Front Matter
Author:
Cristian Alonso
Search for other papers by Cristian Alonso in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Mr. Joey Kilpatrick
Search for other papers by Mr. Joey Kilpatrick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Copyright Page

© 2022 International Monetary Fund

WP/22/116

IMF Working Paper

Fiscal Affairs Department

The Distributional Impact of a Carbon Tax in Asia and the Pacific

Prepared by Cristian Alonso and Joey Kilpatrick

Authorized for distribution by James Daniel

June 2022

IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.

ABSTRACT: While a carbon tax is widely acknowledged as an efficient policy to mitigate climate change, adoption has lagged. Part of the challenge resides in the distributional implications of a carbon tax and a belief that it tends to be regressive. Even when not regressive, poor households could be hurt by a carbon tax, particularly in countries that rely heavily on carbon-intensive energy sources. Using household surveys, we study how a carbon tax may affect households in the Asia Pacific region, the main source of CO2 emissions. We document a wide range of country-specific policies that could be implemented to compensate households, reduce inequality, and build support for adoption.

article image

Title Page

WORKING PAPERS

The Distributional Impact of a Carbon Tax in Asia and the Pacific

Prepared by Cristian Alonso and Joey Kilpatrick1

ContentsContents

  • Glossary

  • Introduction

  • The Importance of Reducing CO2 Emissions in Asia and the Pacific

  • Methodology

  • The Impact of a Carbon Tax on Households in the Region

  • The Impact of a Carbon Tax on Households by Economy

    • China

    • India

    • Indonesia

    • Kiribati

    • Mongolia

    • Myanmar

    • Philippines

    • Other Economies in the Region

  • Conclusion

  • Annex I. Proxy Means Targeting

  • Annex II. Results of a $25 and $75 Carbon Tax

  • Annex III. Consistency of Household Surveys with Consumption in National Accounts

  • Annex IV. India: Robustness Accounting for Universal Electricity Access

  • References

  • FIGURES

  • 1. Cumulative CO2 Emissions, 1750–2020

  • 2. Share of Annual Fuel Combustion Emissions, 2001–2019

  • 3. Per Capita Emissions from Fuel Combusiont, 2000–2019

  • 4. Average Price per Ton of Carbon by Region, 2022

  • 5. Increase in the Price of Energy Goods Induced by a Carbon Tax of $50 per Ton

  • 6. Burden of Higher Prices by Quintile for a Carbon Tax of $50 per Ton

  • 7. Burden of Higher Prices by Quintile and Income per Capita

  • 8. Burden of Lower Labor Income

  • 9. Burden of Higher Prices and Lower Labor Income by Quintile

  • 10. Fiscal Revenues from a Carbon Tax

  • 11. Share of Carbon Tax Revenues Needed to Compensate Poorest Households on Average

  • 12. Share of Carbon Tax Revenues Needed to Improve Welfare for 50% of Households

  • 13. Impact of a $50 per ton carbon tax on households in China

  • 14. Impact of Alternative Compensation Schemes in China

  • 15. Impact of a $50 per Ton Carbon Tax on Households in India

  • 16. Impact of Alternative Compensation Schemes in India

  • 17. Impact of a $50 per Ton Carbon Tax on Households in Indonesia

  • 18. Impact of Alternative Compensation Schemes in Indonesia

  • 19. Impact of a $50 per Ton Carbon Tax on Households in Kiribati

  • 20. Impact of Alternative Compensation Schemes in Kiribati

  • 21. Impact of a $50 per Ton Carbon Tax on Households in Mongolia

  • 22. Impact of Alternative Compensation Schemes in Mongolia

  • 23. Impact of a $50 per Ton Carbon Tax on Households in Myanmar

  • 24. Impact of alternative compensation schemes in Myanmar

  • 25. Impact of a $50 per Ton Carbon Tax on Households in the Philippines

  • 26. Impact of Alternative Compensation Schemes in the Philippines

  • 27. Impact of a $50 per Ton Carbon Tax via Higher Prices

  • A1. $25 Carbon Tax: Impact of Higher Prices on Households

  • A2. $75 Carbon Tax: Impact of Higher Prices on Households

  • A3. Share of Carbon Tax Revenues Needed to Compensate Poorest Households on Average

  • A4. Share of Carbon Tax Revenues Needed to Improve Welfare for 50% of Households

  • A5. Impact of a $50 Carbon Tax in India

  • TABLES

  • 1. Household Surveys’ Summary Statistics

  • 2. Compensating Measures

  • A1. Details About Application of PMT for Each Country

Glossary

AAY-BPL

Antyodaya Anna Yojana- Below Poverty Line

BLT/BLSM

Bantuan Langsung Tunai/Bantuan Langsung Sementara Masyarakat

BSM

Bantuan Siswa Miskin

CPAT

Carbon Pricing Assessment Tool

ETS

Emissions Trading SystemScheme

GDP

Gross Domestic Product

GHG

Green House Gas

Hong Kong SAR

Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region

IEA

International Energy Agency

IMF

International Monetary Fund

LPG

Liquefied Petroleum Gas

NDC

Nationally Determined Contributions

OECD

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

PKPS BBM

Dalam Pencapaian Efektivitas Dana Program Kompensasi Pengurangan Subsidi Bahan Bakar Minyak

PMT

Proxy Means Testing

USD

United States Dollar

WEO

World Economic Outlook

1

We are grateful for excellent comments from Elif Ceren Arbatli Saxegaard, Jean-Marc B. Atsebi, Edgar Buckley, Eduardo Camero Godinez, Hua Chai, Wenjie Chen, James Daniel, William Gbohoui, Koki Harada, Jehann Jack, Sarwat Jahan, Margaux MacDonald, Marina Mendes Tavares, Ian Parry, John Ralyea, Gregor Schwerhoff, Piyaporn (Nikki) Sodsriwiboon, Alberto Tumino, Ting Yan, and participants at the FAD seminar series.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
The Distributional Impact of a Carbon Tax in Asia and the Pacific
Author:
Cristian Alonso
and
Mr. Joey Kilpatrick