Business and Economics > Banks and Banking

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 50 items for :

  • Type: Journal Issue x
Clear All Modify Search
International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department
At the request of Bank of Botswana, a Technical Assistance mission from the Monetary and Capital Markets (MCM) Department visited Gaborone, Botswana during May 27–31, 2024, to assist the authorities in enhancing their forecasting and policy analysis system (FPAS). The mission assessed and advised on both near-term and medium-term forecasting tools and models currently used by the Bank of Botswana. The mission team helped create a new centralized database and introduced a new flexible platform with a suite of models that expands and complements existing near-term forecasting models. The mission team also improved the medium-term forecasting framework by reviewing model calibration, introducing a fiscal block, and recommending further adjustments.
International Monetary Fund. African Dept.
This Selected Issues paper discusses the rationale for and design of a new Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) in Botswana. It reviews the causes of declining financial reserves and calculates fiscal targets that would be needed to achieve insurance and intergenerational equity objectives. While debt ratios have been steady, the government has financed these deficits by drawing down its assets. Intergenerational equity may be better served by creating financial assets, rather than through investment spending, although the two are not mutually exclusive. Botswana has tended to allocate resource revenues primarily to physical and human investment. Before discussing SWF design, it is important to consider the level of savings that the government requires to achieve its policy objectives. There are many reasons why a government may want to generate savings and manage them in a SWF. IMF concludes that a SWF could provide a useful institutional framework to support rebuilding buffers, but achieving significant savings to meaningfully fund an SWF would require much tighter fiscal policy than has been observed in recent years.
Mario Tamez
,
Hans Weenink
, and
Akihiro Yoshinaga
Well-designed legal frameworks and institutional arrangments support the legitimacy of central banks’ autonomous decision-making when grounded on sound legal basis and can prevent over-stepping in the remit of other authorities. This paper explores the key legal intersections of climate change and central banks. Climate change could impact price and finanical stability, which are at the core of a central bank’s mandate. While central banks’ legal frameworks can support climate change efforts they also determine the boundaries of the measures they can adopt. Central banks need to assess their mandate and authority under their current legal frameworks when considering measures to contribute to the global response to climate change, while taking actions to fulfill their legal mandates.
International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department
This technical note discusses assessment of systemic risks and vulnerabilities for banks in Botswana. The systemic risk analysis was conducted in the aftermath of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The assessment is based on stress tests, which simulate the health of the banks under a severe yet plausible adverse scenario. The scenario includes global and domestic inflationary pressures, monetary policy tightness, and a major slowdown of economic activity. The exercises covered eight commercial banks as of June 2022. Three types of stress test exercises were performed: a top-down solvency stress test, a liquidity stress test, and a contagion and interconnectedness stress test. The latter focused on the domestic banking interconnectedness. The financial system appears resilient to a wide range of shocks. Solvency stress tests identify small capital shortfalls in two banks under the adverse scenario. The Financial Sector Assessment Program recommends that the Bank of Botswana introduces macro and micro level stress test based on a multiperiod scenario analysis and develops its framework to assess interest rate risk in the banking book.
International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department
This paper presents Botswana’s Detailed Assessment of Observance—Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision report. Legislative changes for safeguarding operational independence are needed. The supervisory methodology and bank-rating framework requires a review to be a forward-looking assessment of risk. The supervision approach can be strengthened with greater use of qualitative information as inputs for offsite analysis together with a shorter onsite examination cycle. The capital adequacy framework for banks is largely aligned with the Basel framework and proportionate to the risks and complexities of the local banking industry, with minimum capital requirements being set significantly higher than under the Basel framework. The supervisory approach to management of problem assets, provisions and reserves by banks needs revision. There is a need to develop guidance for supervisors and supervisory methodologies to encourage higher standards of liquidity risk management. Material deficiencies exist in relation to regulations for corporate governance.
International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department
This technical note highlights financial sector safety nets (FSN), crisis management, and bank resolution framework in Botswana. The financial safety net framework in Botswana is incomplete, while crisis preparedness and management structures must be expanded. The authorities are, however, poised to significantly improve the FSN and Crisis Management framework. Implementing a suitable law for the Deposit Insurance Scheme of Botswana and preparing the action plan for its operationalization, including clear funding arrangements through bank contributions and a public backstop, are needed. Developing the safety nets that characterize good international practices in the financial regulatory architecture will require the Financial Stability Council (FSC) to prioritize work over the near- to medium-term. The FSC should be expanded to include a crisis preparedness and management mandate, which is in line with its statutory responsibilities outlined in the Bank of Botswana Amendment Act, 2022. The FSC would oversee high-level monitoring of the financial system, analyzing the risks affecting the system, and discussing the appropriate policies to mitigate those risks. The FSC should also formally introduce system-wide crisis management protocols to plan and implement solutions in the event of a crisis.
International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department
This paper presents a technical note on Systemic Liquidity Management in Botswana. The liquidity management framework of the Bank of Botswana (BoB) has been strengthened since the April 2022 monetary policy reforms; however, structural excess liquidity and its volatility persist. The BoB’s liquidity regulations could more effectively facilitate banks’ ability to manage liquidity internally. Although banks maintain liquid assets above the regulatory minimum, these may be insufficient to withstand a high funding liquidity risk. Further support for an effective framework for banks’ liquidity management can emanate from streamlining the BoB’s collateral framework for refinancing facilities. The absence of a framework for emergency liquidity assistance leaves a gap for managing systemic liquidity shocks and should be addressed as a priority. Promoting the development of interbank repo market and government securities market helps to increase financial sector resilience. The existing interbank market is a fragmented unsecured market comprised of one-way lending from large banks to small banks, which is an important but insufficient shock absorber for liquidity risk.
International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department
This paper discusses financial system stability assessment in Botswana. Botswana’s financial sector, which exhibits high integration between banks and non-bank financial institutions, withstood the pandemic well. The economic recovery continues to be strong, but inflation remains high with risks tilted to the upside. The financial sector appears broadly stable, sound, and resilient. Main risks relate to banks’ high concentration of lumpy short-term deposits from retirement funds and insurance companies, volatility in diamond prices, geo-political developments, and the tightening of global financial conditions. The challenging risk environment underscores the need to address the existing gaps in the financial stability framework and the supervisory regime that could impede Bank of Botswana’s operational independence in supervisory matters. The banking supervision approach should be more risk-based and forward-looking, with more skilled staff who can identify emerging risks in the more complex banking sector. Specific regulations for material risks should be issued and Pillar 2 supervisory assessments developed for more risk-sensitive capital requirements. Data gaps should be addressed to enable the implementation of stress tests on a globally consolidated basis, perform more granular analyses of household and corporate sector vulnerabilities, and activate macroprudential tools.
International Monetary Fund. African Dept.
The 2023 Article IV Consultation highlights that following a strong recovery of almost 12 percent growth in 2021, Botswana’s economy grew by 5.8 percent in 2022, significantly above the long-run average of 4 percent. The authorities plan a fiscal expansion in FY2023 followed by two years of substantial fiscal adjustment to reach a small fiscal surplus by FY2025. Growth is expected to slow in 2023 due to a projected decline in diamond production, with the weaker global environment likely to depress other exports. Inflation has fallen since August 2022, returning to the central bank’s objective range. The authorities plan a fiscal expansion in FY2023 followed by two years of substantial fiscal adjustment to reach a small fiscal surplus by FY2025, but implementation risks are elevated. Structural transformation of the economy aims at diversifying production, increasing the relative size of the private sector, and enhancing resilience to external shocks.
Bank of International Settlements
,
International Monetary Fund
, and
World Bank
This report provides an assessment of whether and how multilateral platforms could bring meaningful improvements to the cross-border payments ecosystem. It was written by the Bank for International Settlements’ Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) in collaboration with the BIS Innovation Hub, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank.1 The report analyses the potential costs and benefits of these platforms and how they might alleviate some of the cross-border payment frictions. It also evaluates the risks, barriers and challenges to establishing multilateral platforms and explores two paths for their evolution. The analysis is based on a stocktake, conducted by the CPMI, of existing and potential multilateral platforms as well as bilateral discussions with existing platform operators.