3 Macroeconomic Stability and Economic Growth
  • 1 0000000404811396https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396International Monetary Fund
  • | 2 0000000404811396https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396International Monetary Fund
  • | 3 0000000404811396https://isni.org/isni/0000000404811396International Monetary Fund

Abstract

Broadly speaking, two considerations underlie macroeconomic policy recommendations. First, there needs to be an assessment of the appropriate policy stance to adopt in a given set of circumstances (i.e., should fiscal and/or monetary policy be tightened or loosened?). Second, there is the choice of specific macroeconomic policy instruments that would be beneficial for a country to adopt (e.g., the use of a nominal anchor, a value-added tax (VAT), etc.). In practice, these two considerations are closely linked. Adjusting a policy stance is often done via the adoption of a new instrument (or the modification of an existing one). More important, both considerations are essential to efforts to enhance an economy’s stability.

Broadly speaking, two considerations underlie macroeconomic policy recommendations. First, there needs to be an assessment of the appropriate policy stance to adopt in a given set of circumstances (i.e., should fiscal and/or monetary policy be tightened or loosened?). Second, there is the choice of specific macroeconomic policy instruments that would be beneficial for a country to adopt (e.g., the use of a nominal anchor, a value-added tax (VAT), etc.). In practice, these two considerations are closely linked. Adjusting a policy stance is often done via the adoption of a new instrument (or the modification of an existing one). More important, both considerations are essential to efforts to enhance an economy’s stability.

The specific stance must fit each country’s particular situation. These situations can be put into three broad classes: (1) instability/disequilibrium; (2) stabilization (e.g., transition from instability to stability); and (3) stability/steady economic growth. This Section briefly discusses how macroeconomic policies can contribute to stability. For countries that enjoy stable macroeconomic conditions, there is somewhat greater flexibility in the choice of appropriate stance for macroeconomic policy. The central issue for these countries will be to ensure that the financing of their poverty reduction strategies does not jeopardize macroeconomic stability, which will be discussed in the last section of this pamphlet.

Sources of Instability

There are two main sources of economic instability, namely exogenous shocks and inappropriate policies. Exogenous shocks (e.g., terms of trade shocks, natural disasters, reversals in capital flows, etc.) can throw an economy into disequilibrium and require compensatory action. For example, many low income countries have a narrow export base, often centered on one or two key commodities. Shocks to the world price of these commodities can therefore have a strong impact on the country’s income. Even diversified economies, however, are routinely hit by exogenous shocks, although, reflecting their greater diversification, shocks usually need to be particularly large or long-lasting to destabilize such an economy. Alternatively, a disequilibrium can be “self-induced” by poor macroeconomic management. For example, an excessively loose fiscal stance can increase aggregate demand for goods and services, which places pressure on the country’s external balance of payments as well as on the domestic price level. At times, economic crises are the result of both external shocks and poor management.

Stabilization

In most cases, addressing instability (i.e., stabilization) will require policy adjustment; whereby a government introduces new measures (possibly combined with new policy targets) in response to the change in circumstances.16 Adjustment will typically be necessary if the source of instability is a permanent (i.e., systemic) external shock or the result of earlier, inappropriate macroeconomic policies. However, if the source of instability can be clearly identified as a temporary shock (e.g., a one-time event) then it may be appropriate for a country to accommodate it.17 Identifying whether a particular shock is temporary or is likely to persist is easier said than done. Since there is often a considerable degree of uncertainty surrounding such a judgment, it is usually wise to err somewhat on the side of caution by assuming that the shock will largely persist and by basing the corresponding policy response on the appropriate adjustment.

In most circumstances where adjustment is necessary, both monetary (or exchange rate) and fiscal instruments will have to be used. In particular, successful adjustment to a permanent unfavorable shock that worsens the balance of payments will often require a sustained tightening of the fiscal stance, as this is the most immediate and effective way to increase domestic savings and to reduce domestic demand—two objectives typically at the center of stabilization programs.

Adjustment policies may contribute to a temporary contraction of economic activity, but this contingency should not be used to argue against implementing adjustment policies altogether, as the alternative may be worse. Attempting to sustain aggregate demand through unsustainable policies will almost certainly aggravate the long-run cost of a shock, and could even fail in the short run to the extent that it undermines confidence. In the long run, greater benefits to the poor are to be had as a result of the restoration of macroeconomic stability. The appropriate policies to protect the poor during adjustment are to maintain, or even increase, social expenditures and to adopt, where feasible, compensatory measures that would insulate or offset temporary adverse impacts to the fullest extent possible.18 This is best done by devoting resources to the establishment of effective social safety nets,19 as an enduring part of a country’s poverty reduction strategy, rather than as a response to crisis. Countries that lack such resources/safety nets could be forced to either subject their poor to the short-term adverse effects of stabilization or to delay the pace with which macroeconomic adjustment proceeds (and put off the corresponding long-term benefits to economic growth and poverty reduction).

Countries in macroeconomic crisis typically have little choice but to stabilize quickly, but for countries in the “gray” area of partial stability, finding the right pace may prove difficult. In some cases, a lack of financing will drive the pace of stabilization. Where financing is not a constraint, however, policymakers will need to assess and carefully weigh various factors on a case-by-case basis in choosing the most appropriate pace of stabilization.

Elements of Macroeconomic Stability

Macroeconomic policies influence and contribute to the attainment of rapid, sustainable economic growth aimed at poverty reduction in a variety of ways. By pursuing sound economic policies, policymakers send clear signals to the private sector. The extent to which policymakers are able to establish a track record of policy implementation will influence private sector confidence, which will, in turn, impact upon investment, economic growth, and poverty outcomes.

Prudent macroeconomic policies can result in low and stable inflation. Inflation hurts the poor by lowering growth and by redistributing real incomes and wealth to the detriment of those in society least able to defend their economic interests. High inflation can also introduce high volatility in relative prices and make investment a risky decision. Unless inflation starts at very high levels, rapid disinflation can also have short-run output costs, which need to be weighed against the costs of continuing inflation.

By moving toward debt sustainability, policymakers will help create the conditions for steady and continuous progress on growth and poverty reduction by removing uncertainty as to whether a government will be able to service new debt. By keeping domestic and external debt at levels that can be serviced in a sustainable manner without unduly squeezing nondebt expenditure, policymakers can also ensure that adequate domestic resources are available to finance essential social programs.

Inappropriate exchange rate policies distort the composition of growth by influencing the price of tradable versus nontradable goods. Household survey data for a number of countries indicate that the poor tend to consume higher amounts of nontradable goods while generating relatively more of their income from tradable goods (Sahn, Dorosh, and Younger, 1997). Hence, in addition to distorting trade and inhibiting growth, an overly appreciated exchange rate can impair the relative incomes and purchasing power of the poor.

By building and maintaining an adequate level of net international reserves, a country can weather a temporary shock without having to reduce essential pro-poor spending. External shocks can be particularly detrimental to the poor because they can lower real wages, increase unemployment, reduce nonlabor income, and limit private and net government transfers. The level of “adequate” reserves depends on the choice of exchange rate regime.

  • Agenor, Pierre-Richard, Shantayanan Devarajan, William Easterly, Hippolyte Fofack, Delfin Go, Alejandro Izquierdo, Lodovico Pizzati, 2000, “A Macroeconomic Framework for Poverty Reduction Strategies,” Development Research Group and World Bank Institute (unpublished; Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alesina, Alberto, and Dani Rodrik, 1994, “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 109 (May), pp. 46590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balassa, Bela, 1981, “The Newly Industrializing Developing Countries after the Oil Crisis,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 117, No.1, pp. 14294.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Behrman, Jere, Suzanne Duryea, and Miguel Szeleky, 1999, “Schooling Investments and Macroeconomic Conditions: A Micro-Macro Investigation for Latin America and the Caribbean” (unpublished; Washington: Inter-American Development Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bénabou, Roland, 1996, “Inequality and Growth,” in NBER Macroeconomics Annual: Volume II, ed. by Ben Bernanke and Julio Rotemberg (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Birdsall, Nancy, and Juan Luis Londoño, 1997, “Asset Inequality Matters: An Assessment of the World Bank’s Approach to Poverty Reduction,” American Economic Review, Vol. 87 (May), pp. 3237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bourguignon, François, and Christian Morrisson, 1998, “Inequality and Development: The Role of Dualism,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 57 (December), pp. 23357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bourguignon, François, William H. Branson, and Jaime de Melo, 1989, Macroeconomic Adjustment and Income Distribution: A Macro-Micro Simulation Model (Paris: OECD Development Centre).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bruno, Michael, and William Easterly, 1998, “Inflation Crises and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 41 (February), pp. 326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Calvo, Guillermo, 1998, “Capital Flows and Capital-Market Crises: The Simple Economics of Sudden Stops,” Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 1 (November), pp. 3554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chu, Ke-young, and Sanjeev Gupta, eds., 1998, Social Safety Nets: Issues and Recent Experiences (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collier, Paul, and Jan Willem Gunning, 1999, “Explaining African Economic Performance,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37 (March), pp. 64111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Collier, Paul, and Jan Willem Gunning, and associates, 1999, Trade Shocks in Developing Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

  • Datt, Gaurav, and Martin Ravallion, 1992, “Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures: A Decomposition with Applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 38 (April), pp. 27595.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Datt, Gaurav, and Martin Ravallion, 1998, “Farm Productivity and Rural Poverty in India,” Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 34 (April), pp. 6285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deaton, A., and C. Paxson, 2000, “Growth and Saving Among Individuals and Households,” Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 82 (May), pp. 21225.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deininger, Klaus, 1999, “Asset Distribution, Inequality, and Growth,” Development Research Group (Washington: World Bank).

  • Deininger, Klaus, and Lyn Squire, 1998, “New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth,” Journal of Development Economics Vol. 57 (December), pp. 25987.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Devarajan, Shantayanan, 1999, “Cameroon,” in Trade Shocks in Developing Countries, ed. by Paul Collier and Jan Gunning (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Devarajan, Shantayanan, William R. Easterly, and Howard Pack, forthcoming “Is Investment in Africa Too Low or Too High?”, Journal of African Economies.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Devarajan, Shantayanan, and Dani Rodrik, 1992, “Do the Benefits of Fixed Exchange Rates Outweigh Their Costs? The CFA Zone in Africa,” in Open Economies: Structural Adjustment and Agriculture, ed. by Ian Goldin and L. Alan Winters (Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Devarajan, Shantayanan, Vinaya Swaroop, and Heng-fu Zou, 1997, “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Performance,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 37 (April), pp. 31344.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dollar, David, and Roberta Gatti, 1999, “Gender Inequality, Income and Growth: Are Good Times Good for Women?” Policy Research Report on Gender and Development Working Paper Series No. 1. (Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dollar, David, and Aart Kraay, 2000, “Growth Is Good for the Poor,” World Bank Development Research Group (unpublished; Washington, D.C., World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Easterly, William, and Aart Kraay, 1999, “Small States, Small Problems?” Policy Research Working Paper No. 2139, Development Research Group (Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Easterly, William, and Sergio Rebelo, 1993, “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 32 (December), pp. 41758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fallon, Peter, and Vivian Hon, 1999, “Poverty and Labor-intensive Growth.” Note prepared for World Development Report 2000/2001 (unpublished; Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fischer, Stanley, 1993, “The Role of Macroeconomic Factors in Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 32 (December), pp. 485512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forbes, Kristin, 2000, “A Reassessment of the Relationship Between Inequality and Growth,” American Economic Review, Vol. 90 (September), pp. 869887.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ghosh, Atish, Anne-Marie Gulde, Jonathan Ostry, and Holger Wolf, 1999, “Does the Nominal Exchange Rate Regime Matter?” (unpublished; Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ghosh, Atish, and Steven Phillips, 1998, “Warning: Inflation May Be Harmful to Your Growth,” IMF Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 45 (December), pp. 672710.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hausmann, Ricardo, 1999, “Managing Terms of Trade Volatility,” World Bank PREM Note No. 18, February (Washington: World Bank).

  • Inter-American Development Bank (IADB), 1995 “Overcoming Volatility,” Economic and Social Progress in Latin America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Izquierdo, Alejandro, 1999, “Credit Constraints and the Asymmetric Behavior of Asset Prices and Output under External Shocks,” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kakwani, Nanak, 1993, “Poverty and Economic Growth with Application to Côte d’Ivoire,” Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 39 (June) pp. 121139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro, and John Moore, 1997, “Credit Cycles,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105 (April), pp. 21148

  • Klasen, Stephan, 1999, “Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth and Development? Evidence from Cross-Country Regressions,” Policy Research Report on Gender and Development Working Paper Series No. 7. (Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, Hongyi, Danyang Xie, Heng-fu Zou, 1999. “Dynamics of Income Distribution,” Development Research Group, (unpublished; Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Little, I., R. Cooper, W. M. Corden, and S. Rajapatirana, 1993, Boom, Crisis and Adjustment: The Macroeconomic Experience of Developing Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lustig, Nora, forthcoming. “Crises and the Poor: Socially Responsible Macroeconomics.” Economia, Journal of the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Malmberg Calvo, Christina, 1998, Options for Managing and Financing Rural Transport Infrastructure, World Bank Technical Paper No. 411 (Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masson, Paul, Miguel Savastano, and Sunil Sharma, 1997, “The Scope for Inflation Targeting in Developing Countries,” IMF Working Paper No. 97/130 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitra, Pradeep, 1994, Adjustment in Oil-Importing Developing Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  • Perotti, Roberto, 1992, “Income Distribution: Politics and Growth,” American Economic Review, Vol. 82 (May), pp. 31116.

  • Perotti, Roberto, 1993, “Political Equilibrium, Income Distribution, and Growth.” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 60 (October), pp 75576.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Perotti, Roberto, 1996, “Redistribution and Non-consumption Smoothing in an Open Economy,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 63 (July), pp 41133.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini, 1994, “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?” American Economic Review, Vol. 84 (June), pp. 60021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, Steven, 1999, “Inflation: The Case for a More Resolute Approach” in Economic Adjustment and Reform in Low-Income Countries: Studies by the Staff of the International Monetary Fund, ed. by Hugh Bredenkamp and Susan Schadler (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ramey, Garey, and Valerie A. Ramey, 1995, “Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between Volatility and Growth,” American Economic Review, Vol. 85 (December), pp. 113851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ravallion, Martin, 1997, “Can High-Inequality Developing Countries Escape Absolute Poverty?” Policy Research Working Paper No. 1775 Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sahn, David, Paul Dorosh, and Stephen Younger, 1997, Structural Adjustment Reconsidered: Economic Policy and Poverty in Africa, (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sarel, Michael, 1996, “Nonlinear Effects of Inflation on Economic Growth,” Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 43 (March), pp. 199215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tanzi, Vito, and Howell Zee, 2000, “Tax Policy for Emerging Markets: Developing Countries,” IMF Working Paper No. 00/35 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, Vinod, and Yan Wang, 1998, “Missing Lessons of East Asia: Openness, Education, and the Environment,” Latin America and Caribbean Studies: Proceedings series (Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thorbecke, Erik, and Hong-Sang Jung, 1996, “A Multiplier Decomposition Method to Analyze Poverty Alleviation,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 48 (March), pp. 279300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Timmer, C. Peter, 1997, “How Well Do the Poor Connect to the Growth Process?” Consulting Assistance on Economic Reform Discussion Paper No. 178. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Institute for International Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, Howard, and Edward Anderson, forthcoming, “Growth Versus Distribution: Does the Pattern of Growth Matter?”, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • World Bank, 1982, Accelerated Development in Sub-Saharan Africa (Washington: World Bank).

  • World Bank, 2000, World Development Report (New York and Washington: Oxford University Press and World Bank).