Abstract

The IMF’s Fiscal Transparency Code is the international standard for disclosure of information about public finances and is the centerpiece of the global architecture on fiscal transparency. The Fiscal Transparency Handbook (2018) provides detailed guidance on the implementation of the new Fiscal Transparency Code, which was approved by the IMF Board in 2014. It explains why each principle of the Code is important and describes current trends in implementation of the principles, noting relevant international standards as well. Selected country examples are also provided.

Glossary

Accounting basis: Defined in 2000 by the International Federation of Accountants’ (IFAC) Public Sector Committee (PSC), the predecessor of the International Public Sector Accounting Board (IPSASB), as “the body of accounting principles that determine when the effects of transactions or events should be recognized for financial reporting purposes. It relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the nature of the measurement.” There are many variations of the concept of the accounting basis. The PSC identified two basic reference points (cash and accrual) and two variations (modified cash and modified accrual).

Accounting policies: According to IPSAS, “the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices applied by an entity in preparing and presenting financial statements.”

Accounting system: The set of accounting procedures, internal mechanisms of control, books of account, and plan and chart of accounts that are used for administering, recording, and reporting on financial transactions. Systems should embody double-entry bookkeeping, record all stages of the payments and receipts process needed to recognize accounting transactions, integrate asset and liability accounts with operating accounts, and maintain records in a form that can be audited.

Accrual accounting: Accrual accounting systems recognize transactions or events at the time economic value is created, transformed, exchanged, transferred, or extinguished, and all economic flows (not just cash) are recorded.

Accrual reporting: Reporting based on accrual accounting systems.

Advance release calendar: A calendar that indicates the dates on which regular publications of statistics or other fiscal data will be available to the public.

Annual financial statements: A comprehensive presentation of the government’s financial position and financial performance at the end of each fiscal year, which in most countries are subject to audit by the supreme audit institution before being submitted to the legislature for review and subsequently published. Where accrual-basis accounting is used, the annual financial statements will usually include a balance sheet, an operating statement, a cash-flow statement, and notes. Where cash-basis accounting is used, the statements will comprise a cash receipts and payments or operating statement.

Appropriations: An authority under a law given by the legislature to the executive, valid for a specified period of time, to spend public funds for a specified purpose. Annual appropriations are made through annual budget laws. Supplementary budgets/appropriations are sometimes made by the legislature and amend the annual budget law. A standing appropriation is sometimes used for authority extending beyond a single budget year under separate legislation (e.g., social security laws). In some countries, such as the United States, the term authorization is used to denote a general law setting up a program and permitting appropriation, but not giving any specific authority to spend. In most countries, agencies and departments require specific executive authorization (“apportionment, allotment, or warrant”) before they may incur an obligation against an appropriation.

Assets: Any economic resource controlled by an entity as a result of past transactions or events and from which the economic owner may obtain future economic benefits over a period of time. Types of financial assets include cash, deposits, loans, bonds, shares and other equities, financial derivatives, and accounts receivable. Examples of non-financial assets include buildings, machinery, equipment, inventories, valuables, land, subsoil mineral deposits, and leases.

Augmented balance: The overall balance plus any losses incurred by the central bank, and any issuance of government debt to recapitalize public financial institutions not recorded in the overall balance.

Balance sheet: A comprehensive and consolidated statement of the assets, liabilities, and net worth of the government or the public sector drawn up at a defined point in time, usually the end of the fiscal year.

Borrowing: Includes all direct borrowing by public sector entities, such as bonds, treasury bills, and bank loans, as well as indirect borrowing such as accounts payable, including expenditure arrears and unpaid tax refunds.

Budget calendar: A calendar indicating the key dates in the process of preparing and approving the budget. This calendar would include the date on which the budget circular is issued; the time period during which the finance ministry discusses the budget submissions of ministries, departments, and agencies; the date on which the draft budget should be submitted by the executive to the legislature; the period during which the legislature holds bud-get hearings; and the date on which the budget appropriations bill should be passed by the legislature.

Budget documentation: The documents that are published with the executive’s annual budget submission to the legislature or that are related to the process of preparing the budget. In addition to the draft appropriation bill, these documents could include a fiscal strategy statement, a medium-term budget framework, a fiscal risk statement, and a report on the execution of the budget for the previous year.

Budgetary central government: The ministries, departments, agencies, and other entities belonging to the central government whose spending, revenues, and borrowing activities are included in the central government’s annual budget. There may be extrabudgetary entities whose activities are excluded from the annual budget, and thus from the definition of budgetary central government.

Cash accounting: An accounting system that recognizes transactions and events when cash is received or disbursed.

Cash reporting: Reporting based on cash-accounting systems.

Central government: All government entities that are included in the budgetary central government, plus any units funded by extrabudgetary funds and nonmarket nonprofit institutions that are controlled by the central government. Depending on legal arrangements, social security funds are often considered part of central government.

Chart of accounts: A financial organization tool that provides an organized and coded listing of all the individual accounts that are used to record transactions and make up the ledger system.

Commitments: A stage in the expenditure process at which a contract or other forms of planned expenditures are approved before work is performed or goods and services are delivered. A commitment thus entails a potential obligation for a government to pay in future when the contract is honored by its counterpart. A commitment is not equivalent to a liability. The term is also used in a more general sense to mean firm promises of the government made in policy statements. Since commitments usually mature as payments, their control is an essential part of expenditure control and prevention of expenditure arrears.

Consolidation: A process of presenting the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenditures of a group of public-sector entities (often a controlling government unit and its controlled entities) as if they constituted a single entity. Internal transactions and balances should be eliminated.

Contingency funds or reserves: A separate fund or a budget provision set aside to meet unforeseen and unavoidable requirements that may arise during the budget year. Certain types of contingency (e.g., meeting loan guarantee obligations) may be specified as a potential use for such funds.

Contingent liabilities: Obligations that are contingent on the occurrence of some uncertain future event (e.g., the calling of a government guarantee). They are therefore not yet liabilities, and may never be if a triggering event does not materialize. Contingent liabilities may be explicit (i.e., established by law or through a contract between the government and a third party) or implicit (e.g., based on a public expectation that the government will provide support to an entity should it be in financial difficulties).

Data Dissemination Standards: Standards that enhance the availability of timely and comprehensive statistics, and which contribute to sound macroeconomic policies and the efficient functioning of financial markets. The Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS) is a set of global benchmarks, developed by the IMF, for disseminating macroeconomic statistics to the public. The Enhanced General Data Dissemination System (e-GDDS) is a framework for countries with less developed statistical systems to improve data transparency and governance by publishing essential data for the analysis of macroeconomic conditions. The SDDS Plus Standard is the highest tier of the SDDS and is aimed at economies with systemically important financial sectors.

Debt Sustainability Analysis (DSA): The Debt Sustainability Framework (DSF), developed by the World Bank and the IMF, guides the borrowing decisions of low- and middle-income countries, matching their financing needs with their current and prospective ability to repay debt. The DSA is a tool that is used as part of the DSF to conduct a structured examination of a country’s debt sustainability.

Earmarked taxes: Taxes raised and allocated by a mechanism specified in policy or law to specific expenditure programs, often through an extrabudgetary entity (see extrabudgetary entities).

Economic classification: A classification that identifies the types of expense incurred according to the economic process involved; for example, the payment of wages and salaries or the purchase of goods and services or plant and equipment. The term is generally used to identify the nature and economic effects of government operations.

Expenditure (or payment) arrears: Amounts that are both unpaid and past the due date for payment. Payment arrears represent the stock of invoices that have not been paid by the date specified in a contract, within a normal commercial period for similar transactions, or within a specific period set by laws and regulations. Examples of arrears include bills overdue from suppliers, overdue salaries or transfers, or overdue debt repayment or debt service payments.

Extrabudgetary entities: Entities that operate under the authority or control of government whose budgets are not included in the annual budget of the government that is submitted to the legislature. Such entities may not be subject to the same level of scrutiny or accounting standards as those included in the annual budget. A wide variety of extrabudgetary arrangements are used, including extrabudgetary funds (e.g., social security funds) set up under separate legislation that may or may not have a separate annual appropriation, or extrabudgetary accounts.

Financial derivative: A financial instrument whose value is derived from one or more underlying assets and through which specific financial risks (e.g., interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, equity and commodity price risk, and credit risk) can be traded in financial markets. Examples include futures, swaps, and options.

Fiscal aggregates: Summary fiscal indicators, including on the flow-side total expenditure, total revenue, net lending/net borrowing, and the overall fiscal balance, and on the stock-side gross and net debt, total assets, total liabilities, and net worth.

Fiscal council: A permanent agency with a statutory or executive mandate to assess publicly and independently from partisan influence the government’s fiscal policies, plans, and performance against macroeconomic objectives related to the long-term sustainability of public finances, short- and medium-term macroeconomic stability, and other policy objectives. The council may also be mandated to prepare short- and medium-term macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts that are used by the government in preparing the budget, or to validate the government’s own forecasts.

Fiscal forecasts: Forecasts of the main fiscal aggregates (revenue, expenditure, borrowing, and public debt), and their components such as revenue by categories of tax and nontax revenue, and expenditure by administrative, functional, and economic classification.

Fiscal legislation: Laws or regulations relating to the formulation of fiscal policy; principles of fiscal responsibility; the preparation, approval, and execution of the budget; and the accounting, reporting, and auditing of fiscal information.

Fiscal policy targets and rules: Medium-term objectives or targets for key fiscal indicators such as debt, the fiscal deficit, revenue collection, or expenditure. These targets may include limits on the growth rate or level of these indicators and be formalized as rules that are set in legislation or in pronouncements by the government. In addition, the government may legislate or announce procedural rules for the conduct of fiscal policy, for example, transparency in policymaking, timely disclosure of fiscal information, or the correction of fiscal imbalances within a specified period.

Fiscal reports: Retrospective reports on fiscal developments, including in-year and year-end budget outturn/execution reports, fiscal statistics, and annual financial statements.

Fiscal risks: Potential shocks to government revenues, expenditures, assets, or liabilities that may cause fiscal outcomes to depart from expectations or forecasts. Fiscal risks can be classified into macroeconomic risks that arise when forecasts of key macroeconomic variables are different from forecast; or specific risks such as the realization of contingent liabilities, natural disasters, or other uncertain events such as the bailout of a public corporation or financial institution.

Fiscal statistics: Retrospective reports on the government’s financial performance that provide fiscal data based on international statistical standards such as the IMF’s Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFSM, 2001 or 2014), or the System of National Accounts (SNA, 1993 or 2008), or the European System of National Accounts (ESA, 1995 or 2010).

Fiscal sustainability: The ability of a government to sustain its current spending, revenue raising, and other policies without threatening government liquidity or solvency, or defaulting on some of its liabilities or promised expenditures.

Fiscal transparency: Fiscal transparency refers to the information available to the public about the government’s fiscal policymaking process; the clarity, reliability, frequency, timeliness, and relevance of public fiscal reporting; and the openness of such information. Clarity is the ease with which reports can be understood by users. Reliability is the extent to which reports are an accurate representation of government fiscal operations and finances. Frequency (or periodicity) is the regularity with which reports are published. Timeliness refers to the time lag involved in the dissemination of these reports. Relevance refers to the extent to which reports provide users (legislatures, markets, and citizens) with the information they need to make effective decisions. Openness refers to the ease with which the public can influence and hold governments to account for their fiscal policy decisions.

Functional classification: The functional classification of expenses provides information on the purpose for which an expense was incurred. The United Nations’ Classification of Functions of Government (COFOG) is a detailed classification of the functions, or socioeconomic objectives, that general government entities aim to achieve through various kinds of expenditure. It is generally used to measure the allocation of resources by government for the promotion of various activities and objectives (e.g., health, education, transportation, and communication).

General government: All resident institutional units that fulfill the functions of government as their primary activity. The general government sector comprises the following: all entities of the central, state, regional, provincial, municipal, or local government; all extrabudgetary entities, including social security funds, at each level of government; and all nonmarket nonprofit institutions that are controlled and financed mainly by government units. Therefore, the general government sector can also be defined as all the public institutional entities and units that are nonmarket producers. It does not include public corporations that are market producers, even when these companies are owned and controlled by the government.

Governance: The process by which decisions are made and implemented. Within government, governance is the process by which public institutions conduct public affairs and manage public resources. Good governance refers to the management of government in a manner that is essentially free of abuse and corruption, and with due regard for the rule of law.

Government guarantee: The most common type is a government-guaranteed loan, which requires the government to repay any amount outstanding in the event of default. In some contracts with a public or private sector entity (e.g., PPPs), the government may provide a guarantee that requires it to pay compensation if the revenue outturn or quantity demanded is below the guaranteed level. Similarly, contracts may also contain exchange rate or price guarantees.

Government (or general) ledger accounts: The book where all transactions by the central government, as a debit or a credit, are recorded. The government ledger is generally maintained by a government’s general accounting office.

Gross (net) debt: All liabilities that require the payment of interest and/or principal by the debtor to the creditor at a date or dates in the future. Thus, all liabilities in the government finance statistics (GFS) system are debt, except for shares and other equity and financial derivatives. Net debt is calculated as gross debt minus financial assets corresponding to debt instruments. For some purposes, it may be useful to calculate debt net of highly liquid assets, which is, in most cases, is equal to gross debt minus financial assets in the form of currency and deposits. However, in some cases, debt securities held for debt management purposes could be included as highly liquid financial assets.

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): A set of accounting standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Many of the standards forming part of IFRS are known by the older name of International Accounting Standards.

International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS): A set of accounting standards issued by the IPSAS Board for use by governments and other public-sector entities in the preparation of general purpose financial reports. These standards are comparable to the IFRS that relate to private-sector entities.

In-year fiscal reports: Budget outturn/execution reports and fiscal statistics that are produced every month or quarter within the financial year, and also include full-year reports that are produced shortly after the end of the financial year.

Liability: In the GFSM, a liability is established when an entity is obligated, under specific circumstances, to provide funds or other resources to another entity. Liabilities include Special Drawing Rights (SDRs); currency and deposits; debt securities; loans; equity and investment fund shares; insurance, pension, and standardized guarantee schemes; financial derivatives and employee stock options; and other accounts payable. In IPSAS, a liability is defined as a current obligation of an entity for an outflow of resources that result from a past event. At a minimum, the balance sheet (statement of financial position) should include line items of transfers payable, payables under exchange transactions, provisions, and other financial liabilities.

Macroeconomic forecasts: Projections of key macroeconomic variables such as GDP, consumption, investment, employment, inflation, interest rates, exchange rates, and developments in the world economy. Such forecasts are an important input for making projections of fiscal aggregates such as public spending, revenue, borrowing, and debt.

Macroeconomic risks: Risks that arise when the forecasts of macroeconomic indicators (GDP, employment, exchange rates, etc.) differ from the outturns.

Major audit qualifications: Major audit qualifications include any of the following: (i) a disclaimer audit opinion; (ii) an adverse audit opinion; and (iii) any other audit qualification, the financial impact of which has been estimated by the auditor to be of the order of one percent of GDP or larger.

Major revisions: Revisions to historical fiscal statistics that are large enough to have a macro-critical impact on the key fiscal aggregates, and in particular, any revision of the order of one percent of GDP or larger.

Medium-term budget framework (MTBF): A set of institutional arrangements for prioritizing, presenting, and managing revenue and expenditure over a period of three to five years.

Moral hazard: The possibility that a signal or expectation of future government support may induce an undesirable change in the behavior of the management of a public or private sector entity or enterprise. For example, the entity may be encouraged to engage in more risky activities because some of its potential losses are seen as being effectively underwritten by the government.

Multi-annual contracts: Contracts between the government and the private sector with a term of more than a year, such as PPPs, long-term leases, and medium- or long-term procurement arrangements.

Natural resource company (NRC): A nonfinancial public corporation (state-owned enterprise) that is involved in the exploration, extraction, processing, or sale of minerals or oil.

Net/gross operating balance: A summary measure of the sustainability of the reporting sector’s or subsector’s operations. It is represented by the change in net worth due to transactions (calculated as revenue minus expense). The gross operating balance equals revenue minus expenses excluding the consumption of fixed capital.

Net lending/borrowing: A summary measure indicating the extent to which the government is either putting financial resources at the disposal of other sectors in the economy or abroad, or is utilizing the financial resources generated by other sectors in the economy or from abroad. It may therefore be viewed as an indicator of the financial impact of government activity on the rest of the economy and the rest of the world. Net lending/borrowing equals the net operating balance minus net investment in nonfinancial assets. It is also equal to the net acquisition of financial assets minus the net incurrence of liabilities.

Net worth: Total assets less total liabilities at the end of an accounting period. Some analysis focuses on only the financial assets of the general government sector rather than its total assets. As a result, net financial worth is defined as the total value of financial assets less total liabilities.

Nondebt liabilities: Liabilities that do not require payment(s) of interest and/or principal by the debtor to the creditor at a date, or dates, in the future. They include equity and investment fund shares (which entitle its holders only to dividends and a claim on the residual value of the liabilities), and employee stock options (which do not supply funds or other resources, but rather shift the exposure to risks from one party to another).

Nonmarket nonprofit institutions (NPIs): Legal or social entities created for the production of nonmarket goods and services, but whose status does not permit them to be a source of income, profit, or other financial gain for the entities that establish, control, and mainly finance them. An entity is a nonmarket producer if most of its output is not sold at an economically significant price. NPIs controlled by the government are classified in the general government sector.

Nonperforming loan: Nonperforming loans are those for which: (i) payments of principal and/or interest are past due by three months (90 days) or more, (ii) interest payments equal to three months’ (90 days) interest or more have been capitalized (reinvested in the principal amount) or payment has been delayed by agreement, or (iii) evidence exists to reclassify a loan as nonperforming even in the absence of a 90-day past-due payment, such as when the debtor files for bankruptcy.

Outputs and outcomes: In a performance-assessment framework for government, outputs are defined as the goods or services produced by government agencies (e.g., an increase in the number of teaching hours delivered, or in the volume of welfare benefits assessed and paid), and outcomes are defined as the effects on social, economic, or other indicators arising from the delivery of outputs (e.g., an increase in a country’s PISA scores, or improved social equity).

Overall balance: This term corresponds to the GFSM 1986 terminology of “Overall Deficit/Surplus,” which is defined as revenue plus grants received less expenditure less “lending minus repayments.” The balance so defined is equal (with an opposite sign) to the sum of net borrowing by the government, plus the net decrease in government cash, deposits, and securities held for liquidity purposes. The basis of this balance concept is that government policies are held to be deficit- or surplus-creating, and thus the revenue or expenditures associated with these policies are “above the line.” Borrowing or a rundown of liquid assets, however, is deficit financing or “below the line.” It should be noted that the term lending minus repayments included above the line covers government transactions in debt and equity claims on others undertaken for purposes of public policy rather than for management of government liquidity or earning a return.

Participatory budgeting: A form of budgeting in which citizens’ groups and other nongovernmental organizations participate directly in the process of preparing the budget or in monitoring its implementation. Public participation has proven especially valuable in providing feedback on the quality and timeliness of delivery of key public services in areas such as agriculture, education, the environment, and health.

Primary balance: Equals net lending/borrowing excluding interest expense or net interest expense.

Program budgeting/program classification: Presentation of proposed expenditures in a budget according to the intended objectives and results of the associated programs, which may be defined as groups of related activities carried out by a government. A program classification applies this principle across all government activities. Program budgets allocate expenditures by program and are often associated with performance budgets, or results-based budgets in which indicators are used to measure whether expenditure policies and programs are achieving their desired objectives, outputs, or outcomes.

Public corporation: A legal entity that is owned or controlled by the government and that produces goods or services for sale in the market at economically significant prices. There are two main classes of public corporation: nonfinancial corporations and financial corporations.

Public-private partnership (PPP): A group of long-term arrangements where the private sector supplies infrastructure assets and services that have been traditionally provided or financed by the government. PPPs typically comprise a long-term contract between a private party and a government entity for providing a public asset or service, in which the private party bears significant risk and management responsibility, and remuneration is linked to performance.

Public sector: The public sector consists of all resident institutional units controlled directly or indirectly by resident government entities—namely, all entities of the general government sector and resident public corporations.

Quasi-fiscal activities (QFAs): Operations carried out by public corporations to further a public policy objective that worsens their financial position relative to a strictly commercial profit-maximizing level. QFAs can take a variety of forms, including selling goods and services (e.g., energy, water) at less than their commercial cost or paying more than commercial prices to selected suppliers.

Sensitivity analysis: In macroeconomic and fiscal forecasting, a “what-if” type of analysis to determine the sensitivity of the forecast outcomes to changes in the assumptions or parameters. If a small change in a parameter results in a relatively large change in the outcomes, the outcomes are said to be sensitive to that parameter.

Specific fiscal risk: A fiscal risk that is related to specific sources and triggering events, such as the calling of a guarantee, a natural disaster, or the rescue of a bank.

Special Drawing Right (SDR): The SDR is an international reserve asset, created by the IMF in 1969 to supplement its member countries’ official reserves. SDRs can be exchanged for freely usable currencies. The value of the SDR is based on a basket of five major currencies—the US dollar, the euro, the Chinese renminbi, the Japanese yen, and the British pound.

Subnational governments: Decentralized government entities, created by constitution or law, units that have legislative, judicial, or regulatory authority over a geographically delineated part of the country. These entities are governed by bodies whose members are elected by universal suffrage of persons resident within the delineated area, and have some autonomy with respect to budgets, staff, and assets. Subnational governments include state, provincial, or regional governments, as well as municipalities and other local governments.

Supplementary budgets/appropriations: See appropriations.

Supreme Audit Institution (SAI): Highest national auditing authority within the constitutional system that is responsible for auditing the management of public funds. SAIs may perform compliance, financial, or performance audits. They should be organizationally, administratively, and financially independent of the government. Most SAIs are members of the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI), which acts as a professional standard-setting body.

Tax arrears: Taxes due to government but not paid within the prescribed time.

Tax expenditures: Revenue foregone, atributable to provisions in the tax law that allow special exclusions, exemptions, deductions, credits, concessions, preferential rates, or deferral of tax liabilities for select groups of taxpayers or specific activities. These exceptions may be regarded as alternatives to other policy instruments, such as spending or regulatory programs.

User charges: Payments made by consumers, both individual and companies, to meet all or part of the cost of goods and services provided to them by the public sector.

Bibliography

  • Ahmad, Ehtisham, and Giorgio Brosio, eds., 2006, Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. (London: Edward Elgar).

  • Alesina, Alberto, and Roberto Perotti, 1995, “The Political Economy of Budget Deficits,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, 42 (March), pp. 131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alesina, Alberto, and Roberto Perotti, 1999, “Budget Deficits and Budget Institutions,” in Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, ed. by James M. Potterba and Jürgen von Hagen, National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allan, William, and Taryn Parry, 2003, “Fiscal Transparency in EU Accession Countries: Progress and Future Challenges,” IMF Working Paper 03/163 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, Richard, and Dimitar Radev, 2006, “Managing and Controlling Extrabudgetary Funds,” IMF Working Paper 06/286 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, Richard, and Dimitar Radev, 2010, “Extrabudgetary Funds,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2010/09 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, Richard, and Miguel Alves, 2016, “How to Improve the Financial Oversight of Public Corporations,” IMF How-To Note No. 5 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allen, Richard, Richard Hemming, and Barry H Potter. (eds.), 2013, The International Handbook of Public Financial Management (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alt, James E., and David Dreyer Lassen, 2003, “Fiscal Transparency and Fiscal Policy Outcomes in OECD Countries,” Economic Policy Research Unit Working Paper No. 2003–2 (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alt, James E., and Shanna Rose, 2006, “The Causes of Fiscal Transparency: Evidence from the U.S. States,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 53 (September, Special Issue).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arthur Anderson, 2000, “General and Specific Methodologies for Valuing Contingent Liabilities,” Contingency Fund Project Report (unpublished: Chicago).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Australia, Commonwealth of, 2015, 2015 Intergenerational Report: Australia in 2055 (Canberra).

  • Australia, Commonwealth of, 2017, Budget Strategy and Outlook Budget Paper No. 1. (Canberra).

  • Austrian Federal Ministry of Finance, 2013, “Opening Statement of Financial Position for the Austrian Federal Government as at 1 January 2013” (Vienna: Austrian Federal Ministry of Finance).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 1997, “Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision,” International Legal Materials, Vol. 36 (March), pp. 40532.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beetsma, Roel W. M. J., and Xavier Debrun, 2016, “Fiscal Councils: Rationale and Effectiveness,” IMF Working Paper 16/86 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bléjer, Mario I., and Adrienne Cheasty, eds., 1993, How to Measure the Fiscal Deficit: Analytical and Methodological Issues (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bova, Elva, Marta Ruiz-Arranz, Frederik G. Toscani, and H. Elif Ture, 2016, “The Fiscal Costs of Contingent Liabilities: A New Dataset,” IMF Working Paper No. 16/14 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bova, Elva, Robert Dippelsman, Kara Rideout, and Andrea Schaechter, 2013, “Another Look at Governments’ Balance Sheets: The Role of Nonfinancial Assets,” IMF Working Paper No. 13/95 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brixi, Hana Polackova., and Allen Schick, 2002, Government at Risk: Contingent Liabilities and Fiscal Risk. (Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brumby, James, and Richard Hemming, 2013, “Medium-Term Expenditure Frameworks,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Budina, Nina, Tidiane Kinda, Andrea Schaechter, and Anke Weber, 2012, “Fiscal Rules at a Glance; Country Details from a New Dataset,” IMF Working Paper 12/273 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cangiano, Marco, Teresa Curristine, and Michel Lazare, eds., 2013, Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carson, Carol, 2001, “Toward a Framework for Assessing Data Quality,” IMF Working Paper 01/25 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carson, Carol, Sarmad Khawaja, and Thomas K. Morrison, 2004, “Revisions Policy for Official Statistics: A Matter of Governance,” IMF Working Paper 04/87 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Castro, Manuel Fernando, 2011, “Defining and Using Performance Indicators and Targets in Government M&E Systems,” PREM Notes, No. 12, July.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cebotari, Aliona, 2008, “Contingent Liabilities: Issues and Practice,” IMF Working Paper 08/245 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chalk, Nigel, and Richard Hemming, 2000, “Assessing Fiscal Sustainability in Theory and Practice,” in Fiscal Sustainability, papers presented at a Banca d’Italia Research Department Workshop, Perugia, Italy, January 2022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chand, Sheetal K., and Albert Jaeger, 1996, Aging Populations and Public Pension Schemes, IMF Occasional Paper No. 147 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chevauchez, Benoît, 2007, “Public Management Reform in France,” in Performance Budgeting—Linking Funding and Results, ed. by Marc Robinson (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christofides, Charis, Christian Mulder, and Andrew Tiffin, 2003, “The Link between Adherence to International Standards of Good Practices, Foreign Exchange Spreads, and Ratings,” IMF Working Paper 03/74 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooper, Julie, and Sailendra Patanayak, 2011, “Chart of Accounts: A Critical Element of the Public Financial Management Framework,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2011/03 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corbacho, Ana, and Teresa Ter-Minassian, 2013, “Public Financial Management Requirements for Effective Implementation of Fiscal Rules,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curristine, Teresa, and Suzanne Flynn, 2013, “In Search of Results: Strengthening Public Sector Performance,” in Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture, ed. by Marco Cangiano, Teresa Curristine, and Michel Lazare (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daniel, James A., Jeffrey M. Davis, and Andrew M. Wolfe, 1997, “Fiscal Accounting of Bank Restructuring,” IMF Paper on Policy Analysis and Assessment No. 97/5 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Das, Udaibir S., Yinqiu Lu, Michael G. Papaioannou, and Iva Petrova, 2012, “Sovereign Risk and Asset and Liability Management—Conceptual Issues,” IMF Working Paper 12/241 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, J. M., R. Ossowski, and A. Fedelino, eds., 2003, Fiscal Policy Formulation and Implementation in Oil Producing Countries (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Debrun, Xavier, and Tidiane Kinda, 2014, “Strengthening Post-Crisis Fiscal Credibility: Fiscal Councils on the Rise—A New Dataset,” IMF Working Paper 14/58 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Debrun, Xavier, L. Moulin, A. Turrini, J. Ayuso-i-Casals, and M.S. Kumar, 2008, “Tied to the Mast? National Fiscal Rules in the European Union,” Economic Policy, April.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dippelsman, Robert, Claudia Dziobek, and Carlos A. Gutiérrez Mangas, 2012, “What Lies Beneath: The Statistical Definition of Public Sector Debt,” IMF Staff Discussion Note 12/09 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drabek, Zdenek, and Warren Payne, 2001, “The Impact of Transparency on Foreign Direct Investment,” Staff Working Paper ERAD–99–02 (Geneva: World Trade Organization).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Engel, Eduardo, Ronald Fischer, and Alexander Galetovic, 2003, “Privatizing Highways in Latin America: Fixing What Went Wrong,” Economia, Vol. 4 (Fall), pp. 12964.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission, 2011a, European Statistics Code of Practice—Revised Edition 2011 (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission, 2011b, Manual on Sources and Methods for the Compilation of COFOG Statistics—Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Commission, 2013a, ESS Guidelines on Revision Policy for PEEIs (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).

  • European Commission, 2013b, European System of Accounts (ESA 2010) (Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union).

  • Fainboim, Israel, Duncan Last, and Eivind Tandberg, 2013, “Managing Public Investment,” in Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture, ed. by Marco Cangiano, Teresa Curristine, and, Michel Lazare (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Financial Stability Forum Working Group on Deposit Insurance, 2000, “International Guidance on Deposit Insurance: A Consultative Process” (Basel, June).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flynn, Suzanne, Delphine Moreti, and Joe Cavanagh, 2016, “Implementing Accrual Accounting in the Public Sector,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2016/06 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frankel, Jeffrey A., 2011, “Over-optimism in Forecasts by Official Budget Agencies and Its Implications,” NBER Working Paper 17239 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Funke, Katja, Timothy Irwin, and Isabel Rial, 2013, “Budgeting and Reporting for Public-Private Partnerships,” International Transport Forum Discussion Papers No. 2013/07 (Paris: OECD Publishing).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gelos, R. Gaston, and Shang-Jin Wei, 2002, “Transparency and International Investor Behavior,” IMF Working Paper 02/174 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ghesquiere, Francis, and Olivier Mahul, 2010, “Financial Protection of the State against Natural Disasters: A Primer,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5429, September (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glennerster, Rachel, and Yongseok Shin, 2003, “Is Transparency Good for You, and Can the IMF Help?IMF Working Paper 03/132 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldstein, Morris, 1997, “The Case for an International Banking Standard,” Policy Analyses in International Economics 47 (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gramlich, Edward M., 1998, A Guide to Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2nd ed. (Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press).

  • Guha-Sapir, D., R. Below, and P. Hoyois, 2016, EM-DAT Database—The CRED/OFDA International Disaster Database (Brussels: Universite Catholique de Louvain).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hameed, Farhan, 2005, “Fiscal Transparency and Economic Outcomes,” IMF Working Paper 05/225 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hammami, Mona, Jean-François Ruhashyankiko, and Etienne B. Yehoue, 2006, “Determinants of Public-Private Partnerships in Infrastructure,” IMF Working Paper 06/99 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, Jason, Richard Hughes, Gösta Ljungman, and Carla Sateriale, 2013, “Medium-Term Budget Frameworks in Advanced Economies: Objectives, Design, and Performance,” in Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture, ed. by Marco Cangiano, Teresa Curristine, and Michel Lazare (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heller, Peter, 2003, Who Will Pay? Coping with Aging Societies, Climate Change, and Other Long-Term Fiscal Challenges (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hemming, Richard, 2013a, “The Macroeconomic Framework for Managing Public Finances,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hemming, Richard, 2013b, “The Role of Independent Fiscal Agencies,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hemming, Richard, M. Alier, Barry Anderson, M. Cangiano, and Murray Petrie, 2006, Public-Private Partnerships, Government Guarantees, and Fiscal Risk (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hemming, Richard, Michael Kell, and Axel Schimmelpfennig, 2003, Fiscal Vulnerability and Financial Crises in Emerging Market Economies, IMF Occasional Paper No. 218 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hemming, Richard, and Philip Joyce, 2013, “The Role of Fiscal Councils in Promoting Fiscal Responsibility,” in Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture, ed. by Marco Cangiano, Teresa Curristine, and Michel Lazare (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HM Treasury, 2013, The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government (London: TSO).

  • Inter-American Development Bank, 1997, Latin America after a Decade of Reforms, Economic and Social Progress Report (Washington, DC).

  • International Budget Partnership, 2000, “Governmental Financial Reporting: Accounting Issues and Practices,” International Public Sector Study No. 11 (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Budget Partnership, 2018, Open Budget Survey 2017 (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 1986, A Manual on Government Finance Statistics (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 1996, Guide to the Data Dissemination Standards. Module 1: The Special Data Dissemination Standard (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 1998, The General Data Dissemination System: Standards for the Dissemination by Countries of Economic and Financial Statistics (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2001, Government Finance Statistics Manual 2001 (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2003a, Data Quality Assessment Framework and Data Quality Program (Washington, DC: Statistics Department).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2003b, Guidelines for Public Debt Management: Accompanying Document and Selected Case Studies (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2004a, Public Investment and Fiscal Policy (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2004b, Public-Private Partnerships (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2005a, Government Guarantees and Fiscal Risk (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2005b, “Operational Framework for Debt Sustainability, Assessments in Low-Income Countries—Further Considerations” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2006, “Applying the Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries Post Debt Relief” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2007, Guide on Resource Revenue Transparency (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2008, “Fiscal Risks: Sources, Disclosure, and Management” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2011a, Fiscal Monitor, April 2011: Shifting Gears—Tackling Challenges on the Road to Fiscal Adjustment (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2011b, Public Sector Debt Statistics: Guide for Compilers and Users (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2012a, “Fiscal Transparency, Accountability, and Risk” (Washington, DC)

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2012b, “Iceland: Technical Assistance Report on a New Organic Budget Law, Country Report No. 12/4” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013a, “Costa Rica: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 13/316” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013b, “Ireland: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 13/209” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013c, “The Functions and Impact of Fiscal Councils, Policy Paper” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013d, The General Data Dissemination System: Guide for Participants and Users (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013e, The Special Data Dissemination System: Guide for Subscribers and Users (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2014a, “Bolivia: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 14/77” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2014b, Government Finance Statistics Manual 2014 (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2014c, “Portugal: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 14/306” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2014d, “Revised Guidelines for Public Debt Management, Policy Paper” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2014e, “Russian Federation: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 14/134” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2014f, “Update on the Fiscal Transparency Initiative, Policy Paper” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2015a, “Finland: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 15/60” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2015b, “Making Public Investment More Efficient,” IMF Policy Paper (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2015c, “Mozambique: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 15/32” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2015d, “Peru: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 15/294” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2015e, “Philippines: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 15/156” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2015f, “Romania: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 15/67” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2016a, “Albania: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 16/5” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2016b, “Analyzing and Managing Fiscal Risks—Best Practices,” IMF Policy Paper (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2016c, “Guatemala: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 16/372” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2016d, “Kenya: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 16/221” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2016e, “Tunisia: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 16/339” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2016f, “United Kingdom: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 16/351” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2017a, “Brazil: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 17/104” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2017b, “Georgia: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 17/291” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2017c, “Georgia: Request for Extended Arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility and Cancellation of Stand-by Arrangement, Country Report No. 17/97” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2017d, “Turkey: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 17/208” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2017e, “Uganda: Fiscal Transparency Evaluation, Country Report No. 17/130” (Washington, DC).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2018, “Guidance Note on the Bank-Fund Debt Sustainability Framework for Low Income Countries,” IMF Policy Paper (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank, 2003, “International Standards-Strengthening Surveillance, Domestic Institutions, and International Markets” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2009, “Developing a Medium-Term Debt Management Strategy (MTDS)—Guidance Note for Country Authorities” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2017, “The Medium-Term Debt Management Strategy: An Assessment of Recent Capacity Building” (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions, 1992, Guidelines for Internal Control Standards (Vienna: Internal Control Standards Committee).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 1995, Auditing Standards, issued by the Auditing Standards Committee at the XIVth Congress of INTOSAI 1992 in Washington, DC, as amended by the XVth Congress of INTOSAI 1995 in Cairo.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2007, “ISSAI 10—The Mexico Declaration on SAI Independence,” Approved at XIXth Congress of INTOSAI, Mexico.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB), 2006a, “International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) 1—Presentation of Financial Statements.”

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2006b, “International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) 19—Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.”

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013, “Recommended Practice Guideline 1: Reporting on the Long-Term Sustainability of an Entity’s Finances,” July.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2017, “Financial Reporting under the Cash Basis of Accounting.”

  • Irwin, Timothy, 2012, “Accounting Devices and Fiscal Illusions,” IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/12/02 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2015, “Defining the Government’s Debt and Deficit,” IMF Working Paper 15/238 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Irwin, Timothy, and Tanya Mokdad, 2010, Managing Contingent Liabilities in Public-Private Partnerships: Practice in Australia, Chile, and South Africa (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jacobs, Davina, Jean-Luc Hélis, Dominique Bouley, and Stephen Mayes, 2009, “Budget Classification,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2009/06 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jobst, Andreas A., and Dale F. Gray, 2013, “Systemic Contingent Claims Analysis—Estimating Market-Implied Systemic Risk,” IMF Working Paper 13/54 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khan, Abdul, and Stephen Mayes, 2009, “Transition to Accrual Accounting,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2009/02 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khemani, Pokar D., and Benoit Wiest, 2016, “How to Check Integrity of Fiscal Data,” IMF How-To Note No. 4 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kopits, George, 2011, “Independent Fiscal Institutions: Developing Good Practices,” OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 11/3.

  • Kowalski, P., M. Büge, M. Sztajerowska, and M. Egeland, 2013, “State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications,” OECD Trade Policy Paper 147 (Paris: OECD).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kumar, M., E. Baldacci, A. Schaechter, C. Caceres, D. Kim, X. Debrun, J. Escolano, J. Jonas, P. Karam, I. Yakadina, and R. Zymek, 2009, “Fiscal Rules-Anchoring Expectations for Sustainable Public Finances,” IMF Staff Paper (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lahey, Robert, 2010, “The Canadian M&E System: Lessons Learned from 30 Years of Development,” ECD Working Paper No. 23 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lane, Timothy, Atish Ghosh, Javier Hamann, Steven Phillips, Marianne Schulze-Ghatas, and Tsidi Tsikata, 1999, IMF-Supported Programs in Indonesia, Korea, and Thailand: A Preliminary Assessment, IMF Occasional Paper No. 178 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lienert, Ian, 2010, “Role of the Legislature in Budget Processes,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2010/04 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013a, “Role of the Legislature in Budget Processes,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), 2013b, “The Legal Framework for Public Finances and Budget Systems,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF), and Moo-Kyung Jung, eds., 2004, “The Legal Framework for Budget Systems: An International Comparison,” OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 4/3 (Special Issue).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marchessault, Lindsey, 2014, Public Participation in the Budget Cycle: Lessons from Country Examples (Washington, DC: Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishan, Edward J., and Euston Quah, 2007, Cost-Benefit Analysis (New York: Routledge).

  • National Treasury, Republic of South Africa, 2014, “Technical Guidelines for the Preparation of Adjusted Estimates of National Expenditure,” August 2014.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries, 2014, “Diverse and Value-Creating Ownership,” Meld. St. 27 (2013–2014), Report to the Storting (white paper). https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld.-st.-27–2013-2014/id763968/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), 2015, Economic and Fiscal Outlook July 2015 (London: HMSO).

  • Olken, Benjamin, 2007, “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 115 (2), 20049.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1984, Tax Expenditures: A Review of the Issues and Country Practices, report by the Committee on Fiscal Affairs (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 1996, Tax Expenditures: Recent Experiences, prepared by the Working Party on Tax Policy Analysis and Tax Statistics of the Committee on Fiscal Affairs (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2002, OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency (Paris).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2004a, The Legal Framework for Budget Systems: An International Comparison, a special issue of the OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 4, No. 3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2004b, OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (Paris).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2010a, Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS) (Paris).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2010b, Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries (Paris).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2014a, “Draft Recommendation of the OECD Council on the Principles of Budgetary Governance,” (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2014b, “Recommendation of the Council on Principles for Independent Fiscal Institutions” (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015a, OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, 2015 Edition (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2015b, “OECD Review of the Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: Lithuania” (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2017, OECD Budget Transparency Toolkit: Practical Steps for Supporting Openness, Integrity and Accountability in Public Financial Management (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patanayak, S., 2016, “Expenditure Control: Key Features, Stages, and Actors,” Technical Notes and Manuals (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patanayak, S., and J. Cooper, 2011, “Chart of Accounts: A Critical Element of the Public Financial Management Framework,” Technical Notes and Manuals (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Patanayak, S., and I. Fainboim, 2011, “Treasury Single Account: An Essential Tool for Government Cash Management,” Technical Notes and Manuals (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PEFA Secretariat, 2016a, PEFA Handbook, Volume I: The PEFA Assessment Process—Planning, Managing and Using PEFA (Washington, DC: PEFA Secretariat).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PEFA Secretariat, 2016b, PEFA Handbook, Volume II: PEFA Assessment Field Guide (Washington, DC).

  • PEFA Secretariat, 2016c, PEFA Handbook, Supplementary Guidance for Subnational PEFA Assessments (Washington, DC).

  • PEFA Secretariat, 2016d, PEFA Handbook, Framework for Assessing Public Financial Management (Washington, DC).

  • Petrie, Murray, 2002, “Accounting and Financial Accountability to Capture Risk,” in Government at Risk: Contingent Liabilities and Fiscal Risk, ed. by Hana Polackova Brixi and Allen Schick (Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petrie, Murray, 2003, “Promoting Fiscal Transparency: The Complementary Roles of the IMF, Financial Markets, and Civil Society,” IMF Working Paper 03/199 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petrie, Murray, 2013, “Managing Fiscal Risk,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Petrie, Murray, and Jon Shields, 2010, “Producing a Citizens’ Guide to the Budget: Why, What and How?OECD Journal on Budgeting, Vol. 10/2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Potter, Barry, 2013, “User Charging,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robinson, Marc, ed., 2007, Performance Budgeting—Linking Funding and Results (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

  • Robinson, Marc, ed., 2013, “Performance Budgeting,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robinson, Marc, ed., and Duncan Last, 2009, “A Basic Model of Performance-Based Budgeting,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2009/01 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sarr, Babacar, 2014, “Are New PFM Reforms in the WAEMU and the CEMAC Working? Lessons from the Open Budget Survey,” IBP Research Note.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saxena, Sandeep, 2017, “How to Strengthen the Management of Government Guarantees,” IMF How-To Note No. 6 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saxena, Sandeep, and Sami Yläoutinen, 2016, “Managing Budgetary Virements,” IMF Technical Notes and Manuals No. 2016/04 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shand, David, 2013, “External Audit,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ter-Minassian, Teresa, ed., 1997, Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

  • Tommasi, Daniel, 2013, “The Coverage and Classification of the Budget,” in The International Handbook of Public Financial Management, ed. by Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • The Treasury, Government of New Zealand, 1995, Fiscal Responsibility Act 1994: An Explanation (Wellington).

  • The Treasury, Government of New Zealand, 2016, Budget Economic and Fiscal Update (BEFU) 2016 (Wellington).

  • Tyson, Justin, 2014, “Reforming Tax Expenditures in Italy: What, Why, and How?IMF Working Paper No. 14/07 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations (UN), 1996, “Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice: Action against Corruption,” Note by the Secretariat, September 26, A/C.3/51/L.2 (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations (UN), European Commission (EC), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and World Bank, 2009, System of National Accounts 2008 (SNA 2008) (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • UN Industrial Development Organization, 1995, “Guide to Practical Project Appraisal – Social Benefit-Cost Analysis in Developing Countries, (New York)

  • US Government, Congressional Budget Office, 2004, “Estimating the Value of Subsidies for Federal Loans and Loan Guarantees”, Congressional Budget Office (Washington, DC)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Villela, Luis, Andrea Lemgruber, and Michael Jorrat, 2010, “Tax Expenditure Budgets: Concepts and Challenges for Implementation,” IDB Working Paper Series 131 (Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Rachel F., Timothy Irwin, and Lewis K. Murara, 2015, “Trends in Fiscal Transparency: Evidence from a New Database of the Coverage of Fiscal Reporting,” IMF Working Paper No. 15/188 (Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wehner, Joachim, 2010, Legislatures and the Budget Process: The Myth of Fiscal Control (Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • World Bank, 2001, “Features and Functions of Supreme Audit Institutions,” PREM Notes, No. 59., 2016, World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends (Washington, DC).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Website References

Australia:

Budget Papers: http://www.budget.gov.au/

Treasury: http://www.treasury.gov.au/

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision:

https://www.bis.org/bcbs/index.htm?m=3%7C14

Canada:

Federal Tax Expenditures: https://www.fn.gc.ca/purl/taxexp-eng.asp

Customs Cooperation Council:

Declaration of the World Customs Organization: http://www.wcoomd.org

European System of Accounts (ESA2010):

http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/esa-2010

European Union:

Fiscal governance in the EU Member States: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finace/publications/european_economy/public_finaces2006_en.htm

Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI):

http://www.eitiransparency.org/

Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency (GIFT):

http://www.fiscaltransparency.net/

Hong Kong SAR:

Budget: http://www.budget.gov.hk/

Hungary:

Government: http://www.meh.hu/default.htm

IFAC:

http://www.ifac.org

IMF:

Data Quality Assessment Framework: http://dsbb.imf.org/pages/dqrs/dqaf.aspx

Dissemination Standards: http://dsbb.imf.org/Default.aspx

Fiscal Transparency http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/

GFS Manuals and Guides http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfs/manual/gfs.htm

Public Investment Management: http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/publicinvestment/

ROSCs: http://www.imf.org/external/NP/rosc/rosc.aspx

Standards and Codes: http://www.imf.org/external/standards/index.htm

International Budget Partnership:

http://www.internationalbudget.org/

INTOSAI:

http://www.intosai.org/

ISSAI Framework: http://www.issai.org/

International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB):

https://www.ipsasb.org/

New Zealand Treasury:

http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/

OECD:

Directorate for Public Governance: http://www.oecd.org/gov/

Budgetary governance: http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/principles-budgetary-governance.htm

Budget transparency: http://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/best-practices-budget-transparency.htm

Recommendations and Guidelines on Regulatory Policy: http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/recommendations-guidelines.htm

PEFA:

www.PEFA.org

South Africa:

South African Treasury: http://www.treasury.gov.za

Transparency International:

https://www.transparency.org/

United Kingdom:

HM Treasury: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-treasury

Office for Budget Responsibility: http://obr.uk/

United Nations:

Classification of the Functions of Government: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcst.asp?Cl=4

Commission on International Trade Law: Model Law on Public Procurement (2011): http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/procurement_infrastructure/2011Model.html

Statistical Division: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/default.htm

United Nations Governance and Institution Building: http://www.un.org/esa/progareas/governance.html

United States:

Budget of the United States: https://www.usa.gov/budget

Congressional Budget Office: http://www.cbo.gov/

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board: http://www.fasab.gov/

Taxpayer Advocate Service: https://www.irs.gov/taxpayer-advocate

World Bank:

Governance Global Practice: http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance

Public Finance: http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/public-finace

World Trade Organization:

Agreement on Government Procurement: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/gproc_e/gp_gpa_e.htm

Index

Note: Page numbers followed by “b” indicate boxes, “f” indicate figures, “t” indicate tables, and “n” indicate footnotes.

  • Accounting basis, 22f, 50b

  • Accounting policies, 21, 23

  • Accounts Chambers, Russia, 87b

  • Accrual accounting, 19, 21–23, 22f, 39, 40, 107n122

  • Accrued expenditures, 23. See also Expenditures

  • Accrued revenue, 23. See also Revenue(s)

  • Action areas for disaster risk management, 128

  • Administrative classification, 35, 35t, 36–38. See also Budget classifications

  • Aggregate projections of revenue, expenditure, and financing, 63

  • Alternative macroeconomic scenarios, 102–3

  • Annual budget estimates, 53

  • Annual Budget Law (LOA) of Brazil, 57b

  • Assets. See also Liabilities

    • fiscal reports coverage, 18–21

    • fiscal risk management, 115–18

    • legal framework for acquisition and disposal of, 118

    • nonfinancial, 20–21

    • valuation, 19, 21

  • Audit

    • external, 47–49

    • opinions on financial statements, 48t

  • Australia

    • aligning reporting standards, 52b

    • budget laws and fiscal risk disclosure, 98b

    • business investment in GDP, 61b

    • Final Budget Outcome, 52b

    • intergenerational report, 110b

    • tax expenditures, 27n49

  • Austria, statement of financial position, 20b

  • Balance sheets. See also Assets; Liabilities

    • extending scope of analysis of, 117–18

    • fiscal report coverage of, 17–19

    • management of, 118

    • steps establishing full, 19

    • trends in, 18b

  • Bank of Finland, 126b

  • Bank of International Settlements (BIS), 39n62

  • Bank statements, 19

  • Best Practices for Budget Transparency (OECD), 2, 4n15, 34t, 54t, 68t, 84t, 100t

  • Binding framework, 62b. See also Medium-term budget framework (MTBF)

  • Borrowing, 19

  • Brazil

    • Annual Budget Law (LOA), 57b

    • budget documentation, 57b

    • budget execution reports, 30b

    • budget laws and fiscal risk disclosure, 98b

    • Length-of-Service Guarantee Fund, 57b

    • macroeconomic forecasts, 60b

    • sensitivity analysis in fiscal risks statement, 102b

  • Budget annexes/supplementary statements, 53

  • Budgetary central government, 13b

  • Budgetary contingencies, 113–15

  • Budget/budgeting. See also Fiscal forecasts/ forecasting and budgeting

    • components to be included, 53

    • comprehensiveness, 54–67

    • difference between fiscal forecasts, fiscal reports, and, 50–52, 50b

    • orderliness, 67–73

    • policy orientation, 73–84

    • timeliness of, 72–73

  • Budget classifications, 34–38

    • administrative, 35, 35t, 36–38

    • economic, 35, 35t, 36–38

    • functional, 35, 35t, 37–38

    • program, 35, 35t, 38

  • Budget execution reports, 9

  • Budget provisions, 111b

  • Budget system law, 69b

  • Budget unity, 55–58

  • Business investment, 61b

  • Canada

    • legislature power to amend budget, 70b

    • statistical integrity, 47b

  • Cash flows

    • from financing activities, 23

    • from investing activities, 23

    • from operating activities, 23

  • Cash flow statement, 23

  • Cash holdings, 19

  • Central Africa Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC), 17b, 64b, 71b

    • Directive on Transparency and Good Governance, 98b

  • Central/national government entities, 13b, 16

  • Charter of Budget Honesty Act (1998) of Australia, 98b

  • Chile

    • PPP management, 123b

    • public investment projects, 67b

    • structural balance rule, 77b

  • Citizen’s guide to budget, 82, 82b

  • Classification of fiscal information, 34–38. See also Budget classifications

  • Code of Good Practices on Transparency in Monetary and Financial Policies (IMF), 112t

  • Colombia

    • budget execution reports, 30b

    • fiscal policy objectives, 77b

    • monitoring regime for subnational governments, 133b

    • natural disasters risk management, 129b

  • Comparability of fiscal data, 50–52

  • Congressional Budget Office (CBO) of US, 88b

  • Contingencies. See Budgetary contingencies

  • Contingent claims analysis (CCA), 126b

  • Controller and Auditor-General (CAG) of New Zealand, 50b

  • Core Principles for Effective Deposit Insurance Systems, 112t

  • Costa Rica

    • budget execution reports, 30b

    • medium-term budget framework (MTBF), 63b

  • Cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 65, 66b, 67

  • Côte d’Ivoire, fiscal risks disclosure, 106b

  • Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR), 54t

  • Coverage of fiscal reports, 10–27

    • examples of difference in, 11f

    • flows, 21–24

    • institutions, 12–17

    • principles, 10

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 10–11t, 28t

    • stocks, 17–21

    • tax expenditures, 24–27

  • Credibility of fiscal forecasts and budgets, 84–93

    • forecast reconciliation, 91–93

    • independent evaluation, 85–88

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 84–85t

    • supplementary budget, 88–91

  • Cyprus, budget laws and fiscal risk disclosure, 99b

  • Data Dissemination Standards (IMF), 28t, 44–46, 44t

  • Data Quality Assessment Framework (DQAF), 34t, 44t, 46

  • Deadlines for fiscal report publication, 28

  • Debt, 18b, 19. See also Liabilities

    • data collection, 19

    • disclosure and analysis, 116–17

  • Debt sustainability analyses (DSA), 117b

  • Demographics

    • fiscal implications of change in, 108b

    • long-term projections, 107

  • Deposits, 19

  • Direct controls, ceilings, or caps, 111b. See also Fiscal risk management

  • Disaster and Emergency Management Administration Presidency (AFAD), Turkey, 129b

  • Disaster risk management, action areas for, 128

  • Draft budget legislation, 53

  • East African Community (EAC), 17b

  • Economic and Monetary Union for Central Africa (CEMAC), 64b

  • Economic classification, 35, 35t, 36–38. See also Budget classifications

  • Economic efficiency, 78b. See also

  • Performance information, on budget

  • Economic growth, long-term projections, 107

  • Economy, 78b. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Effectiveness, 78b. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Efficiency, 78b. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Environmental consideration, long-term projections, 107

  • Environmental risks, 128–29

  • European Statistics Code of Practice, 34t

  • European System of Accounts (ESA), 42

  • European System of Accounts 2010 Transmission Program, 16b

  • European Union (EU)

    • absolute error ex post real GDP forecast accuracy, 59f

    • general government consolidation, 16–17b

    • optimistic bias in forecast accuracy, 60f

    • stock of government guarantees in, 119f

  • Eurostat, 16b

  • Excessive Deficit Procedure (Maastricht Treaty), 16b

  • Expenditures. See also Revenue(s)

    • budget documentation, 55–58

    • forecast reconciliation, 91–93

    • medium-term projections of, 62–64

  • Explicit risks, 104

    • disclosure of, 105

  • External audit, 47–49

  • Extrabudgetary central government, 14b

  • Extrabudgetary funds (EBF), 15b

    • Brazil, 16b

    • budget documents incorporating, 56–57

    • Turkey, 16b

  • Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), 113t, 126, 127

  • Financial crisis of 2008, 2

  • Financial management information system (FMIS), 30

  • Financial Sector Assessment Programs (FSAP), 124

  • Financial sector exposure, 124–26

  • Financial system, 100b

  • Financing, budget documentation of, 55–58

    • forecast reconciliation, 91–93

    • medium-term projections of, 62–64

  • Financing activities, cash flows from, 23

  • Finland

    • financial stability reports, 126b

    • presentation of forecast reconciliations, 93b

    • reconciliation of fiscal data, 40–41b

  • Fiscal coordination, 130–37

    • public corporations, 134–37

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 130t

    • subnational governments, 131–33

  • Fiscal councils, 85–86

  • Fiscal data, comparability of, 50–52

  • Fiscal forecasts/forecasting and budgeting, 53–93. See also Budget/budgeting

    • comprehensiveness, 54–67

    • concept, 54

    • credibility of, 84–93

    • difference between budgets, fiscal reports, and, 50–52, 50b

    • dimensions, 53–54

    • macroeconomic forecasts, 58–61

    • orderliness, 67–73

    • policy orientation, 73–84

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 54–55t

  • Fiscal legislation, 68–71

    • budget system law, 69b

    • Iceland, 71b

    • powers of legislature to modify budget, 69, 70b

    • timing of budget submission, adoption, and publication, 69

  • Fiscal policy objectives, 74–77

  • Fiscal reports/reporting, 9–52

    • categories, 9

    • coverage, 10–27

    • defined, 9

    • difference between fiscal forecasts, budgets, and, 50–52, 50b

    • dimensions, 9

    • as foundation of good fiscal management, 9

    • frequency and timeliness, 27–33

    • integrity, 43–52

    • quality, 33–43

  • Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Systems Law of Cyprus, 99b

  • Fiscal Responsibility and Transparency Law (FRTL), 77b

  • Fiscal Responsibility Law (2000) of Brazil, 98b

  • Fiscal risk(s)

    • concept, 95

    • costs of realizations, 96f

    • country’s vulnerability to, 95

    • disclosure and analysis, 96–97 (See also Fiscal risk disclosure and analysis)

    • government’s ability to respond, 96

    • macroeconomic, 95, 101–3 (See also Macroeconomic risks)

    • specific, 95, 104–7. See also Specific fiscal risk

  • Fiscal risk disclosure and analysis, 96–97

    • institutional arrangements, 98

    • long-term sustainability analysis, 107–10

    • macroeconomic risks, 101–3

    • outline of a comprehensive statement of, 99–100b

    • specific fiscal risk, 104–7

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 100–101t

    • summary reporting, 98–99

  • Fiscal risk management, 97, 110–29

    • asset and liability management, 115–18

    • budgetary contingencies, 113–15

    • environmental risks, 128–29

    • financial sector exposure, 124–26

    • guarantees, 118–21

    • institutional arrangements, 98

    • instruments for, 111b

    • natural resources, 126–28

    • principles, 110

    • public-private partnerships (PPP), 121–24

    • stages, 97b

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 112b

  • Fiscal rules, 75, 75b

  • Fiscal statistics, 9

    • government agency and, 46

    • integrity of, 44–47

    • professionally independent body and, 46, 47b

    • professional practices of agency producing, 45b

  • Fiscal transparency

    • defined, 1

    • for effective fiscal management, 1

  • Fiscal Transparency Code (IMF), 1–4, 2b

    • pillars, 3–4

    • revised, architecture of, 3f

  • Fiscal Transparency Evaluations (FTE), 5–6, 6f

  • Fixed framework, 62b. See also Medium-term budget framework (MTBF)

  • Flows, coverage of, 21–24. See also Cash flows

  • Forecast reconciliation, 91–93

  • France

    • legislature power to amend budget, 70b

    • program classification, 38b

    • tax expenditures, 27n49

  • Frequency of fiscal reports, 27–33

    • in-year reports, 28–30

  • Functional classification, 35, 35t, 37–38. See also Budget classifications

  • G20 countries, timeliness of budget, 72, 73b

  • General government sector, 14b

    • consolidated data for, 16–17

  • Georgia

    • assessments of the governments’

    • macroeconomic and fiscal forecasts, 87b

    • debt sustainability analyses (DSA), 117b

    • Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO), 87b

  • Germany, legislature power to amend budget, 70b

  • Global Initiative for Fiscal Transparency (GIFT), 81n102

    • principles of public participation, 81b

  • Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFSM), 4n15, 5b, 10t, 13, 15n29, 34, 35, 101t, 112t, 130t

  • Government financial statements, 9

  • Greece, budget execution reports, 30b

  • Gross basis, 55, 55n74

  • Gross revenues, budget documentation of, 55–58

  • Guarantees, 100b

    • annual publication of, 119–20

    • as common source of fiscal risk, 118

    • fiscal risk management, 118–21

    • one-off, 119

    • standardized, 119

  • Guatemala, public sector institutions coverage in fiscal reports, 12f

  • Guidelines for Fiscal Risk Disclosure and Management (IMF), 130t

  • Guidelines for Public Debt Management, 112t

  • Guidelines on the Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, revised 2015 (OECD), 130t

  • Guide on Coverage and Sectorization of the Public Sector (IMF), 11t

  • Iceland

    • fiscal legislation for budget process, 71b

    • monitoring regime for subnational governments, 133b

    • subnational government, 133b

  • Implicit risks, 104–5

  • Incentives, 111b

  • Independent evaluation of fiscal forecasts and budgets, 85–88

    • compared with alternative forecasts, 86–87

    • fiscal councils, 85–86

    • independent entity, 87–88

    • institutional measures, 86

  • India

    • legislature power to amend budget, 70b

    • tax expenditures, 26b

  • Indicative framework, 62b. See also Medium-term budget framework (MTBF)

  • Input, 78b, 79. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Integrity of fiscal reports, 43–52

    • comparability of fiscal data, 50–52

    • external audit, 47–49

    • principles, 43

    • statistical integrity, 44–47 (See also Fiscal statistics)

  • International Budget Partnership, Open Budget Survey, 2–3, 28t, 55t, 68t, 74t, 85t

  • International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), 17

  • International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS), 4n15, 10–11t, 50, 100t, 112t, 121, 130t

    • characteristics for financial reporting, 33b

  • International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI), 4n15, 44t

  • Investing activities, cash flows from, 23

  • Investment projects, 64–67

    • Chile and Korea, 67b

    • cost-benefit analysis (CBA), 65, 66b, 67

  • In-year reports, frequency of, 28–30

  • Ireland, budget execution reports, 30b

  • Italy, legislature power to amend budget, 70b

  • Kenya

    • administrative and economic classifications, 37b

    • material variation to approved budget, 90b

  • Korea

    • open discussion of budget issues, 83b

    • public investment projects, 67b

  • Legal claims, 100b

  • The Legal Framework for Budget Systems: An International Comparison (Lienert and others), 67t

  • Legislation. See Fiscal legislation

  • Lending programs, 99b

  • Length-of-Service Guarantee Fund, Brazil, 57b

  • Liabilities. See also Assets; Debt

    • contractual, 21

    • defined, 18b

    • fiscal reports coverage, 18–21

    • fiscal risk management, 115–18

    • public debt, 18b

  • Lithuania, annual report of public corporations, 137b

  • Loans, 18b

  • Local Government Act, Iceland, 71b

  • Long-term sustainability analysis, 107–10

  • Macroeconomic forecasts, 58–61

  • Macroeconomic risks, 99b

    • defined, 95

    • fiscal risk analysis, 101–3

    • probabilistic fiscal forecasts, 103

    • scenario analysis, 102, 102b

  • Macroeconomic statistics, 42

  • Malawi, presentation of output information, 80b

  • Manual on Sources and Methods for the Compilation of COFOG Statistics (EUROSTAT), 34t

  • Marketable debt instruments, 18b

  • Medium-term budget framework (MTBF), 53, 62–64

    • Cameroon, 64b

    • Costa Rica, 63b

    • terms and concepts, 62b

  • Medium-term debt management strategy (MTDS), 116b

  • Medium-term fiscal framework (MTFF), 53, 62b

  • Medium-Term Macroeconomic Program, Norway, 127b

  • Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS, MAPS2), 55t

  • The Mexico Declaration on SAI Independence, 44t, 47

  • Mining investment, 61b

  • Ministries of finance, 105

  • National Audit Act (2008) of Uganda, 49b

  • National Budget, Norway, 127b

  • National Disaster Fund, Colombia, 129b

  • National Disaster Management Strategy, Turkey, 129b

  • National Plan for Disaster Prevention and Assistance, Colombia, 129b

  • National Planning Authority, Uganda, 84b

  • Natural disasters, 100b, 128–29

  • Natural resources, 126–28

    • EITI, 113t, 126, 127

    • long-term projections, 107

  • New Zealand

    • aligning reporting standards, 52b

    • budget laws and fiscal risk disclosure, 99b

    • Controller and Auditor-General (CAG), 50b

    • investment statement, 118b

    • macro-fiscal scenario analysis, 102b

    • Public Finance Act of, 118b

  • nonfinancial assets, 20–21

    • valuation of, 19, 21

  • Nonmarketable debt instrument, 18b

  • Nontax revenue, 23, 23n42

    • budget documentation, 56

  • Norway

    • reporting on natural resources, 127b

    • state ownership strategy, 136b

  • Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) of UK, 88b

  • Office of the Auditor General (OAG), 49b

  • One-off guarantees, 119

  • Operating activities, cash flows from, 23

  • Orderliness of budget process, 67–73

    • fiscal legislation, 68–71

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 67t

    • timeliness, 72–73

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)

    • benchmark tax system by, 25b

    • Best Practices for Budget Transparency, 2, 4n15, 34t, 54t, 68t, 84t, 100t

    • Guidelines on the Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises, revised 2015, 130t

    • Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems, 55t

  • Other accounts payable, 18b

  • Outcome, 78b, 80. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Output, 78b, 80. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) of Georgia, 87b

  • Performance indicators, 79

  • Performance information, on budget, 77–80

    • input, 78b, 79

    • key terms related to, 78b

    • outcome, 78b, 80

    • output, 78b, 80

    • program classification, 78b

  • Performance reporting, 79

  • Peru

    • consolidated financial statements, 32b

    • fiscal policy objectives, 77b

    • FRTL, 77b

    • performance information and budget process, 80b

    • tax expenditures, 26b

  • Petroleum Resources on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, 127b

  • Philippines

    • coverage of flows, 23b

    • debt sustainability analysis, 109b

    • fiscal risk statement, 102–3b, 106b

  • Planning ministry, 65n88

  • Policy objectives. See Fiscal policy objectives

  • Policy orientation, of fiscal forecasts and budgets, 73–84

    • fiscal policy objectives, 74–77

    • performance information, 77–80

    • public participation, 81–83

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 74b

  • Portugal

    • budget documentation coverage, 58b

    • budget execution reports, 30b

    • historical revisions to fiscal data, 43b

    • tax expenditure and, 27b

  • Principles of Budgetary Governance (OECD), 11t, 28t, 100t

  • Productivity, 78b. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Program classification, 35, 35t, 38. See also Budget classifications

    • key characteristics of, 78b

  • Publication of fiscal reports, 27–33

    • deadlines, 28

    • in-year reports, 28–30

    • year-end reports, 31–33

  • Public corporations, 14b, 100b, 134–37

    • commercial accounting standards, 17

    • compliance with IFRS, 17

    • liabilities of financial and nonfinancial, 134b

  • Public debt, 18b, 99b. See also Debt; Liabilities

    • incurrence and management of, 116

    • long-term projections, 107, 108, 109b

    • vulnerabilities, 117

  • Public Debt, Guarantees, and Grants, 123b

  • Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA), 5b, 28t, 34t, 44t, 54t, 68t, 74t, 84t, 130t

  • Public Finance Act 1989 (Section 26G), of New Zealand, 99b

  • Public Finance Act of 2015 (PFA), Iceland, 71b

  • Public Financial Management Act of Sierra Leone, 99b

  • Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA), 5b, 54t

  • Public investment plan (PIP), 65n88

  • Public participation, in budget process, 81–83

    • citizen’s guide to budget, 82, 82b

    • fiscal management process, 81

    • GIFT’s principles of, 81b

  • Public-private partnerships (PPP), 100b, 121–24

    • complementary ways of ensuring transparency, 121

    • debt-like and/or guaranteed obligations, 121

    • PFRAM, 5b, 112t, 122b

    • publication of rights, obligations, and other exposures under, 122–24

  • Public-Private Partnerships Fiscal Risks Assessment Model (PFRAM), 5b, 112t, 122b

  • Public Sector Debt Statistics: Guide for Compilers and Users (PSDSG), 11t

  • Public Sector Debt Statistics: Guide for Users and Compilers (IMF), 112t

  • Public sector entities, coverage of, 12

    • compliance with IFRS, 17

    • consolidation of stocks and flows within, 15, 15b

    • subsectors, 12, 13–14b

  • Quality of fiscal reports, 33–43

    • classification, 34–38 (See also Budget classifications)

    • historical revisions, 41–42, 43b

    • internal consistency, 38–40

    • standards, norms, and guidance material, 34t

  • Quasi-fiscal activity (QFA), 137

  • Reconciliation

    • concept, 38n59

    • Finland, 40–41b

    • fiscal data, 38–40

    • forecast, 91–93

    • key measures, 38–39

    • stock-flow adjustments, 39, 40

  • Regulations, incentives, and other indirect measures, 111b. See also Fiscal risk management

  • Resource Accounts, Norway, 127b

  • Revenue(s). See also Expenditures

    • budget documentation of, 55–58

    • forecast reconciliation, 91–93

    • medium-term projections of, 62–64

  • Revenue loss from tax expenditures, 24–27. See Tax expenditures

  • Risks. See Fiscal risk(s)

  • Risk transfer, sharing, or insurance mechanisms, 111b

  • Role of Handbook, 6–7

  • Rolling framework, 62b. See also Medium-term budget framework (MTBF)

  • Romania, identification of changes in aggregate-level forecasts, 92b

  • Russia

    • Accounts Chambers, 87b

    • budget execution reports, 30b

    • scrutiny of macroeconomic and fiscal projections, 87b

  • Scenario analysis, 102, 102b

  • Sector working groups, Uganda, 84b

  • Securities, 18b

  • Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (UN), 113t, 128

  • Sensitivity analysis

    • Brazil’s statement of fiscal risks, 102b

    • budget documentation, 102–3

    • government’s debt holdings, 117

    • long-term sustainability analysis, 109

    • Philippines’ fiscal risk statement, 102–3b

  • Sierra Leone, budget laws and fiscal risk disclosure, 99b

  • Social security funds, 12, 14b

    • budget documentation, 57–58

    • GFSM 2014, 15n29

    • long-term sustainability analysis, 109–10

  • South Africa

    • contingency reserve access criteria, 114b

    • medium-term expenditure projections, 64b

    • public disclosure of fiscal information, 83b

  • South Africa National Treasury, 83b

  • Special drawing right, 18b

  • Special purpose funds, 15b. See also Extrabudgetary funds (EBF)

  • Specific fiscal risk, 95, 97

    • explicit and implicit risks, 104–5

    • monitoring and managing, 111, 111b

    • Sources and magnitude, 104, 104b

    • summary reporting of, 104–7

  • Staff Guidance Note for Public Debt

  • Sustainability Analysis in Market Access Countries (IMF), 101t

  • Standardized guarantees, 119

  • Standing Orders of the Althingi (Parliament), Iceland, 71b

  • State Ownership Policy, Norway, 136b

  • Statistical integrity, 44–47. See also Fiscal statistics

  • Statistics. See Fiscal statistics

  • Statistics Canada, 47b

  • Stock-flow adjustments, 39, 40

    • Finland, 40–41b

    • Stocks, coverage of, 17–21

  • Subnational government, 10

    • Colombia, 133b

    • consolidated data for, 16

    • fiscal risks, 100b, 104, 105, 131–33

    • Iceland, 133b

    • information on, 131–33

    • Peru’s compliance with fiscal rules, 77b

    • public sector, 12, 14b

  • Supplementary budget, 51b, 88–91

    • effective control by the legislature, 89–90

    • modifications to appropriations, 88

    • new emergency policy priorities, 89

    • prior to material changes, 90–91

    • regularizing expenditure exceeding approved budget, 90

    • timing of approval of, 88, 89f

    • unexpected macroeconomic developments, 89

  • Supreme audit institution (SAI), 7, 43, 47–49, 81

  • System of National Accounts (SNA), 42

  • Tanzania, fiscal risks disclosure, 106b

  • Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool (TADAT), 5b

  • Tax arrears, 135

  • Tax expenditures

    • annual publication, 26

    • Australia, 27n49

    • control on, 26–27

    • estimation methods, 25

    • expiration dates, 27n50

    • France, 27n49

    • grouped by sector/policy area, 26

    • India, 26b

    • Peru, 26b

    • Portugal, 27b

    • revenue loss from, 24–27, 25f

  • Tax Expenditures in OECD Countries, 11t

  • Tax revenue, 23, 56

  • Technical efficiency, 78b. See also Performance information, on budget

  • Technical Notes and Manuals, 11t, 34b

  • Timeliness

    • of budget documents, 72–73

    • of fiscal reports, 27–33

  • Treasury Single Account (TSA), 19

  • Tunisia

    • budget classifications, 37b

    • legislative authorization to changes in expenditures, 91b

  • Turkey

    • expenditure rules/fiscal targets, 76b

    • extrabudgetary funds (EBF), 16b

    • legislature power to amend budget, 70b

    • natural disasters risk management, 129b

  • Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool (TCIP), 129b

  • Uganda

    • Constitution (1995), 84b

    • contingent liabilities related to PPP, 123b

    • external audit, 49b

    • National Audit Act (2008), 49b

    • Office of the Auditor General (OAG), 49b

    • sector working groups, 84b

  • United Kingdom (UK)

    • budget execution reports, 30b

    • fan charts of macro-fiscal aggregates, 103b

    • Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR), 88b

    • Whole of Government Accounts System of, 17b

  • United States (US)

    • Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 88b

    • disclosure on guarantees, 120–21b

  • User charges, 23b, 56n75

  • West Africa Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU), 17b, 71b

  • Whole of Government Accounts System of United Kingdom, 17b

  • World Bank Catastrophe Drawdown Option, 129b

  • Year-end reports, timeliness of, 31–33

List of Figures

List of Boxes

1

Ideally, the information should be published online for ease of public access. This ensures that budget documents are not available at the discretion of governments to only a privileged few that have access to ministries of finance/government agencies. Some countries also have freedom of information legislation that requires government agencies to make available to the public on request any information they hold, subject to certain clearly specified exceptions (which generally include national security, obligations of confidentiality to a third party, law enforcement, and personal privacy). Such legislation can create a presumption in favor of public release and place the onus on government to demonstrate an overriding public interest in case of nondisclosure.

4

The Fiscal Transparency Code complements other standards and helps to anchor the work of other organizations in the fiscal area. It reflects the IMF’s focus on macro-critical issues. To minimize overlap and ensure that various standards are fully aligned, IMF staff has worked closely with relevant stakeholders.

10

Each dimension focuses on a key attribute of the respective pillar, whereas a principle typically highlights a specific output or observable characteristic under the respective dimension.

11

Pillar IV has undergone two rounds of public consultations, has been tested in several countries, and will be finalized at end-2018.

12

Achieving the advanced practice would require enhanced institutional capacity and resources and therefore should receive priority only after a country has successfully implemented the good practice under the respective principle of the Code.

13

The IMF’s Government Finance Statistics Manual (GFSM) in fiscal statistics; International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) in government accounting; International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAI) in external audit; and OECD Best Practices for Budget Transparency in the budget area.

14

For published FTE reports, see http://www.imf.org/external/np/fad/trans/.

15

For further information, see “The 2017 Joint Review of the Standards and Codes Initiative—Policy Area Background Paper.”

16

Each pillar contains three to four dimensions, and each dimension, two to four principles.

17

In addition to national/central governments, most elements of the Code can be applied to subnational governments, and their compliance with recommended fiscal transparency practices should be encouraged.

18

Regional bodies play an increasingly important role in harmonizing fiscal reporting practices and enforcing transparency standards among their member states. These regional harmonization efforts are typically most extensive in monetary unions where timely reliable, and comparable fiscal data from member states are needed to monitor and enforce regional fiscal convergence criteria. Examples of regional bodies include the European Union, the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU), the Eastern Caribbean Currency Union (ECCU), the Central African Economic and Monetary Community (CEMAC), and the East African Community (EAC).

19

Once Pillar IV is finalized, it will be integrated into the Handbook by providing detailed guidance on specific principles and practices applicable to resource-rich countries, which are not already covered by the other three pillars.

20

Standards such as the special data dissemination standard (SDDS) set the government obligations regarding data compilation and dissemination.

21

For example, fiscal targets focusing on general government deficit and debt may stir governments to shift debt-creating fiscal activity into public corporations, as it was apparent in the 2008 sovereign debt crisis in Europe.

22

The national statistics agency and/or ministry of finance should maintain a list of all public sector entities, classified according to their economic nature.

23

Two key criteria for classifying an entity as part of general government and/or public sector are the control test (i.e., whether an entity is controlled by the government and is therefore part of the public sector) and the market test (i.e., whether that entity is part of the general government sector or is a public corporation). The classification of entities in the public sector should be subject to regular review to reflect any change in the entities’ status resulting from commercialization, privatization, or acquisition by the government.

24

Consistent with the 2008 SNA, the GFSM 2014 allows for social security funds to be accommodated in two alternative subsectors of general government. Either these entities can be combined as a separate subsector (this is often the case for countries that compile fiscal statistics in the context of national accounts) or they can be classified according to the level of government that organizes and manages them and, therefore, be combined with the other entities at the same level. This manual adopts the later approach as it helps provide the full picture at each level of government.

25

Turkey meets “good practice” under this principle as it produces consolidated general government fiscal data (see IMF, 2017d). The Box 2.5 under “basic practice” discusses, however, how Turkey has rationalized its EBFs over the years.

26

This requires the identification and elimination of all intra- and intersectoral flows and stocks. These transactions include grants, interest, dividends, taxes, and any purchases/sales of goods and services by one entity from another, as well as changes in stock positions (including loans and other accounts receivable/payable, and the acquisition or disposal of assets from one entity to another).

27

This requires the identification and elimination of all intra- and intersectoral flows/transactions. These transactions include grants, subsidies, interest, dividends, taxes, and any purchases/sales of goods and services by one entity from another, as well as changes in stock positions (including loans and other accounts receivable/payable, the acquisition or disposal of assets from one entity to another, and purchases of equity or other investment by a government entity in a public corporation).

28

International Financial Reporting Standards are prepared by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). See http://www.ifrs.org.

29

Valuing assets and liabilities is not straightforward. Various methods exist for valuation as discussed in Chapter 3 of the GFSM 2014 or IPSAS 29.

31

Net financial worth is defined as the total value of the financial assets minus the total value of liabilities. This balancing item is often cited because of the general government and public sector’s influence on a country’s financial system and also because of the difficulties in valuing government-specific nonfinancial assets with unique characteristics.

32

While these liabilities are actual liabilities, the fact that their measurement rests on various assumptions and methods often creates difficulties in estimating their outstanding value. This is the reason why they are considered an element of the advanced level of practice.

33

For more information on valuation methods for nonfinancial assets, including a detailed description of the three methods mentioned in this paragraph, see Bova and others (2013).

34

For this purpose, an “economic event” is an event that results in the creation, transfer, or destruction of economic value. Economic events can include the delivery of a taxable service by a private company (for which the government accrues tax revenue), performance of a public service by a government employee (for which the government accrues a salary and perhaps a pension expense), or the loss or theft of a government asset such as a vehicle or equipment (for which a reduction in the asset stock will be recognized).

35

These other economic events are real and can be connected to previous or subsequent cash impacts, for example, depreciation usually represents the allocation of the cost of an asset over its useful life, and revaluation or impairment may reflect a changed view of the (cash) amount that can be recovered from the asset when sold.

36

Nontax revenues comprise revenue from the sale of goods and services, and other items (rent, interest, dividends, etc.). Where fiscal reports cover the whole public sector, the nontax revenue received by public corporations—such as petroleum companies, railways, and postal services—is likely to be significant. Sales of public assets may also generate significant financial inflows but have no impact on a country’s net worth and are therefore excluded from revenue, as defined in the IPSAS and GFSM 2014.

38

See, for example, Australia’s Charter of Budget Honesty Act, 1998, and the U.S. Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act, 1974.

39

International comparability of tax expenditure estimates is significantly limited by the different approaches undertaken by different countries when preparing tax expenditure reports.

40

From an economic management point of view, a comparison of tax expenditures with peers also facilitates an analysis of its appropriateness.

<