Abstract

Supporting domestic demand, addressing crisis legacies, rebuilding buffers against external shocks, and improving the business environment to boost investment and long-term growth are still the key policy challenges for CESEE countries.

Supporting domestic demand, addressing crisis legacies, rebuilding buffers against external shocks, and improving the business environment to boost investment and long-term growth are still the key policy challenges for CESEE countries.

The country-specific priorities depend on how far along these economies are in the postcrisis adjustment and their exposure to external risks:

  • Where the recovery is well advanced, the policy priorities need to increasingly shift toward the medium term, including rebuilding fiscal buffers and continuing with reforms to improve the business environment and address structural weaknesses. This is not to deny that there is still a lot of uncertainty about the strength of global recovery that, domestically, inflation is still too low in many CESEE economies, and that the key crisis legacies—high NPLs and debt overhangs—still need further work (notably in SEE).

  • For economies that are in recession (Russia and other CIS countries), the key challenge is to steer the adjustment to terms-of-trade and other shocks with a view to supporting weak internal demand and reducing high inflation.

  • Countries vulnerable to external shocks—such as those with large external financing needs, weak fiscal positions or high dependence on commodity exports—need to be prepared to deal with market pressures by using exchange rate flexibility as a shock absorber (Russia, Turkey) alongside macroprudential policies to contain the build-up of financial sector risks, and also gradually rebuilding FX-reserves buffers (Turkey).

Inflation Challenges

In low-inflation economies, monetary policy should remain accommodative. Additional policy action may be necessary if inflation expectations continue to decline, or interest-rate differentials widen, resulting in unwarranted upward pressure on exchange rates that could prove disinflationary. Countries that do not have monetary autonomy – euro peggers or euro area members – have less scope for policy action (Figure 3.1). Where activity is still sluggish and fiscal space allows, countries could use discretionary, expansionary fiscal policies.

Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1.

CESEE: Headline Inflation, 2015

(Percent, year-over-year)

Source: IMF estimates;Note: Euro area countries and euro peggers are in RED.

For high-inflation economies, policies should aim to address excess demand pressures and external vulnerabilities to increase confidence in the currency.

Fiscal Challenges

Despite improvements in their budgetary structures, CESEE countries face significant fiscal challenges. Most CESEE countries still face sizable adjustment needs to stabilize debt levels and/or return to full compliance with the EU’s fiscal rules. The need for further consolidation tends to be larger in SEE. The analysis in this report offers some insights.

Countries with sizable fiscal adjustment needs (mostly in SEE; Figure 3.2) could achieve more growth-friendly fiscal consolidation via cutbacks in subsidies and tax incentives, reforms to entitlement programs, and the introduction or strengthening of modern property tax regimes. In a number of economies, tax compliance and administration need to be improved. At the same time, productive public investment should be shielded from cuts. EU member states should increase the absorption of EU funds and increase their focus on projects that could better enhance potential growth.

Figure 3.2.
Figure 3.2.

CESEE: Estimated Remaining Adjustment Needs

(Percent of GDP)

Note: The debt stabilizing primary balance uses current debt level as a benchmark; -1 percent of GDP is the European Commission’s Medium Term Objective for many CESEE countries. Neither metric gives a full account of fiscal consolidation needs.

Countries that do not have urgent consolidation needs could concentrate their efforts on improving their budgetary structures. This would involve reducing corporate income taxes in line with peers or replacing corporate income taxation with increased personal income taxation, especially for higher earners; financing a larger portion of social spending from general taxation, particularly the VAT, instead of social security contributions; and taking steps to enhance the amount and efficiency of health and capital spending, while limiting unproductive transfers and subsidies.

Balance-Sheet Repair

Addressing high NPLs and debt overhangs requires a comprehensive approach. A recent IMF study on the causes and consequences of persistently high NPLs in Europe (Aiyar and others 2015) finds that the weak economic recovery is only part of the story and that the underlying reasons are often deep rooted. A new survey of European country authorities and banks shows that deficiencies in the legal framework and underdeveloped distressed debt markets are, on average, seen as the most severe obstacles to distressed debt resolution in countries with high NPL levels across Europe.

For SEE countries, obstacles to NPL resolution related to information access, legal systems, and distressed debt market functioning are regarded as more severe than in other European countries with high NPLs (Figure 3.3). Furthermore, different obstacles tend to be interlinked, with difficulties in one area compounding challenges in others. Thus, resolving high NPLs requires a comprehensive strategy that includes tightened supervisory policies, insolvency reforms, and measures to develop distressed debt markets (see Aiyar and others 2015 for detailed recommendations).

Figure 3.3.
Figure 3.3.

IMF Survey-Based Scores on Obstacles to the Resolution of Nonperforming Loans

Source: IMF surveys of country authorities and banks.Notes: The figure shows average obstacle scores based on the survey responses of European countries with high numbers (over 10 percent of gross loans at postcrisis peak) in each of five areas (information, supervisory framework, tax regime, legal framework, and distressed debt market). The scores range from 1 to 3, where 3 = high degree of concern, 2 = medium degree of concern; and 1 = no concern. CESEE = Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe.; SEE=Southeastern Europe.

Long-term growth challenges

Lifting potential growth is a key medium-term goal for CESEE countries. For much of the region, long-term growth forecasts are now substantially lower than before the crisis (Figure 3.4), largely due to lower total factor productivity. Capital flows to the region are and will likely remain significantly below pre-crisis levels. At the same time demographic dynamics are markedly negative in many countries across the region. In this context, sustained productivity gains can only materialize through structural reforms focused on expanding the role of the private sector, increasing labor and product market flexibility, accelerating the restructuring of loss-making state-owned enterprises, and improving the efficiency of public administrations and the judiciary.

Figure 3.4.
Figure 3.4.

CESEE: Long-Term Growth Forecasts in 2007 and 2015

(Percent)

Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook.Note: CEE = Central and Eastern Europe; CESEE = Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe; CIS = Commonwealth of Independent States; SEE = Southeastern Europe.
  • View in gallery

    CESEE: Headline Inflation, 2015

    (Percent, year-over-year)

  • View in gallery

    CESEE: Estimated Remaining Adjustment Needs

    (Percent of GDP)

  • View in gallery

    IMF Survey-Based Scores on Obstacles to the Resolution of Nonperforming Loans

  • View in gallery

    CESEE: Long-Term Growth Forecasts in 2007 and 2015

    (Percent)

  • Abbring, J., G. Berg and J. Ours, 2005, “The Effect of Unemployment Insurance Sanctions on the Transition Rate from Unemployment to Employment,Economic Journal, Vol. 115(505), pp 602630.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Acosta-Ormaechea, S., and J. Yoo, 2012, “Tax Composition and Growth: A Broad Cross-Country Perspective,IMF Working Paper No. 12/257 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Acosta-Ormaechea, S. and Morozumi, A., 2013, “Can a Government Enhance Long-Run Growth by Changing the Composition of Public Expenditure?IMF Working Paper 13/162 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Afonso A., and J. Alegre, 2011, “Economic growth and budgetary components: a panel assessment for the EU,Empirical Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 703723.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Agnello, L., and R. Sousa, 2012, “How Does Fiscal Consolidation Impact on Income Inequality?,Banque de France, Document de Travail 282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Andrle, M., P. Blagrave, P. Espaillat, K. Honjo, B. Hunt, M. Kortelainen, R. Lalonde, D. Laxton, E. Mavroeidi, D. Muir, S. Mursula, and Snudden, S., 2015, “The Flexible System of Global Models – FSGM,IMF Working Paper 14/17 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arnold, J., 2008, “Do tax structures affect aggregate economic growth? Empirical evidence from a panel of OECD countries,OECD Economics Department Working Paper 643, (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aschauer, D., 1989, “Is Public Expenditure Productive?,Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 177200.

  • Ball, L., Furceri, D., Leigh, D. and P. Loungani, 2013, “The Distributional Effects of Fiscal Austerity,IMF Working Paper No. 13/151 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin, 1992, “Public Finance in Models of Economic Growth,The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 59, Issue 4 (October), pp. 645661.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blundell, R., and S. Bond, 1998, “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models,Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 87, pp. 115143.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blundell, R., A. Duncan and C. Meghir, 1998, “Estimating labor supply responses using tax reforms,Econometrica 66, pp. 827861.

  • Bom, P.R.D., J. E. Ligthart, 2009. “How Productive is Public Capital? A Meta-Regression Analysis,Working Paper No. 0912, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bornhorst, F., G. Dobrescu, A. Fedelino, J. Gottschalk, and T. Nakata, 2011, “When and How to Adjust Beyond the Business Cycle? A Guide to Structural Fiscal Balances,Technical Notes and Manuals 11/02, April (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bose, N., M. Haque, and D. Osborn, 2003, “Public expenditure and economic growth: a disaggregated analysis for developing countries,Centre for Growth and Business Cycle Research Discussion Paper Series 30, University of Manchester.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cournede, B., A. Goujard, and A. Pina, 2014, “Reconciling fiscal consolidation with growth and equity,OECD Journal: Economic Studies, Vol. 2013/1, (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crivelli, E., and S. Gupta, 2014, “Resource blessing, revenue curse? Domestic revenue effort in resource-rich countries,European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 35, pp. 88101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crivelli, E., M. Keen, and R. De Mooij, 2015, “Base Erosion, Profit Shifting, and Developing Countries,IMF Working Paper 15/118 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • De Mooij, R. and S. Ederveen, 2008, “corporate tax elasticities: A reader’s guide to empirical findings,Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24(4), pp. 680697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dharmapala, D., 2014, “what do we know about base erosion and profit shifting? A review of empirical literature,Fiscal Studies 35, pp. 42148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dhont, T. and F. Heylen, 2009, “Employment and growth in Europe and the US: the role of fiscal policy composition,Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 61, pp. 538565.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eissa, N. and J. Liebman, 1996, “Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit,Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, pp. 605637.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Federe, E. and B. Dahlby, 2012, “The impact of tax cuts on economic growth: Evidence from the Canadian provinces,National Tax Journal, Vol. 65(3), pp. 563594.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Girouard, N., and C. Andre, 2005, “Measuring Cyclically Adjusted Budget Balances for OECD Countries,OECD Economics Department, Working Paper 434, (Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gupta, S., B. Clements, E. Baldacci, and C. Mulas-Granados, 2005, “Fiscal policy, expenditure composition and growth in low-income countries,Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 24(3), pp. 441463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hall, R. and D. Jorgenson, 1967, “Tax policy and investment behavior,American Economic Review 57, pp. 391414.

  • Heinz, F. and Y. Sun, 2014, “ Sovereign CDS Spreads in Europe: The Role of Global Risk Aversion, Economic Fundamentals, Liquidity, and Spillovers,IMF Working Paper 14/17 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herrera, S. and G. Pang, 2005Efficiency of Public Spending in Developing Countries: An Efficiency Frontier Approach,Policy Research Working Papers 3645 (Washington: The World Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund, 2013, “Fiscal Adjustment in an Uncertain World,IMF Fiscal Monitor, April.

  • International Monetary Fund, 2014a, “Back to Work: How Fiscal Policy can Help,IMF Fiscal Monitor, October.

  • International Monetary Fund, 2014b, “Fiscal Policy and Income Inequality,Policy Paper 23, January.

  • International Monetary Fund, 2014c, “Budget Institutions in G20 Countries—An Update,Policy Paper, April.

  • International Monetary Fund, 2015a, “Fiscal Policy and Long-Term Growth,Policy Paper, June 2015.

  • International Monetary Fund, 2015b, “Mind the Credit Gap,Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe Regional Economic Issues, May.

  • International Monetary Fund, 2015c, “Making Public Investment More Efficient,Policy Paper, June 2015.

  • Johansson, A., C. Heady, J. Arnold, B. Brys, and L. Vartia, 2008, “Tax and Economic Growth,OECD Economics Department Working Paper 620 (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joumard, I. and P. Kongsrud, 2003, “Fiscal Relations across Government Levels,OECD Economics Department Working Paper 375 (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • King, R. and S. Rebelo, 1990, “Public Policy and Economic Growth: Developing Neoclassical Implications,Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98(5).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kneller, R., M. Bleaney, and N. Gemmell, 1999, “Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries,Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 74(2), pp. 171190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kopits (2008), “The Political Economy of Fiscal Reform in Central and Eastern Europe,OECD Journal of Budgeting 2008/3, (Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, Y. and R. Gordon, 2005, “Tax structure and economic growth,Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 89(5), pp. 10271043.

  • Mendoza, E., G. Milesi-Ferretti, and P. Asea, 1997, “On the ineffectiveness of tax policy in altering long-run growth: Harberger’s superneutrality conjecture,Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 66(1), pp. 99126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyer, B. D., 2002, “Labor supply at the extensive and intensive margins: The EITC, Welfare, and Hours Worked”, American Economic Review, Vol. 92(2), pp. 373379.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mulas-Granados Carlos, 2005, “Fiscal Adjustments and the Short-term Trade-off between Economic Growth and Inequality,Revista de Economía Publica, Vol. 172(1), pp. 6192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norregaard, J., 2012, “Taxing Immovable Property: Revenue Potential and Implementation Challenges,IMF Working Paper 13/129, (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Odedokun, M., 2001, “Public finance and economic growth: Empirical evidence from developing countries,Research Discussion Paper 2001/72, World Institute for Development Economics.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2006, Employment Outlook

  • Pecorino, P., 1993, “Tax Structure and Growth in a Model with Human CapitalJournal of Public Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 251271.

  • Pissarides, C., 1998, “The impact of employment tax cuts on unemployment and wages; the role of unemployment benefits and tax structure,European Economic Review 42, pp. 155183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodrik, D., 1998, “Why do more open economies have bigger governments?,Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pp. 9971032, October.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romp, W., and J. De Haan, 2007, “Public capital and economic growth: A critical survey,Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 8(S1), 652.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stepanyan, A., Roitman, A., Minasyan, G., Ostojic, D., and N., Epstein, 2015, “The Spillover Effects of Russia’s Economic Slowdown on Neighboring CountriesIMF Departmental Paper (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tanzi, V., & Tsibouris, G., 2000, “Fiscal reform over ten years of transition,IMF Working Paper 00/113, (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woo, J., Bova, E. Kinda, T. and S. Zhang, 2013, “Distributional Consequences of Fiscal Consolidation and the Role of Fiscal Policy: What Do the Data Say?IMF Working Paper No. 13/195 (Washington: International Monetary Fund).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation