Narrow Your Choices

Refine By Topic

Refine By Series

Refine By Language

Refine By Date

—

Refine By IMF Taxonomy

Refine By JEL Taxonomy

Refine by LOC Taxonomy

Refine By THEMA Taxonomy

  • Print
  • Save

Western Hemisphere > Belize

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
  • Investments: Bonds x
Clear All Modify Search
Cover IMF Working Papers
External Private Financing and Domestic Revenue Mobilization: A Dilemma?
Hippolyte W. Balima
,
Deirdre Daly
, and
Mr. Boileau Loko
Domestic revenue mobilization (DRM) is essential for low-income and emerging economies to sustainably finance their development needs and has received increasing attention in recent years. Studies have centered on structural factors such as the size and the structure of the economy, and the quality of institutions, notably to account for weaknesses in revenue administrations. Nevertheless, DRM can take time and carry political costs. Raising more financing through donors or private investors may be an easier and more politically palatable way for countries to meet spending needs. Using an impact assessment methodology and panel regressions over a sample of 72 developing countries, we found no evidence that access to bond markets or external commercial loans undermines the countries’ efforts to collect tax revenue. On the contrary, we found that access to markets has a positive impact on domestic revenue mobilization. Plausible explanations are that private financing must be repaid, and strong macroeconomic fundamentals are key for maintaining market access. We have also found that macroeconomic stability and the strength of institutions do matter for domestic revenue mobilization.
Keywords:
Domestic revenue mobilization; Bond markets; external commercial debt.; WP; market access; access country; access unit; market discipline effect; market financing; external commercial debt; access group; Revenue mobilization; International bonds; Emerging and frontier financial markets; Bonds; Sub-Saharan Africa
Cover IMF Working Papers
Long-Term Returns in Distressed Sovereign Bond Markets: How Did Investors Fare?
Mr. Jochen R. Andritzky
and
Julian Schumacher
Sovereign debt restructurings are perceived as inflicting large losses to bondholders. However, many bonds feature high coupons and often exhibit strong post-crisis recoveries. To account for these aspects, we analyze the long-term returns of sovereign bonds during 32 crises since 1998, taking into account losses from bond exchanges as well as profits before and after such events. We show that the average excess return over risk-free rates in crises with debt restructuring is not significantly lower than the return on bonds in crises without restructuring. Returns differ considerably depending on the investment strategy: Investors who sell during crises fare much worse than buy-and-hold investors or investors entering the market upon signs of distress
Keywords:
WP; excess return; crisis episode; debt crisis; distress investor; net present value; public debt; sovereign risk; sovereign default; bond restructuring; period return; return index; investor type; long-term return; investment strategy; longer-term return; market value; returns in sovereign bond bond market; bond investor; buy-and-hold investor; Bonds; Sovereign bonds; Debt restructuring; Crisis resolution; Global
Cover IMF Working Papers
Belize's 2016-17 Sovereign Debt Restructuring - Third Time Lucky?
Mr. Tamon Asonuma
,
Mr. Michael G. Papaioannou
,
Eriko Togo
, and
Mr. Bert van Selm
This paper examines the causes, processes, and outcomes of Belize’s 2016–17 sovereign debt restructuring—its third episode in last 10 years. As was the case in the earlier two restructurings, in 2006–07 and in 2012–13, the 2016–17 debt restructuring was executed through collaborative engagement with creditors outside an IMF-supported program. While providing liquidity relief and partially addressing long-term debt sustainability concerns, the restructuring will need to be underpinned by ambitious fiscal consolidation and growth-enhancing structural reforms to secure durable gains.
Keywords:
WP; debt; Belize; restructuring experience; Sovereign Debt; Sovereign Defaults; Sovereign Debt Restructurings; Serial Debt Restructurings; restructuring process; debt sustainability concern; NPV haircut; debt portfolio risk; IMF engagement; Belize bond price; restructuring approach; U.S. dollar; face value; coupon rate; amendment terms; debt restructuring process; Debt restructuring; Bonds; Sovereign debt restructuring; Fiscal consolidation; Caribbean
Cover IMF Working Papers
Sovereign Debt Restructurings in Belize: Achievements and Challenges Ahead
Mr. Tamon Asonuma
,
Gerardo Peraza
,
Kristine Vitola
, and
Mr. Takahiro Tsuda
This paper examines the causes, processes, and outcomes of the two Belize sovereign debt restructurings in 2006–07 and in 2012–13 that occurred outside of an IMF-supported program. It finds that the motivation for the two debt restructurings differed, as the former was driven by external liquidity concerns while the latter was motivated by a substantial increase in the coupon rates and future fiscal solvency concerns. Despite differential treatment between residents and non-residents, both 2006–07 and 2012–13 debt exchanges were executed through collaborative engagement, due in part to the existence of a broad-based creditor committee and the authorities’ effective communication strategy. However, while providing temporary liquidity relief, neither of the debt restructurings properly addressed long-term debt sustainability concerns. Going forward, the success of the 2012–13 debt restructuring will still depend on the country’s ability to strengthen fiscal efforts and public debt management framework.
Keywords:
WP; bond; Belize; deficit; exchange offer; External Debt; Inter-Creditor Equity; Sovereign Debt Restructuring; debt exchange; growth performance; step-up coupon; cash flow; Belize debt restructuring; market haircut; amortizing bond; debt exchange operation; market financing; debt sustainability concern; bond exchange; Debt restructuring; Bonds; Debt service; Global
Cover Policy Papers
Sovereign Debt Restructuring - Recent Developments and Implications for the Fund's Legal and Policy Framework
International Monetary Fund
his paper reviews the recent application of the Fund’s policies and practices on sovereign debt restructuring. Specifically, the paper: • recaps in a holistic manner the various policies and practices that underpin the Fund's legal and policy framework for sovereign debt restructuring, including on debt sustainability, market access, financing assurances, arrears, private sector involvement (PSI), official sector involvement (OSI), and the use of legal instruments; • reviews how this framework has been applied in the context of Fund-supported programs and highlights the issues that have emerged in light of recent experience with debt restructuring; and • describes recent initiatives in various fora aimed at promoting orderly sovereign debt restructuring, highlighting differences with the Fund’s existing framework. Based on this stocktaking, the paper identifies issues that could be considered in further depth in follow-up work by staff to assess whether the Fund’s framework for debt restructuring should be adapted: • first, debt restructurings have often been too little and too late, thus failing to re-establish debt sustainability and market access in a durable way. Overcoming these problems likely requires action on several fronts, including (i) increased rigor and transparency of debt sustainability and market access assessments, (ii) exploring ways to prevent the use of Fund resources to simply bail out private creditors, and (iii) measures to alleviate the costs associated with restructurings; • second, while creditor participation has been adequate in recent restructurings, the current contractual, market-based approach to debt restructuring is becoming less potent in overcoming collective action problems, especially in pre-default cases. In response, consideration could be given to making the contractual framework more effective, including through the introduction of more robust aggregation clauses into international sovereign bonds bearing in mind the inter-creditor equity issues that such an approach may raise. The Fund may also consider ways to condition use of its financing more tightly to the resolution of collective action problems; • third, the growing role and changing composition of official lending call for a clearer framework for official sector involvement, especially with regard to non-Paris Club creditors, for which the modality for securing program financing commitments could be tightened; and • fourth, although the collaborative, good-faith approach to resolving external private arrears embedded in the lending into arrears (LIA) policy remains the most promising way to regain market access post-default, a review of the effectiveness of the LIA policy is in order in light of recent experience and the increased complexity of the creditor base. Consideration could also be given to extending the LIA policy to official arrears.
Keywords:
PP; debt exchange; Fund policy; debt restructuring; debt sustainability; Fund staff; market access; Fund resource; Debt restructuring; Sovereign debt restructuring; Bonds; Debt sustainability; Global; West Africa; Africa; Caribbean