IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit
comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the
author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.
IMF Working Papers describe research in progress by the author(s) and are published to elicit
comments and to encourage debate. The views expressed in IMF Working Papers are those of the
author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management.
We present estimates of welfare by country for 2007 and 2014 using the methodology of
Jones and Klenow (2016) which incorporates consumption, leisure, mortality and
inequality, and we extend the methodology to include environmental externalities. During
the period of the global financial crisis welfare grew slightly more rapidly than income per
capita, mainly due to improvements in life expectancy. This led to welfare convergence in
most regions towards advanced country levels. Introducing environmental effects changes
the welfare ranking for countries that rely heavily on natural resources, highlighting the
importance of the natural resource base in welfare. This methodology could provide a
theoretically consistent and tractable way of monitoring progress in several Sustainable
Development Goal (SDG) indicators.