4 EXPENDITURE WEIGHTS AND THEIR SOURCES
Author:
International Monetary Fund
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Abstract

4.1 A consumer price index (CPI) is usually calculated as a weighted average of the price changes for the consumption goods and services covered by the index. The weights are meant to reflect the relative importance of the goods and services as measured by their shares in the total consumption of households. The weight attached to each good or service determines the impact that its price change will have on the overall index. The weights should be made publicly available in the interests of transparency, and for the information of the users of the index.

Introduction

4.1 A consumer price index (CPI) is usually calculated as a weighted average of the price changes for the consumption goods and services covered by the index. The weights are meant to reflect the relative importance of the goods and services as measured by their shares in the total consumption of households. The weight attached to each good or service determines the impact that its price change will have on the overall index. The weights should be made publicly available in the interests of transparency, and for the information of the users of the index.

4.2 The weights depend on the scope of the index which, in turn, depends on the main use, or uses, for the index. The uses and scope of a CPI have already been explained in some detail in the two previous chapters. This chapter therefore focuses on the derivation and compilation of the weights and the data sources that may be used to estimate them. In practice, the weights usually refer to expenditures on consumption goods and services by households, as distinct from the actual use of those goods and services to satisfy the needs and wants of households. Expenditure-based weights are appropriate for a CPI based on the acquisitions approach. The difference between the acquisitions and uses approach to CP Is was explained in the previous chapter.

4.3 In the special case of owner-occupied housing, however, many countries adopt the uses rather than the acquisitions approach. They measure changes in the prices of the flows of housing services consumed by households as distinct from changes in the prices of dwellings. It is shown in Chapter 23 of this manual that one important consequence of adopting the uses approach to owner-occupied housing is that its weight in the overall CPI is considerably greater than when the acquisitions approach is used. The reason is that the values of the housing services consumed by owner-occupiers have to cover not only the depreciation on the houses purchased but also the interest costs on the capital invested in the dwellings. Over a period of years, the uses approach may well give twice as much weight to owner-occupied housing as the acquisitions approach. Reference may be made to Chapter 23 for further details and explanation.

The weighting structure of the consumer price index

4.4 As explained in more detail in Chapters 7 and 9, the calculation of a CPI usually proceeds in two stages. In the first stage, elementary indices are estimated for each of the elementary aggregates. Elementary indices are constructed by (a) collecting a sample of representative prices for each elementary aggregate, and then (b) calculating an average price change for the sample. In the second stage, a weighted average is taken of the elementary indices using the expenditures within the elementary aggregates as weights.

4.5 Elementary aggregates are usually the smallest groups of goods and services for which expenditure data are available to be used as weights. They may cover the whole country or separate regions within the country. Likewise, elementary aggregates may be distinguished for different types of outlets. The nature of the elementary aggregates depends on circumstances and the availability of expenditure data. Elementary aggregates may therefore be defined differently in different countries. In general:

  • Elementary aggregates should consist of groups of goods or services that are as similar as possible.

  • They should also consist of goods or services that may be expected to have similar price movements. The objective is to minimize the dispersion of price movements within the aggregate.

  • The elementary aggregates should be appropriate to serve as strata for sampling purposes in the light of the sampling regime planned for the data collection.

4.6 The aggregation structure for a CPI is illustrated in Figure 4.1 using the Classification of Individual Consumption according to Purpose (COICOP) described in Chapter 3, although similar national classifications may be used instead:

  • First, the entire set of consumption goods and services covered by the overall CPI is divided into divisions, such as “food and non-alcoholic beverages”.

  • Each division is then divided into groups, such as “food”.

  • Each group is further divided into classes, such as “bread and cereals”.

  • Each class may be divided into more homogeneous sub-classes, such as “rice”.

  • Finally, a sub-class may be further subdivided to obtain the elementary aggregates, by dividing according to region or type of outlet, as illustrated in Figure 4.1. In some cases, a particular sub-class cannot be, or does not need to be, further subdivided, in which case the sub-class becomes the elementary aggregate.

The sub-classes and elementary aggregates are not part of COICOP itself but more detailed breakdowns of COICOP classes that are needed for CPI purposes.

Figure 4.1.
Figure 4.1.

Typical aggregation structure of a consumer price index (CPI)

4.7 Within each elementary aggregate, one or more products are selected to represent the price movements of all the goods and services in the elementary aggregate. For example, the elementary aggregate consisting of rice sold in supermarkets in the northern region covers all types of rice, from which parboiled white rice and brown rice with over 50 per cent broken grains are selected as representative products. Of course, more representative products might be selected in practice. Finally, for each kind of representative product, a number of individual products can be selected for price collection, such as particular brands of parboiled rice. Again, the number of sampled products selected may vary depending on the nature of the representative product.

4.8 The methods used to calculate the elementary price indices from the individual price observations collected within each elementary aggregate are explained in Chapter 9, and are not of immediate concern here. Working upwards from the elementary price indices, all indices above the elementary aggregate level are described as higher-level indices that can be calculated from the elementary price indices using the elementary expenditure aggregates as weights. The aggregation structure is consistent, so that the weight at each level above the elementary aggregate is always equal to the sum of its components. The price index at each higher level of aggregation can be calculated on the basis of the weights and price indices for its components, that is, the lower-level or elementary price indices. The individual elementary price indices are not necessarily sufficiently reliable to be published separately, but they remain the basic building blocks of all higher-level indices. Above the level of the elementary aggregate, therefore, no new information is introduced into the calculation of the CPI.

Group, class and sub-class weights

4.9 The weights for the groups, classes and subclasses are their shares in the total consumption expenditures of the reference population. They are most often derived from household expenditure surveys (HESs). These surveys are also described as household budget surveys (HBSs). As these surveys are sample surveys subject to reporting and non-response errors as well as sampling errors, the estimated shares for certain subclasses are often modified or revised on the basis of supplementary or additional information from other sources.

Regional weights

4.10 Within a given sub-class, the regional weight shows the consumption expenditure in the region in proportion to the expenditure in the whole country for that sub-class. For example, if 60 per cent of the total expenditure on fresh fruit occurs in the North region and 40 per cent in the South region, then the regional weight for fresh fruit is 60 per cent for the North region and 40 per cent for the South region.

4.11 A region may also be a geographical area, a city or a group of cities, with a particular location or of a certain size. The rationale for introducing regional weights is to create more homogeneous entities which are likely to experience similar price movements and have similar consumption patterns. For example, there may be quite large differences in consumption patterns and price developments between urban and rural areas. It may be necessary to distinguish different regions in federal countries because CPIs for the provinces or local states may be required for administrative or political purposes. In addition, in federal countries indirect taxes and hence price development may differ between the provinces.

4.12 Regional weights may typically be obtained from the HES or they may be estimated from retail sales data or population data. Regional weights may or may not be introduced into the CPI, depending on the size and structure of the country, data availability, resources and the purpose of the index.

Outlet or outlet-type weights

4.13 Prices are collected from a variety of outlets and outlet types. Information about the sale or market share of the outlets may be used to form elementary aggregate weights specific to a given region and outlet ype. One advantage from applying outlet weights is that it may allow prices to be collected centrally from supermarkets or other types of chain outlets.

Elementary aggregate weights

4.14 The elementary aggregate weights are the stratum weights according to expenditure class or sub-class, region and type of outlet. For example, expenditures within the sub-class “fresh fruit” may be divided into four regions, each having its own regional weight, as in Table 4.1. Assume further that it is known or estimated that 60 per cent is sold in supermarkets and 40 per cent in independent outlets, and that this same breakdown holds for all regions. Let the weight of fresh fruit in the CPI for the whole country be, say, 5 per cent. If no breakdown by region or outlet is carried out, then the sub-class as a whole becomes the elementary aggregate carrying a weight of 5 per cent in the overall index.

4.15 If weights are available by region but not by type of outlet, the 5 per cent is distributed over the four regions to obtain four separate elementary aggregates, one for each region. For example, the elementary aggregate for the North region will have a weight of 0.20 x 0.05 = 1.0 per cent in the overall CPI for the whole country. If a further division can be made according to type of outlet as well as region, then each region comprises two elementary aggregates: one for supermarkets and one for independent outlets. The weight for, say, the elementary aggregate for fresh fruit in the North region sold in supermarkets is then 0.12 x 0.05 = 0.6 per cent in the overall CPI for the whole country.

Data sources

4.16 The decision about what source or sources to use and how they should be used depends on an analysis of their respective advantages and disadvantages, and on the main purpose of the index. In most countries, the two main sources for calculation of the weights are the HES and the national accounts estimates for households’ final consumption expenditures. Additional information may, however, be obtained from production and trade statistics, or from government departments, producers, marketing bodies and individual enterprises. Such additional information is particularly useful for estimating weights at the most detailed level. Although several of the sources may have been used to prepare the national accounts estimates, they may be able to provide further details that were not used by the compilers of the national accounts.

Table 4.1

Example of weights by region and outlet type for the sub-class “fresh fruit”

article image

Household expenditure surveys

4.17 As the HES may have been designed to serve more than one purpose, it is desirable to ensure that the survey design also meets the requirements for the CPI. The main requirements are that the survey should be representative of all private households in the country, and not exclude any particular group, and should include all types of consumption expenditures by households.

4.18 The HES may include payments that are outside the scope of the CPI: for example, payments of income taxes, life insurance premiums, remittances, gifts and other transfers, investments, savings and debt repayments. These should be excluded from the total used to calculate the expenditure shares that serve as the basis for estimating the CPI weights. There may also be a difference in the population coverage between the intended scope for the CPI and the actual scope of the HES, but the effects on the CPI of any consequent bias in the resulting weight estimates are likely to be very minor if the HES is designed to provide results for the whole population and not just a particular population group.

4.19 National food surveys are special surveys in which the primary emphasis is on collecting information on family expenditures for food products. These surveys provide a very detailed breakdown of food expenditures that can be used to derive the weights for elementary aggregates for food below the level of a COICOP class.

4.20 The HES may provide the basis for estimating specific weights for regions with different consumption patterns. These weights should be applied to the respective elementary price indices to calculate indices for the regions concerned.

4.21 In general, HES data for certain types of expenditures may not be sufficiently reliable and need to be checked against data from other sources. Certain types of expenditures may not even be covered by an HES so that they have to be estimated using other sources. The reliability of the CPI weights will obviously depend to a large extent on the reliability of the household expenditure data. As the HES is a sample survey, the estimates are bound to be subject to sampling errors, which may be relatively large for small or infrequent expenditures. The quality of the estimates will also suffer from non-response and from the underreporting of some types of consumption. Underreporting is probably the most serious and common problem affecting HESs. Some expenditures are not reported because the purchases are small or exceptional, and therefore easy to forget. Although large, estimates of expenditures on durable goods may also be problematic, since they are only purchased very infrequently. Some expenditures are not reported because the products have a social stigma or are illegal (e.g., drugs, alcohol and tobacco). When no adjustments are made for such under-reporting, the consequence is an underestimation of the weights for these items and an overestimation of the weights for the correctly reported items. For these reasons, to the extent possible, results from the HES should be compared and/or combined with the statistics from other sources when constructing CPI weights, especially when the HES sample is small.

4.22 For the purposes of the CPI, it is desirable for the HES to be conducted annually. This will allow countries to revise and update their expenditure weights each year. One advantage of annual updating of weights is that the differences between the results obtained from the use of different index number formulae tend to be reduced. Any bias which may follow from using a Lowe index that uses a fixed basket of goods and services will not have time to accumulate to a significant magnitude, as explained in Chapters 1, 9 and 15.

4.23 Some countries conduct continuous HESs with gradually rotating samples. A programme of annual surveys with samples large enough to provide the type of estimates required for CPI weights can, however, be very costly. For this reason, some countries conduct large-scale surveys at ten-year or five-year intervals, perhaps supplemented with a smaller annual sample. Other countries distribute a large sample over several years. The average of the results over several successive years of smaller-scale surveys may provide a set of satisfactory annual estimates. The weights derived in this way as the average rates of expenditure over periods of two or three years will also smooth any erratic consumer behaviour over a short period, for example as a result of events such as droughts or floods, civil strife, oil shocks, or exceptionally mild or cold winters.

4.24 It should be noted that in some countries it may be possible to experiment with new methods of recording expenditures in an HES by using scanner data generated by electronic points of sale. For example, by collecting the printed bar code receipts for cash which customers receive, the Icelandic HES could obtain, at virtually no cost to the surveyed households, precise information about types and brands of goods purchased in different outlets.

National accounts

4.25 There may be differences in the scope and definition of consumption between the national accounts and the CPI, and also a difference in the reference population of households between the national accounts and the HES.

4.26 First, in national accounts, the household sector consists of all resident households, including people living in institutional households. HESs, however, do not usually cover persons living permanently in institutional households, such as retirement homes or religious institutions. If the CPI is meant to cover all resident households, therefore, national accounts estimates may be used to adjust the HES data.

4.27 Second, as already explained in Chapter 3, it is possible to have two alternative concepts of total final consumption, domestic and national. The domestic concept refers to consumption on the economic territory, including the consumption of visiting foreign households but excluding the consumption of resident households when abroad. The national concept used in national accounts refers to the consumption of all the residents of the country, whether at home or abroad, the consumption of non-residents being excluded. The HES usually covers only resident households, and may or may not cover their expenditures abroad, depending on the instructions given to the respondents.

4.28 National accounts data may be used to improve HES weights for products that are under-reported in the HES. Note that national accounts figures for households’ final consumption are usually based on statistics from the HES and from several other sources. This means that national accounts estimates are likely to be useful for estimating weights for consumption categories that tend to be wrongly reported in the HES, and where results from the HES suffer from a significant and distorting partial or total non-response rate.

Retail sales data

4.29 Statistics on retail sales by region and type of outlet may be available for broad groups of items. One disadvantage is that some of the sales may be to groups outside the reference population, perhaps to the business sector or to the government. The corresponding purchases do not form part of household private consumption. Some sales may also be to non-residents, who may or may not be part of the reference population. Furthermore, for regional sales data, it needs to be kept in mind that sales may include sales to people living in other regions.

Point-of-purchase surveys

4.30 Point-of-purchase surveys may provide statistics that can be used to estimate weights for price data, as they permit the analysis of shopping patterns for various segments of the population. Households are asked, for each item purchased, about the amounts spent in each outlet where purchases have been made, and the name and addresses of these outlets. On this basis, a list of outlets can be established, with the total sales for all the different items to the sample of households. A sample of outlets is then drawn from this list, with probability proportional to the sales. Given that household surveys are expensive and that there is an overlap between the HES and point-of-purchase survey, it is possible to combine the two data-collecting activities in an integrated survey that elicits expenditure and outlet data at detailed levels, along with the demographic information about the households needed for sub-group indices.

4.31 A simpler version of this survey may be conducted to obtain weights for groups of products by outlet type. In this case, a purposive sample of each outlet type should be selected. As an alternative, in the absence of this type of survey, national retail sales statistics by outlet type from a survey of outlets could be used to estimate a breakdown of sales by outlet type.

Scanner data

4.32 In the last few years some countries have started to use statistics obtained from cash register data to derive CPI weights. These statistics are based on electronic data records that are stored as scanner data in the databases of sellers. Such scanner data sets include the quantities sold and the corresponding value aggregates. (The cash register receipts usually give the following information: name of the outlet, date and time of purchase, description of items bought, quantity, price and value, form of payment, and VAT amount where relevant.) A comparison of the results from the HES with the corresponding scanner data from the biggest supermarket chains indicates that the use of scanner data can add to the reliability of the weights (Guõnason, 1999). This strengthens the case for using such data to revise CPI weights more often than otherwise would be possible, and probably at lower cost. The limitations of this source of information should, however, be borne in mind. The first one is that scanned data cannot be connected to a specific type of household, whereas the data from the HES can. Another important difference between HES data and scanner data from sellers is that the HES data cover goods bought from outlets that are not using this technology, as well as goods and services that do not carry scanner codes, regardless of where they are sold. Although the use of electronic data records is increasing every year, significant components of the retail trade market are not using scanner data even in countries that are electronically most advanced.

Population censuses

4.33 Population censuses provide statistics on the geographical distribution of the population and households, as well as on the regional differences in household size and composition. Combined with estimates of regional levels of household expenditure, these statistics can be used to estimate regional expenditure weights, especially when such estimates are not available from an HES with a satisfactory degree of precision. In the absence of any expenditure statistics, population statistics might be used as the basis for regional weights. Such estimates for the weights usually have to assume that expenditures per capita or per household are the same in all regions, and have to ignore the fact that there are usually large differences between the urban and rural populations in the level and pattern of items that they consume.

Deriving the weights in practice

4.34 Once the reference population and the coverage of goods and services have been decided, the weights need to be derived. In principle, this is a relatively simple matter, as the weights are calculated as the proportions of the total consumption expenditure of all goods and services included in the index basket for the reference population during the reference period. In practice, however, the calculation of weights is not so straightforward and involves a series of steps.

Payments that are not consumption expenditures

4.35 Only consumption expenditures are relevant for the construction of CPI weights. As explained in Chapter 3, outlays such as payments of social security contributions or income taxes, or repayments of debts, are irrelevant and should be ignored because they are not consumption expenditures.

Unimportant expenditures

4.36 Each elementary aggregate consists of a fairly homogeneous group of products from which one or more representative products are selected for pricing. Some products may have a weight which for all practical purposes is negligible and for which prices are unlikely to be collected in practice. The HES, which in most cases is the main source for deriving the detailed weights, usually includes observations on a much larger variety of goods and services than it is practical to collect prices for. The prices of very minor products may not be worth collecting if they contribute almost nothing to the CPI.

4.37 Even though it may be decided not to collect prices for a certain product, it remains within the scope of the CPI. Some price change has to be explicitly or implicitly assumed, or imputed, and weighted by expenditures. There are two options:

  • The product and the expenditures on it remain within the elementary aggregate, even though no prices are collected for it. The elementary price index for the aggregate as a whole is estimated entirely by the prices of the representative products for which prices are collected. This is equivalent to assuming that the price of the product changes at the same rate as the average for the prices of the representative products.

  • The alternative is to reduce the weight for the elementary expenditure aggregate by excluding the expenditures on the product. This is equivalent to assuming that the price of the excluded product would have moved in the same way as the overall CPI for all the products actually included in the index.

4.38 In principle, the CPI should cover all types of products and expenditures within its scope, even if prices are not collected for some products. It might be decided, for example, to exclude from the index calculations groups with weights lower than, say, 0.1 per cent for food groups and 0.2 per cent for non-food groups. A lower minimum threshold for the food items might be set because the prices for these products tend to display greater variability and because prices for food products are normally less expensive to collect. If an expenditure group is excluded, its weight may be redistributed to another expenditure group that is similar in terms of content and price development. Alternatively, the expenditures may be completely excluded from the calculation of the weights.

Products that are difficult to price

4.39 Among the consumption expenditures, there are likely to be a few products for which the prices, or price changes, cannot be directly or satisfactorily measured, for example, illicit drugs or payments for catering and other service charges for private receptions and parties. Even if reliable prices cannot be obtained, these products should be included in the calculation of the weights if they are within the scope of the index. For difficult-to-price products, the options available are the same as those used for unimportant expenditures.

Use and combination of different sources

4.40 In most countries, the main source for deriving the weights is the HES. As noted above, however, the results from the HES need to be carefully examined and adjusted to take account of under- or over-reporting of certain types of products. The usual strategy is to use supplementary information from other relevant sources to adjust the HES results in order to derive the weights.

4.41 In countries where national accounts data provide reliable estimates of household expenditures, these data can be used to derive the weights at an aggregate level. Detailed HES data can then be used to break down or adjust these weights. In this way, it is possible to reconcile the detailed data from the HES with the aggregate national accounts data to calculate the weights. Weights for the main consumption groups can be obtained from the national accounts down to a certain level of disaggregation, say, 70 consumption groups or classes. Each of these weights can then be further distributed by applying the detailed HES expenditure groups to the national accounts consumption groups or classes. The combination of national accounts and HES data ensures consistency between the CPI and the national accounts data on consumption expenditure of households at the level of the main consumption groups.

Adjusting the weights derived from household expenditure surveys

4.42 As, in most cases, the information from a household expenditure survey is only available with a lag -often around 18 months or more - the new weights will lag behind the new price reference period for the index, which is the period when the new weights are introduced.

4.43 Adjustments might need to be made to the estimates based on the HES results to take into account any significant changes in expenditure patterns in the period between the time that the survey was carried out and the time that the new weights were introduced. Adjustments will typically be made for products which are significantly losing or gaining in importance during this period. It is also possible that expenditure on some products may not be available from the HES because the products appeared on the market after the survey had been completed. One example is mobile telephones and the corresponding charges, which emerged as significant new forms of expenditure in the late 1990s in many countries. Necessary adjustments then need to be made to the survey data to take into account the changes that have occurred. The expenditures on these new products should be estimated on the basis of information available from other sources (e.g., import and retail trade statistics), taking into account the need to exclude expenditures by enterprises and for business purposes.

Weight reference period

4.44 The weight reference period is the time period to which the estimated weights relate. The choice of the period covered by the expenditure statistics used to derive the weights is crucial. Generally speaking, the period chosen as the base should be long enough to cover a seasonal cycle. Further, if the index is not annually chained, the year chosen should have economic conditions that can be considered to be reasonably normal or stable. To achieve this, it may be necessary to adjust some of the values to normalize them and overcome any irregularities in the data for the particular period that constitutes the source of the information. The weight reference period should not be too distant from the price reference period. The weight reference period is typically a single calendar year. A month or quarter is too short a period to use as a weight base period, since any one month or quarter is likely to be affected by accidental or seasonal influences. In some instances, data for a single year may not be adequate either because of unusual economic conditions or because the sample is not large enough. An average of several years of expenditure data may then be used to calculate the weights. Countries in which this method is applied include the United States and the United Kingdom. In the United States, the expenditure information from the Consumer Expenditure Survey over a three-year period is used. In the United Kingdom, an average of three years of Expenditure and Food Survey data is used for regional weights, for stratification and for a limited number of groups of products where prices tend to be particularly volatile.

4.45 During periods of high inflation, multiple year weights may be calculated by averaging value shares rather than averaging actual value levels. Averaging the value levels will give too much weight to the data for the most recent year. Another option is to update the values for each year to a common period and then to compute a simple arithmetic average of adjusted yearly data.

4.46 As the weight reference period usually precedes the price reference period, the expenditure weights may be price updated to take account of the relative price changes from the weight reference period to the price reference period. Price updating of weights is discussed in more detail in Chapter 9, paragraphs 9.95 to 9.104.

Need for revising the weights

4.47 Most countries calculate their CPI as the change in the value of a specified basket of goods and services. An index of this general kind is described in this manual as a Lowe index. Its properties and behaviour are explained in Chapters 1, 9 and 15. Although CPIs are often described as Laspeyres indices, they are usually not Laspeyres indices in practice. A Laspeyres index is defined as an index in which the basket of goods and services is that of the price reference period, but a typical CPI basket uses the basket of some weight reference period that precedes the price reference period, as just explained. As many countries continue to use the same fixed basket of goods and services over a period of years, the question arises of how often the basket should be revised in order to ensure that it does not become out of date and irrelevant.

4.48 In the short run, consumers will change consumption patterns in response to shifts in relative prices, mostly between products included in the same class or sub-class. Over longer time periods, consumption patterns are also influenced by factors other than price changes. Most importantly, changes in the level and distribution of household income will cause a shift in demand for goods and services towards goods and services with higher income elasticities. Demographic factors such as ageing of the population, and technological changes, such as the increase in the use of computers, are examples of other factors that affect spending behaviour in the longer run. Furthermore, new products will be introduced and existing ones may be modified or become obsolete. A fixed basket will be unresponsive to all these changes.

4.49 As a result of both relative price changes and long-term effects, the weights may become out of date and less representative of current consumption patterns. As shown in Chapter 15, the bias in a Lowe index is likely to increase with the age of the weights. At some point, it therefore becomes desirable to use the weights of a more recent period to ensure that the index is weighting appropriately the price changes currently faced by consumers.

Frequency of updating the weights

4.50 The 1987 ICLS resolution concerning consumer price indices recommended that the weights should be updated periodically, and at least once every ten years, to guarantee the representativity of the index. However, the 2003 ICLS resolution proposes more frequent updates of the weights, such as once every five years, to ensure their relevance. Countries which are experiencing significant economic changes and thus more rapid changes in consumption patterns should update their weights even more frequently, say annually.

4.51 The need to revise the weights generally increases as the length of time from the weight reference period increases. The decision when to update the weights depends, for the most part, on the differences observed between the current weighting structure and that for the weight reference year. Changes in the relative importance of each item can be observed through expenditure survey results. If these statistics are available only at irregular intervals, the frequency of weight revision may necessarily be linked to the availability of results from the HES.

4.52 The introduction of new weights each year might possibly cause an upward drift in the index if there are big fluctuations in consumption caused by factors such as an economic blockade, or extremely favourable or unfavourable weather conditions. In general, the profile of the index time series can be sensitive to the selection of the weight reference period. It might be best to use a “normal” consumption period, if possible, as the basis for weighting information and to avoid periods in which there are special factors at work of a temporary nature. All available information concerning the nature of consumption in a weight reference period should be taken into consideration.

4.53 When the weights are to be fixed for several years, the objective should be to adopt weights that are not likely to change much in the future rather than precisely reflect the activity of a particular period that may be abnormal in some way.

4.54 Each year it is desirable to carry out a review of the weights in order to ensure that they are sufficiently reliable and representative. The review, which may be confined to weights at the level of sub-indices and their major components, should examine whether or not there are indications that important changes may have taken place in the consumption pattern since the weighting reference period.

4.55 Whenever the weighting pattern has been updated, the new index using updated weights should be calculated for an overlapping period with the old one so that the two can be linked.

Classification

4.56 In deriving the weights, the detailed expenditure items identified in the HES must be mapped to the CPI expenditure classes. If HES classes do not match CPI expenditure classes, the HES results must be transformed to match the CPI categories. This can be done by aggregating or disaggregating the relevant HES headings over the relevant CPI expenditure classes. Such transformation is achieved much more easily and more reliably if the coding list for expenditure items in the HES is coordinated with the corresponding list of items used for collecting price observations for the CPI.

4.57 For the purposes of international comparison, the classification scheme of goods and services should, to the extent practical, be in line with the United Nations Classification of Individual Consumption according to Purpose (COICOP) (see Annex 2). To facilitate estimation and application of weights, it is also desirable that the classification used be consistent with the classifications used for HESs and other statistics (for example, retail sales statistics). In the interests of maintaining both coordination of the statistical system and international comparability, the HES should also use a classification for types of expenditure that will be consistent with COICOP, and it should also be possible to establish a mapping between products in the retail sales price collections and COICOP. Another important objective is that the aggregation structure employed by the classification system should meet the major needs of users.

4.58 Using COICOP as an example, the classifications have the following hierarchical structure:

  • groups: there are 47 of these in COICOP;

  • classes: sub-divisions of the groups;

  • sub-classes: the lowest-level categories that are weighted and usually the most detailed level of the structure for which index series are published - these are the expenditure components and weights that remain fixed when using a fixed weight index;

  • individual products: the lowest level of the CPI basket, that is, the individual goods and services for which prices are actually collected - this is the level at which the composition of the CPI basket can be adjusted between two major revisions of the weighting structure to reflect changes in product supply and consumer behaviour.

4.59 Upper-level indices are formed by weighting together lower-level indices through progressive levels of aggregation, as defined by the classification structure. Weights are fixed for a period (say one, three or five years) between index reweighting.

4.60 The selection of the level in the index hierarchy at which the structure and weights are fixed for a period is particularly important. The main advantage of setting the level relatively high is that the actual samples of products and their prices below this level can be adjusted and updated as needed. New products can be introduced into the samples, and the weights at the lower level reestablished on the basis of more recent information. There is thus a greater opportunity to keep the index representative, through an ongoing review of the sample of representative products.

4.61 If the level is set relatively low in the index structure, there is less freedom to maintain the representativeness of the index on an ongoing basis, and there will be a greater dependence on the periodic index review and reweighting process. In such circumstances, the arguments for frequent reweighting become stronger.

Items requiring special treatment

4.62 Some products, such as seasonal products, insurance, second-hand goods, expenditures abroad, etc., may need special treatment when constructing their weights. Reference may be made to Chapters 3, 10 and 22 for further details.

4.63 Seasonal products. Various approaches may be used to deal with seasonal products, for example:

  • a fixed weights approach, which assigns the same weight for the seasonal product in all months, using an imputed price in the out-of-season months. Seasonal products are treated in the same way as other consumption products;

  • a variable weights approach, in which a changing (or moving) weight is attached to the product in various months. In this method, the weights of the seasonal products change monthly according to changes in the quantities consumed during the different months of the weight reference period. The principle of a fixed basket - i.e. fixed weights - should, however, be maintained at least at some level of aggregation.

4.64 The advantage of applying the fixed weights method is mainly that it is consistent with the methods used for other consumption goods and services, and with the fixed basket index formula. In contrast to the moving weights method, the fixed weights method reflects monthly changes in prices only, and not in quantities. Another disadvantage of the moving weights method is that the weights are based on the monthly seasonal fluctuations in the weight reference period, whereas the monthly fluctuations in consumption may differ every year.

4.65 The fixed weights method may also have disadvantages, a major one being that during the months that fresh fruits or vegetables disappear, prices and indices have to be estimated or imputed for these items (or, as is done in some countries, prices and indices have to be frozen throughout the period of disappearance). These imputations need not be made when applying the moving weights method. In addition, the average fixed weight determined for all months of the year does not actually reflect the monthly consumption. Therefore, if there is a negative correlation between prices and quantities, there may be an upward bias in the index.

4.66 The choice of measuring seasonal goods according to the fixed weights method or the moving weights method should be based on whether the focus is on month-to-month changes or on the long-term index changes. The use of an annual basket and the use of annual expenditure shares are appropriate where the main interest is in the longer-run trend of price changes. On the other hand, if the focus is on month-to-month changes, then the annual weights attached to each month-to-month price relative can be unrepresentative of actual transactions that are taking place in the two consecutive months under consideration. In the latter case, monthly price changes for items that are out of season can be greatly magnified by the use of annual weights.1 To satisfy the needs of different users, it may be appropriate to construct two indexes: one for the short-term measurement of price changes (with variable monthly weights) and another longer-term index (with fixed annual weights). The issue of seasonal items is dealt with in detail in Chapter 22.

4.67 Insurance. As explained in the section on insurance in Chapter 3, the weights for non-life insurance could be based on either the gross premiums paid or on the implicit service charges. The implicit service charges for administering the insurance and providing the insurance services are estimated by the gross premiums plus the income from investment of the insurance reserves less the amounts payable to policy holders in settlement of claims.2 The net premiums are defined as the gross premiums less the service charges: in other words, the net premiums equal the claims. The net premiums and claims can be regarded as transfers, or redistributions, between policy-holding households. In general, it seems preferable to base the weights for non-life insurance on the service charges. These are the estimated amounts paid by households for the services provided by insurance firms. However, a case can also be made for basing the weights on the gross premiums. This is a difficult area in which there is not yet a consensus.

4.68 Second-hand goods, including used cars. As already explained in paragraphs 3.127 to 3.129 of Chapter 3, the prices of used or second-hand durable goods purchased by households are included in the CPI in the same way as the prices of new goods. However, households also sell used durables, such as cars. If the price of a second-hand good rises, a purchasing household is worse off, but a selling household is better off. From a weighting perspective, sales constitute negative expenditures, which implies that price changes for used goods sold by households implicitly carry a negative weight in the CPI. In effect, purchases and sales of second-hand goods between households, whether directly or indirectly through a dealer, cancel out (except for the dealers’ margins, see Chapter 3) and carry no weight in the CPI. However, households also buy from, and sell to, other sectors. For the reference population as a whole, namely the entire set of households covered by the CPI, the weight to be attached to a particular kind of second-hand good is given by households’ total expenditures on it less the value of the households’ receipts from sales to/from outside the household sector. There is no reason why these should cancel out on aggregate. For example, many of the second-hand cars purchased by households may be imported from abroad. The difference between total expenditures and total sales is usually described as households’ net expenditures. This is the weight to be attached the second-hand good in question.

4.69 Except in the case of used cars, however, it is practically impossible to estimate the net expenditure because most HESs do not collect the data that would allow for a comparison between expenditures and receipts from sales of individual kinds of second-hand goods. Usually, only the total amount received from the sale of second-hand goods is collected. This information does, however, give an idea of the volume and significance of these transactions in the national economy. In countries where this volume is small, second-hand goods (except used cars) may be ignored when calculating the weights of the index.

4.70 Because the amounts spent on purchasing second-hand cars are usually large, they should be included in the CPI basket if the data are available. In the absence of reliable data, however, their weight can be added to the weight of new cars.

4.71 Most countries include expenditure on secondhand goods in the estimation of CPI weights, but secondhand goods are not covered in the price collection (because of the difficulty of pricing the same good each month or, where the goods are different, making an appropriate quality adjustment). It is therefore assumed that the prices of new and second-hand goods move in the same way.

4.72 In countries where second-hand purchases are important and their prices are believed to change at different rates from those of new goods, separate weights are needed for them. The information could be obtained, at least for some major durables, from HESs, if the surveys ask about expenditure on second-hand and new goods.

4.73 Expenditure abroad and expenditures by nonresidents. If the objective is to construct an index which is representative of price movements within a given country or area, the weighting system must reflect purchases by both resident and non-resident households. In practice, the proportion of total purchases that are made by visitors from abroad or other areas may be difficult to estimate, except for certain types of purchases in geographical areas where foreign tourism is the dominant economic activity. Sources other than HESs must be used in order to ensure that the weights include the expenditures made by foreign tourists and reflect all purchases of consumer goods and services made by resident or non-resident households within the country. These sources may be national accounts or commercial sales statistics.

4.74 Where the main purpose of the index is to measure price changes experienced by the resident population, the weights should include their expenditures abroad. This would require collection, through the HES, of data on expenditures made outside the country (for example, expenditures on hotels and meals during holidays, durables, health and education). Possible ways of constructing the index to cover expenditure abroad would be:

  • –price collection outside the country of residence;

  • –the use of appropriate sub-indices provided by the statisticians in other countries for the kinds of products purchased there by residents;

  • –establishing a panel of residents who would report prices paid for their purchases abroad.

4.75 Given the limitations of HESs to provide reliable data on expenditures abroad, and the practical difficulties of constructing an index for expenditure abroad, the weights may have to be based on expenditure surveys without adjusting for the place of acquisition, and prices may be collected only for the goods and services acquired in the economic territory of the country. Such an approach assumes that the price changes of the goods and services acquired abroad are the same as those for the same goods and services acquired at home.

Errors in weighting

4.76 If all prices moved in the same way, weights would not matter. On the other hand, the greater the variation in price behaviour between products, the greater the role of weights in measuring aggregate price change.

4.77 Small changes in the weights usually have very little effect upon the overall CPI. An error in the weight for a given subindex only matters to the extent that the change in the subindex differs from the average change in the overall CPI. In general, the higher a sub-index’s weight, the lower is the tolerable percentage error in that weight. It follows that the tolerable error in the weights declines as the rate of relative price change for the relevant items increases. Finally, it is also clear that while errors in weighting may not have a large influence on the overall index, the sub group-level errors could be significant. Australian experience shows that even items with relatively large weights can tolerate errors of 20-30 per cent in the weights (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2000). According to Eurostat’s studies, CPIs are fairly insensitive to changes in weights. Eurostat has, however, suggested developing quality control procedures for monitoring the weights of items for which changes in prices have diverged from the movement of the overall index (Eurostat, 2001). The question of the effects of weighting errors on the subindex and the overall index is discussed in Rameshwar (1998).

1

For example, the impact of change in tomato prices at the beginning of the season would be overstated in the general index. Similarly, its impact in the peak months would be understated.

2

In the national accounts, the gross premiums plus the investment income less the estimated service charges are described as “net premiums”. By definition, “net premiums” equal claims payable, both flows being treated as transfers, or redistributions, between policy-holding households. The “net premiums” are not regarded as expenditures.

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Figure 4.1.

    Typical aggregation structure of a consumer price index (CPI)

  • Abraham, K.G., J.S. Greenlees and B.R. Moulton. 1998. “Working to Improve the Consumer Price Index”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 2736.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aczél, J. 1987. A Short Course on Functional Equations (Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Co.).

  • Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index. 1995. Toward a More Accurate Measure of the Cost of Living, Interim Report to the Senate Finance Committee, Sep. 15 (Washington, D.C.).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aizcorbe, A.M., and P.C. Jackman, 1993. “The commodity substitution effect in CPI data, 1982–91”, in Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 116, No. 12, pp. 2533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aizcorbe, A., C. Corrado and M. Doms. 2001. Constructing Price and Quantity Indexes for High Technology Goods, Industrial Output Section, Division of Research and Statistics (Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Alterman, W.F., W.E. Diewert and R.C. Feenstra. 1999. International Trade Price Indexes and Seasonal Commodities (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anderson, R.G., B.E. Jones and T. Nesmith. 1997. “Building New Monetary Services Indexes: Concepts, Data and Methods”, in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 5383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ardilly, P. and F. Guglielmetti, 1993. “La précision de l’indice des prix: mesure et optimisation”, in Economie et Statistique. No. 267, juillet.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arguea, N.M., C. Haseo and G.A. Taylor. 1994. “Estimating Consumer Preferences using Market Data: An Application to U.S. Automobile Demand”, in Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 9, pp. 118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Armknecht, P.A. 1996. Improving the Efficiency of the U.S. CPI, Working Paper No. 96/103 (Washington, D.C.: IMF).

  • Armknecht, P.A., and D. Weyback. 1989. “Adjustments for Quality Change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index”, in Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 107123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Armknecht, P.A., and D. Weyback. and F. Maitland-Smith. 1999. Price Imputation and Other Techniques for Dealing with Missing Observations, Seasonality and Quality Change in Price Indices, Working Paper No. 99/78 (Washington, D.C.: IMF), June. Available at: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/1999/wp9978.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Armknecht, P.A., and D. Weyback. and F. Maitland-Smith. W.F. Lane and K.J. Stewart. 1997. “New Products and the U.S. Consumer Price Index”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2003), pp. 375391.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arrow, K.J., H.B. Chenery, B.S. Minhas and R.M. Solow. 1961. “Capital–Labor Substitution and Economic Efficiency”, in Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 63, pp. 225250.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Astin, J. 1999. “The European Union Harmonized Indices of Consumer Prices. HICP)”, in R. Gudnason and T. Gylfadottir (eds.): Proceedings of the Ottawa Group Fifth Meeting, Reykjavik, Iceland, 25–27 Aug.; also published in Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE, Vol. 16, pp. 123135. Available at: http://www.statcan.ca/secure/english/ottawagroup/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Astin, J. 2001. New Uses of PPPs within the European Union, Paper presented at the Joint World Bank-OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, (Washington, D.C., Jan. 30Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aten, B., R. Summers and A. Heston. 2001. An Explanation of Stability in Country Price Structures: Implications for Spatial–temporal Comparisons, Paper presented at the Joint World Bank-OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, (Washington, D.C., Jan. 30–Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1997. An Analytical Framework for Price Indexes in Australia, Information Paper, Catalogue No. 6421.0. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2000. Price Index and The New Tax System, Information Paper, Catalogue No. 6425.0. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2003. Australian Consumer Price Index: Concepts, Sources and Methods, Catalogue No. 6461.0. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bailey, M.J., Muth, R.F. and Nourse, H.O. 1963. “A Regression Method for Real Estate Price Construction”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 58, pp. 933942..

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baker, D. 1998. “Does the CPI Overstate Inflation? An Analysis of the Boskin Commission Report”, in D. Baker (ed.): Getting Prices Right (Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute), pp. 79155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baldwin, A. 1990. “Seasonal Baskets in Consumer Price Indexes”, in Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 251273.

  • Balk, B.M. 1980a. “Seasonal Products in Agriculture and Horticulture and Methods for Computing Price Indices”, in Statistical Studies No. 24 (The Hague: Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1980b. “Seasonal Commodities and the Construction of Annual and Monthly Price Indexes”, in Statistische Hefte, Vol. 21, pp. 110116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1980c. “A Method for Constructing Price Indices for Seasonal Commodities”, in The Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Vol. 143, pp. 6875.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1981. “A Simple Method for Constructing Price Indices for Seasonal Commodities”, in Statistische Hefte, Vol. 22, pp. 7278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1983. “Does There Exist a Relation between Inflation and Relative Price Change Variability? The Effect of the Aggregation Level”, in Economic Letters, Vol. 13, pp. 173180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1985. “A Simple Characterization of Fisher’s Price Index”, in Statistische Hefte, Vol. 26, pp. 5963.

  • Balk, B.M. 1989a. “Changing Consumer Preferences and the Cost of Living Index: Theory and Nonparametric Expressions”, in Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 157169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1989b. “On Calculating the Precision of Consumer Price Indices”, in Contributed Papers 47th Session of the ISI (Paris).

  • Balk, B.M. 1990. “On Calculating Cost-of-Living Index Numbers for Arbitrary income Levels”, in Econometrica, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 7592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1994. On the First Step in the Calculation of a Consumer Price Index, Paper presented at First Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Ottawa, Oct. 31-Nov. 4. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1995. “Axiomatic Price Index Theory: A Survey”, in International Statistical Review, Vol. 63, pp. 6993.

  • Balk, B.M. 1996a. “A Comparison of Ten Methods for Multilateral International Price and Volume Comparisons”, in Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 12, pp. 199222.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 1996b. “Consistency in Aggregation and Stuvel Indices”, in The Review of income and Wealth, Vol. 42, pp. 353363.

  • Balk, B.M. 1998a. Industrial Price, Quantity and Productivity Indices (Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers).

  • Balk, B.M. 1998b. On the Use of Unit Value Indices as Consumer Price Subindices, Paper presented at the Fourth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, (Washington, D.C., Apr. 22–24, Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 2000a. Divisia Price and Quantity Indexes 75 Years After, Draft Paper, Department of Statistical Methods (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 2000b. On Curing the CPI’s Substitution and New Goods Bias, Research Paper 0005, Department of Statistical Methods (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 2001. Aggregation Methods in International Comparisons: What have we Learned?, Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001–41-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (Rotterdam: Erasmus University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. 2002. Price Indexes for Elementary Aggregates: The Sampling Approach, Research Report, Methods and Informatics Department (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. and W.E. Diewert. 2001. “A Characterization of the Törnqvist Price Index”, in Economics Letters, Vol. 73, pp. 279281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balk, B.M. and H.M.P. Kersten. 1986. “On the Precision of Consumer Price Indices Caused by the Sampling Variability of Budget Surveys”, in Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 14, pp. 1935.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bartik, T.J. 1988. “Measuring the Benefits of Land Improvements in Hedonic Models”, in Land Economics, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 172183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bascher, J. and T. Lacroix. 1999. Dishwashers and PCs in the French CPI: Hedonic Modeling, from Design to Practice, Paper presented at the Fifth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Reykjavik, Aug. 25–27. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baxter, M. (ed.). 1998. The Retail Prices Index. Technical Manual (London: Office for National Statistics, UK).

  • Bean, L.H. and O.C. Stine. 1924. “Four Types of Index Numbers of Farm Prices”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 19, pp. 3035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Becker, G.S. 1965. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time”, in Economic Journal, Vol. 75, pp. 493517.

  • Beidelman, C. 1973. Valuation of Used Capital Assets (Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association).

  • Beidelman, C.. 1976. “Economic Depreciation in a Capital Goods Industry”, in National Tax Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 379390.

  • Berndt, E.R. 1991. The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).

  • Berndt, E.R. D. Ling and M.K. Kyle. 2003. “The Long Shadow of Patent Expiration: Generic Entry and Rx to OTC Switches”, in M. Shapiro and R.C. Feenstra (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 229273.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berndt, E.R. D. Ling and M.K. Kyle. L.T. Bui, D.H, Lucking-Reiley and G.L. Urban. 1997. “The Roles of Marketing, Product Quality and Price Competition in the Growth and Composition of the U.S. Anti-Ulcer Drug Industry”, in T. Bresnahan and R.J. Gordon: The Economics of New Goods, NBER Studies in income and Wealth (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press), pp. 277232.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berndt, E.R. D. Ling and M.K. Kyle. L.T. Bui, D.H, Lucking-Reiley and G.L. Urban. Z. Griliches and N.J. Rappaport. 1995. “Econometric Estimates of Price Indexes for Personal Computers in the 1990s”, in Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, pp. 24368.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Berry S., J. Levinsohn and A. Pakes. 1995. “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium”, in Econometrica, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 841890; also published as NBER Working Paper No. W4264, July 1996, available at: http://www.nber.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Beuerlein, I. 2001. The German consumer price index for telecommunication services: a user profile approach for mobile technology and Internet access, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bode, B. and van J. Dalén. 2001. Quality-Corrected Price Indexes of New Passenger Cars in the Netherlands, 1990–1999, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Böhm-Bawerk. E.V, 1891. The Positive Theory of Capital, translated from the original German edition of 1888 by W. Smart (New York: G.E. Stechert).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boon, M. 1998. “Sampling designs in compiling consumer price indices: current practices at EU statistical institutes”, in Research in Official Statistics, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 3952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bortkiewicz, L.V. 1923. “Zweck und Struktur einer Preisindexzahl”, in Nordisk Statistisk Tidsskrift 2, pp. 369408.

  • Boskin, M.J. (Chair), E.R. Dullberger, R.J. Gordon, Z. Griliches and D.W. Jorgenson. 1996. Final Report of the Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index, U.S. Senate, Committee on Finance (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boskin, M.J. (Chair), E.R. Dullberger, R.J. Gordon, Z. Griliches and D.W. Jorgenson. 1998. “Consumer Prices in the Consumer Price Index and the Cost of Living”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowley, A.L. 1899. “Wages, Nominal and Real”, in R.H.I. Palgrave, (ed.): Dictionary of Political Economy, Volume 3 (London: Macmillan), pp. 640651.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bowley, A.L. 1901. Elements of Statistics (Westminster: Orchard House).

  • Bowley, A.L. 1919. “The Measurement of Changes in the Cost of Living”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 82, pp. 343361.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bradley, R., B. Cook, S.E. Leaver and B. R. Moulton. 1997. An Overview of Research on Potential Uses of Scanner Data in the U.S. CPI, Paper presented at the Third Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Voorburg, Apr. 16–18. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braithwait, S.D. 1980. “The Substitution Bias of the Laspeyres Price Index: An Analysis Using Estimated Cost-of-Living Indexes”, in American Economic Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 6477.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bresnahan, T.F. 1997. “Comment”, in T.F. Bresnahan and R.J. Gordon (eds.): The Economics of New Goods, NBER Studies in income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 237247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canning, J.B. 1929. The Economics of Accountancy (New York: The Ronald Press Co.).

  • Carli, G.R. 1804. “Del valore e della proporzione dei metalli monetati”, in Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica, Vol. 13 (Milano: G.G. Destefanis), pp. 297366; originally published in 1764.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carruthers, A.G., D.J. Sellwood and P.W. Ward. 1980. “Recent Developments in the Retail Prices Index”, in The Statistician, Vol. 29, pp. 132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cassel, E. and R. Mendelsohn. 1985. “On the Choice of Functional Forms for Hedonic Price Equations: Comment”, in Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 18, Sep., pp. 135142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Castles, I. 1997. The OECD-EUROSTAT PPP Program: Review of Practice and Procedures (Paris: OECD).

  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert, 1982a. “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity”, in Econometrica, Vol. 50, 13931414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert, L.R. Christensen and W.E. Diewert. 1982b. “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input and Productivity using Superlative Index Numbers”, in Economic Journal, Vol. 92, pp. 7386.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cecchetti, S.G. 1997. “Measuring Inflation for Central Bankers”, in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 79, pp. 143155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, L.R. and D.W. Jorgenson. 1969. “The Measurement of U.S. Real Capital Input, 1929–1967”, in Review of income and Wealth, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 293320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Christensen, L.R. and D.W. Jorgenson. and L.J. Lau. 1971. “Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Production Function”, in Econometrica, Vol. 39, pp. 255256.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Church, A.H. 1901. “The Proper Distribution of Establishment Charges, Part III”, in The Engineering Magazine, Vol. 21, pp. 904912.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clements, K.W. and H.Y. Izan. 1981. “A Note on Estimating Divisia Index Numbers”, in International Economic Review, Vol. 22, pp. 745747.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clements, K.W. and H.Y. Izan. and H.Y. Izan. 1987. “The Measurement of Inflation: A Stochastic Approach”, in Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 5, pp. 339350.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cobb, C. and P.H. Douglas. 1928. “A Theory of Production”, in American Economic Review, Vol. 18, pp. 39165.

  • Cochran, W.G. 1977. Sampling Techniques, 3rd edition (New York: Wiley).

  • Cockburn, I.M. and A.H. Anis. 1998. Hedonic Analysis and Arthritic Drugs, Working Paper 6574 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coggeshall, F. 1887. “The Arithmetic, Geometric and Harmonic Means”, in Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 8386.

  • Combris, P., S. Lecocqs and M. Visser. 1997. “Estimation of a Hedonic Price Equation for Bordeaux Wine: Does Quality Matter?”, in Economic Journal, Vol. 107, No. 441, pp. 390402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Commission of the European Communities (Eurostat), IMF, OECD, United Nations and World Bank. 1993. System of National Accounts 1993 (Brussels/Luxembourg, New York, Paris, Washington, D.C.).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Congressional Budget Office (CBO). 1994. Is the Growth of the CPI a Biased Measure of Changes in the Cost of Living?, CBO Paper, Oct. (Washington, D.C.).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crawford, A. 1998. “Measurement Biases in the Canadian CPI: An Update”, in Bank of Canada Review, Spring, pp. 3956.

  • Cropper, M.L., L.L. Deck and K.E. McConnell. 1988. “On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions”, in Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 668 –675.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crump, N. 1924. “The Interrelation and Distribution of Prices and their Incidence Upon Price Stabilization”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 87, pp. 167206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cunningham, A.W.F. 1996. Measurement Bias in Price Indices: An Application to the UK’s RPI, Bank of England Working Paper 47 (London: Bank of England).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curry, B., P. Morgan and M. Silver. 2001. “Hedonic Regressions: Misspecification and Neural Networks”, in Applied Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 659671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Czinkota, M.R. and I. Ronkainen. 1997. “International Business and Trade in the Next Decade: Report from a Delphi Study”, in Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 827844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1992. “Computing Elementary Aggregates in the Swedish Consumer Price Index”, in Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 8, pp. 129147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1994. Sensitivity Analyses for Harmonizing European Consumer Price Indices, Paper presented at the First Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Ottawa, Oct. 31-Nov. 4. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1995. “Quantifying errors in the Swedish consumer price index”, in Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 347356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1997. Experiments with Swedish Scanner Data, Paper presented at the Third Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Voorburg, Apr. 16–18. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1998a. On the Statistical Objective of a Laspeyres Price Index, Paper presented at the Fourth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Washington, D.C., Apr. 22–24. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1998b. “Studies on the Comparability of Consumer Price Indices”, in International Statistical Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 83113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1999a. “On Reliability, Uncertainty and Bias in Consumer Price Indexes”, in M. Silver and D. Fenwick (eds.): Proceedings of the Measurement of Inflation Conference (Cardiff: Cardiff University), pp. 184190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. 1999b. A note on the Variance of the Sample Geometric Mean, Research Report 1991: 1, Department of Statistics (Stockholm: Stockholm University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. and O. Muelteel. 1998. Variance estimation in the Luxembourg CPI, Cellule “Statistique et décision” (Luxembourg: Centre de Recherche Public-Centre Universitaire).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalén, J. and E. Ohlsson. 1995. “Variance Estimation in the Swedish Consumer Price Index”, in Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 347356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalton, K.V., J.S. Greenlees, and K.J. Stewart. 1998. “Incorporating a Geometric Mean Formula into the CPI”, in Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 121, No. 10, pp. 37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies, G.R. 1924. “The Problem of a Standard Index Number Formula”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 19, pp. 180188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davies, G.R. 1932. “Index Numbers in Mathematical Economics”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 27, pp. 5864.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Haan, J. 2001. Generalised Fisher Price Indexes and the Use of Scanner Data in the CPI, Unpublished Paper (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Haan, J. 2003. Time Dummy Approaches to Hedonic Price Measurement, Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Paris, May 27–29. Available at: http://www.insee.fr/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Haan, J. and E. Opperdoes. 1997. Estimation of the Coffee Price Index Using Scanner Data: Simulation of Official Practices, Paper presented at the Third Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Voorburg, Apr. 16–18. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Haan, J. and E. Opperdoes, and C. Schut. 1997. Item Sampling in the Consumer Price Index: A Case Study using Scanner Data, Research Report (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Haan, J. and E. Opperdoes, and C. Schut. 1999. “Item Selection in the Consumer Price Index: Cut-off Versus Probability Sampling”, in Survey Methodology, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 3141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Deaton, A. 1998. “Getting prices right: What should be done?”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 3746.

  • Denny, M. 1974. “The Relationship Between Functional Forms for the Production System”, in Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 7, pp. 2131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1974a. “Applications of Duality Theory”, in M.D. Intriligator and D.A. Kendrick (eds.): Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. II (Amsterdam: North-Holland) pp. 106171.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1974b. “Intertemporal Consumer Theory and the Demand for Durables”, in Econometrica, Vol. 42, pp. 497516.

  • Diewert, W.E. 1976. “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers”, in Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 4, pp. 114145.

  • Diewert, W.E. 1978. “Superlative Index Numbers and Consistency in Aggregation”, in Econometrica, Vol. 46, pp. 883900.

  • Diewert, W.E. 1980, “Aggregation Problems in the Measurement of Capital”, in D. Usher (ed.): The Measurement of Capital, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 433528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1983a. “The Theory of the Cost of Living Index and the Measurement of Welfare Change”, in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.): Price Level Measurement (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 163233; reprinted in W.E. Diewert (ed.): Price Level Measurement (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990), pp. 79–147.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1983b. “The Theory of the Output Price Index and the Measurement of Real Output Change”, in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.): Price Level Measurement (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 10491113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1983c. “The Treatment of Seasonality in a Cost of Living Index”, in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.): Price Level Measurement (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 10191045.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1986. Microeconomic Approaches to the Theory of International Comparisons, Technical Working Paper No. 53 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1992a. “Fisher Ideal Output, Input and Productivity Indexes Revisited”, in Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3, pp. 211248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1992b. “Exact and Superlative Welfare Change Indicators”, in Economic Inquiry, Vol. 30, pp. 565582.

  • Diewert, W.E. 1993a. “The Early History of Price Index Research”, in W.E. Diewert and A.O. Nakamura (eds.): Essays in Index Number Theory, Vol. 1, Contributions to Economic Analysis 217 (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 3365.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1993b. “Duality Approaches to Microeconomic Theory”, in W.E. Diewert and A.O. Nakamura (eds.): Essays in Index Number Theory, Vol. 1, Contributions to Economic Analysis 217 (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 105175.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1993c. “Symmetric Means and Choice under Uncertainty”, in W.E. Diewert and A.O. Nakamura (eds.): Essays in Index Number Theory, Vol. 1, Contributions to Economic Analysis 217 (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 355433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1993d. “Overview of Volume 1”, in W.E. Diewert and A.O. Nakamura (eds.): Essays in Index Number Theory, Vol. 1, Contributions to Economic Analysis 217 (Amsterdam: North-Holland) pp. 131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1995a. Axiomatic and Economic Approaches to Elementary Price Indexes, Discussion Paper No. 95–01, Department of Economics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia). Available at: http://www.econ.ubc.ca.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1995b. On the Stochastic Approach to Index Numbers, Discussion Paper No. 95–31, Department of Economics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia). Available at: http://www.econ.ubc.ca.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1996a. “Price and Volume Measures in the National Accounts”, in J. Kendrick (ed.): The New System of National Economic Accounts (Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 237285.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1996b. Seasonal Commodities, High Inflation and Index Number Theory, Discussion Paper 96–06, Department of Economics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1996c. Sources of Bias in Consumer Price Indexes, Discussion Paper, School of Economics (Sydney: University of New South Wales).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1997. “Commentary on Mathew D. Shapiro and David W. Wilcox: Alternative Strategies for Aggregating Price in the CPI”, in The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 127137.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1998a. “Index Number Issues in the Consumer Price Index”, in The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 4758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1998b. “High Inflation, Seasonal Commodities and Annual Index Numbers”, in Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 2, pp. 456471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 1999a. “Index Number Approaches to Seasonal Adjustment”, in Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 3, pp. 4868.

  • Diewert, W.E. 1999b. “Axiomatic and Economic Approaches to Multilateral Comparisons”, in A. Heston and R.E. Lipsey (eds.): International and Interarea Comparisons of Income. Output and Prices (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1387.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2000. Notes on Producing an Annual Superlative Index Using Monthly Price Data, Discussion Paper No. 00-08, Department of Economics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia). Available at: http://www.econ.ubc.ca.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2001. “The Consumer Price Index and Index Number Purpose”, in Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 27, pp. 167248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2002a. “The Quadratic Approximation Lemma and Decompositions of Superlative Indexes”, in Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 28, pp. 6388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2002b. Similarity and Dissimilarity Indexes: An Axiomatic Approach, Discussion Paper No. 02-10, Department of Economics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia). Available at: http://www.econ.ubc.ca.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2002c. “Harmonized Indexes of Consumer Prices: Their Conceptual Foundations”, in Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 138, No. 4, pp. 547637.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2002d. Notes on Hedonic Producer Price Indexes, Unpublished Paper, Department of Economics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia), Jan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2002e. Hedonic Regressions: A Review of Some Unresolved Issues, Unpublished Paper, Department of Economics (Vancouver: University of British Columbia).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2003a. “Hedonic Regressions: A Consumer Theory Approach”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 317348.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diewert, W.E. 2003b. Measuring Capital, NBER Working Paper W9526 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

  • Diewert, W.E. and D.A. Lawrence. 2000. “Progress in Measuring the Price and Quantity of Capital”, in L.J. Lau (ed.): Econometrics Volume 2: Econometrics and the cost of Capital: Essays in Honor of Dale W. Jorgenson (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 273326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dikhanov, Y. 1997. The Sensitivity of PPP-Based Income Estimates to Choice of Aggregation Procedures, Unpublished Paper, International Economics Department (Washington, D.C.: World Bank), Jan.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dippo, C.S. and C.A. Jacobs. 1983. “Area Sampling Redesign for the Consumer Price Index”, in Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, pp. 118123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Divisia, F. 1926. L’indice monétaire et la théorie de la monnaie (Paris: Société anonyme du Recueil Sirey).

  • Drechsler, L. 1973, “Weighting of Index Numbers in Multilateral International Comparisons”, in Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 19, pp. 1734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drobisch, M. W. 1871a. “Ueber die Berechnung der Veränderungen der Waarenpreise und des Geldwerths”, in Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol. 16, pp. 143156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drobisch, M. W. 1871b. “Ueber einige Einwürfe gegen die in diesen Jahrbüchern veröffentlichte neue Methode, die Veränderungen der Waarenpreise und des Geldwerths zu berechten”, in Jahrbücher für Nationalokonomie und Statistik, Vol. 16, pp. 416427.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ducharme. L.M. 1997. “The Canadian Consumer Price Index and the Bias Issue: Present and Future Outlooks” in L.M. Ducharme (ed.): Bias in the CPI: Experiences from Five OECD Countries, Prices Division Analytical Series, No. 10 (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 1324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duggan, J. E. and R. Gillingham. 1999. “The Effect of Errors in the CPI on Social Security Finances”, in Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 161169.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dulberger, E.R. 1989. “The Application of an Hedonic Model to a Quality-Adjusted Price Index For Computer Processors”, in D. Jorgenson and R. Landau (eds.): Technology and Capital Formation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dulberger, E.R. 1993. “Sources of Price Decline in Computer Processors: Selected Electronic Components”, in M. Foss, M.E. Manser and A.H. Young (eds.): Price Measurement and their Uses, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 103124.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dutot, C. 1738. Réflections politiques sur les finances et le commerce, Vol. 1 (La Haye: Les freres Vaillant et N. Prevost).

  • Dwyer, L., P. Forsyth and D.S. Prasada Rao. 2001. PPPs and the Price Competitiveness of International Tourism Destinations, Paper presented at the Joint World Bank–OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, Washington, D.C., Jan. 30–Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edgeworth, F.Y. 1888. “Some New Methods of Measuring Variation in General Prices”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 51, pp. 346368.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edgeworth, F.Y. 1923. “The Doctrine of Index Numbers According to Mr. Correa Walsh”, in The Economic Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 343351.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Edgeworth, F.Y. 1925. Papers Relating to Political Economy, Vol. 1 (New York: Burt Franklin).

  • Edwards, R. 1997. “Measuring Inflation in Australia”, in L.M. Ducharme (ed.): Bias in the CPI: Experiences from Five OECD Countries, Prices Division Analytical Series, No. 10 (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 512.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ehemann, C., A.J. Katz and B.R. Moulton. 2002. “The Chain-Additivity Issue and the U.S. National Accounts”, in Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 28, pp. 3749.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eichhorn, W. 1978. Functional Equations in Economics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company).

  • Eichhorn, W. and J. Voeller. 1976. Theory of the Price Index, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 140 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eldridge, L.P. 1999. “How price indexes affect BLS productivity measures”, in Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 122, No. 2, pp. 3546.

  • Elteto, O. and P. Koves. 1964. “On an Index Number Computation Problem in International Comparison”, in Statisztikai Szemle, Vol. 42, pp. 507518 (in Czech).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epple, D. 1987. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated Products”, in Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 95, pp. 5980.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence Mode. (Brussels: European Foundation for Quality Management). Available at: http://www.efqm.org.

  • Eurostat. 1993. Classification of Products by Activity in the European Economic Community (CPA) (Luxembourg).

  • Eurostat.. 2001a. Compendium of HICP Reference Documents (Luxembourg: Unit B3, Harmonisation of Price Indices), Mar.

  • Eurostat. 2001b. Handbook on Price and Volume Measures in National Accounts (Luxembourg: European Commission).

  • Feenstra, R.C. 1994. “New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices”, in American Economic Review, Vol. 34, pp. 157177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feenstra, R.C. 1995. “Exact Hedonic Price Indices”, in Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77, pp. 634654.

  • Feenstra, R.C. and C.R. Shiells. 1997. “Bias in U.S. Import Prices and Demand”, in T.F. Bresnahan and R.J. Gordon (eds.): The Economics of New Goods, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago), pp. 249276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feenstra, R.C. and M.D. Shapiro. 2003. “High Frequency Substitution and the Measurement of Price Indexes”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 123146.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feenstra, R.C. and W.E. Diewert. 2001. Imputation and Price Indexes: Theory and Evidence from the International Price Program, Working Paper No. 335 (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics). Available at: http://www.bls.gov.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fenwick. D. 1997. “The Boskin Report from a United Kingdom Perspective”, in L.M. Ducharme (ed.): Bias in the CPI: Experiences from Five OECD Countries, Prices Division Analytical Series, No. 10 (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 4552.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fenwick. D. A. Ball, M. Silver and P.H. Morgan. 2003. “Price Collection and Quality Assurance of Item Sampling in the Retail Price Index: How Can Scanner Data Help?”, in M. Shapiro and R. Feenstra (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2003), pp. 6787.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferger, W.F. 1931. “The Nature and Use of the Harmonic Mean”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 26, pp. 3640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferger, W.F. 1936. “Distinctive Concepts of Price and Purchasing Power Index Numbers”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 31, pp. 258272.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferrari, G. and M. Riani. 1998. “On Purchasing Power Parities Calculation at the Basic Heading Level”, in Statistica. Vol. LVIII, pp. 91108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferrari, G. and M. Riani. G. Gozzi and M. Riani. 1996. “Comparing GEKS and EPD Approaches for Calculating PPPs at the Basic Heading level”, in Eurostat: Improving the Quality of Price Indices: CPI and PPP (Luxembourg).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, F.M. and K. Shell. 1972. “The Pure Theory of the National Output Deflator”, in The Economic Theory of Price Indexes (New York: Academic Press), pp. 49113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fisher, I. 1897. “The Role of Capital in Economic Theory”, in Economic Journal, Vol. 7, pp. 511537.

  • Fisher, I. 1911. The Purchasing Power of Money (London: Macmillan).

  • Fisher, I. 1921, “The Best Form of Index Number”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 17, pp. 533537.

  • Fisher, I. 1922. The Making of Index Numbers (Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin).

  • Fisher, W.C. 1913. “The Tabular Standard in Massachusetts History”, in Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 417451.

  • Fixler, D. and K.D. Zieschang. 1992. “Incorporating Ancillary Measures of Processes and Quality Change into a Superlative Productivity Index”, in Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 2, pp. 245267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fixler, D. and K.D. Zieschang. and K.D. Zieshang. 2001. Price Indices for Financial Services, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Flux, A.W. 1921. “The Measurement of Price Change”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 84, pp. 167199.

  • Forsyth, F.G., and R.F. Fowler. 1981. “The Theory and Practice of Chain Price Index Numbers”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, Vol. 144, No. 2, pp. 224247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frisch, R. 1930. “Necessary and Sufficient Conditions Regarding the Form of an Index Number Which Shall Meet Certain of Fisher’s Tests”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 25, pp. 397406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Frisch, R. 1936. “Annual Survey of General Economic Theory: The Problem of Index Numbers”, in Econometrica, Vol. 4, pp. 138.

  • Frost, S. 2001. The Construction of Price Indices for Deposit and Loan Facilities, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: www.ottawagroup.org/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Funke, H. and J. Voeller. 1978. “A Note on the Characterization of Fisher’s Ideal Index”, in W. Eichhorn, R. Henn, O. Opitz and R.W. Shephard (eds.): Theory and Applications of Economic Indices (Würzburg: Physica-Verlag), pp. 177181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Funke, H. and J. Voeller. G. Hacker and J. Voeller. 1979. “Fisher’s Circular Test Reconsidered”, in Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtshaft und Statistik, Vol. 115, pp. 677687.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garcke, E. and J.M. Fells. 1893. Factory Accounts: Their Principles and Practice, Fourth Edition (First Edition 1887) (London: Crosby, Lockwood and Son).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Geary, R.C. 1958. “A note on the comparison of exchange rates and purchasing power between countries”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A), Vol. 121, pp. 9799.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Genereux, P.A. 1983. “Impact of the Choice of Formulae on the Canadian Consumer Price Index” in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.): Price Level Measurement (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 489535.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilman, S. 1939. Accounting Concepts of Profit (New York: The Rolland Press Co.).

  • Goldberger, A.A. 1968. “The Interpretation and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Functions”, in Econometrica, Vol. 35, pp. 464472.

  • Goodhart, C. 2001. “What Weights should be Given to Asset Prices in the Measurement of Inflation?”, in Economic Journal, Vol. 111, June, F335 -F356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gordon, R.J. 1990. The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

  • Gordon, R.J. and Z. Griliches. 1997. “Quality Change and New Products”, in American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Fourth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp. 8488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gorman, W.M. 1980. “A Possible Procedure for Analyzing Quality Differentials in the Egg Market”, in Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 47, pp. 843856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenlees, J. 1997. “Expenditure Weight Updates and Measured Inflation”, Paper presented at the Third Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Voorburg, Apr. 16–18.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenlees, J. 1999. Random Errors and Superlative Indexes, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Western Economic Association, 8 July, San Diego, CA.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenlees, J. 2000. “Consumer Price Indexes: Methods for Quality and Variety Change”, in Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 3758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Greenlees, J. 2003, Introducing the Chained Consumer Price Index, Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Paris, May 27–29. Available at: http://www.insee.fr.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Griliches, Z. 1988. Technology, Education and Productivity: Early Papers with Notes to Subsequent Literature (New York: Basil Blackwell).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Griliches, Z. 1990. “Hedonic Price Indices and the Measurement of Capital and Productivity: Some Historical Reflections”, in E.R. Berndt and J.E. Triplett (eds.): Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 185206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gudnason. 1999. Use of Cash Register Data, Paper presented at the Fifth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Reykjavik, Aug. 25–27. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gudnason, R. 2003. How do we Measure Inflation? Some Measurement Problems, Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, May 27–29, Paris. Available at: http://www.insee.fr.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardy, G.H., J.E. Littlewood and G. Pólya. 1934. Inequalities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

  • Harper, M.J., E.R. Berndt and D.O. Wood. 1989. “Rates of Return and Capital Aggregation Using Alternative Rental Prices”, in D.W. Jorgenson and R. Landau (eds.): Technology and Capital Formation (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 331372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haschka, P. 2003. Simple Methods of Explicit QA for Services in Complex Pricing Schemes, Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, May 27–29, Paris. Available at: http://www.insee.fr.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hausman, J. A. 1997. “Valuation of New Goods Under Perfect and Imperfect Conditions”, in T.F. Bresnahan and R.J. Gordon (eds.): The Economics of New Goods, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 209237.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hausman, J. A. 1999. “Cellular Telephone, New Products, and the CPI”, in Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 188194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hausman, J. A. 2002. Sources of Bias and Solutions to Bias in the CPI, NBER Working Paper 9298 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hawkes, W.J. 1997. Reconciliation of Consumer Price Index Trends in Average Prices for Quasi-Homogeneous Goods Using Scanning Data, Paper presented at the Third Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Voorburg, Apr. 16–18. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hawkes, W.J. and F.W, Piotrowski. 2003. “Using Scanner Data to Improve the Quality of Measurement in the Consumer Price Index”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 1738.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haworth, M.F., D. Fenwick and R. Beaven. 1997. Recent Developments in the UK Retail Prices Index: Quality Management, Paper presented at the Third Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Voorburg, Apr. 16–18. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hicks, J.R. 1940, “The Valuation of the Social Income”, in Economica, Vol. 7, pp. 105124.

  • Hicks, J.R. 1941–42. “Consumers’ Surplus and Index Numbers”, in The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 9, pp. 126137.

  • Hicks, J.R. 1946. Value and Capital, Second Edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

  • Hidiroglou M.A. and J. M. Berthelot. 1986. “Statistical editing and imputation for periodic business surveys”, in Survey Methodology, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 7383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, R.J. 1995. Purchasing Power Methods of Making International Comparisons, Ph.D. Dissertation (Vancouver: University of British Columbia).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, R.J. 1999a. “Comparing Price Levels across Countries Using Minimum Spanning Trees”, in The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, pp. 135142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, R.J. 1999b. “International Comparisons using Spanning Trees”, in A. Heston and R.E. Lipsey (eds.): International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output and Prices, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 109120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, R.J. 1999c. “Chained PPPs and Minimum Spanning Trees”, in A. Heston and R.E. Lipsey (eds.): International and Interarea Comparisons of Income. Output and Prices, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press), pp. 327364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, R.J. 1999d. “Comparing Price Levels Across Countries Using Minimum Spanning Trees”, in The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 81, pp. 135142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, R.J. 2001. “Measuring Inflation and Growth Using Spanning Trees”, in International Economic Review, Vol. 42, pp. 167185.

  • Hill, R.J. 2002. Superlative Index Numbers: Not All of them Are Super, Discussion Paper No. 2002/04, School of Economics (Sydney: University of New South Wales).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, T.P. 1988. “Recent Developments in Index Number Theory and Practice”, in OECD Economic Studies, Vol. 10, p. 123148.

  • Hill, T.P. 1993. “Price and Volume Measures”, in System of National Accounts 1993 (Brussels/Luxembourg, New York, Paris, New York, and Washington, D.C.: Commission of the European Communities, IMF, OECD, World Bank and United Nations), pp. 379406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, T.P. 1996. Inflation Accounting: A Manual on National Accounting under Conditions of High Inflation (OECD: Paris).

  • Hill, T.P. 1998. “The Measurement of Inflation and Changes in the Cost of Living”, in Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE, Vol. 15, pp. 3751.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hill, T.P. 1999. COL Indexes and Inflation Indexes, Paper tabled at the Fifth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Reykjavik, Aug. 25–27. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hillinger, C. 2002. A General Theory of Price and Quantity Aggregation and Welfare Measurement, CISifo Working Paper No. 818 (Munich: University of Munich).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffmann, J. 1998. Problems of Inflation Measurement in Germany, Discussion Paper 1/98, Economic Research Group of the Deutsche Bundesbank (Frankfurt: Deutsche Bundesbank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffmann, J. 1999. The Treatment of Quality Changes in the German Consumer Price Index, Paper presented at the Fifth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Reykjavik, Aug. 25–27. Available at: http://www.ott.awa-group.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoffmann, J. and C. Kurz. 2002. Rent Indices for Housing in West Germany: 1985 to 1998, Discussion Paper 01/02, Economic Research Centre of the Deutsche Bundesbank (Frankfurt: Deutsche Bundesbank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holdway, M. 1999. An Alternative Methodology: Valuing Quality Changes for Microprocessors in the PPI, Unpublished Paper (Washington. D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hotelling, H. 1925. “A General Mathematical Theory of Depreciation”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 20, pp. 340353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houthakker, H.S. 1952. “Compensated Changes in Quantities and Qualities Consumed”, in Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 19, pp. 155164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoven, L. 1999. Some Observations on Quality Adjustment in the Netherlands, Unpublished Paper, Department of Consumer Prices (Voorburg: Statistics Netherland).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hulten, C.R. 1973. “Divisia Index Numbers”, in Econometrica, Vol. 41, pp. 10171026.

  • Hulten, C.R.. 1990. “The Measurement of Capital”, in E.R. Berndt and J.E. Triplett (eds.): Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 119158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hulten, C.R. 1996. “Capital and Wealth in the Revised SNA”, in J.W. Kendrick (ed.): The New System of National Accounts (New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 149181.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hulten, C.R. and F.C. Wykoff. 1981a. “The Estimation of Economic Depreciation using Vintage Asset Prices”, in Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 15, pp. 367396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hulten, C.R.. 1981b. “The Measurement of Economic Depreciation”, in C.R. Hulten (ed.): Depreciation, Inflation and the Taxation of Income from Capital (Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press), pp. 81125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hulten, C.R.. 1996. “Issues in the Measurement of Economic Depreciation: Introductory Remarks”, in Economic Inquiry, Vol. 34, pp. 1023.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Labour Organization (ILO). 1987. Report of the Fourteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians (Geneva).

  • International Labour Organization (ILO). 1990. ISCO-88: International Standard Classification of Occupations (Geneva).

  • International Labour Organization (ILO). 1998. “Guidelines concerning dissemination practices for labour statistics”, in Report of the Sixteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians (Geneva). Web address: http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/standardsy guidelines/index.htm).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Labour Organization (ILO). 2003. Report III to the Seventeenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians (Geneva).

  • ILO, IMF, OECD, Eurostat, UNECE and the World Bank. 2004. Producer Price Index Manual (Brussels/Luxembourg, Geneva, Washington, D.C, Geneva, Washington, D.C).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). General Data Dissemination System (GDDS). Web address: http://dsbb.imf. org/Applications/web/gdds/gddshome/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). Special Data Dissemination Standard (SDDS). Web address: http://dsbb.imf.org/Applications/web/sddshome.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). 1993. Balance of Payments Manual, Fifth Edition (Washington, D.C.).

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2001. Government Financial Statistics Manual (Washington, D.C.).

  • Ioannidis, C. and M. Silver. 1999. “Estimating Hedonic Indices: An Application to UK Television Sets”, in Journal of Economics. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 7194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ISO 9000, Geneva, International Standards Organization. 1994. Web address: http://iso.ch.

  • ISO 9001. Geneva, International Standards Organization. 2000. Web address: http://iso.ch.

  • Jacobsen, J. 1997. Variance Estimation and Sample Allocation in the Finnish CPI, Memo written for Statistics Finland, Mar. 11.

  • Jensen, J.L.W.V. 1906. “Sur les functions convexes et les inegalités entre les valeurs moyennes”, in Acta Math., Vol. 8, pp. 9496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jevons, W.S. 1863. “A Serious Fall in the Price of Gold Ascertained and its Social Effects Set Forth”, reprinted in Investigations in Currency and Finance (London: Macmillan and Co., 1884), pp. 13118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jevons, W.S. 1865. “The Variation of Prices and the Value of the Currency since 1782”, in Journal of the Statistical Society of London, Vol. 28, pp. 294320; reprinted in Investigations in Currency and Finance (London: Macmillan and Co., 1884), pp. 119150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jevons, W.S. 1884. “A Serious Fall in the Value of Gold Ascertained and its Social Effects Set Forth. 1863”, in Investigations in Currency and Finance (London: Macmillan and Co.), pp. 13118.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jorgenson, D.W. 1989. “Capital as a Factor of Production”, in D.W. Jorgenson and R. Landau (eds.): Technology and Capital Formation (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jorgenson, D.W. 1996. “Empirical Studies of Depreciation”, in Economic Inquiry, Vol. 34, pp. 2442.

  • Jorgenson, D.W. and Z. Griliches. 1967. “The Explanation of Productivity Change”, in Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 34, pp, 249283.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Katz, A.J. 1983. “Valuing the Services of Consumer Durables”, in The Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 29, pp. 405427.

  • Kennedy, P. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).

  • Kenny, P.B. 1995. Errors in the Retail Prices Index, Memo written for the UK Central Statistical Office/Office for National Statistics, 8 Mar.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keynes, J.M. 1930. A Treatise on Money in Two Volumes; I; The Pure Theory of Money (London: Macmillan).

  • Khamis, S.H. 1970. “Properties and Conditions for the Existence of a New Type if Index Numbers”, in Sankhya, Series B, Vol. 32, pp. 8198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khamis, S.H. 1972. “A New System of index Numbers for National and International Purposes”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol. 135, pp. 96121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khamis, S.H. 1984. “On Aggregation methods for International Comparisons”, in Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 185205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knibbs,Sir G.H. 1924. “The Nature of an Unequivocal Price Index and Quantity Index”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 19, pp. 4260 and 196205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kokoski, M.F., K. Waehrer and P. Rozaklis. 2001. Using Hedonic Methods for Quality Adjustment in the CPI: The Consumer Audio Products Component, Working Paper No, 344 (Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kokoski, M.F., K. Waehrer and P. Rozaklis. B.R. Moulton and K.D. Zieschang. 1999. “Interarea Price Comparisons for Heterogeneous Goods and Several Levels of Commodity Aggregation”, in A. Heston and R.E. Lipsey (eds.): International and Interarea Comparisons of Income, Output and Prices, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 123166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Konüs, A.A. 1924. “The Problem of the True Index of the Cost of Living”, in The Economic Bulletin of the Institute of Economic Conjuncture (in Russian), No. 9–10, pp. 6471; published in English in 1939 in Econometrica, Vol. 7, pp. 1029.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Konüs, A.A. and S.S. Byushgens. 1926. “K probleme pokupatelnoi cilideneg”, in Voprosi Konyunkturi, Vol. 2, pp. 151172.

  • Koskimäki. T, and M. Ylä-Jarkko. 2003. Segmented Markets and CPI Elementary Classifications, Paper presented at the Seventh Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Paris, May 27–29. Available at: http://www.insee.fr/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koskimäki. T, and M. Ylä-Jarkko. and Y. Vartia. 2001. Beyond Matched Pairs and Griliches Type Hedonic Methods for Controlling Quality Changes in CPI Subindices, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kotler, P. 1991. Marketing Management, Seventh Edition (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).

  • Kravis, I.B., A.W. Heston and R. Summers. 1982. World Product and Income: International Comparisons of Real Gross Domestic Product (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krueger, A.B. and A. Siskind. 1998. “Using Survey Data to Assess Bias in the Consumer Price Index”, in Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 121, No. 4, pp. 2433.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lancaster, K.J. 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory”, in Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 132156.

  • Lancaster, K.J. 1971, Consumer Demand: A New Approach (New York: Columbia University Press).

  • Lane, W. 2001. Addressing the New Goods Problem in the Consumer Price Index, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at http://www.ottawa.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laspeyres, E. 1871. “Die Berechnung einer mittleren Waar-enpreissteigerung”, in Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol. 16, pp. 296314.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lau, L.J. 1979. “On Exact Index Numbers”, in Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 61, pp. 7382.

  • Leaver, S.G. and D. Swanson. 1992. “Estimating Variances for the U.S. Consumer Price Index for 1987–1991”, in American Statistical Association: Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section (Alexandria, VS), pp. 740745.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leaver, S.G. and D. Swanson. and R. Valliant. 1995. “Statistical Problems in Estimating the U.S. Consumer Price Index”, in Cox et al. (eds.): Business Survey Methods (New York: Wiley).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lebow, D.E. and J.B. Rudd. 2003. “Measurement Error in the Consumer Price Index: Where Do We Stand?”, in Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 41, pp. 159201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lebow, D.E. and J.B. Rudd. J.M. Roberts and D.J. Stockton. 1994. Monetary Policy and the ‘Price Level’, Unpublished Paper (Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), July.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lehr, J. 1885. Beiträge zur Statistik der Preise (Frankfurt: J.D. Sauerlander).

  • Leontief, W. 1936. “Composite Commodities and the Problem of Index Numbers”, in Econometrica, Vol. 4, pp. 3959.

  • Lequiller, F. 1997. “Does the French Consumer Price Index Overstate Inflation?”, in L.M. Ducharme (ed.): Bias in the CPI: Experiences from Five OECD Countries, Prices Division Analytical Series, No. 10 (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 2543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levy, F., H. Beamish, R.J. Murnane and D. Aurtor. 1999. Computerization and Skills: Example from a Car Dealership, Brookings Program on Output and Productivity Measurement in the Services Sector, Workshop on Measuring the Output of Business Services, May 14, (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ley, E. 2003. “Comment”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 379382.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liegey .Jr, P.R. 1992. “Adjusting apparel indices in the CPI for quality differences”, in M.F. Foss, M. Manser and A. Young (eds.): Price Measurements and their Uses, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liegey .Jr, P.R. 1994. “Apparel Price Indexes: Effects of Hedonic Adjustments”, in Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 117, pp. 3845.

  • Liegey .Jr, P.R. 2000. Hedonic Quality Adjustment Methods for Microwave Ovens in the U.S. CPI, Methodology Paper (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Linder, F. 1996. Reducing bias in the estimation of consumer price indices by using integrated data, Research Report (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lloyd. P.J. 1975. “Substitution Effects and Biases in Nontrue Price Indices”, in American Economic Review, Vol. 65, pp. 301313.

  • Lowe, J. 1823. The Present State of England in Regard to Agriculture, Trade and Finance, Second Edition (London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lowe, R. 1996. “The Type and Extent of Quality Changes in the Canadian CPI”, in J. Dalen (ed.): Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices (Stockholm: Statistics Sweden), pp. 231249. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lowe, R. 1999. The Use of the Regression Approach to Quality Change for Durables in Canada, Paper presented at the Fifth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Reykjavik, Aug. 25–27. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maddala, G.S. 1988. Introduction to Econometrics (New York: Macmillan).

  • Malmquist, S. 1953. “Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces”, in Trabajos de Estadistica, Vol. 4, pp. 209242.

  • Malpezzi, S., L. Ozanne and T. Thibodeau. 1987. “Micro-economic Estimates of Housing Depreciation”, in Land Economics, Vol. 63, pp. 372385.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manser, M.E. and R.J. McDonald. 1988. “An Analysis of Substitution Bias in Measuring Inflation, 1959–85”, in Econometrics, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 909930.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marshall, A. 1887. “Remedies for Fluctuations of General Prices”, in Contemporary Review, Vol. 51, pp. 355375.

  • Marshall, A.. 1898. Principles of Economics, Fourth Edition (London: The Macmillan Co.).

  • Matheson, E. 1910. The Depreciation of Factories and their Valuation, Fourth Edition (London: E. & F.N. Spon).

  • McClelland, R. and M. Reinsdorf. 1999. Small Sample Bias in Geometric Mean and Seasoned CPI Component Indexes, Economic Working Paper (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCracken, P.M., J. Tobin et al. 1999. Measuring Prices in A Dynamic Economy: Re-Examining the CPI (New York: The Conference Board).

  • Mendelsohn, R. 1984. “Estimating the Structural Equations of Implicit Market and Household Production Functions”, in Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 673677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mendershausen, H. 1937. “Annual Survey of Statistical Technique: Methods of Computing and Eliminating Changing Seasonal Fluctuations”, in Econometrica, Vol. 5, pp. 234262.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merkel, F.K. 2000. Addressing New Item Bias in the Producer Price Indexes: A PPI Quality Improvement Initiative, Unpublished Paper (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, W.C. 1927. Business Cycles (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research).

  • Moulton, B.R. 1996a. Constant Elasticity Cost-of-Living Index in Share Relative Form (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics), Dec.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, B.R. 1996b. “Bias in the Consumer Price Index: What is the Evidence?”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 159177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, B.R. 2001, “The Expanding Role of Hedonic Methods in the Official Statistics of the United States”, in Proceedings of a Symposium on Hedonic Methods (Wiesbaden: Deutches Bundesbank and German Federal Statistical Office), June.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, B.R. and K.E. Moses. 1997. “Addressing the Quality Change Issue in the Consumer Price Index”, in Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1, pp. 305366.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, B.R. and K.E. Moses, and E.P. Seskin. 1999. “A Preview of the 1999 Comprehensive Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts”, in Survey of Current Business. Vol. 79, pp. 617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moulton, B.R. and K.E. Moses. and E.P. Seskin. T. LaFleur and K.E. Moses. 1999, “Research on Improved Quality Adjustment in the CPI: The Case of Televisions”, in W. Lane (ed.): Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics), pp. 7799. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mudgett, B.D. 1955. “The Measurement of Seasonal Movements in Price and Quantity Indexes”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 50, pp. 9398.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muellbauer, J. 1974. “Household Production Theory, Quality, and the ‘Hedonic Technique’”, in The American Economic Review, Vol. 64, No. 6, pp. 977994.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Murray, J. and N. Sarantis. 1999. “Price-Quality Relationships and Hedonic Price Indexes for Cars in the United Kingdom”, in International Journal of the Economics of Business, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muth, R.F. 1966. “Household Production and Consumer Demand Functions”, in Econometrica, Vol. 34, pp. 699708.

  • Nevo, A. 2001. New Products. Quality Changes, and Welfare Measures Computed from Estimated Demand Systems, NBER Working Paper #W8425 (Cambridge. MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Norberg, A. 1999. “Quality Adjustment: The Case of Clothing”, in M. Silver and D. Fenwick (eds.): Proceedings of the Measurement of Inflation Conference (Cardiff: Cardiff University). Available at: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nordhaus, W.D. 1998. “Quality Change in Price Indexes”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 5968.

  • Obst, Ca.l. 2000. “A Review of Bias in the CPI”, in Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE, Vol. 17, pp. 3758.

  • Office for National Statistics (UK). 1998. The Retail Prices Index: A Technical Manual. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk.

  • Oi, W.Y. 1997. “The Welfare Implications of Invention”, in T.F. Bresnahan and R.J. Gordon (eds.): The Economics of New Goods, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 109141.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Okamoto. M. 1999. Empirical Study of Outlet Sampling Using Scanner Data, Paper presented at the ILO/ECE Joint Meeting on CPI. Geneva, Nov. 3–5. Available at: http://www.unece.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Okamoto. M. 2001. Mid-Year Basket Index as a Practical Approximation to a Superlative Index, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Opperdoes, E. 2001. Some Empirical Experiments with CES Functions, Unpublished Paper (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1997. Synthesis Paper on Shortcomings of the Consumer Price Index Measure of Inflation for Economic Policy Purposes, Paper prepared for Working Party No. 1 on Macroeconomic and Structural Policy Analysis, ECO/CPE/WP1(97)12, Sep. (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1998. FISM, A Note by the OECD Secretariat, Prepared for the Joint OECD/ESCAP Meeting on National Accounts - 1993 System of National Accounts: Five Years On, Bangkok, May 4–8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1999. Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures (Paris).

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2001a. Measuring Productivity: Measurement of Aggregate and Industry-Level Productivity Growth (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2001b. Measuring Capital: Measurement of Capital Stocks, Consumption of Fixed Capital and Capital Services (Paris).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Osgood, W.F. 1925. Advanced Calculus (New York: Macmillan).

  • Paasche, H. 1874. “Uber die Preisentwicklung der letzten Jahre nach den Hamburger Borsennotirungen”, in Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol. 12, pp. 168178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pakes, A. 2001. A Reconsideration of Hedonic Price Indices with an Application to PC’s, Working Paper No. 8715 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research), revised November 2001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palgrave, R.H.I. 1886. “Currency and Standard of Value in England, France and India and the Rates of Exchange Between these Countries”, in Memorandum submitted to the Royal Commission on Depression of Trade and Industry, Third Report, Appendix B, pp. 312390.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, P. 1992. “Price Elasticity Dynamics Over the Adoption Life Cycle”, in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXIX, pp. 358367.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pierson, N.G. 1895. “Index Numbers and Appreciation of Gold”, in Economic Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 329335.

  • Pierson, N.G. 1896. “Further Considerations on Index-Numbers”, in Economic Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 127131.

  • Pigou, A.C. 1920. The Economics of Welfare (London: Macmillan).

  • Pollak, R.A. 1975. “Subindexes of the Cost of Living”, in International Economic Review, Vol. 16, pp. 135160.

  • Pollak, R.A. 1980. “Group Cost-of-Living Indexes”, in American Economic Review, Vol. 70, pp. 273278.

  • Pollak, R.A. 1981. “The Social Cost-of-Living Index”, in Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 15, pp. 311336.

  • Pollak, R.A. 1983. “The Theory of the Cost-of-Living Index”, in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.): Price Level Measurement (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 87161; reprinted in R.A. Pollak: The Theory of the Cost-of-Living Index (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 352; also reprinted in W.E. Diewert (ed.): Price Level Measurement (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1990), pp. 577.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollak, R.A. 1989. “The Treatment of the Environment in the Cost-of-Living Index”, in R.A. Pollak: The Theory of the Cost-of-Living Index (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 181185.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pollak, R.A. 1998. “The Consumer Price Index: A Research Agenda and Three Proposals”, in Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 6978.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Popkin, J. 1997. “Improving the CPI: The Record and Suggested Next Steps”, in Business Economics, July, pp. 4247.

  • Prais, S.J. 1959. “Whose Cost of Living?”, in The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 26, pp. 126134.

  • Prennushi, G. 2001. PPPs and Global Poverty: Strengths and Weaknesses, Paper presented at the Joint World Bank-OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, Washington, D.C., Jan. 30–Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Price Statistics Review Committee. 1961. The Price Statistics of the Federal Government (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rameshwar, S. 1998. “A Note on Weights for Consumer Price Indices”, in Inter-Stat No. 18 (Luxembourg, London, Paris: Eurostat, DfID, INSEE), pp. 8996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. 1990. “A System of Log-Change Index Numbers for Multilateral Comparisons”, in J. Salazar-Carrillo and D.S. Prasada Rao (eds.): Comparisons of Prices and Real Products in Latin America (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. 1995. On the Equivalence of the Generalized Country-Product-Dummy (CPD) Method and the Rao-System for Multilateral Comparisons, Working Paper No. 5, Centre for International Comparisons (Philadelphia. PA: University of Pennsylvania).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. 1997. “Aggregation Methods for International Comparison of Purchasing Power Parities and Real Income: Analytical Issues and Some Recent Developments”, in Proceedings of the International Statistical Institute, 51st Session, pp. 197200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. 2001a. Integration of CPI and ICP: Methodological Issues, Feasibility and Recommendations, Paper presented at the Joint World Bank-OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications. Washington, D.C., Jan. 30–Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. 2001b. Weighted EKS and Generalized Country Product Dummy Methods for Aggregation at Basic Heading Level and above Basic Heading Level. Paper presented at the Joint World Bank-OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, Washington, D.C. Jan. 30–Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. and K.S. Banerjee. 1984. “A Multilateral Index Number System Based on the Factorial Approach”, in Statistische Hefte, Vol. 27, pp. 297313.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. and M. Timmer. 2000. Multilateralisation of Manufacturing Sector comparisons: Issues, Methods and Empirical Results, Research Memorandum No. GD 47 (Groningen: Groningen Growth and Development Centre).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rao, D.S. Prasada. C.J. O’Donnell and E. Ball. 2000. Transitive Multilateral Comparisons of Agricultural Output and Productivity Using Minimum Spanning Trees and Generalized EKS Methods, Paper presented at the Workshop on Agricultural Productivity: Data, Methods, and Measures, March 9–10, Washington, D.C..

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rasmussen, D.W. and T.W. Zuehlke. 1990. “On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions”, in The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 72, pp. 668675.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reese, M. 2000. Hedonic Quality Adjustment Methods for College Textbooks for the U.S. CPI, Methodology paper (Cambridge, MA: Bureau of Labor Statistics). Available at: http://www.bls.gov.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinsdorf, M.B. 1993. “The Effect of Outlet Price Differentials on the U.S. Consumer Price Index”, in M.F. Foss, M.E. Manser and A.H. Young (eds.): Price Measurement and their Uses, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 227254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinsdorf, M.B. 1994. Price Dispersion, Seller Substitution and the U.S. CPI, Working Paper 252 (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinsdorf, M.B. 1996. Constructing Basic Component Indexes for the U.S. CPI from Scanner Data: A Test Using Data on Coffee, Working Paper 277 (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics.).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinsdorf, M.B. 1998. Divisia Indices and the Representative Consumer Problem, Paper presented at the Fourth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Washington, D.C., Apr. 22–24. Available at: http://www.Ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinsdorf, M.B. 2003. Personal Communication, Sep. 9.

  • Reinsdorf, M.B.and B.R. Moulton. 1997. “The Construction of Basic Components of Cost-of-Living Indexes”, in T.F. Bresnahan and R.J. Gordon (eds.): The Economics of New Goods, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinsdorf, M.B. P. Liegey, and K. Stewart. 1996. New Ways of Handling Quality Change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index, Working Paper 276 (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reinsdorf, M.B. W.E. Diewert and C. Ehemann. 2002. “Additive Decompositions for the Fisher, Tornqvist and Geometric Mean Indexes”, in Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 28, pp. 5161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richardson, D.H. 2003. “Scanner Indexes for the Consumer Price Index”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press), pp. 3965.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosén, B. 1997a. “Asymptotic Theory for Order Sampling”, in Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 62, pp. 135158.

  • Rosén, B. 1997b. “On Sampling with Probability Proportional to Size”, in Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 62, pp. 159191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosen, S. 1974. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation and Pure Competition”, in Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 82, pp. 3449.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rothwell, D.P. 1958. “Use of Varying Seasonal Weights in Price Index Construction”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 53, pp. 6677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ryten, J. 1998. The Evaluation of the International Comparison Project (ICP), (Washington, D.C.: IMF).

  • Samuelson, P.A. 1953. “Prices of Factors and Goods in General Equilibrium”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 21, pp. 120.

  • Samuelson, P.A. and S. Swamy. 1974. “Invariant Economic Index Numbers and Canonical Duality: Survey and Synthesis”, in American Economic Review, Vol. 64, pp. 566593.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Särndal, C. E., B. Swensson and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling (New York: Springer-Verlag).

  • Schlömilch, O. 1858. “Über Mittelgrössen versehiedetier Ordnungen”, in Zeitschrift für Mathematik und Physik, Vol. 3, pp. 308310.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schultz, B.J. (Szulc). 1996. “Treatment of Changes in Product Quality in Consumer Price Indices”, in J. Dalén (ed.): Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices (Stockholm: Statistics Sweden), pp. 209229. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schultz, B.J. (Szulc) 1999. “Effects of Using Various Macro-Index Formulae in Longitudinal Price and Comparisons: Empirical Studies”, in W. Lane (ed.): Proceedings of the Fourth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics), pp. 236249. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schultze, C.L. and C. Mackie (eds.). 2002. At What Price? Conceptualizing and Measuring Cost-of-Living and Price Indices (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scrope, G.P. 1833. Principles of Political Economy (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green and Longman).

  • Sellwood, D. 2001. Improving Quality Adjustment in Practice, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Selvanathan, E.A. and D.S. Prasada Rao. 1994. Index Numbers: A Stochastic Approach (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).

  • Shapiro, M.D. and D.W. Wilcox. 1997a. “Alternative Strategies for Aggregating Prices in the CPI”, in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 113125.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shapiro, M.D. and D.W. Wilcox. and D.W. Wilcox. 1997b. Mismeasurement in the Consumer Price Index: An Evaluation, Working Paper No. W5590 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research). Available at: http://www.nbcr.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shephard, R.W. 1953. Cost and Production Functions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

  • Shephard, R.W. 1970. Theory of Cost and Production Functions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

  • Shepler, N. 2000. Developing a Hedonic Regression Model for Refrigerators in the U.S. CPI, Methodology paper (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics). Web site: http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpirfr.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shiratsuka, S. 1999. “Measurement Errors in the Japanese Consumer Price Index”, in Monetary and Economic Studies, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 69102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sidgwick, H. 1883. The Principles of Political Economy (London: Macmillan).

  • Silver, M. 1995. “Elementary Aggregates, Micro-Indices and Scanner Data: Some Issues in the Compilation of Consumer Price Indices”, in Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 41, pp. 427438.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silver, M. 1999. “An Evaluation of the Use of Hedonic Regressions for Basic Components of Consumer Price Indices”, in Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 4156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silver, M. 2002. The Use of Weights in Hedonic Regressions: The Measurement of Quality Adjusted Price Changes, Unpublished Paper, Cardiff Business School (Cardiff: Cardiff University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silver, M. and S. Heravi. 2001a. “Scanner Data and the Measurement of Inflation”, in The Economic Journal, 111 June, F384 -F405.

  • Silver, M. and S. Heravi. and S. Heravi. 2001b. Hedonic Price Indices and the Matched Models Approach, Unpublished Paper, Cardiff Business School (Cardiff: Cardiff University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silver, M. and S. Heravi. and S. Heravi. and S. Heravi. 2002. Why the CPI Matched Models Method May Fail Us, Working Paper 144 (Frankfurt: European Central Bank).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Silver, M. and S. Heravi.and S. Heravi.and S. Heravi.and S. Heravi. 2003. “The Measurement of Quality Adjusted Price Changes”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 277316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sitter, R.R. and R. Balshaw. 1998. Evaluation of Bias and Variance Estimation of the RPI, Confidential Report to the Office for National Statistics (UK) (British Columbia: Simon Fraser University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Solomons, D. 1961. “Economic and Accounting Concepts of Income”, in The Accounting Review, Vol. 36, pp. 374383.

  • Solow, R.M. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”, in Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, pp. 312320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Statistics Sweden. 2001. Swedish Consumer Price Index: A Handbook of Methods (Stockholm).

  • Stone, R. 1956. Quantity and Price Indexes in the National Accounts (Paris: OECD).

  • Summers, R. 1973. “International Price Comparisons Based Upon Incomplete Data”, in Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 116.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sundgren, B. 1993. “Statistical Metainformation Systems Pragmatics, Semantics”, Syntateties, in Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 121142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szulc, B.J. (Schultz) 1964. “Index Numbers of Multilateral Regional Comparisons” (in Polish), in Przeglad Statysticzny. Vol. 3, pp. 239254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szulc, B.J. (Schultz) 1983. “Linking Price Index Numbers,” in W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquette (eds.): Price Level Measurement (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 537566.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Szulc, B.J. (Schultz) 1987. “Price Indices below the Basic Aggregation Level”, in Bulletin of Labour Statistics, Vol. 2, pp. 916.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tauchen, H. and A.D. Witte. 2001. Estimating Hedonic Models; Implications of the Theory, Technical Working Paper No. 271 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research). Available at: http://www.nber.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teekens, R. and J. Koerts. 1972. “Some Statistical Implications of the Log Transformations of Multiplicative Models”, in Econometrica. Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 793819.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tellis, G.J. 1988. “The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales”, in Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25, pp. 167177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Theil, H. 1954. Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

  • Theil, H. 1967, Economics and Information Theory (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

  • Törnqvist, L. 1936. “The Bank of Finland’s Consumption Price Index”, in Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin, Vol. 10, pp. 18.

  • Törnqvist, L. and E. Törnqvist. 1937. “Vilket är förhällandet mellan finska markens och svenska kronans köpkraft?”, in Eko-nomiska Samfundets Tidskrift, Vol. 39, pp. 139; reprinted in Collected Scientific Papers of Leo Törnqvist (Helsinki: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy. 1981), pp. 121160.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trajtenberg, M. 1989. Economic Analysis of Product Innovation: The Case of CT Scanners, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

  • Triplett, J.E. 1981. “Reconciling the CPI and the PCE Deflator”, in Monthly Labor Review, Sep., pp. 315.

  • Triplett, J.E. 1983. “Concepts of Quality in Input and Output Price Measures: A Resolution of the User-Value Resource-Cost Debate”, in M.F. Foss (ed.): The U.S. National Income and Product Accounts: Selected Topics, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 269311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triplett, J.E. 1987. “Hedonic Functions and Hedonic Indices”, in J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.): The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Vol, 2 (London: Macmillan), pp. 630634.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triplett, J.E. 1990. “Hedonic Methods in Statistical Agency Environments: An Intellectual Biopsy”, in E.R. Berndt and J.E. Triplett (eds.): Fifty Years of Economic Measurement: The Jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 207238.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triplett, J.E. 1997. “Current Status of the Debate on the Consumer Price Index in the U.S.”, in L.M. Ducharme (ed.): Bias in the CPI: Experiences from Five OECD Countries, Prices Division Analytical Series, No. 10 (Ottawa: Statistics Canada), pp. 5360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triplett, J.E. 1999, “The Solow Productivity Paradox: What do Computers do to Productivity?”, in Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2, Apr., pp. 309334.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triplett, J.E. 2001. “Should the Cost-of-Living Index Provide the Conceptual Framework for a Consumer Price Index?”, in The Economic Journal, Vol. 111, June, F311 -F334.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triplett, J.E. 2002. Handbook on Quality Adjustment of Price Indexes for Information and Communication Technology Products, Draft, OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry (Paris: OECD).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triplett, J.E. 2003. “Using Scanner Data in Consumer Price Indexes: Some Neglected Conceptual Considerations”, in R.C. Feenstra and M.D. Shapiro (eds.): Scanner Data and Price Indexes, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 151162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trivedi, P.K. 1981. “Some Discrete Approximations to Divisia Integral Indices”, in International Economic Review, Vol. 22, pp. 7177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turvey, R. 1979. “The Treatment of Seasonal Items in Consumer Price Indices”, in Bulletin of Labour Statistics, Fourth Quarter (Geneva: ILO), pp. 1333.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turvey, R. 1996, Elementary Aggregate (micro) Indexes, Paper presented at the Eurostat Seminar on Improving the Quality of Price Indices: CPI and PPP, Florence, Dec. 18–20, 1995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turvey, R. 1998. “New Outlets and New Products”, in B. Balk (ed.): Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices (Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands), pp. 97110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turvey, R. 1999. “Incorporating New Models into a CPI: PCs as an Example”, in M. Silver and D. Fenwick (eds.): Proceedings of the Measurement of Inflation Conference (Luxembourg, London, Cardiff: Eurostat, Office for National Statistics, Cardiff University). Available at: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turvey, R. 2000. “True Cost of Living Indexes”, in R. Gudnason and D. Gylfadottir (eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices (Reykjavik: Statistics Iceland). Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Turvey, R. et al. 1989. Consumer Price Indices: An ILO Manual (Geneva: ILO).

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1983. “Changing the Home Ownership Component Of the Consumer Price Index to Rental Equivalence”, in CPI Detailed Report (Washington, D.C.).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1997. BLS Handbook of Methods, Bulletin 2490 (Washington, D.C.).

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1998. “Measurement Issues in the Consumer Price Index”, in Statistical Journal of the United Nations ECE, Vol. 15, pp. 136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • U.S. General Accounting Office. 2000. Consumer Price Index: Update of Bosk in Commission’s Estimate of Bias, Report GAO/GGD-00–50 (Washington, DC), Feb.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • U.S. Senate, Committee on Finance. 1996. Final Report of the Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index, Print 104–72, 104 Cong., 2nd Session (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations. 1990. International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Statistical Papers Series M, No. 4, Rev. 3 (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations. 1992. Handbook of the International Comparison Program, Series F, No. 62 (New York).

  • United Nations. 1994. Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics, Adopted by the UN Statistical Commission. UN Economic and Social Council, 1994, Report of the Special Session of the Statistical Commission, New York, 11–15 Apr., 1994, E/1994/29 (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations. 1998a. Principles and Recommendations for Population and Housing Censuses. Revision 1. Statistical Papers Series M, No. 67/Rev. 1, Sales No. E.98.XVII.8 (New York).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • United Nations. 1998b. Central Product Classification. CPC. Version 1.0, Statistical Papers Series M, No. 77, Ver. 1.0 (New York).

  • United Nations. 1999. Classifications of Expenditure According to Purpose, Statistical Papers Series M, No. 84 (New York).

  • United Nations. 2002. International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, ISIC, Revision 3.1 (New York: United Nations Statistical Division).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Ijzeren, J. 1987. Bias in International Index Numbers: A Mathematical Elucidation, Dissertation for the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (The Hague: Koninklijke Bibliotheek).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van Mulligen, P.H. 2003. Quality aspects in price indices and international comparisons: Applications of the hedonic method, Ph.D. thesis (Groningen: University of Groningen). Web site: http://www.cbs.nl/en/publications/articles/generat/theses/theses.htm.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vartia, Y.O. 1976. Relative Changes and Index Numbers (Helsinki: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy).

  • Vartia, Y.O. 1978. “Fisher’s Five-Tined Fork and Other Quantum Theories of Index Numbers”, in W. Eichhorn, R. Henn, O. Opitz and R.W. Shephard (eds.): Theory and Applications of Economic Indices (Wurzburg: Physica-Verlag), pp. 271295.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ville, J. 1946. “The Existence-Conditions of a Total Utility Function” (in French); translated in 1951 in The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 19, pp. 123128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vogt, A. 1977. “Zum Indexproblem: Geometrische Darstellung sowie eine neue Formel”, in Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, Vol. 113, pp. 7388.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vogt, A. 1978. “Divisia Indices on Different Paths”, in W. Eichhorn, R. Henn, O. Opitz and R.W. Shephard (eds.): Theory and Applications of Economic Indices (Wurzburg: Physica-Verlag), pp. 297305.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vogt, A. 1980. “Der Zeit und der Faktorumkehrtest als ‘Finders of Tests’”, in Statistische Hefte, Vol. 21, pp. 6671.

  • Vogt, A.and J. Barta. 1997. The Making of Tests for Index Numbers (Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag).

  • von Auer, L. 2001. An Axiomatic Checkup for Price Indices, Working Paper No. 1/2001, Faculty of Economics and Management (Magdeburg: Otto von Guericke University).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • von Auer, L. 2002. “Spurious Inflation: The Legacy of Laspeyres and Others”, in The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 42, pp. 529542.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • von der Lippe, P. 2001. Chain Indices: A Study in Price Index Theory, Publication Series Spectrum of Federal Statistics, Vol. 16 (Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walras, L. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics, translated from French by W. Jaffe (London: George Allen and Unwin); first published in 1874.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walsh, C.M. 1901. The Measurement of General Exchange Value (New York: Macmillan and Co.).

  • Walsh, C.M. 1921a. The Problem of Estimation (London: P.S. King & Son).

  • Walsh, C.M. 1921b. “Discussion”, in Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 17, pp. 537544.

  • Walsh, C.M. 1932. “Index Numbers”, in E.R.A. Seligman (ed.): Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 7 (New York: The Macmillan Co.), pp. 652658.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ward, M. 2001. True Comparisons in Real and Money Terms, Paper presented at the Joint World Bank-OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, Washington, D.C., Jan. 30–Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Westergaard, H. 1890. Die Grundzdge der Theorie der Statistik (Jena: Fischer).

  • White, A.G. 1999. “Measurement Biases in Consumer Price Indexes”, in International Statistical Review, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 301325.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • White, A.G. 2000. “Outlet Types and the Canadian Consumer Price Index”, in Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 33, pp. 488505.

  • Wold, H. 1944. “A Synthesis of Pure Demand Analysis, Part 3”, in Skandinavisk Aktuarietidskrift, Vol. 27, pp. 69120.

  • Wold, H. 1953. Demand Analysis (New York: John Wiley).

  • Wooldridge, J.M. 1996. “Estimating Systems of Equations with Different Instruments for Different Equations”, in Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 74, pp. 387405.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woolford, K. 1999. “Measuring Inflation: A Framework Based on Domestic Final Purchases”, in M. Silver and D. Fenwick: Proceedings of the Measurement of Inflation Conference (Cardiff: Cardiff University), pp. 534543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woolford, K. 2001. Financial Services in the Consumer Price Index, Paper presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Working Group on Price Indices, Canberra, Apr. 2–6. Available at: http://www.ottawagroup.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wynne, M.A. 1997. “Commentary”, in Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 161167.

  • Wynne, M.A. 1999. Core Inflation: A Review of Some Conceptual Issues, Research Department Working Paper 99–03 (Dallas, TX: Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wynne, M.A. and F.D. Sigalla. 1994. “The Consumer Price Index”, in Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review, Second Quarter, pp. 122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Young, A. 1812. An Inquiry into the Progressive Value of Money in England as Marked by the Price of Agricultural Products (Piccadilly: Hatchard).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yule, G.U. 1921. “Discussion of Mr. Flux’s Paper”, in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 84, pp. 199202.

  • Zarnowitz, V. 1961. “Index Numbers and the Seasonality of Quantities and Prices”, in G.J. Stigler (Chair): The Price Statistics of the Federal Government (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research), pp. 233304.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zieschang, K.D. 1988. The Characteristics Approach to the Problem of New and Disappearing Goods in Price Indexes. Working Paper No. 183 (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Labor Statistics).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zieschang, K.D. P.A. Armnecht and D. Smith. 2001. Integrated Inter-Area and International Price Comparisons with Consumer Price Index Compilation, Paper presented at the Joint World Bank-OECD Seminar on Purchasing Power Parities: Recent Advances in Methods and Applications, Washington, D.C., Jan. 30–Feb. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation