Article

In Search of Greater Global Balance

Author(s):
International Monetary Fund. External Relations Dept.
Published Date:
April 2007
Share
  • ShareShare
Show Summary Details

Some analysts argue that large global imbalances—the U.S. trade deficit and the surpluses of some advanced economies, emerging markets, and oil exporters—can be sustained for a relatively long time because they reflect secular changes in the global economy, such as the integration into world markets of countries with large and underutilized labor forces and the relatively less rapid aging of the U.S. population. According to this view, the narrowing of the imbalances will depend on a rebalancing of the saving and investment behaviors of the United States and the surplus economies, with exchange rate realignment playing a minor role.

Others argue that because of the incomplete global integration of markets for goods and services and the rigidities that impede the reallocation of resources to tradable sectors, a narrowing of global imbalances will require a rebalancing of demand between the United States and surplus economies plus considerable movement in real exchange rates to avoid a prolonged U.S. recession.

History sheds some light

Chapter 3 of the IMF’s April 2007 World Economic Outlook (WEO) looks at a broad range of countries over the past 40 years to identify episodes of large external imbalances. It then looks at the length of the episodes and the roles real exchange rates and changes in growth differentials played in the adjustment of the imbalances.

Depreciation helps

During deficit reversals, GDP growth in advanced economies declined less when their currency depreciation was large.

Citation: 36, 6; 10.5089/9781451938319.023.A007

Sources: IMF staff calculations.

1Maximum change in real effective exchange rate within the period surrounding the reversal (-T…T). A decrease represents a real depreciation of a country’s currency relative to its trading partners.

2Average real GDP growth after the reversal (1…T) less average real GDP growth before the reversal (-T…-1).

The issue: Large external imbalances are considered potentially risky, but how can they be reduced?

The bottom line: Cross-country experiences suggest that a market-led realignment of real exchange rates, in conjunction with a balancing of demand across countries, can smooth the unwinding of external imbalances.

The debate: There’s no consensus about how long such imbalances can be sustained or the channels through which adjustment takes place.

The WEO analysis shows that movements of real exchange rates helped smooth the rebalancing of demand involved in the narrowing of external imbalances. GDP growth declined less in advanced countries undergoing a large and sustained reversal of external deficits when their currency depreciation was relatively large (see chart). Domestic policies were also important for external adjustment. In particular, increases in saving rates and strong fiscal consolidation in deficit countries helped sustain investment and growth rates. For both advanced and emerging market countries, large and sustained reversals of external surpluses tended to entail real currency appreciations. Moreover, when countries’ surpluses narrowed, domestic demand generally picked up and monetary and fiscal policies were more expansionary.

U.S. trade balance

The WEO analysis suggests that U.S. trade volumes may be more responsive to changes in the real value of the U.S. dollar than is often assumed. Standard trade models tend to underestimate this response because they do not account for the large differences in response across sectors or for the extent to which imports include intermediate products that are produced domestically. Furthermore, long-run U.S. trade price elasticity has increased over time, reflecting greater competition among firms in an increasingly globalized economy. Taking these factors into account, the WEO finds that a real depreciation of the U.S. dollar of 5-10 percent, rather than the usually quoted 10-20 percent, could reduce the U.S. trade deficit by 1 percent of GDP. The current U.S. trade deficit represents about 6½ percent of GDP.

In sum, the adjustment of global imbalances will probably entail a combination of exchange rate movements and a rebalancing of domestic demand—rising rates of absorption in surplus countries and lower demand growth in the United States. Fiscal consolidation designed to ensure that the U.S. economy is well placed to face the cost of population aging would also help.

Roberto Cardarelli and Alessandro Rebucci

IMF Research Department

Other Resources Citing This Publication