This Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper for the Kingdom of Lesotho presents a determined plan in pursuance of high and sustainable equity-based economic growth. It contains medium-term objectives and strategies to address the major challenges facing the country. These challenges include employment creation and income generation, and improving quality of and access to education and health services. Lesotho plans to deal boldly with its trading and investment partners by exploiting the opportunities inherent in the process of globalization under such mechanisms as the Africa Growth and Opportunities Act.

Abstract

This Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper for the Kingdom of Lesotho presents a determined plan in pursuance of high and sustainable equity-based economic growth. It contains medium-term objectives and strategies to address the major challenges facing the country. These challenges include employment creation and income generation, and improving quality of and access to education and health services. Lesotho plans to deal boldly with its trading and investment partners by exploiting the opportunities inherent in the process of globalization under such mechanisms as the Africa Growth and Opportunities Act.

The outcomes of the costing exercise show that in order to implement the PRS activities in the matrix, the incremental cost to Government will be in the order M1.2 Billion per annum. This represents an increase in total aggregate expenditure of approximately 30%, and would result in Government absorbing economic resources equivalent to over 50% of GDP. As public revenue is expected to decline, this would imply increased deficits, resulting in higher levels of debt and the diversion of resources to debt servicing rather than poverty targeted programmes. Hence, the Government recognises the importance of selecting high priority areas and ensuring the quality of public expenditure through rigorous application of planning and budget procedures.

To some extent, high priority elements of the PRS would be financed through reallocation from lower priority activities which are included within the existing budget ceilings. In addition it may be possible to mobilise additional external sources by presenting the PRS to a donor conference. However, it is vital that public expenditure commitments do not exceed the long term sustainability of the budget by creating maintenance and service obligations which this economy cannot afford.

COSTING METHODOLOGY AND LIMITATIONS

During the initial phase of the PRS a major costing exercise was carried out. All objectives, strategies and activities in the PRS Matrix were costed using a unit cost approach, based on information from different ministries. However, these estimates will require reviewing and revising during PRS implementation, mainly because:

  • article image
    The PRS costing was undertaken during 2003/04, and most activities were already ongoing, hence, were budgeted for under 2004/05 and 2005/06. This means that the original incremental costs reflected in this PRS overstates today’s requirements.

  • article image
    The PRS costing took place before the prioritisation and ranking of the objectives and strategies. As a result, it covered a wider range of activities, as 755 activities were costed. This proved to be a daunting exercise, as such the outcome should be viewed as indicative.

  • article image
    Although the dataset that was compiled provided the basis for the indicative costing of the national priorities, as the PRS evolved and advanced the wording in the implementation matrices changed. Therefore, an investigation was necessary to identify which costing matched activities in these latest matrices.

  • article image
    Some of the new activities could not be easily traced, as such do not show related costs (Please note that some activities do not show costs because they do not require additional funds that would justify their costing to be implemented).

Costs are not provided under priorities, ‘Improve Public Service Delivery’ and ‘Scaling up the Fight against HIV and AIDS’. The former is being extensively costed under the three major components of the ongoing Public Sector Improvement and Reform Progamme (PSIRP). HIV and AIDS is a cross cutting issue whose costs have been integrated in other sectors. This priority will be funded through the 2% of the annual recurrent budget earmarked for HIV and AIDS related activities under every ministry. Another source will be the Global Fund, which has awarded Lesotho US$34 Million (US$29 Million for HIV and AIDS, and US$5 Million for Tuberculosis) to be disbursed over a period of five years.

POVERTY REDUCTION STRATEGY PAPER COST MATRIX, 2004/5 TO 2006/7

PRSP NATIONAL PRIORITY ONE: EMPLOYMENT CREATION AND INCOME GENERATION

article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
1

Bethel is a training institution providing people without school-leaving certificates with survival life skills

2

Lesotho White Paper 2003 distinguishes SMME’s in terms of the number of employees: >3 Micro-size, 4–9 Small size and 10–49 Medium size.

Kingdom of Lesotho: Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, Prioritization, and Cost Matrix
Author: International Monetary Fund