Front Matter
Author:
Mr. Marcos d Chamon
Search for other papers by Mr. Marcos d Chamon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Erik Klok
Search for other papers by Erik Klok in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mr. Vimal V Thakoor
Search for other papers by Mr. Vimal V Thakoor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Mr. Jeromin Zettelmeyer
Search for other papers by Mr. Jeromin Zettelmeyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Copyright Page

© 2022 International Monetary Fund

WP/22/162

IMF Working Paper

Strategy, Policy and Review Department

Debt-for-Climate Swaps: Analysis, Design, and Implementation

Prepared by Marcos Chamon, Erik Klok, Vimal Thakoor, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer

Authorized for distribution by Ceyla Pazarbasioglu

August 2022

IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

ABSTRACT: This paper compares debt-for-climate swaps—partial debt relief operations conditional on debtor commitments to undertake climate-related investments—to alternative fiscal support instruments. Because some of the benefits of debt-climate swaps accrue to non-participating creditors, they are generally less efficient forms of support than conditional grants and/or broad debt restructuring (which could be linked to climate adaptation when the latter significantly reduces credit risk). This said, debt-climate swaps could be superior to conditional grants when they can be structured in a way that makes the climate commitment de facto senior to debt service; and they could be superior to comprehensive debt restructuring in narrow settings, when the latter is expected to produce large economic dislocations and the debt-climate swap is expected to materially reduce debt risks (and achieve debt sustainability). Furthermore, debt-climate swaps could be useful to expand fiscal space for climate investment when grants or more comprehensive debt relief are just not on the table. The paper explores policy actions that would benefit both debt-climate swaps and other forms of climate finance, including developing markets for debt instruments linked to climate performance.

RECOMMENDED CITATION: Chamon, Marcos, Erik Klok, Vimal Thakoor, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer. 2022. “Debt-for-Climate Swaps: Analysis, Design, and Implementation.” IMF Working Paper 2022/162, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

article image

Title Page

WORKING PAPERS

Debt-for-Climate Swaps: Analysis, Design, and Implementation

Prepared by Marcos Chamon, Erik Klok, Vimal Thakoor, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer1

Contents

  • Introduction

  • Debt-For-Climate Swaps: A Primer

  • When Do Debt-for-Climate Swaps Make Sense?

    • Debt-Climate Swaps Compared to Climate-Conditional Grants

    • Debt-Climate Swaps Compared to Comprehensive Debt Restructuring

  • Why Have Debt Swaps Remained a Niche Instrument?

    • Use of Funds: The Costs of Finding, Structuring, and Monitoring Projects

    • Supply of Funds: Debt Volume and Composition

  • Should Debt Swaps be Scaled Up, and if so, How?

    • Bundling Projects and Policy Reforms

    • Budgetary Expenditures Supporting Adaptation and/or Mitigation

    • Developing KPIs and Creating KPI-Linked Bond Markets

    • Using Carbon Credits to Incentivize Debt-Climate Swaps

    • Mobilizing Official Funding for Debt Swaps or Grants Linked to Climate Action

  • Conclusion

  • Annex I. Fiscal Transfers Associated with a Debt Swap

    • When Do Debt Swaps Expand the Fiscal Space of the Debtor?

    • Debt Swaps versus Conditional Grants

    • Would the Debtor be Better Off Keeping the Donor-Provided Cash Rather Buying Back Debt?

    • Donor-Conducted versus Debtor-Conducted Buybacks

  • References

  • BOXES

  • 1. Recent Debt Swaps in Seychelles (2015) and Belize (2021)

  • 2. Comparing Climate-Conditional Grants and Debt-Climate Swaps: An Example

  • FIGURES

  • Figure 1. Countries’ Fiscal Risk Categorization and Climate Vulnerability

  • Figure 2. Number of Countries with Above-Median Climate Risk, by Probability of Fiscal Crisis Risk

  • Figure 3. Illustrative Structure of a Tripartite Debt Swap

  • Figure 4. Sovereign Borrowing Space Measure for 64 Low-Income Countries

  • Figure 5. Distribution of Weighted-Average Bond Bid Prices for a Sample of PRGT and MAC Countries

  • Figure 1.1

  • Figure 1.2

  • Figure 1.3. External Public Debt of LICs by Creditor Composition

  • Figure 1.4. External Public Debt of MACs by Creditor Composition

  • TABLES

  • Annex 1.1 External Debt of Low-Income Countries by Creditor Type

  • Annex 1.2. External Debt of Market-Access Countries by Creditor Type

1

The authors are grateful to Shamshad Akhtar, Simon Black, Mark Bowman, Carter Brandon, Lee Buchheit, Edgar Buckley, Nadja Bohme, Peter Breuer, Kennedy Byron, Anderson Caputo Silva, Oya Celasun, Kay Chung, Chanda de Long, Dennis Essers, Marcello EstevĂŁo, Stephanie Fontana, Slav Gatchev, Kevin Gallagher, Mary Goodman, Sebastian Grund, Alejandro Guerson, Jaime Guajardo, Mitu Gulati, Klaus Hellwig, Saanya Jain, Florence Jaumotte, Emilia Jurzyk, Ken Kashiwase, Karin Kemper, Parinaz Khademi, Kristina Kostial, Peter Lindner, Mira Merhi, Annapurna Mitra, Mahmoud Mohieldin, Justin Mundy, Sean Nolan, Natalija Novta, Augustus Panton, Ugo Panizza, Sejal Patel, Ceyla Pazarbasioglu, Christian Peter, Romina Picolotti, Marcos Poplawski, James Roaf, Francisco Roch, Alok Sharma, Paul Steele, Fiona Stewart, Mariusz Sumlinski, Stijn Verhelst, Ignazio Visco, Ulrich Volz, Beatrice Weder di Mauro, Elisson Wright, Johannes Wiegand, Simon Zadek, and participants in a July 2021 Round table on Climate Finance and Debt Sustainability convened by the IMF Managing Director for discussions and comments on earlier drafts. Zhuo Chen and Dilek Sevinc provided first-rate research assistance.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Debt-for-Climate Swaps: Analysis, Design, and Implementation
Author:
Mr. Marcos d Chamon
,
Erik Klok
,
Mr. Vimal V Thakoor
, and
Mr. Jeromin Zettelmeyer