Iceland: Staff Report for the 2005 Article IV Consultation
Author:
International Monetary Fund
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Iceland’s 2005 Article IV Consultation reports that new projects have rekindled rapid growth and the economy is exhibiting signs of overheating, with imbalances evident in inflation, the current account, and external debt. GDP grew at an average rate of 3.8 percent between 1995 and 2004, second only to Ireland among industrial countries. Major investment projects have contributed both to the high growth rate and to overall macroeconomic volatility because of their size relative to that of the economy.

Abstract

Iceland’s 2005 Article IV Consultation reports that new projects have rekindled rapid growth and the economy is exhibiting signs of overheating, with imbalances evident in inflation, the current account, and external debt. GDP grew at an average rate of 3.8 percent between 1995 and 2004, second only to Ireland among industrial countries. Major investment projects have contributed both to the high growth rate and to overall macroeconomic volatility because of their size relative to that of the economy.

1. This supplement provides an update to the staff’s medium-term outlook for Iceland based on revisions to historical National Accounts data and outturns since the staff report was finalized. The new information does not change the thrust of the staff appraisal, though the stronger momentum of growth heightens the risks and strengthens the case for a more restrictive fiscal stance.1

2. In mid–September, Statistics Iceland released revisions to quarterly National Accounts data extending back to 1997 that reflect the application of chain linking. The revisions suggest that the trough of the 2001-02 downturn was milder, with the pace of the subsequent recovery being slower in 2003, but faster in 2004 (annual growth in 2004 was revised up by 1 percentage point). Reported year–over–year GDP growth for the second quarter of 2005, at 6.8 percent, is slightly faster than was expected. Taken together, the revisions to GDP and its second quarter growth rate suggest that there is more momentum in the economy than assessed at the time the staff report was finalized. Additional support for this view is evident in September’s year–over–year CPI inflation rate of 4.8 percent, above both expectations and the 4 percent upper limit of the central bank’s tolerance range.

uA03fig01

Iceland: Growth profile and Revisions

Citation: IMF Staff Country Reports 2005, 367; 10.5089/9781451819304.002.A002

3. Given the greater momentum in the economy, the staff outlook for growth and inflation in 2005 has been revised upward and the current account deficit is now forecast to be 13 percent of GDP. For 2006, however, staff expects a more pronounced slowing in growth because monetary policy is likely to tighten more than previously expected with inflation now outside the tolerance range. In fact, markets are expecting the policy rate to increase by 50 basis points, to 10 percent, when the quarterly Monetary Bulletin is released on September 29, with most analysts looking for additional tightening to follow. Based on the outlook for faster growth in nominal private consumption and wages, higher than previously expected revenues will lead to slightly larger fiscal surpluses in 2005 and 2006. However, on a structural basis, the fiscal balance is now forecast to be in deficit over these two years as opposed to the very small surpluses forecast previously.

4. The updated outlook, with a larger current account deficit, higher short-term nominal interest rates and, consequently, the potential for more appreciation of the currency in the near-term, implies that the risk of a sharp slowing in activity further out may now be higher.

Table 1.

Iceland: Selected Economic Indicators, 2000-06

article image
Sources: Statistics Iceland; Central Bank of Iceland; Ministry of Finance; and staff estimates.

Staff estimates. Actual minus potential output, in percent of potential output.

In percent of labor force.

A positive (negative) sign indicates an appreciation (depreciation).

National accounts basis.

A positive (negative) sign indicates a decrease (increase) in gross official foreign reserves.

Excluding imports from the construction of hydropower facility and smelters in 2003-04.

Table 2.

Iceland: Summary Operations of the General Government, 1999–2006

(in percent of GDP)

article image
Sources: Ministry of Finance; and Fund staff estimates and calculations.

In percent of potential GDP.

Change in percent.

Actual output less potential in percent of potential.

Table 3.

Iceland: Financial Soundness Indicators, 1998–2005

article image
article image
Sources: Financial Supervisory Authority and Central Bank of Iceland.

Commercial banks and six largest savings banks. Fisheries Investment Fund and Industrial Loan Fund included 1996–1997. FBA include 1998–1999. Kauphting Inc. included from year 1996. Figures for Islandsbanki include both the banking and insurance part of the corporation.

Inflation adjusted accounting principles were discontinued in year 2002. Results for year 2002 and onwards are therefore in nominal terms but were in real terms before year 2002.

Deposit money banks, adjusted for FBA and Commercial Loan Fund. Kaupthing bank Inc. included from year 2002 and Glitnir included from May 2003.

Figures from year 2003 onwards for sectoral breakdown of lendings is not comparable with the past because of new loan classification.

Item “miscellaneous” also includes individuals’ private business operations. Changed with new loan classification in year 2003. See note above.

Loans for which special provisions have been posted less specific provisions, and other loans which have been interest frozen. Appropriated assets not included.

New loan classification results in a break for this series in the year 2003.

Table 4.

Iceland. Medium-term Scenario, 2003–10

(Percentage change, unless otherwise indicated)

article image
Sources: CBI; and IMF staff estimates.

Contributions to growth

In percent of GDP

In percent of potential output

Table 5.

Iceland: Balance of Payments, 1999–2004

article image
Sources: Central Bank of Iceland.
1

Attached are updated staff report tables and the background section of the PIN reflecting the latest available data and the new projections.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Iceland: Staff Report for the 2005 Article IV Consultation
Author:
International Monetary Fund