Voting Right Rotation, Behavior of Committee Members and Financial Market Reactions: Evidence from the U.S. Federal Open Market Committee
Author:
Michael Ehrmannnull

Search for other papers by Michael Ehrmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Robin Tietz
Search for other papers by Robin Tietz in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Bauke Visser
Search for other papers by Bauke Visser in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
Which Federal Reserve Bank presidents vote on the U.S. monetary policy committee depends on a mechanical, yearly rotation scheme. Rotation is without exclusion: nonvoting presidents do attend and participate in the meetings of the committee. We test two hypotheses about the dependence of presidents' behavior on voting status. (i) Loss compensation: presidents compensate the loss of the right to vote with an increased use of speeches and contributions. (ii) Motivation: presidents complement the right to vote with an increased use of speeches and contributions. The evidence favors the motivation hypothesis. Also, in years that presidents vote, their speeches move financial markets less than in years they do not vote. We argue that this vote discount is consistent with presidents’ communication behavior.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
IMF Working Papers