Abstract

This section reviews statistical issues pertaining to the two major types of statistical information used in macroprudential analysis: macroeconomic indicators pertaining to the financial sector (financial macrostatistics) and aggregated microprudential data. Financial macrostatistics—such as monetary statistics, financial accounts of the System of National Accounts (SNA), and sectoral balance sheets—are frameworks for organizing data into comprehensive overviews of the condition and transactions of the financial sector and its key components, and thus can provide indicators of the activity and operation of the financial system. Aggregated microprudential data are summations of (mostly) supervisory information on the condition of individual banks that may provide indications of the overall condition of the financial sector.

This section reviews statistical issues pertaining to the two major types of statistical information used in macroprudential analysis: macroeconomic indicators pertaining to the financial sector (financial macrostatistics) and aggregated microprudential data. Financial macrostatistics—such as monetary statistics, financial accounts of the System of National Accounts (SNA), and sectoral balance sheets—are frameworks for organizing data into comprehensive overviews of the condition and transactions of the financial sector and its key components, and thus can provide indicators of the activity and operation of the financial system. Aggregated microprudential data are summations of (mostly) supervisory information on the condition of individual banks that may provide indications of the overall condition of the financial sector.

We examine key issues affecting the statistical accuracy, usefulness, and international comparability of MPIs, and consider how the IMF could integrate work on MPIs into its statistical programs and support national authorities in the compilation of timely and reliable statistics needed to assess the condition of the financial system. Appendix I reviews the statistical frameworks for compilation of macroprudential data that are in place at the IMF, other international organizations, and selected central banks and supervisory agencies, and reviews the suitability of these frameworks for compilation of macroprudential data.72

The importance of reliable statistics in the assessment of the condition of the financial sector is well established. Unfortunately, in a significant number of problem cases, available statistics have not been of sufficient timeliness and/or quality to provide early and clear warning of emerging difficulties. In this connection, the importance and quality of monetary, balance of payments, and financial system data, as well as the need for comprehensiveness in the collection, methodological soundness of the compilation, accuracy of compilation, and timely and informative public disclosure have often been emphasized. Moreover, comparability of MPIs across countries contributes strongly to their usefulness, a point emphasized at the September 1999 consultative meeting by private sector users of MPIs. Such comparability can be achieved through adherence of MPIs to internationally agreed supervisory, accounting, and statistical standards that provide clear rules for both the compilation and interpretation of MPIs.

Financial macrostatistics and aggregated microprudential data, which are both used in macroprudential analysis, interrelate in numerous ways because both are derived from individual banks’ balance sheets and other detailed financial information. The two types of data could be brought into closer correspondence by applying standard statistical concepts (such as definitions of residency, sectors, and financial instruments) when compiling aggregate microprudential data, and by enhancing financial macrostatistics with additional detail needed for macroprudeniial analysis (such as information on nonperforming loans).

Statistical Frameworks for MPIs

Financial Macrostatistics

Nearly all countries compile financial sector macroeconomic statistics, primarily in the form of monetary statistics. However, monetary statistics generally do not provide the specific types of data used for macroprudential analysis or may lack needed detail. Other financial statistics frameworks, such as flow of funds accounts or sectoral balance sheets,73 can provide the detailed financial information for the financial sector and other sectors of the economy that can be used For macroprudential analysis. Among the numerous MPIs that can be constructed directly from monetary statistics or other financial macrostatisticai frameworks are: central bank credit to banks, the ratio of deposits to M2, the ratio of loans to capital, the ratio of loans to total deposits, lending to nonresidents, the ratio of foreign currency loans to total loans, the ratio of foreign currency liabilities to total capital, and the distribution of credit by sector.

International standards exist for the construction of these macrostatistics frameworks, which contribute to their comparability across countries. An important attribute of these frameworks is that they present specific sectors within the context of the overall economy and can be used to analyze the dynamics of the financial sector and the transmission of financial stress across sectors. Also, these frameworks are flexible and can be enhanced with additional detail needed for macroprudential analysts. These frameworks are highly developed in only a few countries.

The IMF is moving to promote compilation of financial sector macroeconomic statistics harmonized with international standards through the forthcoming Monetary and Financial Statistics Manual. Financial statistics compiled in accordance with the manual can be further augmented to provide more macroprudential information, such as on impairment of claims, credit concentration, maturity of liabilities, subordinated debt, capital adequacy, connected lending, and relations with foreign affiliates.74 Work is currently ongoing also at the ECB to augment the monetary statistics program with macroprudential information (see Appendix I).

Aggregations of Microprudential Data

The second major type of information used for macroprudential analysis consists of summations of information used by supervisors to assess the condition of individual banks. In addition to the use of these data in specific MPIs, a recent report by the Bank of England called for national supervisory authorities to design a template with minimum requirements for key indicators of bank quality for disclosure of aggregated microprudential data to the public: We recommend that national supervisory agencies lake upon themselves the responsibility for the collection, compilation and dissemination of data on banks to meet the needs of users. These data would be at least at the peer group and aggregate level; both on solo and consolidated basis; and include key indicators of capital, asset quality, earnings and liquidity, such as capital adequacy ratios, non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets, return on assets and equity, and a breakdown of assets and liabilities by maturity. Data should be published on a quarterly frequency. The above list is only a suggested bare minimum and not a comprehensive list of indicators. A common disclosure template in the form of a minimum requirement could be agreed on by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and could be so designed to meet the needs of macroprudential surveillance. This would require implementation of greater disclosure requirements than those currently applicable in many countries, and possibly even legislative changes to augment the authority of supervisors to ask for and to publish these data. We recommend that countries take up this task with the priority it deserves.75

Some microprudential information can be meaningfully aggregated to provide a useful depiction of the condition of the financial sector. Some other microprudential information, however, may reflect specific information needs of supervisors on the condition of individual batiks that might prove difficult to aggregate or unsuitable for aggregation. For example, VaR analysis is only valid for the analysis of specific portfolios. Other potential MPIs are affected in a similar way. Also, simple aggregation of prudential information of individual banks can disguise important structural information, and it is often necessary to supplement the aggregate data with information on dispersion, peer-group analysis, and the interrelationships between systemically large banks.

It is instructive to review how the most commonly used indicator, the risk-based capital ratio, could be aggregated into a statistic to describe the condition of the banking sector. The ratios for individual banks cannot be directly aggregated—data on the numerator (capital) and the denominator (risk-adjusted assets) must be collected from each bank and separately aggregated. The supervisory definition of capital used as the numerator is unique so that data cannot be extracted directly from either accounting records or statistical sources, and there are analytical needs to compile separate information on the three tiers of capital recognized by supervisors. Likewise, data on risk-weighted assets used in the denominator are also based on supervisory concepts not used in accounting or statistical work, and thus are not comparable across countries because they are affected by national accounting practices for valuation of assets, accrual of income, and recognition of impairment. The aggregate ratio is calculated by simple division of the aggregate numerator by the aggregate denominator, A low ratio is a clear sign of vulnerability, and a declining trend may signal increased risk exposure and possible capital adequacy problems. A relatively high ratio, however, does not guarantee that there are not serious difficulties in financial institutions that account for a significant share of the system’s assets.

There have been numerous calls for compilation and dissemination of information on the aggregate risk-based capital ratio but, as described above, a number of practical and conceptual issues, and decisions about ancillary information, need to be considered in creating a statistical measure of the ratio.

Statistical Issues Affecting MPIs and International Comparability

Table 4 summarizes some of the major statistical issues affecting MPIs.76 This table cross-classifies selected MPIs by major types of issues that could impede their construction, affect their usefulness for analysis or disclosure, or affect international comparability. The focus is on issues related to compilation of MPIs constructed from aggregated individual bank prudential data, which—in contrast to financial macrostatistics, for which there are recognized international standards-—are often affected by a range of statistical problems that might impair their comparability across countries and reliability as indicators. Even where ample individual bank prudential data exist, there might be practical difficulties or conceptual problems in compiling them into statistical aggregates. The most important statistical issues are discussed in the following subsections.

Table 4.

Statistical Issues Affecting MPIs

article image
article image
Notes: Types of statistical issues identified:No prudential standards. Indicates that international supervisory or regulatory standards do not exist for these MPIs or for key components of the MPIs, For example, the absence of uniform supervisory standards for provisions or accruals of income on impaired loans could result in wide variations in the meaning of MPIs employing information on the value of loans or bank profitability. Therefore, data reported by national authorities may employ different concepts or compilation methods and might be incomparable across countries.No statistical standards. Indicates that international statistical standards have not been promulgated for these MPIs or for key components of the MPIs, or that statistical equivalents to supervisory concepts have not yet been developed. For example, in the first case, there are no statistical standards on accruals of income on impaired loans. In the second case, little work has been done to date to develop standard statistical measures to capture supervisory information, even for straightforward measures such as sectoral concentration of lending.Diverse: accounting standards. Indicates that an MPI is unlikely to be comparable across countries because of diverse accounting practices in different countries.Consolidation issues. Indicates that the consolidation used by a bank can affect the meaning of the MPI. Most important, supervisory information collected from a multinational bank using a worldwide consolidation that encompasses activity throughout the world might have little relevance for the analysis of the condition of the financial sector in specific countries in which the bank operates. Consolidation issues may also arise because of variations between countries in the units consolidated within the reports (holding companies foreign trade subsidiaries).Poor data on asset quality. Refers to poor or missing information on the quality of assets, such as impairment of claims, misreporting of the effective value of claims, excessive volatility of assets, country risk, or risks from overconcentration of investments.Bank-specific information. Refers to prudential information specific to individual banks that cannot plausibly be aggregated to provide information on the overall financial sector. Qualitative in-formation. such as information on the skills and background of management, which is information typically sought by supervisors, cannot be aggregated- Moreover, information related to specific portfolios held by banks (VaR, net foreign exchange exposure) often cannot be aggregated, or must be used in conjunction with dispersion indices or measures of concentration.Derivatives issues. Refers to issues related to the recognition, valuation, or accounting treatment of derivatives and off-balance sheet instruments.

Absence or Diversity of Standards

The usefulness of MPIs for surveillance and public disclosure is hindered by incomparability across countries because of a lack of international standards, highly diverse national standards, failure of standards to keep up with rapid innovation in financial markets, or failure to adhere to applicable prudential or accounting standards. In the cases of supervisory and accounting standards, there may be no applicable international standards, or highly diverse national standards may exist. Also, existing accounting standards in many countries often apply historical valuations to claims and liabilities, which can disguise changes in corporations’ financial conditions. Little or no work has been done to date to develop statistical formulas and definitions for most of the proposed MPIs.

Poor Data on Asset Quality

Poor information on asset quality and on the holders of weak credits impairs the analysis of risks lacing the financial sector by reducing the usefulness of balance sheet data for making assessments of the conditions of financial institutions. These data limitations often can hide the buildup of systemic financial sector problems. Specific data limitations include lack of complete or realistic information on the full recoverable value of loans and securities, country risk, foreign exchange risk, exposures by counterparties, and the nettability of claims.77

Use of National Versus Global Consolidations

Much supervisory data is collected using a global consolidation that incorporates the worldwide activity of a bank into a single financial statement, which guarantees that all of its relevant activity is captured. Such data, however, might relate only loosely to financial conditions within any specific country in which a multinational firm operates, and much of the reported data may refer to activity or financial positions outside national authorities’ jurisdictions and policy control. In contrast, standard macroeconomic statistics use a national consolidation, and therefore exclude affiliated units in other countries.78 National financial statistics can be related to the other national macroeconomic statistics, such as GDP or national interest rates, and cover national financial activity that will be under the influence of national policy officials.

The use of the two different consolidations can have important implications for the construction of MPIs, For example, a global risk-based capital ratio is relevant for the supervision of a bank operating in multiple countries, but it is not possible to aggregate meaningfully global ratios for all banks operating in a country. This implies that there is a need to collect separate data for institutions’ domestic activity and their global activity. Such a separation is straightforward for some assets and liabilities, such as loans and deposits, but for other items there may be difficulties such as uncertainty over the allocation to individual national branches of capital items registered at the level of the global corporation.79

The scope of MPIs in different countries can also differ significantly depending on the precise collection of units drawn within the consolidated reports. This scope, in turn, depends on factors such as national legal definitions, the scope of activities permitted by banks, and rules on consolidation of subsidiaries and branches. Moreover, a related statistical coverage problem is that rapid change in financial markets can result in growth of new financial industries that might not be captured within existing supervisory or statistical reporting systems. A particular concern is that supervisory or statistical systems may fail to encompass all financial activities that might involve significant systemic risks (e.g., hedge funds and other mutual funds, consumer finance companies, trust funds, securities clearing systems).

Derivatives and Off-Balance Sheet Positions

Financial derivatives and off-balance sheet positions present special problems in evaluating the condition of financial institutions, because of the lack of reporting of positions, high volatility, and potentially large positions. Such concerns have led the accounting profession to move toward explicit recognition of virtually all derivatives on balance sheets using a market value or equivalent measure of value (fair value). International statistical standards for recognition and valuation of derivatives have also been developed, largely based on work at the IMF. These standards are now just beginning to be implemented, mostly in the context of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) monetary statistics and the international reserves template. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, of BIS, and IOSCO have also proposed new standards for the recognition, valuation, and disclosure of information on derivatives.80 Increased recognition of most derivatives on balance sheets at fair value, which is in line with most new regulatory proposals, will affect many of the proposed MPIs.

Options for Further Development of MPIs

A precondition for further work on aggregation of prudential information for individual hanks is ascertaining through surveys or other means the feasibility (given national legal and supervisory practices and statistical operations) of collecting data for the various types of MPIs that have been proposed. Because of the diversity in national supervisory practices and philosophies of supervision, the types of prudential data collected by national central banks and national supervisory offices are not well known. The IMF is therefore in the process of carrying out a survey of national authorities and users of MPIs to ascertain what types of MPIs they need, whether prudential statistics are compiled systematically for individual banks or are available as aggregates, the types of data covered, gaps in coverage, and the accounting, legal, and institutional standards that affect compilation of the data. National practices and regulations related to public disclosure are also being assessed. An important aspect of the survey is to gather information and ascertain the feasibility of constructing a core set of indicators or whether different sets of MPIs are required for different types of economies—such as financial centers, other industrial economies, emerging market economies, and developing economies.

The survey and technical reviews are aimed at gaining a clear understanding of what is involved in compiling or disseminating MPIs. For example, it might be found that a significant number of MPIs are inherently microeconomic in nature and cannot be meaningfully aggregated. Moreover, new MPIs might be proposed and the priorities in the formulation of international standards might change.81

Another important element in developing MPIs is to consider them in the context of the rapid changes in perspectives and standards of supervisors, accountants, and the public. Many initiatives are under way to develop standards that might bring about greater coherence and enhance the quality of MPIs,82 Important changes in standards are now taking place and others are forthcoming in a process that may take considerable time to approach completion. As standards are developed, national practices will gradually come into line, which should enhance reporting within each country and improve the international comparability of data. Moreover, to the extent that standard-setting organizations come to agreement among themselves (including on the adoption of applicable international statistical standards), the results will be greater coherence in compiled data, better understanding by the public, improved statistical support for the development of policy, and reductions in respondents’ and compilers’ costs of compiling data. Substantial differences across countries will continue for some time though, which requires an approach that works in parallel, both for greater future harmonization of data, but that also proceeds now on the basis of available, un-harmonized data.

In summary, additional information gathering and technical research is needed before we come to a decision point on the statistical strategies to follow in developing MPIs. Depending on options selected for developing MPIs, major resource and prioritization issues as well as organizational or legal issues could confront international organizations and national entities. Some types of MPIs may prove difficult and costly to compile, or may require new data collection systems that do not fit easily into existing statistical arrangements. Conversely, much of the work of upgrading statistical systems to encompass MPIs dovetails with the ongoing work at the IMF and elsewhere to enhance statistical, accounting, auditing, and supervisory systems to keep pace with globalization and rapid changes in financial markets,83 and thus might be viewed as incremental initiatives to work already under way.

Following is a list of some of the statistical options available for compiling MPIs, The specific strategy for following these options will depend greatly on the willingness, technical strengths, and resources of the various international and national entities that might be involved.

  • (1) Monetary statistics could be augmented with specific types of data used for macroprudential analysis. The additional data sought would consist mostly of balance sheet information, but might also include information on financial institutions’ income, expenses, and profitability. Under this option, the IMF would augment its existing system for compiling monetary statistics and use it as a basis for compiling MPIs across a range of countries.84

  • (2) A new monthly or quarterly compilation of financial sector prudential data could be instituted, covering all MPIs (should a decision be made not to use option 1), or covering only those MPIs that are not readily included will in a monetary statistics framework. The lead role in such work could be taken by the IMF or other international organizations.

  • (3) National entities could be encouraged to compile and disseminate unharmonized national data on the condition of individual banks or aggregations of microprudential data.

  • (4) National entities could enhance their programs to compile financial macrostatistics, especially sectoral balance sheets and flow of funds accounts, to support macroprudeniial analysis. These accounts are tools to assess the financial strength or vulnerabilities of the major sectors of an economy and the potential for transmission of financial stress between sectors.

  • (5) Modalities for monitoring or contributing to ongoing work to develop international standards could be explored. One possibility would be to convene an interdisciplinary working group that would follow proposals for accounting, auditing, supervisory, and statistical standards as well as changes in disclosure requirements for financial institutions, and that would support harmonization with international statistical standards.

  • (6) A handbook or manual on statistical compilation of MPIs could be prepared to provide guidance to compilers and to assist users in analyzing MPIs.

Cited By

  • Akerlof, George A., 1970,The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84 (August), pp. 488 –500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Altman, Edward I., 1968,Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy,Journal of Finance, Vol. 23 (September), pp. 589 –609.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baig, Taimur, and Ilan Goldfajn, 1999,Financial Market Contagion in the Asian Crisis,IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 46 (June), pp. 167 –195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 1988, International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 1996, Amendment to the Capital Accord to Incorporate Market Risks (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 1997, Principles for the Management of Interest Rate Risk (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 1999a, A New Capital Adequacy Framework (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 1999b,Capital Requirements and Bank Behaviour: The Impact of the Basel Accord,BCBS Working Paper No. 1 (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), 1999c,Supervisory Lessons to Be Drawn from the Asian Crisis,BCBS Working Paper No. 2 (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), and International Organization of Securities Commissions, Technical Committee (IOSCO), 1998, Supervisory Information Framework for Derivatives and Trading Activities (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank for International Settlements, Committee on the Global Financial System, 1999, A Review of Financial Market Events in Autumn 1998 (Basel).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bank of England, 1999, Financial Stability Review, Issue 6 (London).

  • Berg, Andrew, and Catherine Pattillo, 1999,Are Currency Crises Predictable?: A Test,IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 46 (June), pp.107 –38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bussière, Matthieu, and Christian Mulder, 1999,External Vulnerability in Emerging Market Economies: How High Liquidity Can Offset Weak Fundamentals and the Effects of Contagion,IMF Working Paper 99/88 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caprio, Gerald, and Daniela Klingebiel, 1996,Bank Insolvencies: Cross-Country Experience,Policy Research Working Paper No, 1620 (Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cole, Rebel A., Barbara G. Cornyn, and Jeffrey W. Gunther, 1995,FIMS: A New Monitoring System for Banking Institutions,Federal Reserve Bulletin, Vol. 81 (January), pp. 1 –15,

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Corsetti, Giancarlo, Paolo Pesenti, and Nouriel Roubini, 1998,What Caused the Asian Currency and Financial Crisis? Part II: The Policy Debate,NBER Working Paper No. 6834 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, E. Philip, 1996,Institutional Investors, Unstable Financial Markets and Monetary Policy,in Risk Management in Volatile Financial Markets, ed. by Franco Bruni, Donald E. Fair, and Richard O’Brien (Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, E. Philip, 1999, Financial Data Needs far Macroprudential Surveillance—What Are the Key Indicators of Risks to Domestic Financial Stability?, Handbooks in Central Banking, Lecture Series No. 2, Center for Central Banking Studies (London: Bank of England).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, E. Philip, Robert Hamilton, Robert Heath, Fiona Mackie, and Aditya Narain, 1999, Financial Market Data for International Financial Stability, Center for Central Banking Studies (London: Bank of England).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, and Enrica Detragiache, 1998,The Determinants of Banking Crises in Developing and Developed Countries,IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 45 (March), pp. 81 –109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Demirgüç-Kunt, Asli, and Enrica Detragiache, 1999,Monitoring Banking Sector Fragility: A Multivariate Logit Approach with an Application to the 1996–97 Banking Crisis,Policy Research Working Paper No. 2085 (Washington: World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diamond, Douglas W., and Philip H. Dybvig, 1983,Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 91 (June), pp. 401 –19.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dimson, Elroy, and Paul Marsh, 1997,Stress Tests of Capital Requirements,Journal of Ranking and Finance, Vol. 21 (December), pp. 1515 –46.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dornbusch, Rudiger, llan Goldfajn, and Rodrigo O. Valdés, 1995,Currency Crises and Collapses,Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics 2, Brookings Institution, pp. 219 –94.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Downes, Patrick T., David Marston, and Ínci Ötker, 1999,Mapping Financial Sector Vulnerability in a Non-Crisis Country,IMF Policy Discussion Paper 99/4 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ediz, Tolga, Ian Michael, and William Perraudin, 1998,The Impact of Capital Requirements on U.K. Bank Behavior,Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol. 4 (October), pp. 15 –22 (London: Bank of England).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eichengreen, Barry, and Andrew K. Rose, 1998,Staying Afloat When the Wind Shifts: External Factors and Emerging-Market Banking Crises,NBER Working Paper No, 6370 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research),

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Esquivel, Gerardo, and Felipe B. Larraín, 1998,Explaining Currency Crises,Harvard Institute for International Development, Development Discussion Paper No. 666 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 1997, History of the Eighties: Lessons for the Future (Washington).

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 1997, Maintaining Financial Stability in a Global Economy: A Symposium (Kansas City).

  • Fisher, Irving, 1933,The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions,Econometrica, Vol. 1 (October), pp. 337 –57.

  • Fitch IBCA, 1998, International Bank Rating Methodology, October 1, 1998 (New York).

  • Folkerts-Landau, David, and Carl-Johan Lindgren, 1998, Toward a Framework for Financial Stability, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frankel, Jeffrey A., and Andrew K. Rose, 1996,Currency Crashes in Emerging Markets: An Empirical Treatment,Journal of International Economics, Vol. 41 (November), pp. 351 –66.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fratzscher, Marcel, 1998,Why Are Currency Crises Contagious? A Comparison of the Latin American Crisis of 1994–1995 and the Asian Crisis of 1997–1998,Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 134, No. 4. pp. 664 –91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Furman, Jason, and Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1998,Economic Crises: Evidence and Insights from East Asia,Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics 2, Brookings Institution, pp. 1 –135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gavin, Michael, and Ricardo Hausmann, 1996,The Roots of Banking Crises: The Macroeeonomic Context,Inter-American Development Bank Working Paper No. 318 (Washington: Inter-American Development Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glick, Reuven, Andrew Rose, 1998,Contagion and Trade: Why Are Currency Crises Regional?NBER Working Paper No. 6806 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goldstein, Morris, and Philip Turner, 1996, Banking Crises in Emerging Economies: Origins and Policy Options, BIS Economic Paper No. 46 (Basel: Bank for International Settlements).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • González-Hermosillo, Brenda, 1999,Determinants of Ex-Ante Banking System Distress: A Macro-Micro Empirical Exploration of Some Recent Episodes,IMF Working Paper 99/33 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • González-Hermosillo, Brenda, Ceyla Pazarbaşioğlu, and Robert Billings, 1997,Determinants of Banking System Fragility: A Case Study of Mexico,Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, Vol. 44 (September), pp. 295 –314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodhart, Charles, 1995,Price Stability and Financial Fragility,in Financial Stability in a Changing Environment, ed. by Kuniho Sawamoto, Zenta Nakajima and Hiroo Taguchi (New York: St Martin’s Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guttentag, Jack, and Richard Herring, 1984,Credit Rationing and Financial Disorder,Journal of Finance. Vol. 39 (December), pp. 1359 –82.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haque, Nadeem Ul, Nelson C. Mark, and Donald J. Mathieson, 1998,The Relative Importance of Political and Economic Variables in Creditworthiness Ratings,IMF Working Paper 98/46 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardy, Daniel C., and Ceyla Pazarbaşioğlu, 1998,Leading Indicators of Banking Crises: Was Asia Different?,IMF Working Paper 98/91 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hendricks, Darryll, 1996,Evaluation of Value-at-Risk Models Using Historical Data,Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol. 2 (April), pp. 39 –69.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hilbers, Paul, Russell Krueger, and Marina Moretti, 1999,Macroprudenlial Indicators—Seminar Discusses Ways to Assess Soundness of Financial System to Improve Surveillance,IMF Survey, Vol. 28. No. 18, pp. 296 –97.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Honohan, Patrick, 1997,Banking System Failures in Developing and Transition Countries: Diagnosis and Prediction,BIS Working Paper No. 39 (Basel: Bank for International Settlements).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 1998, World Economic Outlook: May 1998, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 1999a,Communiqué of the Interim Committee of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund,PR/99/46, September 26, 1999.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 1999b, World Economic Outlook: May 1999, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington).

  • International Monetary Fund, 1999c, International Capital Markets: Developments, Prospects, and Key Policy Issues, World Economic and Financial Surveys (Washington).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 1999d,Data Template on International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity: Operational Guidelines,IMF Statistics Department. Available via the Internet: http://dsbb.imf.org/guide.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts, 1993, System of National Accounts 1993. Prepared under the auspices of the Commission of the European Communities—Eurostat, IMF, OECD, United Nations, and World Bank (Brussels: Commission of the European Communities).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaminsky, Graciela, 1999,Currency and Banking Crises: The Early Warnings of Distress,IMF Working Paper 99/178 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaminsky, Graciela, Saul Lizondo, and Carmen Reinhart, 1998,Leading Indicators of Currency Crises,IMF Staff Papers. Vol. 45 (March), pp. 1 –48.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen Reinhart, 1998,On Crises, Contagion, and Confusion,(unpublished; Washington: George Washington University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaminsky, Graciela, and Carmen Reinhart, 1999,The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance-of-Payments Problems,American Economic Review, Vol. 89 (June) pp. 473 –500.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kawai, Masahiro, 1998,The East Asian Currency Crisis: Causes and Lessons,Contemporary Economic Policy. Vol. 16 (April), pp. 157 –72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keeley, Michael C., 1990,Deposit Insurance, Risk, and Market Power in Banking,American Economic Review, Vol. 80 (December), pp. 1183 –200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kodres, Laura, and Matthew Pritsker, 1998,A Rational Expectations Model of Financial Contagion,Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 1998–48 (Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kwack, Sung, 1998,The Financial Crisis in Korea: Causes and Cure,IMF Seminar Series No. 1998–19 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lane, William R., Stephen W. Looney, and James W. Wansley, 1986,An Application of the Cox Proportional Hazards Model to Bank Failure,Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 10 (December), pp. 511 –31.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindgren, Carl-Johan, Gillian Garcia, and Matthew I. Saal, 1996, Bank Soundness and Macroeconomic Policy (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mishkin, Frederic S., 1996,Understanding Financial Crises: A Developing Country Perspective,NBER Working Paper No. 5600 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moody’s Investors Service, 1999, Bank Financial Strength Ratings (New York).

  • Norges Bank, 1998,Financial Sector Outlook: Second Half of 1998,Economic Bulletin, Vol. 69, Issue No.4 (Oslo).

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1999, Bank Profitability; Financial Statements of Banks 1999 (Paris).

  • Radelet, Steven, and Jeffrey D. Sachs, 1998,The East Asian Financial Crisis: Diagnosis, Remedies, Prospects,Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomic 1. Brookings Institution, pp. 1 –90,

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rojas-Suárez, Liliana, and Steven R. Weisbrod, 1995, Financial Fragilities in Latin America: The 1980s and 1990s, IMF Occasional Paper No, 132 (Washington: international Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sachs, Jeffrey D., Aaron Tornell, and Andrés Velasco, 1996,Financial Crises in Emerging Markets: The Lessons from 1995,Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics 1, Brookings Institution, pp. 147 –215.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scharfstein, David S., and Jeremy C. Stein, 1990,Herd Behavior and InvestmentAmerican Economic Review, Vol. 80 (June), pp. 465 –79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sinkey, Joseph F., 1978,Identifying ‘Problem’ Banks: How Do the Banking Authorities Measure a Bank’s Risk Exposure?Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 10 (May), pp. 184 –93.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Standard & Poor’s, 1999, Bank Rating Analysis Methodology Profile, February (New York).

  • Sveriges Riksbank, 1999, Financial Stability Report, May (Stockholm).

  • Thomson Financial BankWatch, 1999, BankWatch Ratings—Characteristics and Methodology (New York).

  • Thomson, James B., 1991,Predicting Bank Failures in the 1980s,Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 9 –20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United States, Department of the Treasury, 1999,Statement of G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors,LS-120, September 25, 1999.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whalen, Gary, 1991,A Proportional Hazards Model of Bank Failure: An Examination of Its Usefulness as an Early Warning Tool,Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 21 –31.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation