Financial Innovation and Statistical Methodological Guidance—Key Considerations
Author:
Mr. Joe Crowley
Search for other papers by Mr. Joe Crowley in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Marco A Espinosa-Vega null

Search for other papers by Marco A Espinosa-Vega in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Elizabeth Holmquist
Search for other papers by Elizabeth Holmquist in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Ken Lamar
Search for other papers by Ken Lamar in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Emmanuel Manolikakis
Search for other papers by Emmanuel Manolikakis in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
James McAndrews null

Search for other papers by James McAndrews in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Holt Williamson
Search for other papers by Holt Williamson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Financial risks outside of the traditional banking sector can quickly spread throughout financial systems and lead to disruptions in the real economy. A lack of adequately detailed financial sector statistics can obscure buildups of risks from policymakers and hinder their ability to effectively respond once these risks materialize. In response, authorities worldwide, international organizations, including the IMF, and the Group of 20 (G-20), called for financial reforms and launched efforts to gather information on nonbank financial intermediary (NBFI) activities—including the Data Gaps Initiative (DGI) and enhanced Financial Stability Board (FSB) NBFI data collection. While these initiatives represent significant strides to strengthen NBFI’s data collection, there continue to be gaps in the conceptual and methodological guidance in the financial and macroeconomic statistics manuals on which the FSB, DGI, and national authorities rely; gaps that are increasing in light of increased globalization and the financial sector digitalization. This paper proposes conceptual guidance to help bridge existing and emerging gaps.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
IMF Working Papers