Abstract

Because of the severe limitations of the available data that are discussed in Appendix I, only the broadest conclusions can be made about the structure and the recent evolution of the WBGS balance of payments. In 1995–96, the balance of payments was characterized by the following.

Because of the severe limitations of the available data that are discussed in Appendix I, only the broadest conclusions can be made about the structure and the recent evolution of the WBGS balance of payments. In 1995–96, the balance of payments was characterized by the following.

(i) Large trade deficits, averaging US$1.2 billion (or 38 percent of GDP) annually, were recorded, incurred largely in trade with Israel as a result of the existing trade arrangements (see below)(Table 9). Exports, estimated at under US$0.4 billion in 1996, were mainly related to subcontracting in labor-intensive sectors such as shoes and clothing, and a few agricultural goods;

Table 9.

West Bank and Gaza Strip: Balance of Payments, 1992–97

(In millions of U.S. dollars)

article image
Sources: Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics; Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation; Palestinian Monetary Authority; and IMF staff estimates.

(ii) Labor income from the employment of Palestinians in Israel, averaging almost 8 percent of GDP annually (compared with an annual average of 29 percent of GDP in 1992–93), partly financed the trade deficits;

(iii) Substantial donor assistance, accounting for average annual inflows of 17 percent of GDP, also financed a substantial part of the trade deficits (see Box 6); and

(iv) The goods and services deficit, as well as a build-up of net foreign assets equivalent to 14 percent of GDP annually in 1995–96, was financed mainly by private capital inflows and/or unrequited transfers (an average of 33 percent of GDP annually).

This amount includes a portfolio shift out of currency and into bank deposits on the part of the population as well as other capital and transfer inflows from Palestinians working in the diaspora, but nevertheless cannot be fully explained.12

After the steady decline in both commodity exports and imports in 1993–94, both are estimated to have increased in 1995.13 The trade deficit in 1995 was almost US$1.3 billion. At the same time, the surplus in the services account narrowed sharply, reflecting primarily the decline in workers’ remittances. The number of Palestinian workers in Israel is estimated to have declined by about 39 percent to a little over 32,000 workers. As a result, the deficit in the goods and services account peaked at 37 percent of GDP. This deficit was financed by the sharp increase in unexplained private capital inflows and/or unrequited transfers as well as public external assistance.

The border closures and the weakening of economic activity in 1996 resulted in the narrowing of the deficit in the goods and services account of the WBGS. In particular, exports declined by about 15 percent and imports by about 10 percent. Given, however, the very low base of exports compared with imports, the deficit in the trade balance declined in 1996 to less than US$1.2 billion, or about 37 percent of GDP, from 40 percent of GDP in 1995. On the other hand, the surplus in the services account, reflecting the impact of border closures on worker remittances, fell by almost two percentage points of GDP. However, the recurrent deficit was financed by private capital inflows and/or private unrequited transfers that are expected to remain high, although about US$170 million less than in 1995.

11

Complete data on lending to and borrowing from the government are not available.