Front Matter
Author:
Jean Chateau
Search for other papers by Jean Chateau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ms. Florence Jaumotte 0000000404811396 https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396 International Monetary Fund

Search for other papers by Ms. Florence Jaumotte in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Gregor Schwerhoff
Search for other papers by Gregor Schwerhoff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Copyright Page

© 2022 International Monetary Fund

WP/22/242

IMF Working Paper

Research Department

Climate Policy Options: A Comparison of Economic Performance Prepared by Jean Chateau, Florence Jaumotte, and Gregor Schwerhoff

Authorized for distribution by Antonio Spilimbergo December 2022

IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

ABSTRACT: We use a global computable general equilibrium model to compare the economic performance of alternative climate policies along multiple dimensions, including macroeconomic outcomes, energy prices, and trade competitiveness. Carbon pricing which keeps the aggregate cost lower and preserves better the overall competitiveness than across-the-board regulation is the first-best policy, especially in energy intensive and trade exposed industries. Regulations and feebates are good alternatives in the power sector, where technological substitution is possible. Feed-in subsidies, if used alone, are not cost effective.

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Jean Chateau, Florence Jaumotte, and Gregor Schwerhoff. 2022 “Climate Policy Options: A Comparison of Economic Performance”. IMF Working Paper 2022/242

article image

Title Page

WORKING PAPERS

Climate Policy Options: A Comparison of Economic Performance

Prepared by Jean Chateau, Florence Jaumotte, and Gregor Schwerhoff1

Contents

  • 1. Introduction

  • 2. The IMF-ENV model and scenario design

    • 2.1 The model

    • 2.2 Scenario design

    • 2.3 Theoretical considerations on economic cost

    • 2.4 Political economy

  • 3. Decarbonization of power systems under alternative policies

    • 3.1 Policy instruments

    • 3.2 The electricity sector

    • 3.3 Fiscal implications

    • 3.4 Macroeconomic implications

    • 3.5 Competitiveness effects

    • 3.6 Ambition level

  • 4. Decarbonization of industrial and power sectors with alternative policies

    • 4.1 Macroeconomic implications

    • 4.2 Competitiveness effects

    • 4.3 Ambition level

  • 5. International Spillovers

    • 5.1 Carbon Leakages

    • 5.2 Energy Security

    • 5.3 Diverse climate policies across countries

  • 6. Sectoral climate policy

  • 7. Conclusion

  • Annex 1. Representation of the power sector in IMF-ENV

  • Annex 2. Detailed figures

  • Annex 3. Planned Policies

  • References

  • Figures

  • Figure 1. Economic impact on G7 countries

  • Figure 2. Power scenarios: Changes in power mix in 2030

  • Figure 3. Power scenarios: The effect of policies on electricity prices in 2030

  • Figure 4. Power scenarios: The effect of policies on the electricity supply in 2030

  • Figure 5. Power scenarios: Impacts on GDP and investment for two types of revenue recycling

  • Figure 6. Power scenarios: Household consumption and employment

  • Figure 7. Power scenarios: Impact on EITE sectors

  • Figure 8. Power scenarios: Effect of carbon tax and feed-in subsidies on EITE and other sectors for G7

  • Figure 9. Power scenarios: The role of policy ambition level for the ranking of policies for G7

  • Figure 10. Power and EITE sectors scenarios: Macroeconomic impacts

  • Figure 11. Power and EITE sectors scenarios: Sectoral results

  • Figure 12. Power and EITE sectors scenarios: Gross output and trade shares of EITE industries

  • Figure 13. Power and EITE sectors scenarios: The role of policy ambition level for the ranking of policies for G7 countries

  • Figure 14. Power and EITE sectors scenarios: Leakage rates in 2030

  • Figure 15. Power and EITE sectors scenarios: Fossil fuel imports

  • Figure 16. Asymmetric policies scenarios: Effect of policies on competitiveness of EITE sectors

  • Figure 17. Losses in market share of G7 countries and the influence of coalition size

  • Figure 18. Effect of planned policies on emissions

  • Figure 19. Effect of planned policies on electricity prices and expenditures in 2030

  • Figure 20. Effect of planned policies on real GDP and trade shares

  • Tables

  • Table 1. Power scenarios: Policy stringency in 2030

  • Table 2. Power scenarios: Tax changes for carbon tax and feed-in subsidy scenarios

  • Table 3. Power and EITE sectors scenarios: Carbon prices in 2030 (2018 USD/t CO2) by level of fragmentation of carbon market

1

Jaden Kim provided outstanding research support for this paper. We thank Antonio Spilimbergo, Romain Duval and Ian Parry for very useful comments and suggestions. Alimata Kini Kabore provided editorial assistance.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Climate Policy Options: A Comparison of Economic Performance
Author:
Jean Chateau
,
Ms. Florence Jaumotte
, and
Gregor Schwerhoff