Bebbington, A., and J. Farrington, 1993, “‘Reluctant Partners?: NGOs,” The State and Sustainable Agricultural Development (New York: Routledge).
Ben-Ner, A., and T. Van Hoomissen, 1993, “The Governance of Non Profit Organizations: Law and Public Policy,” PONPO Working Paper, 195.
Bilodeau M., and A. Slivinski, 1996, “Volunteering Non Profit Entrepreneurial Services,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 31.
Bossyut J., and P. Develtere, 1995, “Between Autonomy and Identity: The Financing Dilemma of NGOs,” Courier, Commission of the European Communities.
Brown, L., and D. Korten, 1991, “Working More Effectively With Non Governmental Organizations,” in S. Paul and A. Israel, Nongovernmental Organizations and the World Bank (Washington: The World Bank).
Brown, L., and others, 2000, “Globalization and the Design of International Institutions” in Nye, J.S. and J.D. Donahue, Governance in a Globalizing World, Brookings Institution Press.
Edwards, M., and D. Hulme 1994, “NGOs Performance and Accountability in the New World Order,” mimeo, Institute for Development Policy and Management.
Edwards, M., and D. Hulme, 1996, “Too Close for Comfort? The Impact of Official Aid on NGOs,” in Edwards, M. and D. Hulme, 1997, “NGOs, State and Donors, Too Close for Comfort?” (London: Pergamon Press).
Faure-Grimaud, A., J.J. Laffont, and D. Martimort, 2000, “A Theory of Supervision with Endogenous Transaction Costs,” Annals of Economics and Finance.
Figuieres, C., 1999, “Banque Centrale Commune, Relations Strategiques Internationales et Stabilisation de la Dette,” GREQAM Working Paper.
Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye, 2001, “Between Centralization and Fragmentation: the Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy,” Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Papers Series RWP01-004.
Levhari, D., and L. Mirman L., 1980, “The Great Fish War: An Example Using a Dynamic Cournot-Nash Solution,” The Bell Journal of Economics.
Robinson, 1997, “Privatising the Voluntary Sector: NGOs as Public Sector Contractors,” in NGOs, States and Donors (London: Pergamon Press).
I am grateful to G. Nancy for guidance and discussions. I would like to thank R. Lagunoff and P. Michel for their comments and technical review. A. Bhatia, A. Feltenstein, A. Mourmouras, S. Nsouli, and participants at an IMF Institute seminar provided many useful suggestions. Errors are solely mine.
The game rules out negative payoffs.
For an analysis of different factors leading a principal to be overruled by her subordinate, see Aghion and Tirole (1997).
Delegation is defined solely as the allocation of autority over the choice of the project to the agent.
For the sake of simplicity, we describe the decisions of the players in a sequential manner, but, actually, they play simultaneously.
This technical assumption indicates that the players have unlimited access to training.
We define trust as the closeness of preferences