Narrow Your Choices

Refine By Topic

Refine By Series

Refine By Language

Refine By Date

—

Refine By IMF Taxonomy

Refine By JEL Taxonomy

Refine by LOC Taxonomy

Refine By THEMA Taxonomy

  • Print
  • Save

Europe > Ireland

You are looking at 1 - 7 of 7 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Public-private sector cooperation x
Clear All Modify Search
Cover IMF Working Papers
Public versus Private Cost of Capital with State-Contingent Terminal Value
Luciano Greco
and
Mariano Moszoro
The economic debate underlines the reasons why discount rates of infrastructure projects should be similar, regardless the public or private source of financing, during the forecast period when flows are risky but predictable. In contrast, we show that the incompleteness of contracts between governments and private firms beyond the forecast period (i.e., when flows of net social benefits are state-contingent) entails expected terminal values that are systematically larger under government rather than private financing. This effect provides a new rationale for applying a lower discount rate in the assessment of projects under public financing as compared to private financing.
Keywords:
Social discount rate; public utilities; private financing of infrastructures; public-private partnerships; discount rates of infrastructure project; A. public financing; financing of infrastructure; private firm; cost of capital; Discount rates; Infrastructure; Public sector; Public investment spending
Cover PIMA Handbook
PIMA Handbook
Public Investment Management Assessment, 1st Edition
International Monetary Fund. Fiscal Affairs Dept.

Abstract

This handbook is aimed at anyone who is involved in a Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA) or who has a practical interest in public investment management. It is intended to be useful for country authorities, IMF staff, staff of other financial institutions and development organizations, and anyone who is interested in exploring different aspects of public investment management to understand how country systems are designed and how they work in practice.

Keywords:
IMF Public Investment Management Assessment; public investment; PIMA; PIM; public investment management; handbook; investment; government; governance; country; spending; infrastructure governance; investment efficiency; investment shock; investment spending; public investment spending; public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP); infrastructure; budget planning; planification; allocation; execution; fiscal rules; global; Asia and Pacific; Africa; Caribbean; Sub-Saharan Africa; Western Hemisphere; Middle East; investment trend; infrastructure investment spending; Pima report; investment planning; PPP investment; Budget planning and preparation; Capital spending; Capital budget
Cover IMF Staff Country Reports
Republic of Estonia: Technical Assistance Report-Public Investment Management Assessment
International Monetary Fund. Fiscal Affairs Dept.
This Technical Assistance Report on the Republic of Estonia highlights that public investment is a priority spending area, and Estonia is seeking to strengthen the efficiency and effectiveness of its capital expenditure from an already high level. Estonia’s public investment is relatively efficient, while further improvements should pay attention to the quality of public services enabled by them. Investment implementation is particularly strong. This reflects Estonia’s open procurement framework that utilizes an advanced e-procurement system, its modern treasury that employs an effective Treasury Single Account system to guarantee cash availability, asset monitoring that has been made routine through full accrual accounting for the whole public sector, and active project management by ministries. Some practices that are already effectively implemented should be formalized in the institutional design which will act as a safeguard. Public investment projects should be managed in an integrated portfolio at all stages of the investment cycle. It is difficult to obtain a picture of all-important investment projects pursued in the public sector including by local governments and state-owned enterprises. A comprehensive portfolio view of all projects supports transparent prioritization across sectors and the identification of systemic patterns or risks.
Keywords:
ISCR; CR; balance sheet; capital expenditure; accounting data; local government; annual budget; Budget planning and preparation; Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP); Public investment spending; Capital spending; Global
Cover Policy Papers
Public Investment Management Assessment - Review and Update
International Monetary Fund. Fiscal Affairs Dept.
Public Investment Management Assessments (PIMAs) are the IMF‘s key tool for assessing infrastructure governance over the full investment cycle and supporting economic institution building in this area. The PIMA framework was first introduced in the 2015 Board Paper on “Making Public Investment More Efficient,” as part of the IMF’s Infrastructure Policy Support Initiative (IPSI). A key motivation for its development has been that strong infrastructure governance is critical for public investment to spur economic growth. PIMAs offer rigorous assessment of infrastructure governance, that is, the key public investment management (PIM) institutions and processes of a country. On the basis of the PIMAs conducted to date, this paper summarizes the lessons learned and updates the assessment framework itself. PIMAs summarize the strengths and weaknesses of country public investment processes, and set out a prioritized and sequenced reform action plan. The PIMA framework has been well-received by member countries, with over 30 PIMAs conducted to date (mainly in emerging markets (EMs) and low income developing countries (LIDCs), and a pipeline of new requests in place; eight PIMAs have been or are about to be published. The PIMAs conducted show that there is much room for strengthening PIM, with weaknesses spread across the investment cycle. The results and recommendations of several PIMAs have been used in IMF lending, surveillance, and capacity development (CD) work, and have improved support and coordination among CD providers. While leaving the structure of the 2015 framework unchanged, the revised PIMA framework highlights some critical governance aspects more prominently. In particular, it brings out more fully some key aspects of maintenance, procurement, independent review of projects, and the enabling environment (e.g., adequacy of the legal framework, information systems, and staff capacity). Yet, the revised PIMA retains the key features of the 2015 framework, including the three-phase structure (planning, allocation, and implementation) with five institutions assigned to each phase, three dimensions under each institution, and three possible scores under each dimension (i.e., not/partially/fully met). The revision has benefitted from extensive stakeholder feedback, including from IMF teams, World Bank staff, and country authorities.
Keywords:
PP; country authorities; infrastructure governance; investment institution; priority reform; reform priority; section IV; efficiency gap; fund member country; department comment; member country request; investment efficiency; country group; Public Investment Management Assessment (PIMA); Public investment spending; Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP); Budget planning and preparation; Infrastructure; Africa; Middle East and Central Asia; Europe; Western Hemisphere; Asia and Pacific
Cover IMF Staff Country Reports
Republic of Poland: Selected Issues
International Monetary Fund
This paper provides three policy lessons to take full advantage of the opportunity afforded by EU funds. The main features of the global integrated monetary and fiscal (GIMF) model and how it was modified to account for income convergence are discussed. The impact of EU funds as exhibited in the model and highlights potential risks related to the authorities’ policy choices, in particular in the fiscal area, are also discussed. The macroeconomic literature on the impact of EU funds can be divided into broad groups: model simulations and econometric studies.
Keywords:
ISCR; CR; EU fund; nominal exchange rate; fund; exchange rate; government wage bill; EU funds; EU fund inflow; wage moderation; EU transfer; Labor markets; Employment; Wages; Public investment spending; Real interest rates; Baltics; Europe; Global
Cover IMF Working Papers
Assessing the Impact of a Change in the Composition of Public Spending: A DSGE Approach
Mr. Ivan Tchakarov
and
Mr. Roland Straub
Despite intense calls for safeguarding public investment in Europe, public investment expenditure, when measured in relation to GDP, has steadily fallen in the last three decades, evoking fears that economic activity may be correspondingly negatively affected. At the same time, however, public consumption in the EU-12 countries has trended up. In this paper, we provide a macroeconomic assessment of the observed change in the composition of public spending in the euro area in a medium-scale two-country dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model. First, we identify the channels through which both temporary and permanent public investment shocks generate larger fiscal multipliers than exogenous increases in public consumption. Second, we quantify the negative impact of a change in fiscal stance, characterized by a permanent rise in public consumption and a permanent fall in public investment, keeping the overall level of public spending constant. The key message of the paper is that calls for reversing the observed trend in the composition of public spending are well justified.
Keywords:
WP; public spending; aggregate demand
Cover Public-Private Partnerships, Government Guarantees, and Fiscal Risk
Public-Private Partnerships, Government Guarantees, and Fiscal Risk
Mr. M. Cangiano
,
Mr. Barry Anderson
,
Mr. Max Alier
,
Murray Petrie
, and
Mr. Richard Hemming

Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) refer to arrangements under which the private sector supplies infrastructure assets and infrastructure-based services that traditionally have been provided by the government. PPPs are used for a wide range of economic and social infrastructure projects, but they are used mainly to build and operate roads, bridges and tunnels, light rail networks, airports and air traffic control systems, prisons, water and sanitation plants, hospitals, schools, and public buildings. PPPs offer benefits similar to those offered by privatization, which is the sale of government-owned enterprises or assets. By the late 1990s, when privatization was losing much of its earlier momentum, PPPs began to be widely seen as a means of obtaining private sector capital and management expertise for infrastructure investment. After a modest start, a wave of PPPs is now beginning to sweep the world. This Special Issue paper provides an overview of some of the issues raised by PPPs, with a particular focus on their fiscal consequences. It also looks at government guarantees, which are used fairly widely to shield the private sector from risk and are a common feature of PPPs. And it examines the consequences of PPPs and guarantees for debt sustainability. The paper concludes with a list of measures that can maximize the benefits and minimize the fiscal risks associated with the use of PPPs. Various appendices augment the discussion by examining country experiences with PPPs, summarizing the statistical reporting framework used to discuss fiscal accounting and reporting, explaining accounting for risk transfer, examining how guarantees are modeled and estimated in Chile, and summarizing international accounting and reporting standards for contingent liabilities.

Keywords:
ISI; SI; guarantee; debt; cost; private sector; PPP asset; PPP investment; concession firm; government balance sheet; charging guarantee fee; PPP contract; Public investment and public-private partnerships (PPP); Public investment spending; Contingent liabilities; Budget planning and preparation; Financial statements; Africa; Central and Eastern Europe; Western Europe; Asia and Pacific; PPP debt; private sector monopolist; debt path; Debt sustainability; Caribbean