Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 10 of 136 items for :

  • "Glass-Steagall Act" x
Clear All

I. Introduction The purpose of this discussion is to provide an overview of the Glass-Steagall Act—that is, of those provisions of U.S. national banking law which create a legal barrier between commercial and investment banking activities conducted in the United States. The focus of this presentation will be on how the legal distinctions between commercial and investment banking in the United States currently are interpreted and applied. This paper will, however, also discuss the origins and development of the Glass-Steagall Act and the prospects for its

International Monetary Fund

Front Matter Page Western Hemisphere Department Contents Summary I. Introduction II. The Demand for Government Deposit Insurance III. Valuation of the Deposit Guarantee IV. Deposit Insurance Reform 1. Timely closure rule for insolvent institutions 2. Risk-related deposit insurance premiums and capital-adequacy standards 3. Reduction in deposit insurance coverage 4. “Narrow” depository institutions V. Reform of the Regulation of Depository Institutions 1. Reform of the Glass-Steagall Act 2. Corporate separateness measures

International Monetary Fund

Glass-Steagall Act refers to Sections 16, 20, 21 and 32 of the Banking Act of 1933. The United States and Japan, under Article 65 of the Securities and Exchange Law of 1948, are unique among the major industrial countries in so separating banking and securities activities. See Broker (1989) , pp. 58-70. 22/ The possible reform of the Glass-Steagall Act has also raised concerns about the concentration of economic power in the financial sector and conflicts of interest from the joint provision of banking and securities services. For discussions of these issues

Mr. Luc E. Leruth and Pierre J. Nicolas

everything, even to self-regulate (the paper also quotes a recent piece by Kay in the Financial Times on the fate of the Glass-Steagall Act); The public at large , because, to some extent, it benefitted from the bubble and fed it (thus, it is not only a victim, it is also an actor), while having a tendency to believe blindly the lines it is fed (e.g., by Madoff). The paper (designed to provide some scientific evidence while remaining a pleasant read) concludes that a Faulkner of economics and finance would be most useful since, like the characters in the short

Steven M. Fries and Mr. Yusuke Horiguchi

. However, the activity restrictions placed on banks under the Glass-Steagall Act, which prohibits in the United States affiliations between most commercial banks and firms that are principally engaged in the underwriting and distribution of securities, limited the ability of banks to respond to this change in profitability. 21/ In view of these developments, Greenspan (1990b) , inter alios , proposed the reform of the Glass-Steagall Act while relying on corporate separateness measures and strengthened capital adequacy standards to restrain any possible increase in

International Monetary Fund
In the United States, the thrift industry crisis and evidence of financial weakness in the banking industry have raised concerns about the cost-effectiveness of the present framework of deposit insurance and regulation of depository institutions that serves to control systemic risks. The reform proposals discussed in this paper aim to create a more cost-effective approach by either modifying the operation of the deposit insurance funds to reduce the value of the deposit guarantee or altering those regulations of depository institutions that limit portfolio risk to reduce their overall cost. Consideration is given to both the potential effectiveness and practicability of the proposed reforms.