Nicaragua: Selected Issues and Statistical Appendix

This Selected Issues paper and Statistical Appendix examines factors that have determined long-term growth in Nicaragua. Stylized facts suggest that government policies have had a decisive influence on growth. In particular, productivity and capital accumulation suffered during periods of excessive deficit spending and inadequate enforcement of private property rights. A sectoral analysis of growth reveals that liberalization and deregulation in the 1990s led to deep structural changes in the economy. The paper also describes the main characteristics of Nicaragua’s tax system, identifying key weaknesses and their economic costs.

Abstract

This Selected Issues paper and Statistical Appendix examines factors that have determined long-term growth in Nicaragua. Stylized facts suggest that government policies have had a decisive influence on growth. In particular, productivity and capital accumulation suffered during periods of excessive deficit spending and inadequate enforcement of private property rights. A sectoral analysis of growth reveals that liberalization and deregulation in the 1990s led to deep structural changes in the economy. The paper also describes the main characteristics of Nicaragua’s tax system, identifying key weaknesses and their economic costs.

II. Tax Reform3

15. This chapter describes the main characteristics of Nicaragua’s tax system, identifying key weaknesses and their economic costs. In addition, it discusses the benefits of tax reform and describes the tax reform being implemented by the authorities.

A. Key Issues in Nicaragua’s Tax System

16. Tax revenues in Nicaragua have declined steadily in recent years. From a peak of 25.8 percent of GDP in 1998, tax revenues dropped to 21.5 percent of GDP in 2001. This deterioration reflects, to a large extent, the high vulnerability of Nicaragua’s tax system to changes in economic activity, especially to a slowdown in domestic demand. The sharp decline in economic growth from 7.4 percent in 1999 to 3.3 percent in 2001 strongly affected revenues from cyclically sensitive taxes such as petroleum products, general value added taxes (VAT) and import duties (Table 1).

Table 1.

Nicaragua: Central Government revenue

article image
Sources: Central Bank of Nicaragua; and IMF staff estimates

17. The main weakness of Nicaragua’s tax system arises from its narrow tax base, which is excessively concentrated on a few taxes and a limited number of taxpayers.4 Table 1 shows that over 60 percent of total tax revenue in 2001 was collected from VAT (42 percent) and excise taxes on petroleum products (18 percent), with the share of petroleum product taxes alone being greater than that of direct taxes. Given the large cyclical swings of petroleum product sales, the large dependence on petroleum taxation exacerbates the vulnerability of the system. In addition, more than half of VAT revenues is generated from imported products, further heightening exposure of the system to economic fluctuations. In addition to petroleum products, excise taxes on consumption are concentrated on a few products, mainly beer and alcoholic beverages, tobacco and sodas (together contributing some 5.5 percent of GDP, or one-fourth of tax revenues).

18. The concentration on few taxpayers arises from widespread exemptions, exonerations, preferential rates and special regimes. These special accommodations narrow the tax base, reduce transparency of the system, and make it difficult to administer. Table 25 illustrates the extensive sectoral exemptions in the Nicaragua’s tax system, including for tourism, agriculture, fishing, and other sectors. Sectors or activities that are exempt from all forms of taxation include, inter alia, universities and higher education institutes, firemen, churches and religious organizations, nonprofit organizations, and imports of medicines, paper, books, and equipment for the media. In the case of direct taxes, there are also several tax-exempted sources of income (Section 1.1 of the Appendix).

Table 2.

Exoncrations and special Regimes

article image
Source: Medal (2002).

19. The VAT is characterized by widespread exemptions, zero-rated products, and preferential rates (Section 4.1 of Appendix). Exemptions are granted to numerous goods and services; a zero-rate VAT regime applies to a long list of products and services, including 59 products included in a so-called “basic consumption basket”, as well as medicines, insecticides, fertilizers, energy, and some machinery and equipment. Zero-rate VAT is also applied to several economic activities beyond exports such as the media, free zones and tourism. Preferential VAT rates are granted to the cement and air travel sectors.

20. A number of economic sectors and activities are exempted from import tariffs, including by constitutional mandate (health; media and communication; education and political parties). Other exempt sectors include petroleum and energy; exports; firefighters; agricultural and transport cooperatives; the national army; the national police; the church and religious congregations; tourism activities; and hospital investments.

21. The revenue loss resulting from these features is substantial. For instance, a 2000 mission from the Fiscal Affairs Department estimated that the cost of exonerations on indirect taxation amounted to 54 percent of actual revenue, or about 10.5 percent of GDP.

B. Economic Costs

22. A key problem of Nicaragua’s tax system is its lack of neutrality. Because different economic sectors do not receive the same tax treatment, relative prices and intersectoral rates of return are affected and resource allocation is distorted. Tax policy rewards certain sectors, with no clear economic criteria, leading inter alia to unproductive rent seeking and corruption. Moreover, several studies of the Nicaraguan tax system6 have pointed to a significant anti-export bias because the tax incentives are predominantly oriented to the production of goods and services for the domestic market.

23. Tax exemptions also introduce different treatment by population group and economic sector, leading to an inequitable tax system. These distortions are illustrated by the fact that the contribution of some economic sectors to tax revenues are far different from their share in GDP (Table 3). For example, agriculture and mining contributed only 1.1 percent of total taxes in 2001, while its share of GDP was 33.7 percent; and the construction sector contributed 1.8 percent of taxes, well below its GDP share of 6.3 percent. In contrast, the manufacturing sector contributed 48.2 percent of taxes, while its share in GDP was 14.4 percent.

Table 3.

Tax Burden by Economic Sector

article image
Source: Inter-American Development Bank (2002).

C. Tax Reform

24. Improving efficiency of resource allocation and equity of the tax system in Nicaragua requires a significant widening of the tax base. To achieve this objective, FAD (2000) recommended the following core measures: (1) eliminating the zero-VAT rate except for exports; (2) reducing VAT exemptions and eliminating special regimes; (3) confining exonerations on imports tariffs to a few products; (4) including oil and its derivatives in the VAT base; (5) eliminating excise taxes on approximately 940 goods; and (6) changing the tax base for excise taxes on sodas and alcoholic beverages from ex-factory to retail prices. FAD stressed that tax policy should not be used as an instrument of income distribution and subsidization to particular economic sectors. Instead, a well-focused expenditure policy should be used for these purposes.

25. Against this background, the authorities in 2002 embarked on a comprehensive, two-stage tax reform. The first stage was approved by the National Assembly in August 2002, yielding about 2.1 percent of GDP on an annual basis. The following main measures were included: (1) reduction of revenue exemptions for a number of sectors and activities, such as the financial system, financial NGOs, interest on saving accounts of the corporate sector, lottery prizes; transactions of agricultural goods; (2) increased tax withholding for several activities (professional services; occasional gains; trade on goods and services; leasing; wood exploitation); (3) a new minimum tax payment for small traders; (4) a new presumptive tax for casinos and bingos; (5) an increase of the tax base for excise tax on sodas by changing the reference price from ex-factory to retail price; (6) reduced scope of accelerated depreciation; (7) gradual elimination preferential VAT rates for air tickets and cement; and (8) elimination of exonerations on imports of a large number of goods.

26. While these measures broadly followed FAD recommendations, the first stage of the reform fell short on the issue of zero-rate VAT. While the original plan was to reduce zero-rated products significantly, the government withdrew this proposal before discussion by the National Assembly. Subsequently, the National Assembly decided to increase the number of zero-rated VAT products included in the “basic consumption basket” (from 19 to 53). As a result, the approved package fell short of the original revenue target (3 percent of GDP), and an important part of the intended improvement in efficiency and transparency of the tax system was not achieved.

27. The second stage of the tax reform, to be implemented by mid-2003, is now expected to make up for the shortfall of the first stage. It is targeted to yield 1 percent of GDP on an annual basis and further improve efficiency, including by additional reduction of import tax exemptions and limiting the zero-rate VAT regime to only exports. To mitigate the social impact, the authorities are planning to use direct and well-targeted spending programs to help the most vulnerable groups of the population. The second round of the reform is also expected to include (i) a considerable reduction of the number of products subject to excises; (ii) an expansion of the income tax base; and (iii) inclusion of oil and its derivatives in the VAT base, compensated by a reduction in excise taxes.

References

  • Artana Daniel, 2001, La Politica Fiscal en Nicaragua. Trabajo preparado para IICA, September.

  • International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, (FAD), 2000, Figliuoli Lorenzo, Erik Haindl, Osvaldo Schenone., Nicaragua: Tratamientos Especiales en la Tributacion al Consumo y a las Importaciones. March.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inter American Development Bank (IADB), 2002. Nicaragua: Desafios para la Modernizacion del Sistema Tributario, August.

  • Medal, Jose Luis, 2002, La Reforma Tributaria en Nicaragua. Trabajo preparado para discusion de la Secretaria Tecnica de la Presidencia (SETEC) y del Ministerio de Hacienda y Credito Publico (MHCP), July.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

APPENDIX I: Nicaragua-Main Taxes

article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
3

Prepared by Jorge Toro.

4

The Appendix presents a detailed description of the Nicaraguan tax system.

5

Based on Medal, 2002.

1

Laws No. 303 and No. 343, amending Law No. 257 on tax and commercial justice, changed the IEC rates and established rollback timetables for this lax (See Annexes 2 and 3).