Abstract

GEM is part of a burgeoning new open economy macroeconomics literature that is rapidly transforming work in international macroeconomics and finance. The strong microeconomic foundations of the new models provide an integrated way of combining aggregate supply, aggregate demand, nominal rigidities, trade, and asset markets in a single unified theoretical framework. Using such models, policies can be evaluated more satisfactorily by analyzing changes in consumer welfare. In addition, because of the inclusion of a range of economic distortions, aggregate demand policies can have permanent effects on consumption, labor participation, and investment.

GEM is part of a burgeoning new open economy macroeconomics literature that is rapidly transforming work in international macroeconomics and finance. The strong microeconomic foundations of the new models provide an integrated way of combining aggregate supply, aggregate demand, nominal rigidities, trade, and asset markets in a single unified theoretical framework. Using such models, policies can be evaluated more satisfactorily by analyzing changes in consumer welfare. In addition, because of the inclusion of a range of economic distortions, aggregate demand policies can have permanent effects on consumption, labor participation, and investment.

This approach is providing new insights on well-established policy issues such as the desirability of alternative monetary policy rules. Even more interesting, simulations have examined questions such as the impact of increasing competition in product and labor markets that could previously only be analyzed in conjunction with costly and time-consuming microeconomic studies. These new insights explain why a number of policy institutions are developing models based on strong microeconomic foundations. GEM is in the vanguard of multicountry policy models being built using explicit microeconomic foundations, just as MULTIMOD was one of the first such policy models to be built using rational expectations.

GEM is already generating useful simulations across a range of issues, but remains a project under development. In particular, the extensions discussed in Section IV of this paper will provide further depth with regard to the modeling of fiscal policy and international asset markets, including financial frictions that have such an effect on emerging market countries. In addition, priority will be given to building a three-country model comprising one large industrial country plus some combination of additional industrial countries and/or emerging market countries within GEM’s flexible structure. Such a model would allow a wide range of issues to be examined in a unified underlying framework. At the same time, MULTIMOD will remain a useful tool for some policy work, although its use will presumably decline over time.

GEM will continue to have a highly flexible structure, in which the model will be adapted to the nature of the issue at hand. This flexibility is important to help provide insights as to the underlying theoretical connections and avoid the model becoming too much of a “black box.” Indeed, one of the strengths of a model with strong microeconomic foundations is that it helps clarify the policy debate by ensuring that the mechanisms at work are well articulated. In addition, such flexibility also makes it easier to add new features to the model, ensuring that the project remains relevant, up-to-date, and continues to garner considerable interest from the rest of the world. As an example, it would be useful to follow recent advances in academia and move away from the assumption that goods are either always traded or not to a structure in which the choice of whether to export a product depends on transportation costs and other characteristics of the good. In particular, such an extension would allow the examination of macroeconomic issues associated with trade reforms. More generally, GEM refinements will continue to be driven by developments in the broader literature and issues confronting the IMF.

A concerted effort is being made to make the model accessible to those inside and outside of the Fund. GEM is a large and complex model, and inevitably it will require an effort for people to learn how to use it. Significant resources have been put into simplifying the software used to generate GEM simulations. The modeling group has already provided training to a group of IMF economists, including several in area departments, which will help integrate the model with bilateral surveillance activities. Encouragingly, a number of the economists being hired at the IMF have used new open economy models in their doctoral work, and hence have a relatively strong background in model use. Outside of the Fund, once the GEM’s structure has stabilized and its properties been more fully investigated, the code and programs to run it will be provided free to those who wish to use the model. This approach was used successfully with MULTI-MOD, in that a range of outside groups used the model for analysis.

Given that GEM remains a project under development, it is difficult to look too far into the future. Two things, however, can be said about the future with some certainty. First, the new open economy macroeconomics literature will continue to expand rapidly. Second, GEM provides a vehicle for absorbing relevant insights from this literature into the Fund, as well as encouraging mutually beneficial interactions between the academic and policy communities.

Cited By

A New International Macroeconomic Model
  • Altig, D., L. Christiano, M. Eichenbaum, and J. Linde, 2003, “Technology Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations” (unpublished).

  • Balassa, Bela 1964, “The Purchasing-Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 72, pp. 58496.

  • Bayoumi, Tamim, Douglas Laxton, and Paolo Pesenti, 2004, “Benefits and Spillovers of Greater Competition in Europe: A Macroeconomic Assessment,ECB Working Paper No. 341 (Frankfurt: European Central Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bernanke, Ben, Mark Gertler, and Simon Gilchrist, 1999, “The Financial Accelerator in a Quantitative Business Cycle,in Handbook of Macroeconomics, ed. by John B. Taylor and Michael Woodford (Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford: Elsevier Science, North-Holland).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin Eichenbaum, and Charles Evans, 2001, “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy,NBER Working Paper No. 8403 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corsetti, Giancarlo, and Luca Dedola, 2002, “Macroeconomics of International Price Discrimination,Temi de Discussione, No. 461 (Rome: Bank of Italy).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, 1976, “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 84, No. 6, pp. 116176.

  • Erceg, C., L. Guerrieri, and C. Gust, 2003, “SIGMA: A New Open Economy Model for Policy Analysis,draft paper prepared for the Annual Central Bank Modelers’ Workshop in Amsterdam.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fleming, J. Marcus, 1962, “Domestic Financial Policies Under Fixed and Under Floating Exchange Rates,Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 9 (November), pp. 36979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galí, J., M. Gertler, and J. D. López-Salido, 2002, “Markups, Gaps, and the Welfare Costs of Business Fluctuations,NBER Working Paper No. 8850 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, Robert E. 1978, “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 86, No. 6, pp. 97187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hart, Oliver, and John Moore, 1994, “A Theory of Debt Based on the Inalienability of Human Capital,Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109, No. 4, pp. 84179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunt, Benjamin L., and Alessandro Rebucci, 2003, “The U.S. Dollar and the Trade Deficit: What Accounts for the Late 1990s?IMF Working Paper No. 03/194 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2000, “The Impact of Higher Oil Prices on the Global Economy;available via the Internet at http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/oil/2000/oilrep.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2001, “Business Cycle Linkages Among Major Advanced Economies,World Economic Outlook, October 2001, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2003a, “How Concerned Should Developing Countries Be About G-3 Exchange Rate Volatility?World Economic Outlook, September 2003, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2003b, “United States: Selected Issues,IMF Country Report No. 03/245 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kollman, Robert, 2002, “Monetary Policy Rules in the Open Economy: Effects on Welfare and Business Cycles,CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3279 (London: Centre for Economic Policy Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kydland, Finn E., and Edward C. Prescott, 1982, “Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations,Econometrica, Vol. 50 (November), pp. 134570.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lane, Philip R., 2001, “The New Open Economy Macroeconomics: A Survey,Journal of International Economics, Vol. 54 (August), pp. 23566.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laxton, Douglas, and Paolo Pesenti, 2003, “Monetary Rules for Small, Open, Emerging Economies,Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 110946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lucas, Robert E., Jr., 1976, “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique,Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1946.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masson, Paul R., Steven A. Symansky, and Guy Meredith, 1990, MULTIMOD Mark II: A Revised and Extended Model, IMF Occasional Paper No. 71 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mendoza, Enrique G., 1991, “Real Business Cycles in a Small Open Economy,American Economic Review, Vol. 81 (September), pp. 797818.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mundell, Robert A., 1963, “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy Under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates,Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, Vol. 29, pp. 47585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muth, J.F., 1961, “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements,Econometrica, Vol. 29, pp. 31535.

  • Obstfeld, Maurice, 2001, “International Macroeconomics: Beyond the Mundell-Fleming Model,IMF Staff Papers, Special Issue, Vol. 47, pp. 139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Obstfeld, Maurice, Kenneth Rogoff, 1995, “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, pp. 62460.

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1997, The OECD Report on Regulatory Reform, Vol. II: Thematic Studies (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Samuelson, Paul A., 1964, “Theoretical Notes on Trade Problems,Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 46, pp. 14554.

  • Schadler, Susan M., Paulo F. Drummond, Louis Kuijs, Zuzana Murgasova, Rachel N. van Elkan, 2004, Adopting the Euro in Central Europe: Challenges of the Next Step in European Integration, IMF Ocasional Paper No. 234 (Washington: International Monetary Fund; forthcoming).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smets, Frank and Raf Wouters, 2002, “An Estimated Stochastic Dynamic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area,ECB Working Paper No. 171 (Frankfurt: European Central Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, John 1993, “Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice,Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Vol. 39 (December), pp. 195214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation