IMF Staff Position Notes

IMF Staff Position Notes
Journal
Publisher:
International Monetary Fund
ISSN:
2072-3202
Staff Position Notes (SPNs) showcase new policy-related analysis and research by IMF departments. SPNs are concise, employ nontechnical language, and aim at a broad audience interested in economic policy issues, including staff involved in mission work, members of the Executive Board, and readers outside the Fund. This series replaced IMF Policy Discussion Papers at the end of 2008. Most SPNs are limited to 25 pages and present only a few simple equations, tables, and charts; this format distinguishes them from IMF Working Papers, which tend to be longer and generally more technical in nature.
Get eTOC Alert

Table of contents

Download

Fiscal Space

Fiscal Space
Get Code Buy
Journal Issue
Share
Volume/Issue:
2010/11
Series:
IMF Staff Position Notes
Author(s):
Jonathan Ostry, Atish Ghosh, Jun Kim, and Mahvash Qureshi
Publisher:
INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND
Published Date:
September 2010
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781455228010.004
ISBN:
9781455228010
ISSN:
2072-3202
Page:
25
In this note, the authors reexamine the issue of debt sustainability in a large group of advanced economies. Their hypothesis is that, when debt is in a moderate range, its dynamics are sustainable in the sense that increases in debt elicit sufficient increases in primary fiscal balances to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio. At high debt levels, however, the dynamics may turn unstable, and the debt ratio may not converge to a finite level. Such a framework allows the authors to define a 'debt limit' that is consistent with a country's historical track record of adjustment in the sense that, without an extraordinary fiscal effort, any debt increment beyond this limit would cause debt to increase without bound. This debt limit is not an absolute and immutable barrier, however, but rather defines a critical point above which a country's normal fiscal response to rising debt becomes insufficient to maintain debt sustainability. Nor should this debt limit be interpreted as being in any sense the optimal level of public debt. Indeed, since this limit delineates the point at which fiscal solvency is called into question-and the analysis abstracts entirely from liquidity/rollover risk-prudence dictates that countries will typically want to be well below their debt limit. Given a country's normal pattern of adjustment, 'fiscal space' is then simply the difference between its debt limit and its current level of debt.
Share
  • ShareShare