Baig, Taimur and Han Goldfajn, 1998, “Financial Market Contagion in the Asian Crisis,” IMF Working Paper, 98/155 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Bank of Thailand, 1998, Bank of Thailand Economic Focus: Focus on the Thai Crisis, Vol., No. 2(April-June) Economic Research Department, Bank of Thailand.
Chan-Lau, Jorge A. and Zhaohui Chen, 1998, “Financial Crisis and Credit Crunch as a Result of Inefficient Financial Intermediation—with Reference to the Asian Financial Crisis,” IMF Working Paper, 98/127 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Chang, Roberto and Andres Velasco, 1998, “Financial Crises in Emerging Markets: A Canonical Model,” Working Paper 98-10, Reserve Bank of Atlanta.
Campbell, John Y. and Robert J. Shiller, 1987, “Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 1062-1088.
Eichengreen, Barry and others, 1998, “Hedge Funds and Financial Market Dynamics,” Occasional Paper 166 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
Engle, Robert F. and Clive W. J. Granger, 1987, “Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing,” Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 251-76.
Flood, Robert P. and Peter M. Garber, 1986, “Collapsing Exchange-Rate Regimes: Some Linear Examples,” Journal of International Economics, Vol. 17, pp. 1-13.
Flood, Robert and Nancy Marion, 1999, “Perspectives on the Recent Currency Crisis Literature,” International Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol. 4, pp. 1-26,
Fratzscher, Marcel, 1998, “Why Are Currency Crises Contagious? A Comparison of the Latin American Crisis of 1994-1995 and the Asian Crisis of 1997-1998,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, pp. 664-691.
Glick, Reuven and Andrew K. Rose, 1998, “Contagion and Trade: Why Are Currency Crises Regional?” Working Paper 6806, National Bureau of Economic Research, (Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research).
Goldstein, Morris, 1998, The Asian Financial Crisis: Causes, Cures, and Systemic Implications, (Washington: Institute of International Economics).
Granger, Clive W. J. 1969, “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods,” Econometrica, Vol. 37, pp. 424-38.
Granger, Clive W. J., Bwo-Hung Huang, and Chin Wei Yang, 1998, “A Bivariate Causality Between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates: Evidence from Recent Asia Flu,” Discussion Paper 98-09 (April), Department of Economics, (San Diego: University of California).
Gregory, Allan W. and Bruce E. Hansen, 1996, “Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime Shifts,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 70, pp. 99-126.
Hall, A., 1990, “Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series with Pretest Data Based Model Selection,” Mimeo, North Carolina State University.
Kaminsky, Graciela L. and Carmen M. Reinhart, 1999, “The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments Problems,” American Economic Review, Vol. 89, No. 3, (June), pp. 473-500.
Kodres, Laura E. and Matthew Pritsker, 1999, “A Rational Expectations Model of Financial Contagion,” Working Paper, (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).
Krugman, Paul, 1979, “A Model of Balance-of-Payments Crises,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 11, No. 3 (August) pp. 311-325.
Krugman, Paul, 1991, “Financial Crises in the International Economy,” in The Risk of Economic Crisis, ed. by Martin S. Feldstein (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Marshall, David, 1998, “Understanding the Asian Crisis: Systemic Risk as Coordination Failure,” Economic Perspectives, 3rd Quarter, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, pp. 13-28.
Masson, Paul, 1998, “Contagion: Monsoonal Effects, Spillovers, and Jumps Between Multiple Equilibria,” IMF Working Paper 98/142 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).
McKinnon, Ronald I. and Huw Pill, 1996, “Credible Liberalizations and International Capital Flows: The ‘Overborrowing Syndrome’,” in Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia, ed. by Takatoshi Ito and Anne O. Kruger, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
- Search Google Scholar
- Export Citation
)| false McKinnon, Ronald I.and Huw Pill, 1996, “ Credible Liberalizations and International Capital Flows: The ‘Overborrowing Syndrome’,” in Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia, ed.by ( Takatoshi Itoand Anne O. Kruger, Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Obstfeld, Maurice, 1996, “Models of Currency Crises with Self-Fulfilling Features,” European Economic Review, Vol. 40, pp. 1037-1047.
Perron, Pierre, 1989, “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis,” Econometrica, Vol. 57, pp. 1361-1401.
Perron, Pierre, 1997, “Further Evidence on Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Variables,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 80, pp. 355-385,
Pesaran, H. Hashem and Bahram Pesaran, 1997, Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pesaran, H. Hashem, and Yongcheol Shin, 1998“Generalized Impulse Response Analysis in Linear Multivariate Models,” Economics Letters, Vol. 58, pp. 17-29.
Saunders, Anthony, 1999, Credit Risk Measurement: New Approaches to Value at Riskand Other Paradigms, (New York: John Wiley and Sons).
Sicat, Gerardo, 1998, “The Philippine Economy in the Asian Crisis,” ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 3, (December), pp. 290-296.
World Bank, 1998, “East Asia’s Financial Crisis: Causes, Evolution, and Prospects,” Global Development Finance: Analysis and Summary Tables (Washington: World Bank).
The author thanks David F. Hendry and V. Santiprabhob for useful discussion in the early stages of this research. He is also grateful to Ritu Basu, Wim Fonteyne, Alfredo Leone, Stephen Schwartz and other colleagues in the IMF for their suggestions and comments and to Natalie Baumer for editorial assistance. All errors are the author’s responsibility. The views expressed are also his and do not necessarily represent those of the Fund.
The term “financial crisis,” refers to simultaneous occurrence of banking and currency crises in this paper.
Sicat (1998) argues that the development in financial regulations and liberalization in the early 1990s was one reason why the Philippines was relatively less affected by contagion. In addition, the Philippines was probably less affected by non-economic factors. For example, political issues related to the credibility of the Suharto regime, are seen as important factors in understanding the financial crisis in Indonesia.
During this time period, Thailand implemented several measures including interest rate liberalization and the establishment of the Bangkok International Banking Facility.
Recent literature, which emphasizes weak banking and financial sectors as one factor in currency crises, includes McKinnon and Pill (1996), Chan-Lau and Chen (1998), Chang and Velasco (1998), Krugman (1998), and Marshall (1998).
To this end, the Asian crisis differs from the Mexican case, since the private sector seems to be the cause rather than the public sector (World Bank 1998).
Furthermore, Goldstein (1998) centers his arguments on a change in expectations and in the assessment of investors about economic conditions. He also introduces a “wake-up call” hypothesis—for instance, the Thai crisis became a wake-up call for investors to re-assess the credibility of other Asian countries whose economies were believed to be sound, but in fact were weak.
To this end, this study focuses on “pure” contagion as defined by Masson (1998) which occurs because of factors which cannot be explained by macroeconomic fundamentals and which often involves self-fulfilling factors and multiple equilibria.
Campbell and Shiller (1987) discuss issues of causality in the context of the present value model, and the causality relationship establishes when the stock price is not an exact linear function of current and past exchange rates.
Another possible source of the failure to establish cointegration in this time-series may be the assumption of a constant return on the financial assets in equation (3).
The top three imports in Thailand are non-electrical machinery and parts, electrical machinery and parts, and chemicals, the top three exports are computers and parts, garments, and rubber. For the Philippines, the main imports include telecommunications equipment and electrical machinery, materials and accessories for the manufacture of electrical equipment, and semi-processed manufactured goods. The main exports are electrical and electronic equipment and components, and garments.
The growth level in the food sector dropped from 9.4 percent in 1994 to 5.8 percent in 1996. This growth rate in 1996 is the lowest among all sectors.
In 1996, the Philippine exports to ASEAN accounted for 14.4 percent of the total, while its imports from ASEAN accounted for 12.3 percent.