Part II International Standards and Practices
Author:
International Monetary Fund
Search for other papers by International Monetary Fund in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
Language:
English
Keywords:
SEM; securities regulator; requesting authority; regulatory authority; regulator in Jurisdiction B; Information exchange; legal power; banking supervisor; information database; Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT); Money laundering; Legal support in revenue administration; Terrorism financing; Global; Africa
Download PDF (105.8 KB)

Abstract

1.1. What are the main barriers to international cooperation between regulators, and how can they best be overcome? This was the focus for discussion at the IMF Cross-Border Cooperation Conference held in Washington, D.C. on July 7 and 8, 2004.

Within Same Series

Other IMF Content

Other Publishers Content

  • Collapse
  • Expand
Cover Working Together
Working Together
Improving Regulatory Cooperation and Information Exchange
Author:
International Monetary Fund
ISBN:
9781589064874
Publication Date:
19 Jun 2007
Publisher:
International Monetary Fund
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589064874.072
Pages:
316
  • <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Rch18fig01">Figure 18.1</xref>.
    View in gallery
    Figure 18.1.

    Domestic Mechanisms for Information Exchange, Ranked by Usefulness (Question 2)

    (Mechanisms rated from 0 = not important to 100 = most important)

  • <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Rch18fig02">Figure 18.2</xref>.
    View in gallery
    Figure 18.2.

    International Mechanisms for Information Exchange, Ranked by Usefulness (Question 3)

    (Mechanisms rated from 0 = not important to 100 = most important)

  • <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Rch18fig03">Figure 18.3</xref>.
    View in gallery
    Figure 18.3.

    Information Requested from Foreign Regulatory Authorities, by Purpose (Question 4)

    (Percent of responses in each category)

  • <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Rch18fig04">Figure 18.4</xref>.
    View in gallery
    Figure 18.4.

    Information Provided to Foreign Regulatory Authorities, by Purpose (Question 11)

    (Percent of responses in each category)

  • <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Rch18fig05">Figure 18.5</xref>.
    View in gallery
    Figure 18.5.

    Main Reasons for Refusal When Information Requested Was Not Provided (Questions 8 and 15)

    (Percent of responses in each category)

  • <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Rch18fig06">Figure 18.6</xref>.
    View in gallery
    Figure 18.6.

    Main Reasons for Refusal, by Purpose of Information, When Requests Were Denied (Questions 8 and 15)

    (Percent of total respondents who exchanged information for specified purposes)

Figure 18.1.

Domestic Mechanisms for Information Exchange, Ranked by Usefulness (Question 2)

(Mechanisms rated from 0 = not important to 100 = most important)
Figure 18.2.

International Mechanisms for Information Exchange, Ranked by Usefulness (Question 3)

(Mechanisms rated from 0 = not important to 100 = most important)
Figure 18.3.

Information Requested from Foreign Regulatory Authorities, by Purpose (Question 4)

(Percent of responses in each category)
Figure 18.4.

Information Provided to Foreign Regulatory Authorities, by Purpose (Question 11)

(Percent of responses in each category)
Figure 18.5.

Main Reasons for Refusal When Information Requested Was Not Provided (Questions 8 and 15)

(Percent of responses in each category)
Figure 18.6.

Main Reasons for Refusal, by Purpose of Information, When Requests Were Denied (Questions 8 and 15)

(Percent of total respondents who exchanged information for specified purposes)