Patterns in IMF Growth Forecast Revisions: A Panel Study at Multiple Horizons
Author:
Metodij Hadzi-Vaskov
Search for other papers by Metodij Hadzi-Vaskov in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Mr. Luca A Ricci
Search for other papers by Mr. Luca A Ricci in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
,
Alejandro Mariano Werner
Search for other papers by Alejandro Mariano Werner in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
Rene Zamarripa
Search for other papers by Rene Zamarripa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close
This paper investigates the performance of the IMF WEO growth forecast revisions across different horizons and country groups. We find that: (i) growth revisions in horizons closer to the actual are generally larger, more volatile, and more negative; (ii) on average, growth revisions are in the right direction, becoming progressively more responsive to the forecast error gap as horizons get closer to the actual year; (iii) growth revisions in systemic economies are relevant for growth revisions in all country groups; (iv) WEO and Consensus Forecast growth revisions are highly correlated; (v) fall-to-spring WEO revisions are more correlated with Consensus Forecasts revisions compared to spring-to-fall revisions; and (vi) across vintages, revisions for a given time horizon are not autocorrelated; within vintages, revisions tend to be positively correlated, suggesting perception of persistent short-term shocks.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
IMF Working Papers