. All tables are checked for internal consistency before being released. However, as the NSO has not yet compiled the financial account, comparisons cannot be made between data derived from the non-financial accounts and changes in net financial assets/liabilities. Revision studies The reasons for revisions are taken into account and analyzed. These revisions are minimal due to the extensive use of accounting data. | Periodicity and timeliness Malta meets the periodicity and timeliness requirements of the SDDS for central government data. Monthly central government debt data are disseminated within one month, which exceeds the SDDS requirement. Data on general government operations, although compiled and reported to regional statistical institutions consistent with the periodicity and timeliness requirements of the SDDS, are not disseminated in Malta. Consistency Government finance data are internally consistent for the general government account as well as the accounts of the other levels of government. General government data are also consistent with the national accounts, balance of payment, and monetary statistics. Revision policy and practice The revision schedule is predetermined and known to the public. Preliminary data are clearly indicated in the publications; however, no distinction is made between previously published and revised data. | Data accessibility Data on central government operations and debt are disseminated according to the budgetary framework. However, GFS for general government following a comprehensive framework is not disseminated in Malta. The NSO is currently not disseminating any GFS time-series data. However, the ARC for national accounts, which includes general government data, is available on the NSO’s website. General government accounts are released to all users at the same time. Statistics not routinely disseminated are available from the NSO on request. Metadata accessibility For government data, NSO provides some notes on the methodology in its News Release publications. However, the NSO does not provide any detailed metadata on its website or in any publication. Assistance to users The hard copy publications and the website provide comprehensive information on how users can contact the NSO for assistance. A catalog of publications is available. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Balance of Payments Statistics
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Balance of Payments Statistics
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions Concepts and definitions generally conform to the definitions and guidelines set out in the Balance of Payments Manual, fifth edition (BPM5). Scope All transactions between residents and nonresidents are, in principle, covered in the balance of payments. However, the transactions of international trading companies (CIBAs) are not recorded in the balance of payments. In addition, no estimates of smuggling are made. Classification/sectorization Data compiled by the NSO meet BPM5 recommendations for classification and sectorization. Basis for recording Statistics are generally recorded in conformity with BPM5 recommendations. In particular, transactions are on an accrual basis, except for certain categories of private sector revenues (interest income of investment companies), which are posted on a cash basis. Transactions are recorded at current market prices and, where applicable, adjustments are made so as to exclude valuation changes. | Source data The data collection system used to compile balance of payments statistics is based essentially on direct reporting from both the nonfmancial and financial sectors, complemented by cash settlements reports provided by banks and other data sources. However, given the size of errors and omissions, the coverage and accuracy of source data are questionable. Assessment of source data Formal checking and vetting of direct reporting survey forms is carried out on a regular basis. Statistical techniques Statistical techniques are used to complete or adjust the source data for several items of the balance of payments, in particular in the current account (adjustments to trade data, estimates of travel). They are broadly adequate. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs Checks are undertaken to ensure consistency between data received from the direct reporting questionnaires and data received from banking institutions. The magnitude of the errors and omissions is monitored but this information is not used to conduct revision studies. Revision studies No revision studies are carried out. In particular, there are no systematic comparisons between provisional and final balance of payments statistics. | Periodicity and timeliness As from the first quarter of 2005, balance of payments statistics are disseminated quarterly, within 70 days of the end of the reference period, which exceeds the SDDS requirements. Consistency Statistical series are sufficiently detailed to enable checking that data are internally consistent. Temporal series are consistent within the same methodological framework. Balance of payments data are consistent with other data sets, notably trade statistics, government finance, and monetary statistics. Revision policy and practice Quarterly balance of payments data are revised on an ongoing basis, but no distinction is made between previously published and revised data. These data are subject to revisions for up to one year. Data are considered final once published in the annual publication of the NSO entitled Balance of Payments, which is normally published one year after the reporting period. | Data accessibility Users have access to balance of payments data through regular publications issued by the NSO and the CBM. These include the NSO’s News Release, the NSO’s annual Balance of Payments publication, and the CBM’s Quarterly Review and Annual Report. Data are also available on the NSO’s website: http://www.nso.gov.mt. Data on external reserve assets are published regularly on a monthly basis and in the CBM’s quarterly and annual publications. They are also available on the CBM’s website: http://www.centralbankmalta.com. Metadata accessibility Comprehensive documentation of the methodology and sources used in the preparation of the balance of payments statement is available on the NSO’s official website: http://www.nso.gov.mt. Assistance to users The hard copy publications and the website provide comprehensive information on how users can contact the NSO for assistance. A catalog of publications is available. |
Malta: Assessment of Data Quality—Dimensions 2 to 5—Balance of Payments Statistics
| 2. Methodological soundness | 3. Accuracy and reliability | 4. Serviceability | 5. Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Concepts and definitions Concepts and definitions generally conform to the definitions and guidelines set out in the Balance of Payments Manual, fifth edition (BPM5). Scope All transactions between residents and nonresidents are, in principle, covered in the balance of payments. However, the transactions of international trading companies (CIBAs) are not recorded in the balance of payments. In addition, no estimates of smuggling are made. Classification/sectorization Data compiled by the NSO meet BPM5 recommendations for classification and sectorization. Basis for recording Statistics are generally recorded in conformity with BPM5 recommendations. In particular, transactions are on an accrual basis, except for certain categories of private sector revenues (interest income of investment companies), which are posted on a cash basis. Transactions are recorded at current market prices and, where applicable, adjustments are made so as to exclude valuation changes. | Source data The data collection system used to compile balance of payments statistics is based essentially on direct reporting from both the nonfmancial and financial sectors, complemented by cash settlements reports provided by banks and other data sources. However, given the size of errors and omissions, the coverage and accuracy of source data are questionable. Assessment of source data Formal checking and vetting of direct reporting survey forms is carried out on a regular basis. Statistical techniques Statistical techniques are used to complete or adjust the source data for several items of the balance of payments, in particular in the current account (adjustments to trade data, estimates of travel). They are broadly adequate. Assessment and validation of intermediate data and statistical outputs Checks are undertaken to ensure consistency between data received from the direct reporting questionnaires and data received from banking institutions. The magnitude of the errors and omissions is monitored but this information is not used to conduct revision studies. Revision studies No revision studies are carried out. In particular, there are no systematic comparisons between provisional and final balance of payments statistics. | Periodicity and timeliness As from the first quarter of 2005, balance of payments statistics are disseminated quarterly, within 70 days of the end of the reference period, which exceeds the SDDS requirements. Consistency Statistical series are sufficiently detailed to enable checking that data are internally consistent. Temporal series are consistent within the same methodological framework. Balance of payments data are consistent with other data sets, notably trade statistics, government finance, and monetary statistics. Revision policy and practice Quarterly balance of payments data are revised on an ongoing basis, but no distinction is made between previously published and revised data. These data are subject to revisions for up to one year. Data are considered final once published in the annual publication of the NSO entitled Balance of Payments, which is normally published one year after the reporting period. | Data accessibility Users have access to balance of payments data through regular publications issued by the NSO and the CBM. These include the NSO’s News Release, the NSO’s annual Balance of Payments publication, and the CBM’s Quarterly Review and Annual Report. Data are also available on the NSO’s website: http://www.nso.gov.mt. Data on external reserve assets are published regularly on a monthly basis and in the CBM’s quarterly and annual publications. They are also available on the CBM’s website: http://www.centralbankmalta.com. Metadata accessibility Comprehensive documentation of the methodology and sources used in the preparation of the balance of payments statement is available on the NSO’s official website: http://www.nso.gov.mt. Assistance to users The hard copy publications and the website provide comprehensive information on how users can contact the NSO for assistance. A catalog of publications is available. |
III. Staff’s Recommendations
16. Based on the review of Malta’s statistical practices, discussions with the data producing agencies (the NSO and the CBM), and responses from data users (see Appendix III of the Detailed Assessments volume), the mission has prepared a set of recommendations. They are designed to further increase Malta’s adherence to internationally accepted statistical practices and would, in the mission’s view, enhance the analytical usefulness of Malta’s statistics. Some additional technical suggestions are included in the Detailed Assessments volume.
Cross-cutting Recommendations
Strengthen and increase staff resources for developing and improving macroeconomic statistics and for meeting the increasing reporting demands of users.
Provide detailed and up-to-date metadata to inform the users.
Disseminate on the official websites all data categories prescribed by the SDDS.
National Accounts
Prepare and disseminate annual and quarterly volume estimates of GDP by the production approach.
Put in place an adequate internal work calendar within NSO that would allow timely production of annual national accounts statistics that follow a well-defined and regular revision policy.
Introduce benchmarking techniques to combine the quarterly estimates with the annual estimates.
Expand the scope of the annual accounts to include income accounts, the capital account, and the rest of the world accounts.
Undertake benchmark revisions as far back as reasonably possible.
Improve the coverage of source data for the service sector as well as the volume estimate measures.
Consumer Price Index
Include imputed rentals of owner-occupied dwellings in the RPI.
Price-update weights when the weights and price reference periods do not coincide.
Publish RPI and HICP datasets with appropriate levels of disaggregation.
Validate the RPI data against other price indices such as the import/export price index and the implicit deflator for household final consumption.
Government Finance Statistics
Disseminate GFS to the public in a framework commensurate with users’ needs.
Continue with the plan to develop GFS time series and post them on the NSO’s website.
Continue to expand the scope of GFS to include stocks of nonfinancial assets and financial assets and liabilities.
Validate and incorporate data obtained from the new survey of government departments that focuses on the adjustments for accrual accounting.
Balance of Payments Statistics
Treat the CIBAs as residents of Malta and include their transactions in the balance of payments. For analytical purposes, this category of operators should be separately identified in the balance of payments statement.
Given the size of the errors and omissions item, continue efforts to improve coverage and accuracy of source data; in particular, undertake regular reviews of the scope of the direct reporting system to ensure adequate coverage.
Undertake revision studies on a regular basis, starting with a systematic comparison between provisional and final data.
Malta: Practices Compared to the SDDS Coverage, Periodicity, and Timeliness of Data
Malta: Practices Compared to the SDDS Coverage, Periodicity, and Timeliness of Data
| SDDS Data Category | Coverage (meets SDDS requirement) | Periodicity | Timeliness | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDDS | Malta | SDDS | Malta | |||
| Real Sector | ||||||
| National accounts | Yes | Q | Q | Q | 70 D | Timeliness exceeds SDDS requirements. |
| Production index/indices | Yes | M | M | 6W (1M encouraged) | M | Data are only disseminated internally. |
| Employment Unemployment Wages/Earnings | Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | |
| Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | ||
| Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | ||
| Consumer price index Producer price index | Yes | M | M | M | 2W | Timeliness exceeds SDDS requirements. |
| Being compiled | M | Being compiled | M | Being compiled | Data are not yet available. | |
| Fiscal sector | ||||||
| General government operations | Yes | A | A | A | 3M | Timeliness exceeds SDDS requirements, but data are not yet disseminated. |
| Central government operations | Yes | M | M | M | M | |
| Central government debt | Yes | Q | M | Q | M | Periodicity and timeliness exceed SDDS requirements. |
| Financial sector | ||||||
| Analytical accounts of the banking sector | Yes | M | M | M | M | |
| Analytical accounts of the central bank | Yes | M (1W recommended) | M | 2W (1W encouraged) | 2W | |
| Interest rates | Yes | D | D | D | D | |
| Stock market | Yes | D | … | D | … | |
| External sector | ||||||
| Balance of payments | Yes | Q | Q | Q | 70D | |
| Official reserve assets | Yes | M (W recommended) | W | M | W | |
| Reserves template | Yes | M | M | M | M | Data are only disseminated internally. |
| Merchandise trade | Yes | M | M | 8W (4-6 W encouraged) | 6-8W | |
| International investment position | Yes | A (Q recommended) | A | 3Q (1Q encouraged) | 3Q | |
| External debt | Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | Data are only disseminated internally. |
| Exchange rates | Yes | D | D | … | … | |
| Addendum: Population | … | A | … | A | 7M | |
Malta: Practices Compared to the SDDS Coverage, Periodicity, and Timeliness of Data
| SDDS Data Category | Coverage (meets SDDS requirement) | Periodicity | Timeliness | Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDDS | Malta | SDDS | Malta | |||
| Real Sector | ||||||
| National accounts | Yes | Q | Q | Q | 70 D | Timeliness exceeds SDDS requirements. |
| Production index/indices | Yes | M | M | 6W (1M encouraged) | M | Data are only disseminated internally. |
| Employment Unemployment Wages/Earnings | Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | |
| Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | ||
| Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | ||
| Consumer price index Producer price index | Yes | M | M | M | 2W | Timeliness exceeds SDDS requirements. |
| Being compiled | M | Being compiled | M | Being compiled | Data are not yet available. | |
| Fiscal sector | ||||||
| General government operations | Yes | A | A | A | 3M | Timeliness exceeds SDDS requirements, but data are not yet disseminated. |
| Central government operations | Yes | M | M | M | M | |
| Central government debt | Yes | Q | M | Q | M | Periodicity and timeliness exceed SDDS requirements. |
| Financial sector | ||||||
| Analytical accounts of the banking sector | Yes | M | M | M | M | |
| Analytical accounts of the central bank | Yes | M (1W recommended) | M | 2W (1W encouraged) | 2W | |
| Interest rates | Yes | D | D | D | D | |
| Stock market | Yes | D | … | D | … | |
| External sector | ||||||
| Balance of payments | Yes | Q | Q | Q | 70D | |
| Official reserve assets | Yes | M (W recommended) | W | M | W | |
| Reserves template | Yes | M | M | M | M | Data are only disseminated internally. |
| Merchandise trade | Yes | M | M | 8W (4-6 W encouraged) | 6-8W | |
| International investment position | Yes | A (Q recommended) | A | 3Q (1Q encouraged) | 3Q | |
| External debt | Yes | Q | Q | Q | Q | Data are only disseminated internally. |
| Exchange rates | Yes | D | D | … | … | |
| Addendum: Population | … | A | … | A | 7M | |
Malta has participated in the General Data Dissemination System (GDDS) since September 2000, and its metadata are posted on the Fund’s Dissemination Standards Bulletin Board (DSBB). These metadata were last updated in June 2003.
The reserves template has been compiled monthly since June 2004, and the annual external debt data have been compiled on a trial basis since 2003.
Consumer price indices include the retail price index (RPI) and the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP).