Front Matter Page
Fiscal Affairs Department
Contents
Abstract
I. INTRODUCTION
II. PFM REFORM ROADMAPS
A. Introduction
B. Assessment
III. ANALYSIS OF PEFA REPORTS, 2009–2020
A. Introduction
B. Methodology to Assess PEFA Scores
C. Analysis of PEFA Results Across the Region
IV. CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT TO SUPPORT THE STRATEGY
A. Introduction
B. Evolution of PFTAC’s Support to PICs
C. Trends in CD activities
D. Authorities’ Views on PFTAC’s Support
E. Support by Other Development Partners
V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
BOXES
Box 1. Overview of the Pacific Islands
Box 2. PFM Roadmaps and Joint Policy Action Matrices (JPAMs)
Box 3. PFM Reforms in the PFTAC Region in the Early 1990s
Box 4. Survey of PICs – Summary of Results
FIGURES
Figure 1. Examples Country Roadmaps and the Budget Cycle
Figure 2. Scoring Methodology of Converting Alphabetical Scoring into Numerical
Figure 3. Comparison of PEFA Scores for PFTAC Region, 2009–2019
Figure 4. PEFA Performance over Time for Fiji, PNG, Samoa and Timor-Leste
Figure 5. Focus of PFTAC’s CD Activities in the Three Phases of Funding
Figure 6. Delivered CD Activities by Fiscal Topic for the Three Funding Phases
TABLES
Table 1. Periodicity of Road maps for the period 2011–2021
Table 2. Comparison of Use of Roadmaps between Kiribati, PNG, and Samoa
Table 3. Breakdown of the PEFA Assessments According to the Relevant Methodology
Table 4. Comparison of PEFA Scores under the 2011 and 2016 Frameworks (percent)
Table 5. Comparison of PEFA scores between PICs, LIDCs and EMEs for the period
Table 6. Evolution of PFTAC’s CD Activities during FY09–19
ANNEXES
Annex 1. Detailed List of PEFA Assessments
Annex 2. Summary of Revisions to the PEFA Framework, 2005 to 2016
Annex 3. Survey for Member Countries on PFTAC PFM CD Activities
Annex 4. CD Support for Selected PICs by all Development Partners, FY 2018–20