Narrow Your Choices

Refine By Topic

Refine By Series

Refine By Language

Refine By Date

—

Refine By IMF Taxonomy

Refine By JEL Taxonomy

Refine by LOC Taxonomy

Refine By THEMA Taxonomy

  • Print
  • Save

Middle East and Central Asia > Kyrgyz Republic

You are looking at 1 - 4 of 4 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Public investments x
Clear All Modify Search
Cover Technical Assistance Reports
Republic of Tajikistan: Technical Assistance Report-Public Investment Management Assessment with the Climate Module
International Monetary Fund. Fiscal Affairs Dept.
This report summarizes findings from a Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA) and the Climate Module (C-PIMA) conducted for Tajikistan. The assessment evaluated the country's public investment management practices, including their climate sensitivity. Tajikistan performs well in certain areas but faces significant gaps in others. Parallel external and internally financed processes present recurring challenges across Tajikistan’s public investment management framework, limiting consistency and strategic alignment. Implementing a comprehensive framework for overseeing all projects, regardless of funding source, would significantly improve efficiency and climate responsiveness.
Keywords:
Republic of Tajikistan; Public investment management; PIMA; C-PIMA; climate change; Green PFM; climate-sensitive infrastructure.; D. Investment allocation; authorities of the Republic of Tajikistan; investment project; Republic of Tajikistan analysis; Investment planning; priorities in Tajikistan; management institution; Public investment spending; Budget planning and preparation; Infrastructure; Central Asia; Central Asia and the Caucasus
Cover IMF Staff Country Reports
Kyrgyz Republic: Ex Post Assessment of Longer-Term Program Engagement
International Monetary Fund
This Ex Post Assessment of Longer-Term Program Engagement for the Kyrgyz Republic explains macroeconomic and structural performance. External debt service claimed a steadily increasing share of fiscal revenues, but a strengthened commitment to prudent fiscal policies and improved policy capacity have helped to turn around macroeconomic performance. Fiscal policy must deliver on its revenue targets, while addressing poverty and servicing large external debt obligations. Debt reduction must continue to be a main objective of any IMF-supported program.
Keywords:
ISCR; CR; current account; U.S. dollar; fiscal policy; exchange rate; central bank; state government; balance of payments; Exports; Export performance; Public investment spending; Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP); Baltics
Cover IMF Staff Country Reports
Kyrgyz Republic: Staff Report for the 2001 Article IV Consultation and Request for Three-Year Arrangement Under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility
International Monetary Fund
Executive Directors commend the government for their achievements in macroeconomic stabilization. Continuing growth, low inflation, and stability in the foreign exchange market provide a solid foundation for the new program. Renewed effort to strengthen tax administration is required. Success in fiscal consolidation depends on streamlining public investment. The National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic (NBKR) has to balance between maintaining low inflation and satisfying the economy's liquidity needs. A continuation of the tight monetary policy is needed. The Kyrgyz Republic's external debt is a serious problem.
Keywords:
ISCR; CR; Kyrgyz authorities; government; IDA enterprise loan; Kyrgyzstan; GDP; enterprise loan; near-term strategy; NBKR liability; central government budget arrears; Public investment spending; Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP); Debt strategy; Asia and Pacific; Central Asia
Cover IMF Working Papers
Output Decline and Recovery in Uzbekistan: Past Performance and Future Prospects
Mr. Jeromin Zettelmeyer
and
Mr. Günther Taube
What explains Uzbekistan’s unusually mild “transformational recession” and its moderate recovery during 1996-97? We examine potential biases in output measurement, the role of “special factors”—including initial production structure, natural resources, and public investment policies—and sectoral output developments. The main findings are (i) Uzbekistan’s relatively favorable output record is not an artifact of measurement alone; (ii) public investment has had no significant effects on growth; (iii) the mildness of Uzbekistan’s transitional recession can be accounted for by its favorable initial production structure and its self-sufficiency in energy; (iv) unless reforms are significantly accelerated, medium-term growth prospects are mediocre.
Keywords:
WP; Uzbek experience; output performance; reform policy; private sector; Uzbek growth path; Uzbekistan; Transition; Growth; Output; Sustainability; unmeasured Uzbekistan effect; Uzbek authorities; Uzbek growth experience; consumer goods; Agricultural commodities; Structural reforms; Agricultural sector; Public investment spending; Baltics