Back Matter
Author:
International Monetary Fund
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund in
Current site
Google Scholar
Close

Abstract

This paper presents a description of the IMF and its activities, focusing in particular on its technical assistance (TA) activities. The report then describes in greater detail the Japan Administered Account for Selected Fund Activities (JSA)—including its objectives, size, scope, and use, as well as assessments of its activities, with a focus on fiscal year (FY) 2007—and the TA activities and scholarship programs that it finances. The IMF’s technical assistance is delivered mainly by its Fiscal Affairs Department (FAD), Monetary and Capital Markets Department (MCM), and Statistics Department (STA). Japan provides grant contributions for two scholarship programs. In 1996, the Japan-IMF Scholarship Program for Advanced Studies, which is administered by the IMF Institute, was established. JSA resources can be used to cover the cost of short- and long-term TA experts and other costs associated with conducting seminars and workshops, such as room rental fees. Although TA activities financed by the JSA can take place in all areas of the world, the Japanese authorities place high priority on funding TA activities in Asia and the Pacific, Central Asia, Central and Eastern Europe, and countries of the former Soviet Union.

Annex 1:

JSA TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROJECTS APPROVED IN FY2007

article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image
article image

Annex 2:

JSA JOINT JAPAN-IMF FIELD VISITS

Purpose

The purpose of these visits is to provide the Japanese authorities with a firsthand view of how JSA funding is being used in the field. These visits are designed to assess (1) how the authorities value the work of funded experts, (2) whether the authorities are making effective use of the assistance, and (3) whether the technical assistance (TA) is making a contribution to the reform process. Discussions also sometimes touch on more generic TA policy and operational issues such as (1) the relative effectiveness of long-term and short-term expert assignments, (2) identification of TA needs, (3) integration of TA into IMF-supported programs, and (4) the role of resident representatives and TA experts in coordinating assistance from other donors.

Format

The joint mission usually includes two Japanese officials (a representative of the Ministry of Finance and a representative of the Japanese Executive Director’s Office) and an IMF staff member.

Countries and projects are selected for review by the Japanese authorities based on a number of considerations to reflect different levels of economic development and structural reform and variation between regions and subject areas.

Once mission members receive briefing notes or are briefed at IMF headquarters, they visit recipient countries where TA is provided and, when possible, meet separately with the senior representatives of the host institution (usually the minister of finance, governor of the central bank, or chairman of the central statistical organization), the immediate counterparts to the expert (usually department heads), and the expert him- or herself. In the case of seminars or training courses, meetings are also held with participants in the respective sessions or courses as well as with officials in charge of human resources development at the relevant training institutions. Meetings are typically held with other concerned donors to seek their views.

Findings

To date, 13 missions have been carried out (covering 21 countries, two regional training institutes, the Pacific Financial Technical Assistance Center, and the East Africa Regional Technical Assistance Center) since this practice was introduced in FY1996. The field visits have found that JSA funding is well administered and effectively used. In all the visits, the authorities were well aware and fully recognized the importance of, and expressed their appreciation for, Japan’s financial support to the IMF’s TA program. The positive firsthand view gained by the Japanese authorities has contributed to the continued strong support by Japan, through its financing of the JSA, for the IMF’s TA program. A list of all field visits and a summary report of the three field visits that took place in FY2007 are provided below. Reports on earlier field visits can be found in previous JSA Annual Reports.

Joint Field Visits in FY1996–FY2007 1

  • 1. Fiji (Pacific Financial Technical Assistance Center) and Western Samoa, March 1996

  • 2. Kazakhstan and the Kyrgyz Republic, June 1996

  • 3. Zambia and Zimbabwe, December 1996

  • 4. The Russian Federation, July 1997

  • 5. Bulgaria and Lithuania, June 1998

  • 6. Indonesia, IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute, and Thailand, June/July 1999

  • 7. Belarus and Slovenia, June 2000

  • 8. Azerbaijan and the Joint Vienna Institute, June 2001

  • 9. Cambodia and the IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute, June 2002

  • 10. Mongolia and Timor-Leste, September 2002

  • 11. Indonesia and Fiji, December 2003

  • 12. Botswana and the East Africa Regional Technical Assistance Center, December 2005

  • 13. Cambodia, the IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute, and the Philippines, March 2007

Joint Field Visits in FY2007

During FY2007, three projects were selected by the Japanese government to be visited: a tax administration strengthening project in the Philippines, support for macroeconomic training at the IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute, and a project to assist with statistics reform in Cambodia. In all three cases, the joint mission found that the JSA-financed assistance had made satisfactory progress and notable achievements, was well coordinated with assistance provided by other bilateral and international donors, and was greatly appreciated by the authorities concerned. In Cambodia and the Philippines, the authorities requested continued JSA support to consolidate the capacity-building gains that had been achieved. In all three visits, the Japanese representatives encouraged the use, where feasible, of Japanese experts.

Philippines, March 4–6, 2007

The JSA has since 1993 financed 19 TA projects in the Philippines totaling some $2.6 million. These have been mostly directed to the Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) and to a lesser extent to the Bureau of Customs (BOC) and the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). At the BSP, assistance has covered a broad range of central banking functions, including (1) strengthening banking legislation to make it consistent with internationally recognized standards; (2) strengthening banking supervision through implementation of risk-focused examination and a consolidated supervision framework, and the establishment of specialist examiner career streams; (3) strengthening financial sector supervision, including enhancing procedures for market-risk examination, designing supervisory programs for complex groups, and enhanced examination procedures for assessing compliance with AML/CFT requirements; (4) improving external sector and balance of payments statistics; and (5) modernizing information technology. At the BOC, assistance has been focused on improving procedures for clearance and valuation of imports, including implementation of the ASYCUDA computerized system for customs procedures. At the BIR, assistance was provided in the mid-1990s for strengthening the large-taxpayer unit and monitoring compliance and strengthening tax legislation.

The government’s current fiscal goal of achieving a balanced budget by 2010 is highly dependent on increased tax revenues, which is in turn contingent on having an effective tax regime and administration. To achieve this, it was recognized that the serious and long-standing organizational and systemic deficiencies in BIR—including in such basic operations as taxpayer registration, returns filing, assessment, and taxpayer audit—need to be urgently addressed and rectified. In early 2006, the IMF, together with the World Bank, assisted the government in putting together a tax administration reform strategy with a total of 26 components, each to be implemented by its own BIR task force. In addition to the IMF and the World Bank, three bilateral donors (Australia, Sweden, and the United States) are also providing assistance to implement various components of the reform plan. The IMF, with JSA financing, has since June 2006 provided a peripatetic advisor to help the BIR reform management unit oversee and push forward implementation of the reform.

The joint review mission met with the commissioner for internal revenue, other senior officials, the JSA-financed advisor, and representatives of the above-mentioned bilateral donors, and were briefed on the reform program’s implementation. Despite noting the satisfactory progress being made, the review mission raised concerns about the local capacity to absorb the TA being provided, the need to avoid overlapping and duplication among the various forms of donor assistance, and the inadequate staff resources to implement all 26 program components. The authorities assured the mission that measures were being taken to address all these concerns, including strategic allocation of resources, monthly BIR-donor meetings at the operational level, and personnel action to resolve staffing deficits by the end of 2007. The authorities expressed appreciation for the valuable contributions of the JSA-financed advisor and their hope that this assistance would continue for the duration of the reform program.

The IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute, March 7–8, 2007

The IMF-Singapore Regional Training Institute (STI), established in Singapore in May 1998 as a joint venture of the IMF and Singapore, provides training on macroeconomic and financial management, and related legal and statistical issues, to government officials from countries in the Asia and Pacific region to enhance the economic and policy-making capacities of these countries. The training program consists of core courses on macroeconomic analysis and policy, and specialized courses on fiscal and monetary economics, national accounts, and money and banking statistics. Seminars and workshops focus on topical issues such as anti–money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism, capital account convertibility, consolidated supervision of banks, crisis prevention in emerging markets, financial markets and new financial instruments, financial soundness indicators, inflation targeting, and tax incentives.

From its establishment in 1998 through 2006, STI has trained more than 5,500 officials. Participants are drawn mainly from central banks, ministries of finance, and national statistical agencies. Since its first year, when STI offered 15 courses to about 450 participants from 28 countries, its course offerings have expanded considerably. For 2007, 25 training events for over 800 officials from 41 countries are planned. Japan’s support for STI has been mainly through the JSA, which, to date, has provided some $3.4 million in financing for experts and participant costs. The JSA currently finances the two senior macroeconomists/instructors on the STI staff.

In April 2006, a meeting of training directors from central banks and finance ministries in the Asia and Pacific region was held to review STI’s activities and discuss training needs and strategies. The meeting confirmed the findings of an independent evaluation carried out in early 2006 that STI’s curriculum and training are highly regarded by participants and their sponsoring agencies and continue to be relevant to their needs, and that there is expected to be a growing demand for both basic courses and specialized training.

The main concerns of the Japanese members of the joint review team—that course participants remain in their official positions long enough to fully utilize their newly acquired skills and that training keep up with new developments and policy issues—were raised with the STI director and the two JSA-financed economists. It was confirmed that these issues were fully taken into account and addressed by (1) the careful vetting and selection of participants to ensure that the sponsoring government agencies would benefit from the training provided and (2) the structuring of courses into basic components and components tailored to address more complex questions and new issues.

Cambodia, March 9, 2007

In Cambodia, the JSA has since 1994 supported TA activities at the National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) in banking supervision, restructuring of the banking system, balance of payments and monetary statistics, operations in foreign exchange, and international reserves management, as well as information and computerization systems; at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) in fiscal policy and macrofiscal management; at the Customs and Excise Department in strengthening customs administration;at the Ministries of Justice and Commerce in the preparation of bankruptcy law; and at the Ministry of Planning (MOP) and the National Statistics Institute (NIS) in national accounts, price, and government finance statistics. To date, almost $6.4 million in JSA financing has been provided for IMF TA in Cambodia, which has contributed significantly to the overall IMF TA for that country.

During FY2007, the JSA financed (1) a long-term central bank advisor at the NBC to assist in strengthening banking supervision, (2) a long-term multisector statistics advisor at the NIS to help the concerned agencies (NIS, MOP, MEF, and NBC) implement the government’s statistics reform program, and (3) short-term experts at the National Treasury to assist with utilization of the new chart of accounts, at the Customs and Excise Department to complete installation of the ASYCUDA computerized customs clearance system, and at the NBC to strengthen internal audit.

The joint mission, which confined its review to JSA’s assistance to the statistics reform program, met with senior officials of the concerned agencies, including the senior minister for economy and finance, the governor of the national bank, the senior minister for planning, and the NIS director general. The authorities expressed great satisfaction with, and appreciation for, the work of the JSA-financed statistics advisor, particularly for his assistance with the enactment of the new statistics laws and sub-decrees; efforts to improve interagency coordination; improvements in balance of payments, consumer price index, and national accounts statistics; as well as improvement in the collection of customs data.

The joint mission noted the significant progress made under the statistics reform program and particularly welcomed (1) the concrete steps taken by the authorities to institutionalize capacity-building measures that would eventually enable the government to continue implementing the reform without external support, and (2) the provision of adequate staff needed to carry out reform activities, which was made possible by government salary supplements for civil servants working on key economic reforms. However, it was also noted that as the government moved into key implementation phases of statistics reform, continued donor assistance would still be needed.

1

Because of scheduling difficulties, joint field visits were not carried out in FY2005.

Annex 3:

ADMINISTERED ACCOUNTS—JAPAN FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY2007

article image
Note: The IMF arranges for an annual audit of the JSA to be undertaken by its external auditors, in connection with their annual audit of the IMF’s own accounts, and for a separate certificate of completion to be provided to the Japanese authorities.
1

Other bilateral donors include Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Italy, Korea, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Multilateral donors include the African Development Bank, the Arab Monetary Fund, the Asian Development Bank, the Caribbean Development Bank, the European Commission, the European Investment Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Islamic Development Bank, the United Nations, the United Nations Development Programme, and the World Bank.

2

In this report, unless a distinction is made, use of the term “JSA” (Japan Administered Account for Selected Fund Activities) is meant to include the JAA (Japan Administered Technical Assistance Account), which was its predecessor.

3

The reference to fiscal year (FY) in this report is to the IMF’s fiscal year, which runs from May 1 through April 30. This report thus covers the period May 1, 2006–April 30, 2007. Reports on FY2000–FY2006 can be found on the IMF’s website, http://www.imf.org/JSA.

4

For additional information on the IMF’s activities, visit http://www.imf.org

5

In this report, “person years” refers to the time spent by IMF staff and experts on TA activities. As of FY2006, all TA-related work—including administrative support that hitherto had not been included, particularly in the IMF Institute and the special services and support departments—is reflected in the total IMF TA delivery figure.

6

Formerly the Monetary and Financial Systems Department (MFD) until its merger with the International Capital Markets Department (ICM) in August 2006.

7

The IMF currently cosponsors seven regional training institutes/programs with other donors and host governments: the Joint Vienna Institute in Austria; the IMFSingapore Regional Training Institute in Singapore; the IMF-Arab Monetary Fund Regional Training Program in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; the Joint Africa Institute, in Tunis, Tunisia; the Joint China-IMF Training Program in Dalian, China; the Joint Regional Training Center for Latin America in Brasilia, Brazil; and the Joint India-IMF Training Program in Pune, India.

8

The six IMF regional technical assistance centers comprise three Africa Regional Technical Assistance Centers (Central AFRITAC, based in Libreville, Gabon; East AFRITAC, based in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; and West AFRITAC, based in Bamako, Mali); the Caribbean Regional Technical Assistance Center (CARTAC), based in Bridgetown, Barbados; the Middle East Technical Assistance Center (METAC), based in Beirut, Lebanon; and the Pacific Financial Technical Assistance Center (PFTAC), based in Suva, Fiji.

9

The IMF arranges for an annual audit of the JSA to be undertaken by its external auditors in connection with the annual audit of the IMF’s own accounts, and for a separate certificate of completion to be provided to the Japanese authorities. See Annex 3 for the audited financial statements of the JSA and the Japan Advanced Scholarship Program for FY2007.

10

Because of the time required for the contracting and fielding of experts and payment of invoices, there is a time lag between commitments and disbursements. The duration of a JSA-funded TA project is normally 6 to 12 months.

11

These figures reflect the priority given to the countries of these regions under JSA financing guidelines, which for FY2007 set a target of 60 percent of allocations for countries in these regions combined.

12

Multiregional projects are those with beneficiaries from more than one region. Annex 1 includes descriptions of such projects.

13

In FY2003, as part of a larger effort to strengthen monitoring and evaluation of IMF technical assistance, a formal multiyear program of TA evaluations was introduced with three to four evaluations to be undertaken annually covering a mix of topics. Evaluations completed in FY2006 under this program covered TA to strengthen the commercial court and implement the bankruptcy law in Indonesia, and financial sector TA to Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kosovo, and Sierra Leone. Evaluations under way in FY2007 cover experience with implementation of the “upstream approach” for delivery of TA in revenue administration, and TA for tax policy in countries undergoing trade and tariff reform.

14

The scholarship program targets candidates from Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Lao P.D.R., Mongolia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam, as well as the Pacific Island countries. Nationals of other countries in the region are also considered on a case-by-case basis.

15

Under the Japan-IMF Scholarship Program for Asia, an academic year refers to the period October 1–September 30. Thus, academic year 2006 refers to the period October 1,2006–September 30, 2007.

16

Graduate Institute for Policy Studies, Hitotsubashi University, International University of Japan, and Yokohama National University.

17

Under the Japan-IMF Advanced Scholarship Program, academic year refers to the period August 1–July 31. Thus, academic year 2004 refers to the period August 1, 2004–July 31, 2005.

  • Collapse
  • Expand