Abstract

During 1999 and into the first half of 2000, global financial conditions generally improved in tandem with the strong rebound in the global economy. Following the most severe market turbulence—especially for emerging markets in the postwar period—entailing a succession of regional crises that enveloped the major financial markets, credit concerns have eased and global investors became more willing to engage in risk taking. This was especially evident in their rush to invest in technology-related companies that underpinned the “new economy.”

During 1999 and into the first half of 2000, global financial conditions generally improved in tandem with the strong rebound in the global economy. Following the most severe market turbulence—especially for emerging markets in the postwar period—entailing a succession of regional crises that enveloped the major financial markets, credit concerns have eased and global investors became more willing to engage in risk taking. This was especially evident in their rush to invest in technology-related companies that underpinned the “new economy.”

As markets recovered during 1999, mature market credit spreads receded from their crisis peaks and have remained appropriately above precrisis levels, given the decline in highly leveraged activities that had compressed spreads before the crisis. The remarkable, continued rapid growth of U.S. productivity—largely related to the new economy—helped sustain the low inflation expansion in the United States, and spurred U.S. and worldwide investment. Despite the upturn in global interest rates, equity markets rose to record highs during the second half of 1999 and into early 2000 on increasingly optimistic expectations of future earnings growth for investments in dynamic technology-related sectors. The deepening and broadening of credit markets in the euro area helped boost global debt issuance, especially euro-denominated debt, reflecting too the increased pace of corporate restructuring (especially merger and acquisition activity) and the gathering strength of the global expansion. Even in Japan, equity markets recovered on initial signs that the decline in output may have bottomed.

Emerging market asset prices saw strong increases in 1999 as fundamentals in many countries improved, and the domestic and external financing situation of most emerging markets continued to recover from the rolling crises that affected Asia, Russia, and Brazil between mid-1997 and early 1999. Reflecting these improvements, the credit ratings of a number of emerging markets improved. Emerging market bonds posted strong returns in 1999, significantly outperforming the low or negative returns for most alternative fixed income asset classes in mature markets. Emerging equity markets also had a stellar year, driven by the performance of technology-related stocks. Other favorable developments include a widening of the investor base for emerging market assets, a diversification of funding sources by borrowers, and a shift toward longer-term funding.

Since March 2000, however, participants in mature and emerging markets have become less at ease with the uneven growth patterns among the major currency areas, signs of inflationary pressures, and increasing external imbalances. These have produced a growing list of questions and risks. In particular, the sustain ability of technology-based productivity gains, which fueled the robust low inflation expansion in the United States, was repeatedly tested by investors as they faced these and other uncertainties. This is clear in the increasing volatility in global equity markets. Emerging market currencies and debt markets were also affected by the sharp correction in technology sectors of equity markets, especially the Nasdaq, as investors identified both these classes of investments with the riskiest of financial assets that would benefit or suffer as risk appetites changed. Additional tensions arose from technical factors related to repurchases of U.S. and U.K. government debt, which impaired traditional hedging and pricing practices associated with government yield curve benchmarks and the interpretation of credit and swap spreads in the mature and emerging markets.

Increased volatility and declines in mature equity and bond markets also adversely affected their counterparts in the emerging markets over March–May 2000. It became apparent that the rally in emerging markets also had been helped in part by the forces that drove the “new economy” paradigm. Further, the rally had relied on expectations of only modest increases in official interest rates in the United States and Europe. Thus, emerging market assets were hit hard when global stock markets fell and the monetary policy tightening in mature markets threatened to be larger than had earlier been expected.

This increased market volatility has heightened once again the recognition of risks in global financial markets, including those associated with the rapid integration of national financial markets into the global arena, the ongoing lack of transparency, and increased competitive pressures on financial institutions. Indeed, reflecting on the lessons from the crises and contagion that spawned earlier global turbulence, investors question the effectiveness of the existing international architecture, including the role of the IMF, to realize the potential to generate growth in increasingly integrated and securitized international capital markets. Private and public sector initiatives have begun to address some of these and related issues, for example with specific measures to improve risk management practices and bolster regulatory and supervisory capabilities. The proposed revision of the 1988 Basel Accord on Capital Adequacy is a key element in bringing prudential regulations up to date. Other public and private groupings have also explored ways to ensure the smooth functioning of the financial system, particularly how to improve banks’ liquidity management, the safety of payment systems, the reliability of stress testing, and the effectiveness of portfolio credit management systems.

This year’s International Capital Markets report reviews and assesses recent developments in the mature and emerging financial markets and continues the analysis of key structural changes in global financial markets that has been presented in recent reports. Global financial markets are inherently information-, communication-, and computation-intensive, and advances in telecommunications and computer technologies during the past two decades have dramatically lowered the cost of undertaking many financial activities. The potential economies of scale and scope created by these declining costs have led to intense competition to gain market share both within and across national and international financial markets. This intense competition has been characterized by the development of new financial instruments and services and the use of these financial innovations to enter new markets or to attract new customers. This year’s report examines two aspects of this process of financial innovation and market penetration: the global development of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market and the expansion of foreign-owned banks into emerging markets. The report also examines another issue, namely market participants’ assessments of proposals for private sector involvement in the prevention and resolution of crises, that is likely to affect the future terms and conditions of market access for many emerging markets.

Chapter II provides a comprehensive assessment of recent developments and trends in the major financial markets and identifies key risks and uncertainties in the outlook. Of particular significance are the questions regarding the durability of the “new economy” and the underpinnings of the global rise in equity markets, the heightened potential for exchange rate volatility, and the risks associated with financial restructuring in the euro area.

Chapter III reviews developments in emerging markets over the past year, including trends in net and gross financing flows, and in primary and secondary markets for emerging market assets. As of mid-2000, emerging market asset prices were mostly modestly higher than a year earlier, reflecting some unwinding of the (probably excessive) pessimism toward emerging market economies that had grown out of the recent crises. Further, while emerging market assets remain among the more volatile asset classes, the continuing decline in the volatility of returns from recent crisis levels will enhance the attractiveness of emerging markets to investors. The chapter also notes some favorable developments in the investor base and the financing sources of emerging market borrowers. While the risk tolerance of some of these new investors is yet to be tested through a full cycle, a wider investor base—provided it has realistic expectations about the return and risk on its holdings—will help support the stability of financing to emerging markets. In addition, at the same time as the investor base is widening, emerging market borrowers are diversifying their financing sources, with greater recourse to domestic currency financing and longer-term funding. The chapter concludes that these developments offer the hope of greater stability in financing flows to emerging markets and greater prudence in the financing of borrowers in emerging markets.

Chapter IV focuses on OTC derivatives markets. The rapid growth, development, and widespread use of OTC derivatives transactions and markets has accompanied, and in many ways driven, the international integration of national financial markets and the globalization of finance. Much has been written about derivatives as financial instruments, and last year’s International Capital Markets report discussed the role of highly leveraged institutions and their OTC derivatives positions in the mature market turbulence during the autumn of 1998. These markets comprise the internationally active financial institutions, and they are central to the functioning and efficiency of the major bond, equity, and foreign exchange markets. They are governed by private sector arrangements and are influenced indirectly by regulatory, supervisory, and legal systems. The smooth functioning of these systemically important markets relies heavily on market discipline, more so than in most other financial markets. Recent episodes of turbulence revealed the risks posed to market stability originating in features of OTC derivatives instruments and markets. The chapter identifies sources of risk to market stability as well as imperfections in the underlying infrastructure. Progress in addressing some of these risks and imperfections has been limited, and the chapter identifies areas where further efforts are necessary if the risks to instability are to be reduced and avoided in the future.

Following the crises in Asia, Russia, and Brazil, the international financial community has explored ways to enhance the international financial architecture with a view to preventing crises, where possible, and to mitigating their severity when they do occur. One cornerstone of the new international financial architecture initiative has been the official community’s efforts to further the private sector’s involvement in crisis prevention and resolution. Chapter V provides a systematic review of recent experiences with, and market views on, these efforts. Within the context of crisis prevention, the official sector has focused on how to improve data transparency, promote improved standards and codes, enhance debt management, facilitate information sharing and negotiation between debtors and creditors, support the introduction of collective action clauses in international bonds, study the feasibility of standstills and stays, and evaluate the usefulness of market-based capital controls. On the crisis resolution front, policies have had the objectives of limiting the size of official financing packages, reducing moral hazard, and restoring medium-term viability of the debtor country. This chapter assesses market views and discusses the extent to which the official community’s objectives have been attained and how the initiative is likely to affect the terms and nature of international financing to emerging markets.

Chapter VI discusses the increasing role of foreign banks in emerging markets. The growing presence of foreign-owned institutions in the second half of the 1990s increased the share of assets under foreign control to more than half of total assets in several emerging markets in Central Europe and Latin America. The chapter analyzes the factors that have stimulated the rise of foreign participation, including those that drove global financial institutions to expand toward emerging markets, and the factors underlying the authorities’ decisions to remove existing barriers to the entry of foreign institutions. The arguments that have been made in favor of and against greater foreign presence and the empirical evidence on the effects of foreign entry are also reviewed and assessed in this chapter. Finally, the main policy issues include the need to coordinate and upgrade prudential supervisory and regulatory policies across borders, bank concentration issues related to the merger of large international banks, and associated systemic issues.

Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues (September 2000)
  • Atkinson, David, Tomishi Ishida, and Hideyuki Ishii, 2000, “City Bank Profitability in the 1990s,” Goldman Sachs Investment Research (February).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bayoumi, Tamim, 2000, “Where Are We Going? The Output Gap and Potential Growth,” in Post-Bubble Blues: How Japan Responded to Asset Price Collapse, ed. by Tamim Bayoumi and Charles Collyns (Washington: International Monetary Fund), pp. 89106.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bebchuk, Lucian, 1999, “Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership, and Dual Class Equity: the Creation and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash Flow Rights,” NBER Working Paper No. 6951 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research, February).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bradley, Michael, and Michael Rosenzweig, 1992, “The Untenable Case for Chapter 11,” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 101 (March), pp. 104395.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fukao, Mitsuhiro, 1998, “Japanese Financial Instability and Weaknesses in the Corporate Governance Structure,” Seoul Journal of Economics, Vol. 11 (Winter), pp. 381422.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gitlin, Richard, and Evan Flaschen, 2000, “Will Japan’s New Civil Rehab Law Work?” Available via the Internet: http://www.FinanceAsia.com

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldman Sachs, 1999a, “Corporate Governance: Progress Report,” Japan Strategy Flash (Tokyo, June 21).

  • Goldman Sachs, 1999b, “Millennium Metamorphosis: From Old to New Japan,” Portfolio Strategy (Tokyo, December 17).

  • Goldman Sachs, 2000a, “Incentive Compensation: Marking Labor to Market Value,” Japan Strategy Flash (Tokyo, January 31).

  • Goldman Sachs, 2000b, “Millennium Metamorphosis: ‘Real’ Restructuring and New Japan,” (Tokyo, March).

  • Hayakawa, Hideo, and Eiji Maeda, 2000, “Understanding Japan’s Financial and Economic Developments Since Autumn 1997,” Working Paper 00-1, Research and Statistics Department (Tokyo: Bank of Japan).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoshi, Takeo, 1998, “Japanese Corporate Governance as a System,” in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research, ed. by Klaus J. Hopt and others (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 84775.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hotchkiss, Edith S., and Robert M. Mooradian, 1998, “Acquisitions as a Means of Restructuring Firms in Chapter 11,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 7 (July), pp. 24062.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 1999, International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues (Washington, September).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kanda, Hideki, 1998, “Comparative Corporate Governance Country Report: Japan,” in Comparative Corporate Governance: The State of the Art and Emerging Research, ed. by Klaus J. Hopt and others (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 92142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaplan, Steven N., 1997, “Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance: A Comparison of Germany, Japan and the U.S.,” in Studies in International Corporate Finance and Governance Systems: A Comparison of the U.S., Japan, and Europe, ed. by Donald H. Chew (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 25158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moody’s Investors Service, 1999, Banking System Outlook: Japan (New York, April).

  • Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, 2000, A Tale of Two Economies (Tokyo, March).

  • Prowse, Stephen, 1994, “Corporate Governance in an International Perspective: A Survey of Corporate Control Mechanisms Among Large Firms in the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan and Germany,” BIS Economic Papers No. 41 (Basel: Bank for International Settlements, July).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Standard & Poor’s, 2000, “A New World for Credit Risk in Japan,” CreditWeek, Vol. 20, No. 9 (March 1), pp. 2024.

  • Swoboda, Peter, and Joseph Zechner, 1995, “Financial Structure and the Tax System,” in Finance, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Vol. 9, ed. by R.A. Jarrow, V. Maksimovic, and W.T. Ziemba (Amsterdam: Elsevier).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Euromoney, 1999, “Poland Becomes the Favorite” (September).

  • Euromoney, 2000, “Foreigners Carve Up Poland’s Banks” (April).

  • Fitch IBCA, 1998, “The Thailand Banking System” (April).

  • Fitch IBCA, 1999a, “The Mexican Banking System” (May).

  • Fitch IBCA, 1999b, “The Malaysian Banking System” (July).

  • IFR Latin America, 2000, “Scandal Tars Brazil’s Bozano” (May).

  • International Monetary Fund, 1999, International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund, September).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kawalec, Stefan, 1999, “Banking Sector Systemic Risk in Selected Central European Countries” (unpublished; Washington: International Monetary Fund, April).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moody’s, 1998, “Seeing Through the Fog: The Lack of Transparency in Latin American Banking Systems” (September).